Transverse myelitis as an unexpected complication following treatment with dinutuximab in pediatric patients with high-risk neuroblastoma: A case series

Dosimetric Comparison Between Proton and Photon Radiation Therapies for Pediatric Neuroblastoma

Purpose

The aim of this study is to determine the most beneficial radiation treatment technique for pediatric patients with thoracic and abdominal neuroblastoma (NBL), through a dosimetric comparison between photon Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and proton Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy treatment plans.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a multicentre case series of 19 patients with thoracic and/or abdominal NBL who underwent radiation therapy, following the recommendations of the European protocol for high-risk NBL (HR-NBL2/SIOPEN). The prescribed dose was 21.6 Gy in 12 fractions (1.8 Gy/fraction) delivered over the preoperative disease volume. The dose volume histograms were analyzed for each patient, and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a significance level of 0.01 was employed to assess statistical differences between the dosimetric parameters investigated. Two homogeneity indices (HI and newHI) were compared to evaluate the uniformity in dose, delivered to the adjacent vertebrae (VBs_Adj).

Results

Both radiation techniques conform to the protocol regarding CTV/PTV coverage for every location. Proton therapy resulted in statistically significant dose sparing for the heart and lungs in supradiaphragmatic locations and for the contralateral kidney, liver, spleen, and bowel in subdiaphragmatic locations. For both techniques, sparing the non-adjacent vertebrae (VBs_NAdj) results more challenging, although promising results were obtained. Furthermore, the dose delivered to the VBs_Adj was not statistically different, in terms of homogeneity, for the 2 radiation techniques that both met the protocol's requirements.

Conclusion

This dosimetric analysis highlights the potential of protons to reduce radiation dose to healthy tissue. These findings apply to all the investigated patients, regardless of primary tumor location, making proton therapy a valuable option for the treatment of neuroblastoma. However, a multidisciplinary assessment of each case is essential to ensure the selection of the most effective and suitable treatment modality.

Global Impact of Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs) in Children: A Focus on Anti-GD2

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), as the name implies, are clonal antibodies that bind to the same antigen. mAbs are broadly used as diagnostic or therapeutic tools for neoplasms, autoimmune diseases, allergic conditions, and infections. Although most mAbs are approved for treating adult cancers, few are applicable to childhood malignancies, limited mostly to hematological cancers. As for solid tumors, only anti-disialoganglioside (GD2) mAbs are approved specifically for neuroblastoma. Inequities of drug access have continued, affecting most therapeutic mAbs globally. To understand these challenges, a deeper dive into the complex transition from basic research to the clinic, or between marketing and regulatory agencies, is timely. This review focuses on current mAbs approved or under investigation in pediatric cancer, with special attention on solid tumors and anti-GD2 mAbs, and the hurdles that limit their broad global access. Beyond understanding the mechanisms of drug resistance, the continual discovery of next generation drugs safer for children and easier to administer, the discovery of predictive biomarkers to avoid futility should ease the acceptance by patient, health care professionals and regulatory agencies, in order to expand clinical utility. With a better integration into the multimodal treatment for each disease, protocols that align with the regional clinical practice should also improve acceptance and cost-effectiveness. Communication and collaboration between academic institutions, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory agencies should help to ensure accessible, affordable, and sustainable health care for all.

Overcoming inter-observer planning variability in target volume contouring and dose planning for high-risk neuroblastoma - a European multicenter effort of the SIOPEN radiotherapy committee

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To establish an international quality standard for contouring and planning for high-risk neuroblastoma within the prospective High-Risk Neuroblastoma Study 2 of SIOP-Europe-Neuroblastoma (SIOPEN HR-NBL2), which includes a randomized question on dose escalation for residual disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on four patients with high-risk neuroblastoma were selected and distributed to the radiotherapy committee of the HR-NBL2 study for independent contouring and planning. Differences in contouring were analyzed using apparent and kappa-corrected agreement. Plans were analyzed regarding the dose-volume histogram metrics. Results were discussed among experts and agreement was obtained.

