Therapeutic plasma exchange for a case of refractory opsoclonus myoclonus ataxia syndrome

Monocentric retrospective clinical outcome in a group of 13 patients with opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome, proposal of diagnostic algorithm and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Dancing eye syndrome or opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome (OMS) is a very rare disease (incidence <1/5,000,000 per year), which is more prevalent in young children. Although it is not usually a cause of mortality, the aftermaths are not rare.

METHODS

We performed an observational retrospective review of children diagnosed with OMS in our neuropediatric department from 1996 to 2020, with the objective of assessing the prognostic value of initial clinical features. All medical data from diagnosis to last follow-up were reviewed. We defined unfavorable evolution of OMS as persistence or worsening of symptoms. Subsequently, based on a literature review, our results and experience, a diagnostic algorithm was developed.

RESULTS

A total of 13 OMS patients were included: 61.5% were male (n = 8), median age at diagnosis was 18 months (IR = 76), median treatment delay was 14 days (IR = 146) and OMS score at onset was 8 (IR = 11). The most frequent etiologies were neuroblastoma-associated and idiopathic OMS (38.46%; n = 5) of the patients, followed by post-infectious OMS (n = 3). All the patients were treated with corticosteroids, five required a surgical intervention (neuroblastoma group), and three required adjunctive immune therapy (immunoglobulins, cyclophosphamide and/or rituximab). We detected neurodevelopmental disorders in 38.46% (n = 5) of the patients, mainly attention deficit (n = 4), and persistent sleep disturbances (n = 4). The median OMS score at the end of follow-up was 1 (IR = 3). An important diagnostic delay, OMS score of ≥10 and age >1 year at onset may correlate with a higher risk of aftermaths. We detected a better prognosis in the post-infectious OMS, with full recovery occurring in 2/3 of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Early clinical suspicion is key to guarantee maximum response of treatment.

Paraneoplastic Syndromes in Neuro-ophthalmology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses the varied types of paraneoplastic syndromes that commonly have neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations. Diagnostic considerations and therapeutic options for individual diseases are also discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Paraneoplastic syndromes can affect the afferent and efferent visual systems. Paraneoplastic syndromes may result in reduced visual acuity from retinal degeneration, alterations in melanocyte proliferation and uveal thickening, or acquired nystagmus. Ocular motor abnormalities related to paraneoplastic syndromes may present with symptoms from opsoclonus or from neuromuscular junction disease. Diagnosis remains challenging, but serologic identification of some specific antibodies may be helpful or confirmatory. Treatment, in addition to directed therapies against the underlying cancer, often requires systemic corticosteroids, plasma exchange, or immunosuppression, but some specific syndromes improve with use of targeted pharmacologic therapy.

SUMMARY

Diagnosis and therapy of paraneoplastic syndromes presenting with neuro-ophthalmic symptoms remain a challenge, but strategies are evolving and new approaches are on the horizon.

An upfront immunomodulatory therapy protocol for pediatric opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome

BACKGROUND

Treatment of opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome (OMS) has historically involved corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for a duration of 6-12 months or longer. This study evaluated whether a brief upfront immunomodulatory therapy protocol with rituximab reduces the duration of OMS therapy without adversely affecting OMS outcomes.

PROCEDURE

Retrospective chart review was performed for consecutive children diagnosed with OMS from 2006 to 2019 at The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Canada). Children treated within 3 months of diagnosis with a treatment protocol involving pulse methylprednisolone (3-5 days, followed by an oral steroid taper), IVIG and/or plasma exchange, and rituximab (protocol group, n = 7) were compared to a historical group treated primarily with prednisone and IVIG (n = 8).

RESULTS

The duration of corticosteroid treatment was shorter in the protocol (median 4.5 [range 3-12] months) compared to that in the historical group (median 21.5 [range 6-70] months, P = .005), and subjects in the protocol group received fewer cycles of IVIG (median 1 [range 0-7] cycle vs 7 [range 1-70] cycles, P = .01). The proportion of children with OMS relapse was similar between the protocol and historic groups (2/6 vs 5/8, P = .59). OMS symptom rating scales at 12-month follow-up were similar in the protocol group (median 2.5, range 0-3) compared to that in the historical group (median 1, range 0-7; P = .66).

CONCLUSIONS

An upfront immunomodulatory therapy protocol with rituximab permits reduction in the duration of corticosteroid and IVIG therapy without a detrimental effect on OMS outcomes. Future studies with longer follow-up will have to determine whether neurocognitive and psychosocial outcomes are improved by this approach.