Irinotecan for relapsed Wilms tumor in pediatric patients: SIOP experience and review of the literature-A report from the SIOP Renal Tumor Study Group

Quantitative determination of liposomal irinotecan and SN-38 concentrations in plasma samples from children with solid tumors: Use of a cryoprotectant solution to enhance liposome stability

Preclinical studies have demonstrated that liposomal irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, has broad activity against adult cancers, including pancreatic, gastric, colon, lung, glioma, ovarian, and breast cancer. Encapsulation of irinotecan into liposomes can modify its pharmacokinetic properties dramatically. Also, the pharmacokinetic profiles of liposomal drug formulations are not fully understood; thus, bioanalytical methods are needed to separate and quantify nonencapsulated vs. encapsulated concentrations. In this study, two robust, specific, and sensitive LC-MS/MS methods were developed and validated to separate and quantify the nonencapsulated CPT-11 (NE-CPT-11) from the sum-total CPT-11 (T-CPT-11) and its major metabolite, SN-38, in human plasma after intravenous administration of liposomal irinotecan. NE-CPT-11 and SN-38 were separated from plasma samples by using solid-phase extraction, and T-CPT-11 was measured by protein precipitation. The liposomal CPT-11 formulation was unstable during sample storage and handling, resulting in elevated NE-CPT-11 concentration. To improve the stability of liposomal CPT-11, a cryoprotectant solution was added to human plasma samples prior to storage and processing. CPT-11, SN-38, and their respective internal standards, CPT-11-d10 and SN-38-d3, were chromatographically separated on a reversed-phase C18 analytical column. The drugs were detected on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in the positive MRM ion mode by monitoring the transitions 587.3 > 124.1 (CPT-11) and 393.0 > 349.1 (SN-38). The calibration curves demonstrated a good fit across the concentration ranges of 10-5000 ng/mL for T-CPT-11, 2.5-250 ng/mL for NE-CPT-11, and 1-500 ng/mL for SN-38. The accuracy and precision were within the acceptable limits, matrix effects were nonsignificant, recoveries were consistent and reproducible, and the analytes were stable under all tested storage conditions. Finally, the LC-MS/MS methods were successfully applied in a phase I clinical pharmacokinetic study of nanoliposomal irinotecan (Onivyde®) in pediatric patients with recurrent solid malignancies or Ewing sarcoma.

Bevacizumab-containing treatment for relapsed or refractory Wilms tumor

INTRODUCTION

Angiogenesis is critical for tumor growth and metastasis. Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic drug used to treat various adult and childhood solid tumors. Its potential efficacy in Wilms tumor (WT) with poor prognosis is not established.

AREAS COVERED

The response to bevacizumab-containing regimens in relapsed or refractory WT was reviewed in available literature. Searches were conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Eight papers were identified, published between 2007 and 2020, including six treatment regimens, predominantly vincristine, irinotecan, and bevacizumab (VIB) ± temozolomide (VITB). Among 16 evaluable patients, there were two complete responses, seven partial responses, five patients achieved stable disease (SD), and two patients had progressive disease. Objective responses (OR) were observed in 56% of all cases. OR or SD was observed in 89% (8/9) patients who received VIB/VITB. Bevacizumab was generally well tolerated. Related toxicities included hypertension, proteinuria, and delayed wound healing.

EXPERT OPINION

This review suggests potential effectiveness and good tolerability of bevacizumab in the setting of relapsed/refractory WT when used in combination with other drugs. Such combination therapies may serve as a bridging treatment option to other interventions and more personalized treatment options in the future; however, focused trials are needed to obtain additional evidence.

Redo nephron-sparing surgery in stage V pediatric renal tumors - A report from the SIOP/GPOH study group for renal tumors

PURPOSE

Nephron-sparing Surgery (NSS) is the surgical treatment of choice in children with bilateral renal tumors or in syndromatic patients. With an increasing role of this surgical approach, there is also an increased number of tumor relapses after NSS. Aim of this study was to evaluate a second ("Redo-") NSS in children with relapsed renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed patients undergoing Redo-NSS for relapsed kidney tumors between 2009 and 2021 at our institution, which represents a national reference center of the SIOP/GPOH renal tumor study group.

RESULTS

Nine patients (5 girls, 4 boys) underwent Redo-NSS with resection of 15 lesions. Mean age at surgery was 58 months (12-137), mean operative time for Redo-NSS was 195 min (137-260). R0 resection status was achieved in all children. Two patients had second relapses, one of them was resected via NSS, the other child underwent tumor nephrectomy. Two patients with anaplastic relapses died from combined second relapses. Thus, 7/9 patients are alive without evidence of disease, an impaired renal function was observed in one child. Mean follow-up after Redo-NSS was 35 months (6-49).