RESULTS

Substantial agreement was found for contouring of the heart (0.64), liver (0.70), left lung (0.74), and right lung (0.74). For contouring of the gastrointestinal tract (0.54), left kidney (0.60), and right kidney (0.59) moderate agreement was obtained. For target volume delineation, agreement for preoperative tumour extent was moderate (0.42), for CTV fair (0.35) and only low (0.06) for residual tumour, respectively. The dose planning strategies appeared to be relatively homogeneous among all experts.

CONCLUSION

Considerable variability was found for the delineation of target volumes, particularly the boost volume, whereas the contouring of the organs at risk and the planning strategy were reasonably consistent. In order to obtain reliable results from the randomized HR-NBL2 trial, standardization of target volume delineation based on adequate imaging is crucial.

Multidisciplinary Clinical Care in the Management of Patients Receiving Anti-GD2 Immunotherapy for High-Risk Neuroblastoma

The addition of anti-disialoganglioside-2 (GD2) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) such as dinutuximab and naxitamab to standard therapies for high-risk (HR) neuroblastoma has significantly improved outcomes for children with this devastating disease. The care for these young patients receiving treatment for HR neuroblastoma is complex, with need for the involvement of a multidisciplinary team. Clinical implementation of anti-GD2 mAb treatment requires the same harmonized team approach. The authors share the development process of this coordinated team method and practical recommendations for administration of anti-GD2 mAbs and adverse event (AE) management. Successful collaboration between nurses and other team members ensures optimal treatment and comfort of patients and their families. The primary focus of this approach is to mitigate and manage AEs associated with anti-GD2 mAb treatments, such as pain, hypotension, allergic reactions, and hypertension, and to ensure safe and effective use of anti-GD2 mAbs. The two treatments approved for use in patients with neuroblastoma, dinutuximab for patients with HR disease following a partial response or better to frontline multimodal therapy and naxitamab for refractory or relapsed HR disease in the bone or bone marrow, were studied in different administration settings and follow different regimens and infusion schedules. Therefore, AE management requirements are specific to each treatment. The awareness of these differences and implementation of appropriate AE management strategies in clinical practice are important to ensure the best possible outcomes for patients with HR neuroblastoma.

Efficacy and Feasibility of Proton Beam Therapy in Relapsed High-Risk Neuroblastoma-Experiences from the Prospective KiProReg Registry

BACKGROUND

Despite an intensive multimodal treatment approach, approximately 50% of high-risk (HR) neuroblastoma (NB) patients experience progression. Despite the advances in targeted therapy, high-dose chemotherapy, and other systemic treatment options, radiation therapy (RT) to sites of relapsed disease can be an option to reduce tumor burden and improve chance for disease control.

METHODS

Patients who received salvage irradiation with proton beam therapy (PBT) for local or metastatic relapse of HR NB within the prospective registry trials KiProReg and ProReg were eligible for this retrospective analysis. Data on patient characteristics, multimodality therapy, adverse events, and oncologic endpoints were evaluated. Adverse events were assessed before, during, and after PBT according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) V4.0.

RESULTS

Between September 2013 and September 2020, twenty (11 male; 9 female) consecutive patients experiencing local (N = 9) or distant recurrence (N = 25) were identified for this analysis. Distant recurrences included osteomedullary (N = 11) or CNS lesions (N = 14). Salvage therapy consisted of re-induction chemo- or chemo-immuno-therapy (N = 19), surgery (N = 6), high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation (N = 13), radiation (N = 20), and concurrent systemic therapy. Systemic therapy concurrent to RT was given to six patients and included temozolomide (N = 4), carboplatine (N = 1), or anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKI) (N = 1). A median dose of 36 Gy was applied to the 34 recurrent sites. Local RT was applied to 15 patients, while five patients, received craniospinal irradiation for CNS relapse. After a median follow-up (FU) of 20 months (4-66), the estimated rate for local control, distant metastatic free survival, and overall survival at 3 years was 68.0%, 37.9%, and 61.6%, respectively. During RT, ten patients (50%) presented with a higher-grade acute hematologic adverse event. Late higher-grade sequelae included transient myelitis with transverse section (N = 2) and secondary malignancy outside of the RT field (N = 1).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of RT/PBT for recurrent HR NB in a multimodality second-line approach. To better define the role of RT for these patients, prospective studies would be desirable.

