1
|
Peng X, Xiong X, Li Y, Li C, Wang Z, Wu Y, Su M, Weng W, Huang K, Zhou D, Fang J. Local Treatment of Children Suffering From Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Study From China. Cancer Control 2024; 31:10732748241240655. [PMID: 38514935 PMCID: PMC10958813 DOI: 10.1177/10732748241240655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment for parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma (PM-RMS) has been a challenge since local control is difficult. The goal of this study was to analyse the impact of different local treatment approaches on childhood PM-RMS patients and help dispel the doubt that whether secondary radical surgery (SRS) should be encouraged in the management of PM-RMS. METHODS A total of 17 children with PM-RMS who received unified systemic chemotherapy and individualized local therapy such as radiotherapy (RT) and/or SRS were included in this retrospective study. The overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were compared between groups adopting different local strategies. RESULTS The 3-year OS and EFS of our PM-RMS patients was 75.5% and 56.5% respectively. The OS and EFS of patients who received SRS were both significantly lower than that of the non-SRS group (3-year OS: 50.0% vs 90.0%, P = .031; 3-year EFS: 33.3% vs 60.6%, P = .020). The OS and EFS of the patients who received RT was higher than that of the patients of the non-RT group (3-year OS: 85.6% vs 0%, P = .001; 3-year EFS: 64.0% vs 0%, P = .011). CONCLUSION This study illustrates that SRS was associated with poor prognosis of PM-RMS and should not be routinely performed. Optimized RT strategies along with more intensive chemotherapy may be alternative options to improve the survival of patients with PM-RMS. Multi-center, large sample and prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaomin Peng
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children’s Medical Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xilin Xiong
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children’s Medical Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Li
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children’s Medical Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chunmou Li
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children’s Medical Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhixuan Wang
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children’s Medical Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Wu
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children’s Medical Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mingwei Su
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children’s Medical Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenjun Weng
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children’s Medical Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ke Huang
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children’s Medical Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dunhua Zhou
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children’s Medical Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianpei Fang
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children’s Medical Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vennarini S, Colombo F, Mirandola A, Chiaravalli S, Orlandi E, Massimino M, Casanova M, Ferrari A. Clinical Insight on Proton Therapy for Paediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Manag Res 2023; 15:1125-1139. [PMID: 37842128 PMCID: PMC10576457 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s362664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper offers an insight into the use of Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) in paediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the literature, investigating comparative photon-proton dosimetry, outcome, and toxicity. In the complex and multimodal scenario of the treatment of RMS, clear evidence of the therapeutic superiority of PBT compared to other modern photon techniques has not yet been demonstrated; however, PBT can be considered an excellent treatment option, in particular for young children and patients with specific primary sites, such as the head and neck area (and especially the parameningeal regions), genito-urinary, pelvic, and paravertebral regions. The unique depth-dose characteristics of protons can be exploited to achieve significant reductions in normal tissue doses and may allow an escalation of tumour doses and greater sparing of normal tissues, thus potentially improving local control while at the same time reducing toxicity and improving quality of life. However, access of children with RMS (and more in general with solid tumors) to PBT remains a challenge, due to the limited number of available proton therapy installations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Vennarini
- Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Colombo
- Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Medical Physics Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefano Chiaravalli
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Maura Massimino
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Michela Casanova
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:31. [PMID: 36805784 PMCID: PMC9942395 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02223-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS We searched for articles using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from their inception to December 22, 2022. Two researchers independently screened literature and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0. RESULTS We got 675 candidate articles, of which 11 studies were included in our study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 544 RMS patients who received PBT. The local control (LC) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.01), 93% (95% CI 0.86-1.00), 78% (95% CI 0.71-0.85), 85% (95% CI 0.78-0.92), and 84% (95% CI 0.74-0.95), respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 82% (95% CI 0.72-0.92), 73% (95% CI 0.61-0.84), 63% (95% CI 0.47-0.79), 64% (95% CI 0.54-0.74), and 76% (95% CI 0.59-0.94), respectively. The overall survival (OS) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 93% (95% CI 0.86-1.00), 85% (95% CI 0.76-0.95), 80% (95% CI 0.63-0.96), 71% (95% CI 0.62-0.80), and 82% (95% CI 0.71-0.94), respectively. Acute and late toxicities were mainly grades 1 to 2 in all studies. CONCLUSION As an advantageous RT technique, PBT is an emerging option for patients with RMS, particularly children and adolescents patients. The data showed that PBT is a feasible, safe, and effective modality for RMS, showing promising LC, OS, PFS, and lower acute and late toxicities. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022329154.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hwang E, Gaito S, France A, Crellin AM, Thwaites DI, Ahern V, Indelicato D, Timmermann B, Smith E. Outcomes of Patients Treated in the UK Proton Overseas Programme: Non-central Nervous System Group. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:292-300. [PMID: 36813694 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The UK Proton Overseas Programme (POP) was launched in 2008. The Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit (PCOU) warehouses a centralised registry for collection, curation and analysis of all outcomes data for all National Health Service-funded UK patients referred and treated abroad with proton beam therapy (PBT) via the POP. Outcomes are reported and analysed here for patients diagnosed with non-central nervous system tumours treated from 2008 to September 2020 via the POP. MATERIALS AND METHODS All non-central nervous system tumour files for treatments as of 30 September 2020 were interrogated for follow-up information, and type (following CTCAE v4) and time of onset of any late (>90 days post-PBT completion) grade 3-5 toxicities. RESULTS Four hundred and ninety-five patients were analysed. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (0-9.3 years). The median age was 11 years (0-69 years). 70.3% of patients were paediatric (<16 years). Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and Ewing sarcoma were the most common diagnoses (42.6% and 34.1%). 51.3% of treated patients were for head and neck (H&N) tumours. At last known follow-up, 86.1% of all patients were alive, with a 2-year survival rate of 88.3% and 2-year local control of 90.3%. Mortality and local control were worse for adults (≥25 years) than for the younger groups. The grade 3 toxicity rate was 12.6%, with a median onset of 2.3 years. Most were in the H&N region in paediatric patients with RMS. Cataracts (30.5%) were the most common, then musculoskeletal deformity (10.1%) and premature menopause (10.1%). Three paediatric patients (1-3 years at treatment) experienced secondary malignancy. Seven grade 4 toxicities occurred (1.6%), all in the H&N region and most in paediatric patients with RMS. Six related to eyes (cataracts, retinopathy, scleral disorder) or ears (hearing impairment). CONCLUSIONS This study is the largest to date for RMS and Ewing sarcoma, undergoing multimodality therapy including PBT. It demonstrates good local control, survival and acceptable toxicity rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Hwang