CONCLUSIONS

In renal tumor relapses, Redo-NSS can be performed with satisfactory oncological and functional results. Occurrence of diffuse anaplasia should possibly refrain from this approach. Further evaluation in international multicenter analyses are necessary for a definitive determination of Redo-NSS.

Phase 1 study of sorafenib and irinotecan in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib,an orally bioavailable, multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, have demonstrated activity in pediatric and adult malignancies. We evaluated the toxicity, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacogenomic (PGX) profile of sorafenib with irinotecan in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors and assessed the feasibility of incorporating patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures as an adjunct to traditional endpoints.

METHODS

Sorafenib, continuous oral twice daily dosing, was administered with irinotecan, orally, once daily days 1-5, repeated every 21 days (NCT01518413). Based on tolerability, escalation of sorafenib followed by escalation of irinotecan was planned. Three patients were initially enrolled at each dose level. Sorafenib and irinotecan PK analyses were performed during cycle 1. PRO measurements were collected during cycles 1 and 2.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were evaluable. Two of three patients at dose level 2 experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), grade 3 diarrhea, and grade 3 hyponatremia. Therefore, dose level 1 was expanded to 12 patients and two patients had DLT, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 elevated lipase. Nine of 15 (60%) patients had a best response of stable disease with four patients receiving ≥6 cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose for pediatric patients was sorafenib 150 mg/m² /dose twice daily with irinotecan 70 mg/m² /dose daily × 5 days every 21 days. This oral outpatient regimen was well tolerated and resulted in prolonged disease stabilization. There were no significant alterations in the PK profile of either agent when administered in combination. Patients were willing and able to report their subjective experiences with this regimen.

Irinotecan Plus Doxorubicin Hydrochloride Liposomes for Relapsed or Refractory Wilms Tumor

Purpose

The prognosis of relapsed or refractory pediatric Wilms tumor (WT) is dismal, and new salvage therapies are needed. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of irinotecan and a doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome regimen for relapsed or refractory pediatric WT.

Patients and Methods

The present study enrolled relapsed or refractory pediatric WT patients who were treated with the AI regimen (doxorubicin hydrochloride liposomes 40 mg/m² per day, day 1, and irinotecan 50 mg/m² per day with 90-min infusion, days 1–5; this regimen was repeated every 3 weeks) at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from July 2018 to September 2020. The response was defined as the best-observed response after at least two cycles according to the Response Evaluation Criteria of Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), and toxicity was evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4.03).

Results

A total of 16 patients (male:female, 8:8) with a median age of 4.2 years (0.5–11 years) with relapsed or refractory disease were enrolled in this study, including 14 patients with relapsed disease and two patients with refractory disease. These patients received 1–8 courses (median, 3 courses) of the AI regimen. Fourteen patients were assessable for response: two with complete response (CR), five with partial response (PR), two with stable disease (SD), and five with progressive disease (PD). The objective response rate was 50% (two CR, five PR), and the disease control rate was 64% (two CR, five PR, and two SD). Seven out of 14 patients (50%) were alive at the last follow-up, ranging from 2.6 to 32.4 months. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 3.5 months (range 0.5–12 months) and 8 months (range 1–28 months), respectively. Sixteen patients were assessable for toxicity, with the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events being alopecia (62%), leukopenia (40%), abdominal pain (38%), diarrhea (23%), and mucositis (16%), etc. No fatal adverse events have been observed, and modest adverse effects can be administered.

Conclusion

Irinotecan and doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome regimens have positive efficacy on relapsed or refractory pediatric WT with well-tolerated toxicity. A prospective clinical trial is warranted.

Unmet needs for relapsed or refractory Wilms tumour: Mapping the molecular features, exploring organoids and designing early phase trials - A collaborative SIOP-RTSG, COG and ITCC session at the first SIOPE meeting

Wilms tumour (WT) accounts for about 6% of all childhood cancers and overall survival of WT is about 90% in international protocols. However, for WT subgroups with much poorer prognoses, i.e. typically high-risk (unfavorable) histology and/or relapse, there is an unmet need to better understand the biology of WT and to translate biological findings into clinics through early phase clinical trials that evaluate innovative therapies. The main challenges are the small numbers of children suitable for early phase trials, the genetic heterogeneity of WT and the low number of somatic mutations that are currently considered 'druggable'. Accordingly, a joint meeting between clinical and biology experts from the international cooperative groups of the Renal Tumour Study Group of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology, the Renal Tumour Committee of the Children's Oncology Group and the European Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer consortium and parents representatives was organised during the first SIOPE meeting in Prague, 2019. We reviewed WT molecular features, ongoing/planned early phase trials and explored available knowledge on organoid technology. The key messages were: (1) relapsed WT should undergo whenever possible thorough molecular characterization and be enrolled in protocols or trials with systematic data collecting and reporting; (2) WT displays few known 'actionable' targets and currently no novel agent has appeared promising; (3) we need to improve the enrolment rate of WT candidates in early phase trials especially for the relatively small subgroup of relapses with an adverse prognostic signature; (4) despite some agnostic early phase trials existing, development of WT-focused trials are warranted; (5) growing organoids with parallel testing of drug panels seems feasible and may direct individual treatment and encourage clinical researchers to incorporate the most promising agents into early phase trials.