Clinical Phenotype and Management of Severe Neurotoxicity Observed in Patients with Neuroblastoma Treated with Dinutuximab Beta in Clinical Trials

Neurotoxicity is an off-tumour, on-target side effect of GD2-directed immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies. Here, we report the frequency, management and outcome of patients enrolled in two prospective clinical trials who experienced severe neurotoxicity during immunotherapy with the anti-GD2 antibody dinutuximab beta (DB) administered as short-term infusion (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN study, randomisation R2, EudraCT 2006-001489-17) or as long-term infusion (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN study, randomisation R4, EudraCT 2006-001489-17 and LTI/SIOPEN study, EudraCT 2009-018077-31), either alone or with subcutaneous interleukin-2 (scIL-2). The total number of patients included in this analysis was 1102. Overall, 44/1102 patients (4.0%) experienced Grade 3/4 neurotoxicities (HR-NBL1 R2, 21/406; HR-NBL1 R4, 8/408; LTI study, 15/288), including 27 patients with severe neurotoxicities (2.5%). Events occurred predominantly in patients receiving combined treatment with DB and scIL-2. Neurotoxicity was treated using dexamethasone, prednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulins and, in two patients, plasmapheresis, which was highly effective. While neurological recovery was observed in 16 of 21 patients with severe neurotoxicities, 5/1102 (0.45%) patients experienced persistent and severe neurological deficits. In conclusion, severe neurotoxicity is most commonly observed in patients receiving DB with scIL-2. Considering the lack of clinical benefit for IL-2 in clinical trials so far, the administration of IL-2 alongside DB is not recommended.

Spinal anesthesia in a patient on monoclonal antibody treatment: a poisoned chalice? A case report

BACKGROUND

Paraplegia is a rare complication of spinal anesthesia.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 68-year-old man who developed postoperative paraplegia and hypoesthesia after spinal anesthesia for an otherwise uncomplicated transurethral resection of the prostate. Acute transverse myelitis was diagnosed based on urgent MRI. A prior history of similar though less severe neurological symptoms after obinutuzumab treatment for follicular lymphoma suggested a potential causative role for obinutuzumab, a novel monoclonal antibody that has not been associated with such devastating neurological side effects yet. High-dose steroid treatment partially attenuated the symptoms, but debilitating hypoesthesia and motor deficit remained present 3 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The presented case warrants caution when performing neuraxial anesthesia in patients on monoclonal antibody therapies.

Treatment-Related Toxicities During Anti-GD2 Immunotherapy in High-Risk Neuroblastoma Patients

The introduction of immunotherapy using an anti-GD2 antibody (dinutuximab, ch14.18) has significantly improved survival rates for high-risk neuroblastoma patients. However, this improvement in survival is accompanied by a substantial immunotherapy-related toxicity burden. The primary objective of this study was to describe treatment-related toxicities during immunotherapy with dinutuximab, IL-2, GM-CSF, and isotretinoin. A retrospective, single center analysis of immunotherapy-related toxicities was performed in twenty-six consecutive high-risk neuroblastoma patients who received immunotherapy as maintenance therapy in the Princess Máxima Center (Utrecht, Netherlands). Toxicities were recorded and graded according to the CTCAE. Particular attention was drawn to pain and fever management and toxicities leading to dose modifications of dinutuximab and IL-2. Twenty-three patients (88%) completed all six courses of immunotherapy. Disease progression, isotretinoin-associated liver toxicity, and catheter-related infection in combination with peripheral neuropathy were reasons for immunotherapy discontinuation. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities for courses 1-5, respectively, were pain, catheter-related infections, and fever. In total, 310 grade ≥3 toxicities were recorded in 124 courses. Thirty-three grade 4 toxicities in 19/26 patients and no grade 5 toxicities (death) were seen. Fifty-nine percent of grade ≥3 toxicities were recorded in the two courses with IL-2. Catheter-related bloodstream infections were identified in 81% of patients. Four of these episodes led to intensive care admission followed by full recovery (grade 4).