- The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - S Gaito
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - A France
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A M Crellin
- NHS England National Clinical Lead Proton Beam Therapy, UK
| | - D I Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's Hospital and School of Medicine, Leeds University, Leeds, UK
| | - V Ahern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - D Indelicato
- University of Florida Department of Radiation Oncology, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - B Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, West German Cancer Centre, German Cancer Consortium, Essen, Germany
| | - E Smith
- The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sparber-Sauer M, Ferrari A, Spunt SL, Vokuhl C, Casey D, Lautz TB, Meyer WH, Walterhouse DO, Pajtler KW, Alaggio R, Schmidt A, Safwat A, Timmermann B, Dall'Igna P, Chen S, Weiss AR, Orbach D. The significance of margins in pediatric Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas: Consensus on surgical margin definition harmonization from the INternational Soft Tissue SaRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT). Cancer Med 2023. [PMID: 36744538 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Margin status following surgery in children, adolescents, and young adults with soft tissue sarcomas is controversial and has been defined differently by various specialties, with definitions changing over time and by cooperative group. The International Soft Tissue Sarcoma Consortium (INSTRuCT) is a collaboration of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee, European pediatric Soft Tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), and the European Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) devoted to improving patient outcomes by pooling and mining cooperative group clinical trial data. METHODS The INSTRuCT non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) working group aimed to develop international harmonized recommendations regarding surgical margin assessment and definitions in children and adolescents with soft tissue tumors. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION This review addresses accepted principles and areas of controversy, including the perspectives of surgeons, pathologists, radiation oncologists, and pediatric oncologists, to develop a framework for building common guidelines for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Sparber-Sauer
- Klinikum der Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart gKAöR, Olgahospital, Stuttgart Cancer Center, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend- und Frauenmedizin, Pädiatrie 5 (Pädiatrische Onkologie, Hämatologie, Immunologie), Stuttgart, Germany.,Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sheri L Spunt
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Christian Vokuhl
- Section of Pediatric Pathology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Dana Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Timothy B Lautz
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - William H Meyer
- Jimmy Everest Section of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
| | - David O Walterhouse
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Kristian W Pajtler
- Hopp-Children's Cancer Center, NCT Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rita Alaggio
- Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratories, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andreas Schmidt
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children's Hospital, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Akmal Safwat
- Oncology Department and Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany
| | - Patrizia Dall'Igna
- Pediatric Surgery, Department of Emergencies and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Sonja Chen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Aaron R Weiss
- Department of Pediatrics, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, United States
| | - Daniel Orbach
- SIREDO Oncology Center (Care, Innovation and Research for Children, Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer), PSL University, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Casey DL, Mandeville H, Bradley JA, Ter Horst SAJ, Sheyn A, Timmermann B, Wolden SL. Local control of parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma: An expert consensus guideline from the International Soft Tissue Sarcoma Consortium (INSTRuCT). Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29751. [PMID: 35484997 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The International Soft Tissue Sarcoma Database Consortium (INSTRuCT) consists of a collaboration between the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee, the European pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS). As part of the larger initiative of INSTRuCT to provide consensus expert opinions for clinical treatment of pediatric soft tissue sarcoma, we sought to provide updated, evidenced-based consensus guidelines for local treatment of parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma using both existing literature as well as recommendations from the relevant cooperative group clinical trials. Overall, parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma represents a distinctly challenging disease to treat, given its location near many critical structures in the head and neck, frequently advanced local presentation, and predilection for local failure. Definitive chemoradiation remains the standard treatment approach for parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma, with surgery often limited to biopsy or salvage therapy for recurrent disease. In this consensus paper, we specifically discuss consensus guidelines and evidence for definitive local management with radiotherapy, with a focus on imaging for radiotherapy planning, dose and timing of radiation, approach for nodal irradiation, various radiation techniques, including proton therapy, and the limited role of surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana L Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Henry Mandeville
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Simone A J Ter Horst
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anthony Sheyn
- Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| | - Suzanne L Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kawai A, Araki N, Ae K, Akiyama T, Ozaki T, Kawano H, Kunisada T, Sumi M, Takahashi S, Tanaka K, Tsukushi S, Naka N, Nishida Y, Miyachi M, Yamamoto N, Yoshida A, Yonemoto T, Yoshida M, Iwata S. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of soft tissue tumors 2020 - Secondary publication. J Orthop Sci 2022; 27:533-550. [PMID: 35339316 DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND These clinical practice guidelines are intended to provide recommendations based on the best evidence obtained to date on key issues in clinical practice to improve the prognosis, diagnostic and therapeutic processes for patients with soft tissue tumors. METHODS The Guidelines Development Committee and Systematic Review Committee were composed of a multidisciplinary team of specialists who play an important role in soft tissue tumor care. Clinical questions (CQs) were determined by choosing key decision-making points based on Algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue tumors. The guidelines were developed according to the "Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds) Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014" and "Minds Manual for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2017." Recommendation strength was rated on two levels and the strength of evidence was rated on four levels. The recommendations were decided based on agreement by 70% or more voters. RESULTS Twenty-two CQs were chosen by the Guidelines Development Committee. The Systematic Review Committee reviewed the evidence concerning each CQ, a clinical value judgment was added by experts, and the text of each recommendation was determined. CONCLUSION We established 22 CQs and recommendations for key decision-making points in the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue tumors according to the Minds Clinical Practice Guideline development methods. We hope that these guidelines will assist the decision-making of all medical staff engaged in the treatment and diagnosis of soft tissue tumors, and eventually lead to improved soft tissue tumor care in the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Kawai
