Speech recognition and frequency of hearing loss in patients treated for cancer in childhood

Modeling the Risk of Hearing Loss From Radiation Therapy in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE

The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) hearing loss (HL) task force reviewed investigations on cochlear radiation dose-response relationships and risk factors for developing HL. Evidence-based dose-response data are quantified to guide treatment planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to correlate HL with cochlear dosimetry. HL was considered present if a threshold exceeded 20 dB at any frequency. Radiation dose, ototoxic chemotherapy exposure, hearing profile including frequency spectra, interval to HL, and age at radiation therapy (RT) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Literature was systematically reviewed from 1970 to 2021. This resulted in 739 abstracts; 19 met inclusion for meta-analysis, and 4 included data amenable to statistical modeling. These 4 studies included 457 cochleas at risk in patients treated with RT without chemotherapy, and 398 cochlea treated with chemotherapy. The incidence and severity of cochlear HL from RT exposure alone is related to dose and age. Risk of HL was <5% in cochlea receiving a mean dose ≤35 Gy but increased to 30% at 50 Gy. HL risk ranged from 25% to 40% in children under the age of 5 years at diagnosis, declining to 10% in older children for any radiation dose. Probability of similar severe HL occurred at doses 18.3 Gy higher for children <3 versus >3 years of age. High-frequency HL was most common, with average onset occurring 3.6 years (range, 0.4-13.2 years) after RT. Exposure to platinum-based chemotherapies added to the rates of HL at a given cochlear dose level, with 300 mg/m2 shifting the dose response by 7 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

In children treated with RT alone, risk of HL was low for cochlear dose <35 Gy and rose when dose exceeded 35 Gy without clear RT dose dependence. High-frequency HL was most prevalent, but all frequencies were affected. Children younger than 5 years were at highest risk of developing HL, although independent effects of dose and age were not fully elucidated. Future reports with more granular data are needed to better delineate time to onset of HL and the effects of chemoradiotherapy.

Local Cisplatin Delivery in Mouse Reliably Models Sensorineural Ototoxicity Without Systemic Adverse Effects

Cisplatin is a lifesaving chemotherapeutic drug with marked ototoxic adverse effects. Cisplatin-induced hearing loss affects a significant part of cancer-surviving patients and is an unmet clinical need with important socioeconomic consequences. Unfortunately, in current preclinical animal models of cisplatin ototoxicity, which are mainly based on systemic delivery, important morbidity is observed, leading to premature death. This methodology not only raises obvious animal welfare concerns but also increases the number of animals used in ototoxicity studies to compensate for dropouts related to early death. To overcome these important limitations, we developed a local delivery model based on the application of a cisplatin solution directly into the otic bulla through a retroauricular approach. The local delivery model reliably induced significant hearing loss with a mean threshold shift ranging from 10 to 30 dB, strongly affecting the high frequencies (22 and 32 kHz). Importantly, mice did not show visible stress or distress indicators and no significant morbidity in comparison with a traditional systemic delivery control group of mice injected intraperitoneally with 10 mg/kg cisplatin, where significant weight loss >10% in all treated animals (without any recovery) led to premature abortion of experiments on day 3. Mass spectrometry confirmed the absence of relevant systemic uptake after local delivery, with platinum accumulation restricted to the cochlea, whereas important platinum concentrations were detected in the liver and kidney of the systemic cisplatin group. A clear correlation between the cochlear platinum concentration and the auditory threshold shift was observed. Immunohistochemistry revealed statistically significant loss of outer hair cells in the basal and apical turns of the cochlea and an important and statistically significant loss of auditory neurons and synapses in all cochlear regions. In conclusion, local cisplatin delivery induces robust hearing loss with minimal morbidity, thereby offering a reliable rodent model for human cisplatin ototoxicity, reducing the number of animals required and showing improved animal welfare compared with traditional systemic models.

Are There Cochlear Dead Regions Involved in Hearing Loss after Cisplatin Ototoxicity?

BACKGROUND

The most common complaint of patients affected by chemotherapy-induced hearing loss is difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments despite the use of hearing aids. Cochlear dead regions, those areas with damaged or absent inner hair cells and dendrites, may account for this type of hearing loss. However, it is unknown whether this condition is associated with cisplatin agents.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether cisplatin is associated with hearing loss and cochlear dead regions.