Long-Term Follow-up of a Phase III Study of ch14.18 (Dinutuximab) + Cytokine Immunotherapy in Children with High-Risk Neuroblastoma: COG Study ANBL0032

PURPOSE

Previously our randomized phase III trial demonstrated that immunotherapy including dinutuximab, a chimeric anti-GD2 mAb, GM-CSF, and IL2 improved survival for children with high-risk neuroblastoma that had responded to induction and consolidation therapy. These results served as the basis for FDA approval of dinutuximab. We now present long-term follow-up results and evaluation of predictive biomarkers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients recieved six cycles of isotretinoin with or without five cycles of immunotherapy which consists of dinutuximab with GM-CSF alternating with IL2. Accrual was discontinued early due to meeting the protocol-defined stopping rule for efficacy, as assessed by 2-year event-free survival (EFS). Plasma levels of dinutuximab, soluble IL2 receptor (sIL2R), and human anti-chimeric antibody (HACA) were assessed by ELISA. Fcγ receptor 2A and 3A genotypes were determined by PCR and direct sequencing.

RESULTS

For 226 eligible randomized patients, 5-year EFS was 56.6 ± 4.7% for patients randomized to immunotherapy (n = 114) versus 46.1 ± 5.1% for those randomized to isotretinoin only (n = 112; P = 0.042). Five-year overall survival (OS) was 73.2 ± 4.2% versus 56.6 ± 5.1% for immunotherapy and isotretinoin only patients, respectively (P = 0.045). Thirteen of 122 patients receiving dinutuximab developed HACA. Plasma levels of dinutuximab, HACA, and sIL2R did not correlate with EFS/OS, or clinically significant toxicity. Fcγ receptor 2A and 3A genotypes did not correlate with EFS/OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunotherapy with dinutuximab improved outcome for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Early stoppage for efficacy resulted in a smaller sample size than originally planned, yet clinically significant long-term differences in survival were observed.

Proton Beam Therapy for Children With Neuroblastoma: Experiences From the Prospective KiProReg Registry

Objective

Radiotherapy (RT) is an integral part of the interdisciplinary treatment of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (NB). With the continuous improvements of outcome, the interest in local treatment strategies that reduce treatment-related side effects while achieving optimal oncological results is growing. Proton beam therapy (PBT) represents a promising alternative to conventional photon irradiation with regard to the reduction of treatment burden.

Method

Retrospective analysis of children with high or intermediate risk NB receiving PBT of the primary tumor site during first-line therapy between 2015 and 2020 was performed. Data from the prospective in-house registry Standard Protonentherapie WPE - Kinder- (KiProReg) with respect to tumor control and treatment toxicity were analyzed. Adverse events were classified according to CTCAE Version 4 (V4.0) before, during, and after PBT.

Results

In total, 44 patients (24 male, 20 female) with high (n = 39) or intermediate risk NB (n = 5) were included in the analysis. Median age was 3.4 years (range, 1.4-9.9 years). PBT doses ranged from 21.0 to 39.6 Gray (Gy) (median 36.0 Gy). Five patients received PBT to the MIBG-avid residual at the primary tumor site at time of PBT according to the NB-2004 protocol. In 39 patients radiation was given to the pre-operative tumor bed with or without an additional boost in case of residual tumor. After a median follow-up (FU) of 27.6 months, eight patients developed progression, either local recurrence (n = 1) or distant metastases (n = 7). Four patients died due to tumor progression. At three years, the estimated local control, distant metastatic free survival, progression free survival, and overall survival was 97.7, 84.1, 81.8, and 90.9%, respectively. During radiation, seven patients experienced higher-grade (CTCAE ≥ °3) hematologic toxicity. No other higher grade acute toxicity occurred. After PBT, one patient developed transient myelitis while receiving immunotherapy. No higher grade long-term toxicity was observed up to date.