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Nobuhito Araki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ashiya Municipal Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ae
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Japan
| | - Toru Akiyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Japan
| | - Toshifumi Ozaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Kawano
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Kunisada
- Department of Medical Materials for Musculoskeletal Reconstruction, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Japan
| | - Minako Sumi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Japan
| | - Shunji Takahashi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Tanaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Japan
| | | | - Norifumi Naka
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NachiKatsuura Town Onsen Hospital, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Nishida
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Miyachi
- Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan
| | - Norio Yamamoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Japan
| | - Akihiko Yoshida
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Masahiro Yoshida
- International University of Health and Welfare, Japan Council for Quality Health Care, Japan
| | - Shintaro Iwata
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Matsumoto Y, Fukumitsu N, Ishikawa H, Nakai K, Sakurai H. A Critical Review of Radiation Therapy: From Particle Beam Therapy (Proton, Carbon, and BNCT) to Beyond. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11080825. [PMID: 34442469 PMCID: PMC8399040 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11080825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss the role of particle therapy—a novel radiation therapy (RT) that has shown rapid progress and widespread use in recent years—in multidisciplinary treatment. Three types of particle therapies are currently used for cancer treatment: proton beam therapy (PBT), carbon-ion beam therapy (CIBT), and boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). PBT and CIBT have been reported to have excellent therapeutic results owing to the physical characteristics of their Bragg peaks. Variable drug therapies, such as chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and immunotherapy, are combined in various treatment strategies, and treatment effects have been improved. BNCT has a high dose concentration for cancer in terms of nuclear reactions with boron. BNCT is a next-generation RT that can achieve cancer cell-selective therapeutic effects, and its effectiveness strongly depends on the selective 10B accumulation in cancer cells by concomitant boron preparation. Therefore, drug delivery research, including nanoparticles, is highly desirable. In this review, we introduce both clinical and basic aspects of particle beam therapy from the perspective of multidisciplinary treatment, which is expected to expand further in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshitaka Matsumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Japan; (K.N.); (H.S.)
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-29-853-7100
| | | | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- National Institute of Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology Hospital, Chiba 263-8555, Japan;
| | - Kei Nakai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Japan; (K.N.); (H.S.)
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Japan; (K.N.); (H.S.)
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Doyen J, Aloi D, Groulier A, Vidal M, Lesueur P, Calugaru V, Bondiau PY. Role of proton therapy in reirradiation and in the treatment of sarcomas. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:550-553. [PMID: 34284969 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Reirradiation and irradiation of sarcoma is often difficult due to the frequent need for a high dose of radiation in order to increase tumor control. This can result in a greater risk of toxicity which can be mitigated with the use of proton therapy. The present review aims to summarize the role of proton therapy in these 2 clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Doyen
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France.
| | - D Aloi
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - A Groulier
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - M Vidal
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - P Lesueur
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Centre de Protonthérapie de Normandie, University of Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - V Calugaru
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - P Y Bondiau
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Spiotto MT, McGovern SL, Gunn GB, Grosshans D, McAleer MF, Frank SJ, Paulino AC. Proton Radiotherapy to Reduce Late Complications in Childhood Head and Neck Cancers. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:155-167. [PMID: 34285943 PMCID: PMC8270100 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00069.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In most childhood head and neck cancers, radiotherapy is an essential component of treatment; however, it can be associated with problematic long-term complications. Proton beam therapy is accepted as a preferred radiation modality in pediatric cancers to minimize the late radiation side effects. Given that childhood cancers are a rare and heterogeneous disease, the support for proton therapy comes from risk modeling and a limited number of cohort series. Here, we discuss the role of proton radiotherapy in pediatric head and neck cancers with a focus on reducing radiation toxicities. First, we compare the efficacy and expected toxicities in proton and photon radiotherapy for childhood cancers. Second, we review the benefit of proton radiotherapy in reducing acute and late radiation toxicities, including risks for secondary cancers, craniofacial development, vision, and cognition. Finally, we review the cost effectiveness for proton radiotherapy in pediatric head and neck cancers. This review highlights the benefits of particle radiotherapy for pediatric head and neck cancers to improve the quality of life in cancer survivors, to reduce radiation morbidities, and to maximize efficient health care use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Spiotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li P, Wang J, Axier A, Zhou K, Yun J, Wang H, Zhang T, Li S. Proton therapy for craniopharyngioma in adults: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046043. [PMID: 34078637 PMCID: PMC8173282 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Craniopharyngioma is the most challenging to treat brain tumour with high recurrence rates, which can be effectively reduced by adjuvant radiotherapy. In recent years, proton therapy (PT), with its physical properties of heavy ion beam, that is, Prague peak phenomenon, has been more frequently used in patients with craniopharyngioma. Compared with conventional X-ray beam radiotherapy, PT can reduce the damage to normal tissues and enlarge the damage to tumours. Some studies have shown that PT has advantages in the treatment of craniopharyngioma in adults. However, the optimal management of craniopharyngioma remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PT for craniopharyngioma in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will search six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Amed, Scopus), clinical research registration websites and grey literature, aiming to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on PT for craniopharyngioma in adults between 1 January 1954 and 28 September 2021. In the RCTs, PT will be used as the intervention group, and conventional X-ray beam radiotherapy will be used as the comparator group. Tumour recurrence and survival will be the primary outcome, and treatment-related toxicity will be the secondary outcome. The study selection, data extraction, bias risk and quality evaluation will be operated by two to four researchers independently. We will use Review Manager V.5.2 (RevMan V.5.2) for data analysis. If there is significant heterogeneity, we will identify the source of heterogeneity by subgroup analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Our study is based on existing RCTs and does not require ethical approval. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal or at a related conference. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020200909.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengtao Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Jialing Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Aximujiang Axier
