1
|
Critoph DJ, Cable M, Farmer J, Hatcher HM, Kuhn I, Taylor RM, Smith LAM. Is there scope to do better? Clinical communication with adolescents and young adults with cancer-A scoping review. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6317. [PMID: 38573227 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION How to communicate effectively with adolescent and young adults with cancer (AYACs) is a research priority. In a UK-wide survey of young people with cancer's research priorities, communication was a striking cross-cutting theme. It is increasingly recognised that AYACs have experiences and communication needs that differ significantly from those of younger children and older adults. The purpose of this review is to explore the features of effective clinical communication with AYACs. METHODS A literature search was undertaken to identify and map the available evidence using a broad scope to get an overview of the pertinent literature, identify knowledge gaps and clarify concepts. The searches yielded 5825 records, generating 4040 unique articles. These were screened and 71 full articles were read by four researchers with disagreements resolved by discussion leaving 29 included articles. Narrative synthesis was undertaken in relation to each of the research questions. RESULTS Three key themes were identified: being an adolescent/young adult, supporters, and healthcare professionals (HCPs). AYACs need to feel that HCPs understand their unique perspective. They want to be involved, this changes over time and in different contexts. Supporters are a central tenet, are most often parents and undertake several roles which are not always universally supportive. HCPs enable involvement of AYACs, and this needs to be actively promoted. AYACs preference for their level of involvement requires continual assessment. The three themes are interlinked and exist within the wider scope of the triadic encounter and cancer experience. CONCLUSION Supporters, most often parents were a key feature across the data and were seemingly paradoxical in nature. Triadic communication, the presence of a third person, is a central tenet of communication with AYACs and we propose a conceptual model to represent the nuances, components, and facets of this complex communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah J Critoph
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Maria Cable
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jessica Farmer
- Haematology & Oncology Department, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helen M Hatcher
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Isla Kuhn
- Isla Kuhn, Head of Medical Library Services, University of Cambridge Medical Library, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rachel M Taylor
- Centre for Nurse, Midwife and Allied Health Profession Led Research (CNMAR), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luke A M Smith
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davies C, Waters D, Fraser J. Children's and young people's experiences of expressing their views and having them heard in health care: A deductive qualitative content analysis. J Clin Nurs 2024; 33:1506-1519. [PMID: 38041392 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
AIM To gain an understanding of children's experiences of expressing their views and having them heard in Australian healthcare settings. DESIGN Child-centred qualitative research. A deductive qualitative content analysis was undertaken. METHODS Data were collected from 20 Australian children and young people between the ages of 7 and 18 years old using the 'draw, write and tell' method. RESULTS Children's experiences of 'space' and 'voice', and therefore the opportunity to express their views in health care were, in the main, positive. At the same time, their experiences of 'audience' and 'influence', the situations in which those views are given due weight, were overwhelmingly described as negative. CONCLUSION Australian paediatric health services appear to have responded to calls to provide children with the opportunity to express their views and thus are delivering on the elements of 'space' and 'voice', whereas the realisation of 'audience' and 'influence' has some way to go. Due weight is not always given to children's views. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE The Lundy model can be used to facilitate a better understanding of the concept of voice, and the responsibility of health organisations in implementing the rights of children and young people, as articulated in Article 12. IMPACT Children and young people have a right to express their views and have them heard in health care, but their experiences in Australian health care are unknown. While children's experiences of expressing their views in health care were mostly positive, their views are not always taken seriously or given due weight. This research impacts child health professionals in Australia and internationally. REPORTING METHOD The study is reported using the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Members of the Youth Advisory Council of two tertiary children's hospitals were consulted and invited to become members of the research team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Davies
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Donna Waters
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer Fraser
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Critoph DJ, Taylor RM, Spathis A, Duschinsky R, Hatcher H, Clyne E, Kuhn I, Smith LAM. Triadic communication with teenagers and young adults with cancer: a systematic literature review - 'make me feel like I'm not the third person'. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080024. [PMID: 38367963 PMCID: PMC10875529 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical communication needs of teenagers and young adults with cancer (TYACs) are increasingly recognised to differ significantly from younger children and older adults. We sought to understand who is present with TYACs, TYACs' experiences of triadic communication and its impact. We generated three research questions to focus this review: (1) Who is present with TYACs in healthcare consultations/communication?, (2) What are TYACs' experiences of communication with the supporter present? and (3) What is the impact of a TYAC's supporter being present in the communication? DESIGN Systematic review with narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES The search was conducted across six databases: Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and AMED for all publications up to December 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Included papers were empirical research published after 2005; participants had malignant disease, diagnosed aged 13-24 years (for over 50% of participants); the research addressed any area of clinical communication. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Three independent reviewers undertook full-text screening. A review-specific data extraction form was used to record participant characteristics and methods from each included paper and results relevant to the three review questions. RESULTS A total of 8480 studies were identified in the search, of which 36 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We found that mothers were the most common supporter present in clinical communication encounters. TYACs' experiences of triadic communication are paradoxical in nature-the supporter can help or hinder the involvement of the young person in care-related communication. Overall, young people are not included in clinical communication and decisions at their preferred level. CONCLUSION Triadic communication in TYACs' care is common, complex and dynamic. Due to the degree of challenge and nuances raised, healthcare professionals need further training on effective triadic communication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022374528.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah J Critoph
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rachel M Taylor
- CNMAR, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anna Spathis
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Robbie Duschinsky
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Hatcher
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Isla Kuhn
- Medical Library, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Luke A M Smith
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pyke-Grimm KA, Franck LS, Halpern-Felsher B, Goldsby RE, Rehm RS. Day-to-Day Decision Making by Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY NURSING 2022; 39:290-303. [PMID: 35538622 PMCID: PMC9807778 DOI: 10.1177/27527530211068718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer must negotiate the transition between childhood and adulthood while dealing with a life-threatening illness. AYA involvement in decision making varies depending on the type of decision and when decisions occur during treatment, and evidence suggests that AYAs want to be involved in decision making. Objective: To explore involvement of AYAs with cancer in day-to-day decisions affected by their cancer and treatment. Methods: This qualitative study used interpretive focused ethnography within the sociologic tradition, informed by symbolic interactionism. Semi-structured interviews and informal participant observation took place at two quaternary pediatric oncology programs. Results: Thirty-one interviews were conducted with 16 AYAs ages 15 to 20 years. Major day to day decision-making categories identified included: (1) mental mindset, (2) self-care practices, (3) self-advocacy, and (4) negotiating relationships. Participants described how they came to grips with their illness early on and decided to fight their cancer. They described decisions they made to protect their health, how they advocated for themselves and decisions they made about relationships with family and friends. Conclusions: Through day-to-day decisions, participants managed the impact of cancer and its treatment on their daily lives. Research should focus on developing and implementing interventions to empower AYAs to participate in day-to-day decisions that will affect how they manage their cancer, its treatment and ultimately their outcomes. Implications for Practice: Healthcare providers can facilitate AYA's participation in day-to-day decision making through encouraging autonomy and self-efficacy by providing support and through effective communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A. Pyke-Grimm
- Stanford Children's Health, Department of Nursing Research and
Evidence-Based Practice, Palo Alto, CA, USA,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford
University School of Medicine,Department of Family Health Care Nursing, San Francisco School of
Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA,Kimberly A. Pyke-Grimm, PhD, RN, CNS,
CPHON, Department of Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice, Stanford
Children's Health, 750 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| | - Linda S. Franck
- Department of Family Health Care Nursing, San Francisco School of
Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bonnie Halpern-Felsher
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Roberta S. Rehm
- Department of Family Health Care Nursing, San Francisco School of
Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA,*Professor Emeritus
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baker JN, Friebert S, Needle J, Jiang J, Wang J, Lyon ME. An Intervention in Congruence for End-of-Life Treatment Preference: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics 2022; 149:e2021054796. [PMID: 35425986 PMCID: PMC9648108 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-054796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES There is a gap in family knowledge of their adolescents' end-of-life (EOL) treatment preferences. We tested the efficacy of Family Centered Advance Care Planning for Teens with Cancer (FACE-TC) pediatric advance care planning (to increase congruence in EOL treatment preferences. METHODS Adolescents with cancer/family dyads were randomized into a clinical trial from July 2016 to April 2019 at a 2:1 ratio: intervention (n = 83); control (n = 43) to either 3 weekly sessions of FACE-TC (Lyon Advance Care Planning Survey; Next Steps: Respecting Choices Interview; Five Wishes, advance directive) or treatment as usual (TAU). Statement of Treatment Preferences measured congruence. RESULTS Adolescents' (n = 126) mean age was 16.9 years; 57% were female and 79% were White. FACE-TC dyads had greater overall agreement than TAU: high 34% vs 2%, moderate 52% vs 45%, low 14% vs 52%, and P < .0001. Significantly greater odds of congruence were found for FACE-TC dyads than TAU for 3 of 4 disease-specific scenarios: for example, "a long hospitalization with low chance of survival," 78% (57 of 73) vs 45% (19 of 42); odds ratio, 4.31 (95% confidence interval, 1.89-9.82). FACE-TC families were more likely to agree to stop some treatments. Intervention adolescents, 67% (48 of 73), wanted their families to do what is best at the time, whereas fewer TAU adolescents, 43% (18 of 42), gave families this leeway (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS High-quality pediatric advance care planning enabled families to know their adolescents' EOL treatment preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin N. Baker
- Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude
Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Sarah Friebert
- Haslinger Family Pediatric Palliative Care Center
- Rebecca D. Considine Research Institute, Akron
Children’s Hospital, Akron, Ohio
| | - Jennifer Needle
- Department of Pediatrics and Center for Bioethics,
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - JiJi Jiang
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of
Military Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jichuan Wang
- Divisions of Biostatistics and Study Methodology
- Center for Translational Research/Children’s
National Research Institute, Children’s National Hospital, Washington,
DC
| | - Maureen E. Lyon
- Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine
- Center for Translational Research/Children’s
National Research Institute, Children’s National Hospital, Washington,
DC
- Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University
School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marron JM, Mithani Z, Meyer EC. The Case of Billy Best: 25 Years Later. Pediatrics 2021; 148:peds.2020-038299. [PMID: 34413248 PMCID: PMC8672381 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-038299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Billy Best was diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma in 1994 at age 16 and became well-known when he ran away from home to avoid receiving further chemotherapy. His story became national news when, with the support of his adopted parents, he returned home and opted to use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) instead of standard chemotherapy and radiation for his cancer treatment. Now 25 years since Billy Best entered the public eye, his story is one that is frequently referenced in pediatrics, bioethics, and other related fields. Here, the authors examine the evolution of various features of this case, including treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma, the interplay between medicine and the media, the role of CAM in pediatric care, navigating entrenched disagreements and how best to integrate adolescents into health care decision-making, and the role of narrative in medical practice. The authors explore the unique role of each of these facets of Billy Best's case, describing how each has or has not changed in the quarter century since that time amid the changing landscape of pediatric health care. Ultimately, although many advances have occurred since Billy Best's time, significant work remains. Additional effort will be required in the future to optimize communication, improve treatment toxicities from Hodgkin lymphoma without decreasing survival, integrate the voice and perspective of adolescents into their treatment decisions, and navigate the roles of CAM and the media in pediatric health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M. Marron
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Office of Ethics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Zamina Mithani
- University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elaine C. Meyer
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Marron JM, Meyer EC, Kennedy KO. The Complicated Legacy of Cassandra Callender: Ethics, Decision-making, and the Role of Adolescents. JAMA Pediatr 2021; 175:343-344. [PMID: 33196794 PMCID: PMC8366032 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.4812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M. Marron
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Elaine C. Meyer
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kerri O. Kennedy
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Office of Ethics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gessler D, Juraskova I, Sansom‐Daly UM, Shepherd HL, Patterson P, Muscat DM. Clinician‐patient‐family decision‐making and health literacy in adolescents and young adults with cancer and their families: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Psychooncology 2019; 28:1408-1419. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.5110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Revised: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Gessler
- School of PsychologyThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence‐Based Decision‐Making (CeMPED)The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Psycho‐Oncology Cooperative Research Group (PoCoG), School of PsychologyThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- School of PsychologyThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence‐Based Decision‐Making (CeMPED)The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Psycho‐Oncology Cooperative Research Group (PoCoG), School of PsychologyThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Ursula M. Sansom‐Daly
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
- School of Women's and Children's HealthUNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Sydney Youth Cancer ServicePrince of Wales Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Heather L. Shepherd
- School of PsychologyThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence‐Based Decision‐Making (CeMPED)The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Psycho‐Oncology Cooperative Research Group (PoCoG), School of PsychologyThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Pandora Patterson
- Cancer Nursing Research UnitThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Research, Evaluation, and Social Policy Unit, CanTeen Australia Newtown New South Wales Australia
| | - Danielle Marie Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|