Conclusion

PBT was a well tolerated and effective local treatment in children with high and intermediate risk NB. The role of RT in an intensive multidisciplinary treatment regimen remains to be studied in the future in order to better define timing, doses, target volumes, and general need for RT in a particularly sensitive cohort of patients.

A Case of Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis During Dinutuximab Therapy for Neuroblastoma

Dinutuximab is a monoclonal antibody administered to patients with high-risk neuroblastoma, usually after an autologous stem cell transplant. Dinutuximab is associated with immune mediated and neurologic toxicities, but fatal adverse events are rare. A case is presented of high-risk neuroblastoma with development of encephalopathy shortly after the first course of dinutuximab. The patient had extensive evaluation for etiology of the symptoms and received aggressive interventions, but ultimately expired. Postmortem diagnosis of anti-N-methyl D-aspartate receptor encephalitis, an autoimmune phenomenon often triggered by infection or malignancy, was made. The potential association of autoimmune encephalitis with dinutuximab and with previous autologous transplant is discussed.

The Role of Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in High-Risk Neuroblastoma Consolidated by anti-GD2 Immunotherapy. Results of Two Consecutive Studies

Background: Treatment of HR-NB comprise induction, consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) followed by anti-GD2 immunotherapy and isotretinoin. Childrens Oncology Group and SIOPEN studies used dinutuximab and cytokines to treat patients in complete remission or refractory Bone/Bone marrow (B/BM) disease after ASCT.

Methods: HR-NB patients referred to Hospital Sant Joan de Déu for anti-GD2 immunotherapy were eligible for two consecutive studies (dinutuximab for EudraCT 2013–004864–69 and naxitamab for 017–001829–40) and naxitamab/Sargramostim CU with or without prior ASCT. Patients enrolled in first complete remission or with primary refractory B/BM disease. We accrued a study population of two groups whose therapy, aside from ASCT, was similar. This is a retrospective analysis of their outcome calculated from study entry.

Results: From December 2014–2019, 67 patients were treated with dinutuximab and cytokines (n = 21) in the Hospital Sant Joan de Déu-HRNB-Ch14.18 study or with naxitamab and Sargramostim either in the Ymabs study 201 (n = 12) or CU (n = 34). 23 patients were treated with primary refractory disease in the B/BM (11 with dinutuximab and 12 with naxitamab), and 44 in first CR (10 with dinutuximab and 34 with naxitamab). Study patients included 13 (19.4%) treated following single ASCT and 54 following conventional chemotherapy. Median follow-up for all patients is 16.2 months. Two-year rates for ASCT and non-ASCT patients were, respectively, EFS 64.1% vs. 54.2% (p = 0.28), and OS 66.7% vs. 84.1% (p = 0.81). For the 44 pts in first CR, 2-years rates for ASCT and non-ASCT patients were, respectively, EFS 65.5% vs. 58.7% (p = 0.48), and OS 71.4% vs. 85.4% (p = 0.63).

Conclusions: In this retrospective, single center study, ASCT did not provide survival benefit when anti-GD2 immunotherapy was used after induction chemotherapy.

Targets and Antibody Formats for Immunotherapy of Neuroblastoma

Neuroblastoma (NB) is a malignant embryonal tumor of the sympathetic nervous system that is most commonly diagnosed in the abdomen, often presenting with signs and symptoms of metastatic spread. Three decades ago, high-risk NB metastatic to bone and bone marrow in children was not curable. Today, with multimodality treatment, 50% of these patients will survive, but most suffer from debilitating treatment-related complications. Novel targeted therapies to improve cure rates while minimizing toxicities are urgently needed. Recent molecular discoveries in oncology have spawned the development of an impressive array of targeted therapies for adult cancers, yet the paucity of recurrent somatic mutations or activated oncogenes in pediatric cancers poses a major challenge to the evolving paradigm of personalized medicine. Although low tumor mutational burden is a major hurdle for immune checkpoint inhibitors, an immature or impaired immune system and inhibitory tumor microenvironment can further complicate the prospects for successful immunotherapy. In this regard, despite the poor immunogenic properties of NB, the success of antibody-based immunotherapy and radioimmunotherapy directed at single targets (eg, GD2 and B7-H3) is both encouraging and surprising, given that most solid tumor antibodies that use Fc-dependent mechanisms or radioimmunotargeting have largely failed. Here, we summarize the current information on the immunologic properties of this tumor, its potential immunotherapeutic targets, and novel antibody-based strategies on the horizon.