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Kai Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Jingwei Yun
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Huayi Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Tingrong Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Shaoshan Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bradley JA, Indelicato DJ, Uezono H, Morris CG, Sandler E, de Soto H, Mailhot Vega RB, Rotondo R. Patterns of Failure in Parameningeal Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:325-333. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
13
|
Greenberger BA, Yock TI. The role of proton therapy in pediatric malignancies: Recent advances and future directions. Semin Oncol 2020; 47:8-22. [PMID: 32139101 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy has promised an advantage in safely treating pediatric malignancies with an increased capability to spare normal tissues, reducing the risk of both acute and late toxicity. The past decade has seen the proliferation of more than 30 proton facilities in the United States, with increased capacity to provide access to approximately 3,000 children per year who will require radiotherapy for their disease. We provide a review of the initial efforts to describe outcomes after proton therapy across the common pediatric disease sites. We discuss the main attempts to assess comparative efficacy between proton and photon radiotherapy concerning toxicity. We also discuss recent efforts of multi-institutional registries aimed at accelerating research to better define the optimal treatment paradigm for children requiring radiotherapy for cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Greenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Urgent Proton Beam Therapy With Interinstitutional Transfer for Patients With Intracranial Rhabdomyosarcoma: Report of 3 Cases. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2020; 42:e12-e17. [PMID: 31688631 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000001620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
A number of cases have been reported in recent years regarding the use of proton beam therapy to mitigate adverse events affecting important cranial organs in cases of rhabdomyosarcoma at parameningeal sites. However, few reports have described the use of proton beam therapy as urgent radiotherapy for parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma with intracranial extension. We treated 3 patients diagnosed with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma extending into the cranium who were assessed at other hospitals as suitable for urgent radiotherapy and transferred to our hospital for proton beam therapy. These patients comprised 2 boys and 1 girl 6 to 12 years of age at diagnosis, and proton beam therapy was started on days 5, 11, and 23 after diagnosis, respectively. Patients with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma extending into the cranium can be transferred to institutions equipped to perform proton beam therapy. To minimize the interval to starting therapy, medical information should be shared with institutions capable of providing such therapy as soon as the possibility of intracranial soft-tissue sarcoma is recognized. Proton beam therapy is 1 option for radiotherapy in cases of intracranial rhabdomyosarcoma.
Collapse
|
15
|
Sardaro A, Carbonara R, Petruzzelli MF, Turi B, Moschetta M, Scardapane A, Stabile Ianora AA. Proton therapy in the most common pediatric non-central nervous system malignancies: an overview of clinical and dosimetric outcomes. Ital J Pediatr 2019; 45:170. [PMID: 31881905 PMCID: PMC6935184 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-019-0763-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy represents an important approach in the therapeutic management of children and adolescents with malignant tumors and its application with modern techniques – including Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) – is of great interest. In particular, potential radiation-induced injuries and secondary malignancies – also associated to the prolonged life expectancy of patients – are still questions of concern that increase the debate on the usefulness of PBT in pediatric treatments. This paper presents a literary review of current applications of PBT in non-Central Nervous System pediatric tumors (such as retinoblastoma, Hodgkin Lymphoma, Wilms tumor, bone and soft tissues sarcomas). We specifically reported clinical results achieved with PBT and dosimetric comparisons between PBT and the most common photon-therapy techniques. The analysis emphasizes that PBT minimizes radiation doses to healthy growing organs, suggesting for reduced risks of late side-effects and radiation-induced secondary malignancies. Extended follow up and confirms by prospective clinical trials should support the effectiveness and long-term tolerance of PBT in the considered setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Sardaro
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Roberta Carbonara
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | - Maria Fonte Petruzzelli
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Barbara Turi
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Moschetta
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Arnaldo Scardapane
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Proton beam therapy is a highly conformal form of radiation therapy, which currently represents an important therapeutic component in multidisciplinary management in paediatric oncology. The precise adjustability of protons results in a reduction of radiation-related long-term side-effects and secondary malignancy induction, which is of particular importance for the quality of life. Proton irradiation has been shown to offer significant advantages over conventional photon-based radiotherapy, although the biological effectiveness of both irradiation modalities is comparable. This review evaluates current data from clinical and dosimetric studies on the treatment of tumours of the central nervous system, soft tissue and bone sarcomas of the head and neck region, paraspinal or pelvic region, and retinoblastoma. To date, the clinical results of irradiating childhood tumours with high-precision proton therapy are promising both with regard to tumour cure and the reduction of adverse events. Modern proton therapy techniques such as pencil beam scanning and intensity modulation are increasingly established modern facilities. However, further investigations with larger patient cohorts and longer follow-up periods are required, in order to be able to have clear evidence on clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heike Thomas