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in patients participating in routine audiological monitoring during and after chemotherapy treatment. Adults undergoing audiological evaluation who had completed chemotherapy treatment were invited to participate. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to pure tone thresholds. Group 1 patients had thresholds over 70 dB (HL) at 2,000 Hz and higher frequencies. Group 2 patients had thresholds below 70 dB (HL) up to 2,000 Hz. Patients in the control group had normal thresholds at all frequencies. The threshold equalizing noise test (TEN[HL]) was used to identify cochlear dead regions by repeating thresholds in the presence of TEN noise played from a compact disc. The presence of cochlear dead regions was established when the masked threshold was 10 dB or greater above the TEN level and 10 dB or greater above the absolute threshold at any frequency.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included in study group 1, 10 patients in study group 2, and 7 patients in the control group. Cochlear dead regions were present in all patients with hearing loss and in none of the control group. For groups 1 and 2, mean differences between absolute and masked thresholds were 21 and 16 dB at 500 Hz; 22 and 15 dB at 1,000 Hz; 31 and 17 dB at 2,000 Hz; 32 and 20 dB at 3,000 Hz; and 31 and 21 dB at 4,000 Hz, respectively. Nevertheless, analysis of variance testing with Bonferroni analysis showed a difference between groups 1 and 2 only at 2,000, 3,000, and 4,000 Hz.

CONCLUSION

We found unresponsive or dead cochlear regions in patients who had undergone cisplatin chemotherapy even among patients with mild to moderate hearing loss.

Contribution of the GSTP1 c.313A>G variant to hearing loss risk in patients exposed to platin chemotherapy during childhood

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Ototoxicity is a potential adverse effect of chemotherapy with platin drugs, such as cisplatin and carboplatin, in children. Hearing loss (HL) affecting frequencies below 4 kHz can compromise speech perception. The aim of this study was to investigate whether genetic variants previously implicated in ototoxicity are associated with HL overall and HL below 4 kHz in pediatric oncology patients treated with cisplatin or carboplatin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients given cisplatin or carboplatin for a pediatric cancer at least 5 years prior to the start of the study were enrolled. The patients underwent comprehensive audiological evaluations and genotyping to detect the presence of the GJB2 c.35delG, GSTP1 c.313A>G, and MT-RNR1 m.1555A>G polymorphisms.

RESULTS

HL was identified in 31/61 patients (50.8%), including 28/42 treated with cisplatin (66.6%) and 3/19 treated with carboplatin (15.8%). HL was associated with higher mean doses of cisplatin (p = .002) and carboplatin (p = .010). The c.313A>G variant of GSTP1 (heterozygous or homozygous) was detected in 31/61 patients (50.8%). An association between this variant allele and HL involving frequencies ≤ 4 kHz was identified (p = .020; 10-fold vs. non-carriers). No associations with HL were observed for GJB2 or MT-RNR1 gene variants.

CONCLUSION

The GSTP1 c.313A>G variant may increase the risk of low-frequency HL in pediatric oncology patients treated with cisplatin or carboplatin chemotherapy.

Determinants of ototoxicity in 451 platinum-treated Dutch survivors of childhood cancer: A DCOG late-effects study

Platinum-containing chemotherapeutics are efficacious for a variety of pediatric malignancies, nevertheless these drugs can induce ototoxicity. However, ototoxicity data on large cohorts of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) who received platinum agents, but not cranial irradiation are scarce. Therefore, we have studied the frequency and determinants of ototoxicity in a cross-sectional multicenter CCS cohort, including the role of co-medication since it has been suggested that these play a role in ototoxicity. We have collected treatment data and audiograms from the medical records of CCS treated in the seven pediatric oncology centres in The Netherlands. Ototoxicity was defined as Münster grade ≥2b (>20 dB at ≥4-8 kHz). Four-hundred-fifty-one CCS who received platinum agents, but not cranial irradiation (median age at diagnosis: 4.9 years, range: 0.01-19 years) were included. The overall frequency of ototoxicity was 42%. Ototoxicity was observed in 45% of the cisplatin-treated CCS, in 17% of the carboplatin-treated CCS and in 75% of the CCS that had received both agents. Multivariate analysis showed that younger age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR]: 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-0.6 per 5 years increase); higher total cumulative dose cisplatin (OR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.2-1.5 per 100 mg/m² increase); and co-treatment with furosemide (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.4-3.9) were associated with ototoxicity. We conclude that treatment with (higher total cumulative dose of) cisplatin, young age and furosemide co-medication independently are associated with an increased risk of ototoxicity in CCS. Future prospective studies are necessary to confirm the additive risk of co-medication on the development of ototoxicity.

Audiological profile of patients treated for childhood cancer

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the hearing loss after cancer treatment, according to the type of treatment, with identification of predictive factors.

METHODS

Two hundred patients who had cancer in childhood were prospectively evaluated. The mean age at diagnosis was 6 years, and at the audiometric assessment, 21 years. The treatment of the participants included chemotherapy without using platinum derivatives or head and neck radiotherapy in 51 patients; chemotherapy using cisplatin without radiotherapy in 64 patients; head and neck radiotherapy without cisplatin in 75 patients; and a combined treatment of head and neck radiotherapy and chemotherapy with cisplatin in ten patients. Patients underwent audiological assessment, including pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, and immittancemetry.