Humanized 3F8 Anti-GD2 Monoclonal Antibody Dosing With Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients With Resistant Neuroblastoma: A Phase 1 Clinical Trial

Importance

Chimeric and murine anti-GD2 antibodies are active against neuroblastoma, but the development of neutralizing antibodies can compromise efficacy. To decrease immunogenicity, hu3F8, a humanized anti-GD2 antibody, was constructed.

Objective

To find the maximum-tolerated dose of hu3F8 with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 1 clinical trial used a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design in a single referral center (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York). Participants were enrolled from December 24, 2012, through May 3, 2016, with follow-up and analyses through February 28, 2018. Eligibility criteria included older than 1 year and resistant or recurrent neuroblastoma regardless of the number or kinds of prior treatments. All 57 participants met the eligibility criteria, received treatment according to the protocol, and were included in all analyses.

Interventions

Treatment cycles were monthly, if human antihuman antibody remained negative. Each cycle comprised hu3F8 infused intravenously for 30 minutes on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday as well as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor administered subcutaneously daily from 5 days before infusion through the last day of infusion. After cycle 2, hu3F8 was increased to the highest dose level that had been confirmed as safe.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Toxicity, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and disease response.

Results

Of the 57 participants, 34 (60%) were male and 23 (40%) were female (male-to-female ratio of 1.5), with a median (range) age of 6.8 (2.4-31.3) years at enrollment and a median (range) time of 3.1 (0.6-9.0) years since initial chemotherapy. Participants received a median (range) of 4 (1-15) cycles. Treatment was outpatient with reversible neuropathic pain and without unexpected toxic effects. No maximum-tolerated dose was identified. Dose escalation was associated with increased serum levels and proceeded through dosage of 9.6 mg/kg/cycle (approximately 288 mg/m2), which is more than 2.5 times higher than the standard dosage of 75 mg/m2/cycle or 100 mg/m2/cycle of dinutuximab and m3F8. Human antihuman antibody positivity developed in 5 of 57 patients (9%) after cycle 1, including in 1 of 10 patients (10%) not previously treated with anti-GD2 antibody and in 4 of 47 patients (9%) previously exposed to 1 or 2 anti-GD2 antibodies. Antineuroblastoma activity included major responses associated with higher dosing and prolonged progression-free survival despite a history of relapses.

Conclusions and Relevance

This phase 1 clinical trial found hu3F8 to be associated with modest toxic effects, low immunogenicity, and substantial antineuroblastoma activity; phase 2 trials are in progress.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01757626.

State of the art in immunotherapy of neuroblastoma

Neuroblastoma (NB) is a common and deadly malignancy mostly observed in children. Evolution of therapeutic options for NB led to the addition of immunotherapeutic modalities to the previously recruited chemotherapeutic options. Molecular studies of the NB cells resulted in the discovery of many tumor-associated genes and antigens such as MYCN gene and GD2. MYCN gene and GD2 surface antigen are two of the most practical discoveries regarding immunotherapy of neuroblastoma. The GD2 antigen has been targeted in many animal and human studies including Phase III clinical trials. Even though these antigens have changed the face of pediatric neuroblastoma, they do not take as much credit in immunotherapy of adult-onset neuroblastoma. Monoclonal antibodies have been designed to detect this antigen on the surface of NB tumor cells. Despite bettering the outcomes for NB patients, current therapies still fail in many cases. Studies are underway to discover more specific tumor-associated antigens and more effective treatment options. In the current narrative, immunotherapy of NB - from emerging of this therapeutic backbone in NB to the latest discoveries regarding this malignancy - has been reviewed.