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Doyen J, Jazmati D, Geismar D, Frisch S, Schleithoff SS, Vermeren X, Scheer M, Blase C, Tippelt S, Timmermann B. Outcome and Patterns of Relapse in Childhood Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma Treated With Proton Beam Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:1043-1054. [PMID: 31419513 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 08/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard of care of childhood parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma (pRMS) is chemotherapy and local radiation therapy. Protons are increasingly being used to decrease late effects. The aim of the present study is to analyze the pattern of relapse and the correlation with dosimetric factors in pRMS treated with proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS This retrospective evaluation includes children treated in our institution for pRMS. Information on demographics, treatment, tumor characteristics, and toxicities and outcome was prospectively collected within the in-house registry. For patients presenting with local relapse, a fusion of the dosimetry with magnetic resonance imaging displaying site and geometry of recurrence was performed. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 2.9 years (0.5-4.7). Forty-six patients were identified in our institution between July 2013 and November 2017. Main characteristics of patients were as follows: 56.5% male, median age 5.1 years (1.3-17.5), 39.1% alveolar histology, 26.1%, 52.2%, 8.7%, and 13% patients with subgroup risk classification D, E/F/G, H, or metastatic, respectively, median total prescribed dose 55.8 Gy (50.4-56.4). Estimated 2-year local control, metastasis-free survival, event-free survival, and overall survival were 83.8%, 87.8%, 76.9%, and 88.9%, respectively. No acute or late local toxicity exceeding grade 3 was observed. Risk-group was identified as prognostic factor for metastasis-free survival in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis (trend: P = .09). In this cohort, dosimetric factors did not correlate with outcome. Isolated local failure happened in 5 of the 11 relapses. Local relapses were matched with dosimetry for 6 patients: 4 of them occurred in the high dose volume and 2 in the intermediate or low dose volume. CONCLUSIONS Proton therapy was effective and well feasible even in a critical cohort. Still, local relapse within the target volume of the radiation therapy remains an important issue in pRMS and new treatment strategies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme Doyen
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Fédération Claude Lalanne, Nice, France.
| | - Danny Jazmati
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany
| | - Dirk Geismar
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)
| | - Sabine Frisch
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany
| | - Stefanie Schulze Schleithoff
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany
| | - Xavier Vermeren
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Monika Scheer
- Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany; Cooperative Weichteilsarkomstudiengruppe (CWS) Olgahospital, Pädiatrisches Zentrum der Landeshauptstadt, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany; Department of Pediatric and Oncology, University Hospital of Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Christoph Blase
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany; AnästhesieNetz Rhein-Ruhr, Bochum, Germany
| | - Stephan Tippelt
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ludmir EB, Grosshans DR, McAleer MF, McGovern SL, Harrison DJ, Okcu MF, Chintagumpala MM, Mahajan A, Paulino AC. Patterns of failure following proton beam therapy for head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma. Radiother Oncol 2019; 134:143-150. [PMID: 31005208 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) of the head and neck (H&N) are treated with multimodal therapy, often with radiotherapy (RT) as definitive local therapy. We report on the patterns of failure following proton beam therapy (PBT) for H&N RMS. METHODS Forty-six H&N RMS patients were enrolled on a prospective registry protocol between 2006 and 2015. All were treated with a combination of chemotherapy (ChT) and PBT. Most patients (25 patients, 54%) had parameningeal tumors, of which 11 (24%) had intracranial extension (ICE). Thirteen patients (28%) had primary tumors greater than 5 cm. Median total cyclophosphamide (CPM) equivalent dose was 13.2 g/m2 (range 0-16.8 g/m2). Median RT dose was 50.4 Gy(RBE) (range 36 Gy[RBE]-50.8 Gy[RBE]). RESULTS With median follow-up of 3.9 years, five-year overall survival was 76%, and five-year progression-free survival was 57%. Seventeen patients (37%) experienced relapse, including 7 with local failure (LF). Five-year local control (LC) was 84%. Tumor size greater than 5 cm predicted increased risk of LF (hazard ratio [HR] 6.49, p = 0.03), as did the presence of ICE at diagnosis (HR 5.21, p = 0.03). Six relapses occurred in patients with ICE; all included a component of central nervous system relapse, with leptomeningeal disease and/or LF with an intracranial component. Delayed RT delivery after week 4 of ChT predicted increased risk of relapse for ICE patients (HR 10.49, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS PBT confers excellent LC, and a favorable late toxicity profile as compared with prior photon RT data. Our observations support ongoing trial efforts to dose-escalate RT for patients with larger tumors. However, these data raise concerns regarding excess failures among patients with ICE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan B Ludmir
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - David R Grosshans
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Douglas J Harrison
- Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - M Fatih Okcu
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| | - Murali M Chintagumpala
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Steinmeier T, Schulze Schleithoff S, Timmermann B. Evolving Radiotherapy Techniques in Paediatric Oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:142-150. [PMID: 30639254 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Childhood cancer is rare and survival of childhood cancer has increased up to 80% at 5 years after diagnosis. Radiotherapy is an important element of the multimodal treatment concept. However, due to growing tissue, children are particularly sensitive to radiation-related side-effects and the induction of secondary malignancies. However, radiotherapy techniques have continuously progressed. In addition, modern treatment concepts have been improved in order to minimise long-term effects. Today, radiotherapy is used for various tumour types in childhood, such as sarcomas and tumours of the central nervous system. MATERIALS AND METHODS External beam therapy with either photons or protons and brachytherapy are predominantly used for the treatment of childhood tumours. Technical developments and features, as well as clinical outcomes, for several tumour entities are presented. RESULTS The development of radiotherapy techniques, as well as risk-adapted therapy concepts, resulted in promising outcome regarding tumour control, survival and therapy-related side-effects. It is assumed that proton therapy will be increasingly used for treating children in the future. However, more data have to be collected through multi-institutional registries in order to strengthen the evidence. CONCLUSION The development of radiotherapy techniques is beneficial for children in terms of reducing dose exposure. As compared with other modern and highly conformal techniques, particularly proton therapy may achieve high survival rates and tumour control rates while decreasing the risk for side-effects. However, clinical evidence for modern radiotherapy techniques is still limited today. An optimal patient triaging with the selection of the most appropriate radiation technique for each individual patient will be an important goal for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Steinmeier
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - S Schulze Schleithoff
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - B Timmermann
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Proton therapy for pediatric malignancies: Fact, figures and costs. A joint consensus statement from the pediatric subcommittee of PTCOG, PROS and EPTN. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:44-55. [PMID: 29937209 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Revised: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of childhood cancer, with the primary aim of achieving the highest likelihood of cure with the lowest risk of radiation-induced morbidity. Proton therapy (PT) provides an undisputable advantage by reducing the radiation 'bath' dose delivered to non-target structures/volume while optimally covering the tumor with tumoricidal dose. This treatment modality comes, however, with an additional costs compared to conventional radiotherapy that could put substantial financial pressure to the health care systems with societal implications. In this review we assess the data available to the oncology community of PT delivered to children with cancer, discuss on the urgency to develop high-quality data. Additionally, we look at the advantage of combining systemic agents with protons and look at the cost-effectiveness data published so far.