Outcome of patients with stage IV high-risk Wilms tumour treated according to the SIOP2001 protocol: A report of the SIOP Renal Tumour Study Group

INTRODUCTION

High-risk (HR) metastatic (stage IV) Wilms tumours (WTs) have a particular poor outcome.

METHODS

Here, we report the results of HR (diffuse anaplastic [DA] or blastemal type [BT]) stage IV WT treated patients according to the HR arm in the SIOP2001 prospective study.

RESULTS

From January 2002 to August 2014, 3559 patients with WT were included in the SIOP2001 trial. Among the 525 patients (15%) with metastatic WT, 74 (14%) had stage IV HR-WT. The median age at diagnosis was 5.5 years (range: 1.4-18.3). Thirty-four patients (47%) had BT-WT and 40 (53%) had DA-WT. Five-year event-free survival rates were 44 ± 17% and 28 ± 15% for BT-WT and DA-WT, respectively (p = 0.09). Five-year overall survival rates were 53 ± 17% and 29 ± 16% for BT-WT and DA-WT, respectively (p = 0.03). Metastatic complete response after preoperative treatment was significantly associated with outcome in univariate and multivariate analyses (hazards ratio = 0.3; p = 0.01). Postoperative radiotherapy of metastatic sites might also be beneficial. Forty-three of 74 patients experienced a relapse or progression predominantly in the lungs (80%). The median time to relapse/progression after diagnosis was 7.3 months (range: 1.6-33.3) and 4.9 months (range: 0.7-28.4) for BT-WT and DA-WT, respectively (p = 0.67). This is the first prospective evidence of inferior survival of stage IV BT-WT as compared with historical intermediate-risk WT. Survival of patients with stage IV DA-WT has not improved compared to the previous SIOP93-01 study.

CONCLUSION

These results call for new treatment approaches for patients with HR stage IV WT.

Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Wilms Tumor: An Update

Although differences exist in treatment and risk-stratification strategies for children with Wilms tumor (WT) between the European [International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP)] and American [Children's Oncology Group (COG)] study groups, outcomes are very similar, with an overall survival of > 85%. Future strategies aim to de-intensify treatment and reduce toxicity for children with a low risk of relapse and intensify treatment for children with high-risk disease. For metastatic WT, response of lung nodules to chemotherapy is used as a marker to modify treatment intensity. For recurrent WT, a unified approach based on the use of agents that were not used for primary therapy is being introduced. Irinotecan is being explored as a new strategy in both metastatic and relapsed WT. Introduction of biology-driven approaches to risk stratification and new drug treatments has been slower in WT than in some other childhood cancers. While several new biological pathways have been identified recently in WT, their individual rarity has hampered their translation into clinical utility. Identification of robust prognostic factors requires extensive international collaborative studies because of the low proportion who relapse or die. Molecular profiling studies are in progress that should ultimately improve both risk classification and signposting to more targeted therapies for the small group for whom current therapies fail. Accrual of patients with WT to early-phase trials has been low, and the efficacy of these new agents has so far been very disappointing. Better in vitro model systems to test mechanistic dependence are needed so available new agents can be more rationally prioritized for recruitment of children with WT to early-phase trials.

Review of phase I and II trials for Wilms' tumour - Can we optimise the search for novel agents?

Survival rates for patients with Wilms' tumour (WT) approximate 90% with refined use of currently available interventions. However, a subgroup of patients, with initial high-risk histopathology or relapsing disease, have a poor prognosis, and it is a challenge to identify and prioritise the development of new innovative approaches for these subgroups. We conducted a systematic literature search for published phase I and II clinical trials that registered patients with WTs and characterised the early phase trial activity, quantified response rates and highlighted avenues for further development. We identified 63 trials (48 phase I, three phase I/II, and 12 phase II trials) enrolling 214 patients with WTs, alongside other malignancies. The number of annually recruited WTs did not change significantly and was less than 20% of the potential candidates. The vast majority of the trials were conducted in North America, and 56 different interventions were investigated, including conventional chemotherapy and biologically targeted therapies. Overall, 33 WTs revealed some degree of tumour control. Of these, five patients demonstrated complete remission (2%), 15 patients partial response (7%) and 13 patients stable disease (6%). None of the included novel biologically targeted therapies emerged as promising interventions, and only conventional chemotherapy was able to induce a complete and partial response. We conclude that early phase trial recruitment of WTs is below expected levels, and the clinical outcome of the included patients is dismal. Improvement of the availability and recruitment to early phase trials for WTs, especially in Europe, is needed.