Characterization of MHC Class I and β-2-Microglobulin Expression in Pediatric Solid Malignancies to Guide Selection of Immune-Based Therapeutic Trials

An antigen processing and presentation signature for prognostic evaluation and immunotherapy selection in advanced gastric cancer

Objective

The aim of the study was to propose a signature based on genes associated with antigen processing and presentation (APscore) to predict prognosis and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced gastric cancer (aGC).

Background

How antigen presentation-related genes affected the immunotherapy response and whether they could predict the clinical outcomes of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in aGC remain largely unknown.

Methods

In this study, an aGC cohort (Kim cohort, RNAseq, N=45) treated by ICIs, and 467 aGC patients from seven cohorts were conducted to investigate the value of the APscore predicting the prognosis and response to ICIs. Subsequently, the associations of the APscore with the tumor microenvironment (TME), molecular characteristics, clinical features, and somatic mutation variants in aGC were assessed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the APscore was analyzed to estimate response to ICIs. Cox regression or Log-rank test was used to estimate the prognosis of aGC patients.

Results

The APscore constructed by principal component analysis algorithms was an effective predictive biomarker of the response to ICIs in the Kim cohort and 467 aGC patients (Kim: AUC =0.85, 95% CI: 0.69–1.00; 467 aGC: AUC =0.69, 95% CI: 0.63–0.74). The APscore also was a prognostic biomarker in 467 aGC patients (HR=1.73, 95% CI: 1.21−2.46). Inhibitory immunity, decreased TMB and low stromal scores were observed in the high APscore group, while activation of immunity, increased TMB, and high stromal scores were observed in the low APscore group. Next, we evaluated the value of several central genes in predicting the prognosis and response to ICIs in aGC patients, and verified them using immunogenic, transcriptomic, genomic, and multi-omics methods. Lastly, a predictive model built successfully discriminated patients with vs. without immunotherapy response and predicted the survival of aGC patients.

Conclusions

The APscore was a new biomarker for identifying high-risk aGC patients and patients with responses to ICIs. Exploration of the APscore and hub genes in multi-omics GC data may guide treatment decisions.

Approaches to Enhance Natural Killer Cell-Based Immunotherapy for Pediatric Solid Tumors

Treatment of metastatic pediatric solid tumors remain a significant challenge, particularly in relapsed and refractory settings. Standard treatment has included surgical resection, radiation, chemotherapy, and, in the case of neuroblastoma, immunotherapy. Despite such intensive therapy, cancer recurrence is common, and most tumors become refractory to prior therapy, leaving patients with few conventional treatment options. Natural killer (NK) cells are non-major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted lymphocytes that boast several complex killing mechanisms but at an added advantage of not causing graft-versus-host disease, making use of allogeneic NK cells a potential therapeutic option. On top of their killing capacity, NK cells also produce several cytokines and growth factors that act as key regulators of the adaptive immune system, positioning themselves as ideal effector cells for stimulating heavily pretreated immune systems. Despite this promise, clinical efficacy of adoptive NK cell therapy to date has been inconsistent, prompting a detailed understanding of the biological pathways within NK cells that can be leveraged to develop "next generation" NK cell therapies. Here, we review advances in current approaches to optimizing the NK cell antitumor response including combination with other immunotherapies, cytokines, checkpoint inhibition, and engineering NK cells with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) for the treatment of pediatric solid tumors.

Oncolytic Viruses and Their Potential as a Therapeutic Opportunity in Osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma remains an unmet medical need. Oncolytic viruses are gaining traction as novel cancer therapeutics. These viruses are either naturally nonpathogenic or engineered to be safe by specific genetic deletions yet retain the ability to infect and kill human cancer cells and elicit anticancer immunity. Some versions are being specifically designed and tested in patients with osteosarcoma, though due to their generalized mechanism of action most are being tested in patients across a broad range of cancer types. The activity of these viruses is impacted not only by the susceptibility of tumor cells to infection but also by the tumor microenvironment (TME) and by tumor immunogenicity. Here we review the field of oncolytic viruses with a particular emphasis on highlighting any available data in preclinical osteosarcoma models or in patients with osteosarcoma. While in general the viruses have been shown safe to administer to patients by a variety of routes, their therapeutic efficacy to date has been limited. Given the low rate of adverse events and the likely absence of long-term side effects, the utility of oncolytic viruses will most likely be realized when used in combination with other agents.

PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in paediatric cancers: What does the future hold?

Checkpoint blockade (CPB) immunotherapy has shown unprecedented success in a wide range of adult malignancies, and is increasingly being employed in the treatment of advanced cancers. However, the experience in the paediatric population remains limited and the small number of single agent studies reported have shown disappointing response rates. Paediatric cancers offer unique challenges that can hinder the translation of CPB into the paediatric clinic, and combinational therapies are likely to be needed to achieve therapeutic success. As the number of paediatric trials using CPB rapidly increases, understanding the challenges that these agents may encounter in this population is of special significance to allow the design of optimal combinatorial strategies for each tumour type. Here, we offer an overview of the unique biological and immunological features of paediatric cancers as compared to adult malignancies, and how these might impact the overall success of CPB in the paediatric population. We review the growing body of pre-clinical and clinical experiences to date, and discuss future strategies involving the combination of CPB with traditionally used therapies (chemotherapy and radiotherapy) or with other newly developed immunotherapies.