Collapse
|
21
|
Bojaxhiu B, Ahlhelm F, Walser M, Placidi L, Kliebsch U, Mikroutsikos L, Morach P, Bolsi A, Lomax T, Pica A, Weber DC. Radiation Necrosis and White Matter Lesions in Pediatric Patients With Brain Tumors Treated With Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:987-996. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Revised: 10/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
22
|
Affinita MC, Ferrari A, Milano GM, Scarzello G, De Leonardis F, Coccoli L, Pericoli R, Basso E, Zanetti I, Scagnellato A, Bisogno G. Long-term results in children with head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Italian Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65. [PMID: 29115716 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) occurring at nonparameningeal head and neck (NPM-HN) sites carries a better prognosis than parameningeal RMS and some other sites. We analyzed the treatments administered and results obtained in patients with localized NPM-HN RMS, included in the protocols coordinated by the Italian Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee (STSC), in an effort to identify prognostic factors that could facilitate the tailoring of treatment. METHODS Sixty-six patients up to 18 years of age with previously untreated, localized NPM-HN RMS were prospectively registered in three consecutive protocols: RMS79, RMS88, and RMS96. Primary surgery was recommended when complete tumor resection was deemed feasible without mutilations. In other cases, only a biopsy was performed, followed by chemotherapy and delayed surgery and/or radiotherapy (RT). RESULTS NPM-HN RMS showed favorable characteristics: 72.7% were <5 cm, 72.7% were T1, and 80.3% were N0. With a median follow-up of 16 years (range 7-27), the 10-year progression-free survival and overall survival for the whole group were 65.1% (confidence interval [CI]: 52.3-75.3) and 74.2% (CI: 61.8-83.1). Progressive improvement has been seen in the successive protocols. Age and RT emerged as independent prognostic factors. The group of young children (age <l year) not irradiated was at high risk of failure. CONCLUSION The experience of the Italian STSC confirms that NPM-HN RMS has a favorable prognosis, which has improved over the years due to a better, multimodal treatment approach. RT has an important role, but different modalities such as proton therapy and brachytherapy should be explored in systematic ways in very young children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Carmen Affinita
- Hematology and Oncology Division, Department of Woman and Child Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Francesco De Leonardis
- Pediatric Hematology Oncology Unit, S. Chiara-Pisa University Hospital AOUP, Pisa, Italy
| | - Luca Coccoli
- Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Eleonora Basso
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Division, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Ilaria Zanetti
- Hematology and Oncology Division, Department of Woman and Child Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Angela Scagnellato
- Hematology and Oncology Division, Department of Woman and Child Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Gianni Bisogno
- Hematology and Oncology Division, Department of Woman and Child Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mee T, Kirkby NF, Kirkby KJ. Mathematical Modelling for Patient Selection in Proton Therapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:299-306. [PMID: 29452724 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Proton beam therapy (PBT) is still relatively new in cancer treatment and the clinical evidence base is relatively sparse. Mathematical modelling offers assistance when selecting patients for PBT and predicting the demand for service. Discrete event simulation, normal tissue complication probability, quality-adjusted life-years and Markov Chain models are all mathematical and statistical modelling techniques currently used but none is dominant. As new evidence and outcome data become available from PBT, comprehensive models will emerge that are less dependent on the specific technologies of radiotherapy planning and delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Mee
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - N F Kirkby
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - K J Kirkby
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vogel J, Both S, Kirk M, Chao HH, Bagatell R, Li Y, Womer R, Balamuth N, Reilly A, Kurtz G, Lustig R, Tochner Z, Hill-Kayser C. Proton therapy for pediatric head and neck malignancies. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65. [PMID: 29058370 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Revised: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pediatric head and neck malignancies are managed with intensive multimodality therapy. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may reduce toxicity by limiting exposure of normal tissue to radiation. In this study, we report acute toxicities and early outcomes following PBT for pediatric head and neck malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2010 and 2016, pediatric patients with nonhematologic malignancies of the head and neck were treated with PBT. Clinical and dosimetric data were abstracted from the medical record and treatment planning system with institutional review board approval. RESULTS Sixty-nine consecutive pediatric patients were treated with proton-based radiotherapy for head and neck malignancies. Thirty-five were treated for rhabdomyosarcoma to a median dose of 50.4 Gy relative biological effectiveness [RBE]. Ten patients were treated for Ewing sarcoma to a median dose of 55.8 Gy[RBE]. Twenty-four patients were treated for other histologies to a median dose of 63.0 Gy[RBE]. Grade 3 oral mucositis, anorexia, and dysphagia were reported to be 4, 22, and 7%, respectively. Actuarial 1-year freedom from local recurrence was 92% (95% CI 80-97). Actuarial 1-year overall survival was 93% (95% CI 79-98) in the entire cohort. Oral cavity mucositis was significantly correlated with oral cavity dose (D80 and D50 [P < 0.05], where D80 and D50 are dose to 50% of the volume and dose to 80% of the volume, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this study, we report low rates of acute toxicity in a cohort of pediatric patients with head and neck malignancies. PBT appears safe for this patient population, with local control rates similar to historical reports. Longer follow-up will be required to evaluate late toxicity and long-term disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stefan Both
- Medical Physics Department, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maura Kirk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Hann-Hsiang Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rochelle Bagatell
- Department of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Yimei Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Richard Womer
- Department of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Naomi Balamuth
