Alemtuzumab, Fludarabine, Low-Dose TBI, and Double Umbilical Cord Transplant for Primary Graft Failure in a Patient with Recurrent HLH

A Review of Current and Emerging Therapeutic Options for Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

Objective:

To provide an overview of clinical sequelae and emerging treatment options for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH).

Data Sources:

A literature search was conducted using the search terms “hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis,” “hemophagocytic syndrome,” “macrophage activation syndrome,” and “treatment” on Ovid and PubMed from January 1, 2017, through September 28, 2022.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Relevant clinical trials, meta-analyses, case reports, review articles, package inserts, and guidelines to identify current and emerging therapeutic options for the management of HLH.

Data Synthesis:

Genetic disorders and secondary causes may trigger HLH in both children and adults. Notable improvements in the diagnosis of HLH were seen with implementation of the HLH-2004 standard diagnostic criteria; however, timely and accurate identification of HLH remain significant barriers to optimal management. Multiagent immunochemotherapy are the backbone of aggressive therapy for acutely ill patients with HLH.

Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice:

The global coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and emerging immune effector cell therapies have served to highlight the concerns with immune dysregulation and subsequent HLH precipitation. Without prompt identification and treatment, HLH can be fatal. Historically, the clinician’s armamentarium for managing HLH was sparse, with etoposide-based protocols serving as the standard of care. Relapsed or refractory disease portends a poor prognosis and requires additional treatment options. Second- or subsequent-line options now include hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, emapalumab, alemtuzumab, anakinra, ruxolitinib, and tocilizumab.

Conclusions:

Improvements in diagnostic methods and novel immunosuppressive treatment strategies, including noncytotoxic immunochemotherapy, have transformed the therapeutic landscape. Unfortunately, many unanswered questions remain. Additional studies are required to optimize dosing, schedules, treatment sequences, and indications for novel treatment options.

Treatment of pediatric primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with the HLH-94/2004 regimens and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China

We aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and effectiveness of the HLH-94/2004 regimens and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (pHLH) in China. A retrospective analysis was performed on 38 patients with pHLH at Beijing Children's Hospital. PRF1 (34.2%) and UNC13D (31.6%) were the most common mutations in the pHLH. Thirty-eight patients were treated with the HLH-94/2004 regimens after diagnosis. Twenty-six patients (72.2%) responded to first-line treatment (complete response: 55.5%, partial response: 16.7%). The median survival time was 23 months. The overall survival (OS) rate at 3 years was 74.7%. There was no significant difference in the response rate (72% vs. 63.6%, P = 0.703) or 3-year OS (83.6% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.443) between the patients treated with the HLH-94 regimen and those treated with the HLH-2004 regimen. The incidences of all side effects in patients treated with the HLH-94 or HLH-2004 regimen were 32.0% and 18.2%, respectively (P = 0.394). Among 15 patients treated with HSCT, neither the preconditioning regimen nor the donor type affected patient prognosis (P = 0.205 and P = 0.161, respectively). The disease status (remission or nonremission) before preconditioning did not affect prognosis or the incidence of GVHD. Furthermore, a higher bilirubin level (≥ 30 μmol/L) was correlated with a poorer prognosis in pHLH patients (P = 0.026). The effectiveness rates of the HLH-94 and HLH-2004 regimens, chemotherapy, and HSCT were similar in pHLH patients. A bilirubin level ≥ 30 μmol/L might be an adverse prognostic factor in pHLH.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with Griscelli syndrome: A single-center experience

GS2 is a rare autosomal recessive disease characterized by hypopigmentation, variable immunodeficiency with HLH. HSCT is the only curative treatment for GS2. We analyzed the outcome of 10 children with GS2 who underwent HSCT at our center between October 1997 and September 2013. The median age of the patients at transplant was 13.5 months (range, 6-58 months). All of the patients developed HLH before HSCT and received HLH 94 or HLH 2004 protocols. Donors were HLA-identical relatives in 8 patients, HLA-mismatched relatives in 2 patients. Engraftment was achieved in all except one patient. None of the patients developed acute GVHD. Chronic GVHD occurred in one and veno-occlusive disease occurred in four patients. Eight of the patients are under remission without any neurologic sequelae-median time of disease-free survival is 92.4 months. The present study shows successful transplant outcome without long-term neurologic sequelae in patients with GS2 who underwent HSCT from HLA-related donors.

How to Treat Involvement of the Central Nervous System in Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis?

OPINION STATEMENT

Central nervous system (CNS)-hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is not a disease in itself, but it is part of a systemic immune response. The vast majority of patients with CNS-HLH also have systemic HLH and a large number of patients with primary and secondary HLH have CNS involvement. Reactivations within the CNS are frequent during the course of HLH treatment and may occur concomitant with or independent of systemic relapses. It is also important to consider primary HLH as an underlying cause of "unknown CNS inflammation" as these patients may present with only CNS disease. To initiate proper treatment, a correct diagnosis must be made. A careful review of the patient's history and a thorough neurological examination are essential. In addition to the blood tests required to make a diagnosis of HLH, a lumbar puncture with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should always be done in all cases regardless of the presence or absence of neurological signs or symptom. Treatment options for CNS-HLH include, but are not limited to, those commonly used in systemic HLH, including corticosteroids, etoposide, cyclosporine A, alemtuzumab, and ATG. In addition, intrathecal treatment with methotrexate and corticosteroids has become a standard care and is likely to be beneficial. Therapy must be initiated without inappropriate delay to prevent late effects in HLH. An interesting novel approach is an anti-IFN-gamma antibody (NI-0501), which is currently being tested. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) also represents an important CNS-HLH treatment; patients with primary HLH may benefit from immediate HSCT even if there is active disease at time of transplantation, though care should be taken to monitor CNS inflammation through HSCT and treat if needed. Since CNS-HLH is a condition leading to the most severe late effects of HLH, early expert consultation is recommended.