RESULTS

The treatment involving chemotherapy with cisplatin caused 41.9% and 47.3% hearing loss in the right and left ear, respectively, with a 11.7-fold higher risk of hearing loss in the right ear and 17.6-fold higher in the left ear versus patients not treated with cisplatin (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Children whose cancer diagnosis occurred after the age of 6 have shown an increased risk of hearing loss vs. children whose diagnosis occurred under 6 years of age (p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

The auditory feature found after the cancer treatment was a symmetrical bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Chemotherapy with cisplatin proved to be a risk factor, while head and neck radiotherapy was not critical for the occurrence of hearing loss.

Evaluation and Management of Hearing Loss in Survivors of Childhood and Adolescent Cancers: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

Hearing loss (HL) is common in childhood cancer survivors exposed to platinum chemotherapy and/or cranial radiation and can severely impact quality of life. Early detection and appropriate management can mitigate academic, speech, language, social, and psychological morbidity resulting from hearing deficits. This review is targeted as a resource for providers involved in aftercare of childhood cancers. The goal is to promote early identification of survivors at-risk for HL, appropriate evaluation and interpretation of diagnostic tests, timely referral to an audiologist when indicated, and to increase knowledge of current therapeutic options.

Lowered Cisplatin Dose and No Bleomycin in the Treatment of Pediatric Germ Cell Tumors: Results of the GCT-99 Protocol From the Brazilian Germ Cell Pediatric Oncology Cooperative Group

PURPOSE

We describe the results of a risk-adapted, response-based therapeutic approach from the Brazilian GCT-99 study on germ cell tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From May 1999 to October 2009, 579 participants were enrolled in the Brazilian GCT-99 study. Treatment, defined as specific chemotherapy regimen and number of cycles, was allocated by means of risk-group assignment at diagnosis with consideration for stage and primary tumor site. Patients at low risk received no chemotherapy. Patients at intermediate risk (IR) with a good response (GR) received four cycles of platinum and etoposide (PE), for total doses of platinum 420 mg/m(2) and etoposide 2,040 mg/m(2). Patients at IR with a partial response (PR) received three cycles of PE plus three cycles of ifosfamide, vinblastine, and bleomycin. Patients at high risk (HR) with a GR received four cycles of PE and ifosfamide (PEI) at total doses of platinum 420 mg/m(2), etoposide 1,200 mg/m(2), and ifosfamide 30 g/m(2). Patients at HR with a PR received six cycles of PEI.

RESULTS

The risk-group distribution was 213 LR, 138 IR, and 129 HR for 480 evaluable patients. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates at 10 years were, respectively, 90% and 88.6% in the IR-GR group (n = 126) and 74.1% and 74.1% in the IR-PR group (n = 12). Ten-year rates for the HR-GR group (n = 86) were an OS of 66.8% and an EFS of 62.5%. The HR-PR group (n = 43) had an OS of 74.8% and an EFS of 73.4%. In univariable and multivariable analysis, increased serum lactate dehydrogenase level and histology for a metastatic immature teratoma were prognostic of a worsened outcome.

CONCLUSION

Reduction of therapy to two drugs did not compromise survival outcomes for patients in the IR-GR group, and escalation of therapy with PEI did not significantly improve OS and EFS in patients at HR.

Chronic diseases and life events accounted for 2-18 % population attributable risks for adult hearing loss: UK Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, 2007

Links between chronic diseases and hearing loss in adults have emerged. However, previous investigations were not complete, and the role of life events was unclear. Therefore, it was aimed to examine the relationships of common chronic diseases and life events and adult hearing loss in a country-wide and population-based study. Data were retrieved from UK Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, 2007, being cross-sectional, including demographics, self-reported prior health conditions and hearing loss (ever and in the last 12 months), and several major life events. Analyses included Chi square test, t test, logistic regression model, and population attributable risk estimation. People who had prior health conditions including cancer, migraine, dementia, depression, cataracts, chronic bronchitis, allergy, bowel problem, bladder problem, arthritis, muscle problem or skin problem tended to report hearing loss than their counterparts. People who have experienced major life events including post-traumatic stress disorder, serious illness of close relatives, death of family, serious problems with friends, major financial crisis, valuables stolen, being bullied, violence at home, sexual abuse or running away from home were also more likely to experience ever hearing loss problem or that in the last 12 months. 2.0-13.1 % adult hearing loss could be delayed or prevented by managing chronic diseases while 4.1-18.1 % might be delayed or prevented by minimizing the negative effects of life events. Chronic diseases and life events were associated with hearing loss in adults. Better managing lifestyle to minimize detrimental impacts in future health and nursing programs would be suggested.