- Department of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Anne Reilly
- Department of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Goldie Kurtz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Zelig Tochner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christine Hill-Kayser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chen TW, Sison J, Lee B, Olch AJ, Chang A, Giebeler A, Wong K. A Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and 4π Non-Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for a Patient with Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma. Cureus 2017; 9:e1673. [PMID: 29152430 PMCID: PMC5679771 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children and manifests as two major histological subtypes: embryonal and alveolar. The five-year local failure rate for RMS at parameningeal sites (middle ear, mastoid region, nasal cavity, etc.) is around 17% despite multiple Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRS) trials conducted to determine the optimal radiation treatment regimen. This case report explores the use of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for a 10-year-old child who presented with left eye irritation, facial pain, and headaches and was found to have an alveolar parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma. He received systemic therapy as well as radiation therapy to 5,640 cGy and 4,320 cGy over 24 fractions, prescribed for gross tumor extension and adjacent high-risk involved sites, respectively, via simultaneous integrated boost. Approximately two years following treatment, the patient has had no recurrence of his RMS with no distant metastases. In addition, his presenting symptom of left eye irritation has improved. His only side effect from radiation at this point is short stature, possibly due to growth hormone deficiency. The patient’s IMPT plan was compared with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 4π non-coplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans, and comparisons of isodose lines show decreased dose to the distal brain tissue with preserved target conformality by IMPT. IMPT also allowed for increased sparing of the patient's retina, lens, and lacrimal gland. All radiation plans achieved conformal dose coverage to the planning/scanning target volumes, while the IMPT plan is potentially better at sparing the patient from developing long-term optic apparatus side effects and neurocognitive defects. In this case, IMPT is comparable, if not favorable, when long-term side effects can be reduced while maintaining dose conformality and local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany W Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Health San Antonio Cancer Center
| | | | - Becky Lee
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Andrew Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Scripps Proton Therapy Center
| | | | - Kenneth Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Frisch S, Timmermann B. The Evolving Role of Proton Beam Therapy for Sarcomas. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 29:500-506. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
27
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Proton therapy is characterized by certain physical properties leading to a reduction in integral dose. As proton therapy becomes more widely available, the ongoing discussion on the real indications for proton therapy becomes more important. In the present article, data on proton therapy for tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) is summarized and discussed in view of modern photon treatments. Still today, no randomized controlled trials are available confirming any clinical benefit of protons in CNS tumors. For certain skull base lesions, such as chordomas and chondrosarcomas, dose escalation is possible with protons thus patients should be referred to a proton center if readily available. For vestibular schwannoma, at present, proton data are inferior to advanced photons. For glioma patients, early data is present for low-grade gliomas, presenting comparable results to photons; dose escalation studies for high-grade gliomas have led to significant side effects, thus strategies of dose-escalation need to rethought. For skull base meningiomas, data from stereotactic series and IMRT present excellent local control with minimal side effects, thus any improvement with protons might only be marginal. The largest benefit is considered in pediatric CNS tumors, due to the intricate radiation sensitivity of children's normal tissue, as well as the potential of long-term survivorship. Long-term data is still lacking, and even recent analyses do not all lead to a clear reduction in side effects with improvement of outcome; furthermore, clinical data seem to be comparable. However, based on the preclinical evidence, proton therapy should be evaluated in every pediatric patient. Protons most likely have a benefit in terms of reduction of long-term side effects, such as neurocognitive sequelae or secondary malignancies; moreover, dose escalation can be performed in radio-resistant histologies. Clinical data with long-term follow-up is still warranted to prove any superiority to advanced photons in CNS tumors. If available, protons should be evaluated for chordoma or chondrosarcoma of the skull base and pediatric tumors. However, many factors are important for excellent oncology care, and no time delay or inferior oncological care should be accepted for the sake of protons only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Trnková P, Bolsi A, Albertini F, Weber DC, Lomax AJ. Factors influencing the performance of patient specific quality assurance for pencil beam scanning IMPT fields. Med Phys 2017; 43:5998. [PMID: 27806620 DOI: 10.1118/1.4964449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A detailed analysis of 2728 intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) fields that were clinically delivered to patients between 2007 and 2013 at Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) was performed. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of patient specific dosimetric verifications and to assess possible correlation between the quality assurance (QA) results and specific field metrics. METHODS Dosimetric verifications were performed for every IMPT field prior to patient treatment. For every field, a steering file was generated containing all the treatment unit information necessary for treatment delivery: beam energy, beam angle, dose, size of air gap, nuclear interaction (NI) correction factor, number of range shifter plates, number of Bragg peaks (BPs) with their position and weight. This information was extracted and correlated to the results of dosimetric verification of each field which was a measurement of two orthogonal profiles using an orthogonal ionization chamber array in a movable water column. RESULTS The data analysis has shown more than 94% of all verified plans were within defined clinical tolerances. The differences between measured and calculated dose depend critically on the number of BPs, total thickness of all range shifter plates inserted in the beam path, and maximal range. An increase of the dose difference was observed with smaller number of BPs (i.e., smaller tumor) and smaller ranges (i.e., superficial tumors). The results of the verification do not depend, however, on the prescribed dose, NI correction, or the size of the air gap. There is no dependency of the transversal and longitudinal spot position precision on the beam angle. The value of NI correction depends on the number of spots and number of range shifter plates. CONCLUSIONS The presented study has shown that the verification method used at Centre for Proton Therapy at Paul Scherrer Institute is accurate and reproducible for performing patient specific QA. The results confirmed that the dose discrepancy is dependent on the size and location of the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Trnková