How best to estimate glomerular filtration rate? Novel filtration markers and their application

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic kidney disease is an increasing health burden. Estimating equations using serum concentrations of creatinine and cystatin C facilitate the assessment of kidney function as reflected in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Reduced eGFR is associated with increased risk for numerous adverse outcomes and is an important aspect in many clinical situations. However, current equations are suboptimal in some clinical settings. The review focuses on approaches to improve the estimation of GFR and aims to familiarize the reader with the underlying methodological hypotheses how new markers could contribute to improve the overall performance of estimating equations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Low molecular weight proteins such as β-trace-protein and β-2-microglobulin, as well as newly discovered metabolites, show promise as new filtration markers, as they might be beneficial in populations in which creatinine or cystatin C are inaccurate. We propose that the combination of multiple novel markers, alone or in combination with creatinine, cystatin C or demographics, can potentially improve GFR estimation. For special populations such as dialysis patients, separate equations have been developed to estimate residual kidney function.

SUMMARY

Current GFR estimating equations are an essential part of routine clinical practice but have limitations. The use of multiple markers combined in a single equation appears to be the most promising approach. Future research is required to validate proposed equations in diverse populations.

Immune profiles of desmoplastic small round cell tumor and synovial sarcoma suggest different immunotherapeutic susceptibility upfront compared to relapse specimens

BACKGROUND

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) and synovial sarcoma are rare tumors with dismal outcomes requiring new therapeutic strategies. Immunotherapies have shown promise in several cancer types, but have not been evaluated in DSRCT and synovial sarcoma. Because the immune microenvironment can provide indications of the inflammatory nature of tumors, immunohistochemical staining is able to assess the tumor immune infiltrates in both tumor types.

PROCEDURE

Using tissue microarrays of DSRCT and synovial sarcoma tumor samples, we detected tumoral HLA-A/B/C, beta-2-microglobulin(B2M), and PD-L1 expression, and quantified tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes expressing CD4, CD8, CD56, CD45RO, or FOXP3 by immunohistochemistry. We used staining intensity on a scale of 0-3 and percentage of tumor stained to determine HLA, B2M, and PD-L1 scores. We calculated the cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) target score as HLA score × B2M score/100.

RESULTS

In diagnostic samples, we found high HLA and CTL target scores and low PD-L1 expression with decreased scores in recurrence for both tumor types. We found an increase in CD56⁺ natural killer cells in DSRCT samples from diagnosis to recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

We found similar immunostimulatory profiles in DSRCT and synovial sarcoma. Our findings suggest that DSRCT and synovial sarcoma may be amenable to immunotherapies, albeit there was significant heterogeneity. Interestingly, HLA and CTL target scores decreased at recurrence, possibly reflecting immunoevasion. Our findings suggest both tumor types may be amendable to CTL-based therapies at diagnosis but less so at relapse. Our results support further investigation into the prognostic and predictive value of these findings in a larger dataset.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma and kidney cancer: from sequencing to rational selection

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs), including antibodies against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen 4 and programmed cell death protein 1, have been shown to induce durable complete responses in a proportion of patients in the first-line and refractory setting in advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. In fact, there are several lines of both targeted agents and ICPI that are now feasible treatment options. However, survival in the metastatic setting continues to be poor and there remains a need for improved therapeutic approaches. In order to enhance patient selection for the most appropriate next line of therapy, better predictive biomarkers of responsiveness will need to be developed in tandem with technologies to identify mechanisms of ICPI resistance. Adaptive, biomarker-driven trials will drive this evolution. The combination of ICPI with specific chemotherapies, targeted therapies and other immuno-oncology (IO) drugs in order to circumvent ICPI resistance and enhance efficacy is discussed. Recent data support the role for both targeted therapies and ICPI in the adjuvant setting of melanoma and targeted therapies in the adjuvant setting for renal cell carcinoma, which may influence the consideration of treatment on subsequent relapse. Approaches to select the optimal treatment sequences for these patients will need to be refined.

Limitations and opportunities for immune checkpoint inhibitors in pediatric malignancies

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown great promise in a wide spectrum of adult solid and hematological malignancies, achieving objective tumor responses and prolonging survival. However, there is limited clinical success amongst pediatric patients. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of ICI and present an up-to-date overview of recent and ongoing clinical trials of ICI in pediatric malignancies. In addition, we will discuss immunologic and clinical difficulties in this young population, as well as future prospects for combination of ICI with other immune-based and conventional treatments.

Immune profiling of NF1-associated tumors reveals histologic subtype distinctions and heterogeneity: implications for immunotherapy

Successful treatment of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated tumors poses a significant clinical challenge. While the primary underlying genetic defect driving RAS signaling is well described, recent evidence suggests immune dysfunction contributes to tumor pathogenesis and malignant transformation. As immunologic characterizations, prognostic and predictive of immunotherapeutic clinical response in other cancers, are not fully described for benign and malignant NF1-related tumors, we sought to define their immunologic profiles. We determined the expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A/-B/-C, β-2-microglobulin (B2M), and T cell inhibitory ligands PD-L1 and CTLA-4 by microarray gene analysis and flow cytometry. We examined HLA-A/-B/-C, B2M, and PD-L1 expression on thirty-six NF1-associated tumor samples by immunohistochemistry, and correlated these with tumoral CD4⁺, CD8⁺, FOXP3⁺, CD56⁺, and CD45RO⁺ lymphocytic infiltrates. We evaluated several tumors from a single patient, observing trends of increasing immunogenicity over time, even with disease progression. We observed similarly immunogenic profiles for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) and nodular and plexiform neurofibromas, contrasting with diffuse neurofibromas. These studies suggest that while immunotherapies may offer some benefit for MPNST and nodular and plexiform neurofibromas, tumor heterogeneity might pose a significant clinical challenge to this novel therapeutic approach.