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, PSI West, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| | - A Bolsi
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, PSI West, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| | - F Albertini
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, PSI West, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| | - D C Weber
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, PSI West, Villigen 5232, Switzerland and Radiation Oncology Department, University of Zürich, Rämistrasse 71, Zürich 8006, Switzerland
| | - A J Lomax
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, PSI West, Villigen 5232, Switzerland and Department of Physics, ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, Zürich 8092, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lockney NA, Friedman DN, Wexler L, Sklar C, Casey D, Wolden S. Late Toxicities of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Rhabdomyosarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2016; 63:1608-14. [PMID: 27195454 PMCID: PMC4955714 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2016] [Accepted: 04/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To examine the late effects of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma of the head and neck. MATERIALS/METHODS All 1-year survivors of pediatric head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma treated with IMRT at a single institution from 1999 to 2014 were assessed for long-term complications. Late toxicities were graded according to CTCAE version 4.03. RESULTS Among 30 patients, median age at IMRT was 7.4 (1.5-20.8) years, median follow-up was 7.7 (1.2-14.4) years, and median IMRT dose was 50.4 (36-50.4) Gy. Tumor subsites included parameningeal (80%), orbit (13%), and other (7%). Common late toxicities were facial disfigurement (n = 23, 77%), growth hormone deficiency (n = 11, 37%), cataract (n = 10, 34%), and dental problems (n = 10, 33%). Twenty-two patients (73%) had ≥2 late toxicities and 14 patients (47%) had ≥3 late toxicities. Seventeen patients (57%) experienced grade 2 toxicity and 10 patients (33%) had grade 3 toxicity. Grade 3 toxicities included visual disturbance, cataract, facial disfigurement, chronic sinusitis/otitis, and hearing loss. Severe facial deformity was noted in nine patients (30%), and three patients underwent cosmetic surgery. Patients with severe facial deformity were treated at younger ages (median 6.0 years vs. 8.1 years for patients with no/nonsevere facial deformity) and more likely to have infratemporal fossa tumors. There were no secondary solid malignancies. CONCLUSIONS Late radiation toxicities are common in survivors of pediatric head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma treated with IMRT. While the majority of late effects are mild-moderate, they can significantly impact quality of life, particularly facial disfigurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie A. Lockney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Leonard Wexler
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Charles Sklar
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Dana Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Suzanne Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Leiser D, Calaminus G, Malyapa R, Bojaxhiu B, Albertini F, Kliebsch U, Mikroutsikos L, Morach P, Bolsi A, Walser M, Timmermann B, Lomax T, Schneider R, Weber DC. Tumour control and Quality of Life in children with rhabdomyosarcoma treated with pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Radiother Oncol 2016; 120:163-8. [PMID: 27247053 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2016] [Revised: 05/11/2016] [Accepted: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess clinical outcomes in children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy (PT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Eighty-three RMS (embryonal, n=74; 89%) patients treated between January 2000 and December 2014 were included. The median age was 4.5years (range, 0.8-15.5). All patients received systemic chemotherapy according to prospective protocols. Patients had low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease in 24%, 63%, and 13% of cases, respectively. The median total dose delivered was 54Gy(RBE) (range, 41.4-64.8). RESULTS After a median follow-up time of 55.5 months (range, 0.9-126.3), local failure occurred in 16 patients. The 5-year local-control survival rate was 78.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 69.5-88.5%]. Significant predictors for local failure were group/stage, tumour location, and size. Fourteen patients (16%) died, all from tumour progression. The 5-year overall survival was 80.6% (95%CI, 71.8-90.0%). The 5-year incidence of grade 3 non-ocular late toxicity was 3.6% (95%CI, 1-12%). No grade 4-5 late toxicities were observed. One radiation-induced malignancy was observed (1.2%). The Quality of Life (QoL) scores increased significantly after PT compared to baseline values. CONCLUSIONS PBS PT led to excellent outcome in children with RMS. Late non-ocular toxicity was minimal and QoL good.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic Leiser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland; Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
| | - Gabriele Calaminus
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Robert Malyapa
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
| | - Beat Bojaxhiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland; Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
| | | | - Ulrike Kliebsch
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
| | | | - Petra Morach
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
| | | | - Marc Walser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Germany
| | - Tony Lomax
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Germany; ETH Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Ralf Schneider
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland; Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; University of Bern, Switzerland; University of Zürich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|