Qualitative protein C deficiency due to PROC c.577_579delAAG mutation not detected by chromogenic assays: A case of intractable cerebral sinovenous thrombosis

Compound heterozygous protein C deficiency with pulmonary embolism caused by a novel PROC gene mutation: Case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Protein C is an anticoagulation agent, and protein C deficiency results in vascular thrombosis disease. Hereditary protein C deficiency is a risk factor for pulmonary embolism in adults. Pathogenic variants of the Protein C, Inactivator Of Coagulation Factors Va And VIIIa (PROC) gene which encodes protein C have been identified as a cause of protein C deficiency.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We describe a patient with a novel mutation in the PROC gene who was diagnosed with pulmonary embolism in a Chinese family.

DIAGNOSIS

According to the results of the pulmonary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and the level of blood protein C, the patient was diagnosed with pulmonary embolism caused by protein C deficiency.

INTERVENTIONS

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed for the molecular analysis.

OUTCOME

The results of patient's deoxyribonucleic acid revealed a heterozygous mutation (c.237 + 5G > A) in intron 3 of the PROC gene. His father also harbored the same mutation in the PROC gene. We also reviewed the protein C deficiencies caused by PROC gene mutations in cases.

LESSONS

A novel mutation in intron 3 of PROC gene has not been previously reported in patients with pulmonary embolism caused by protein C deficiency. After anticoagulation therapy, the patient recovered, and CT showed resolution of the thrombosis. Pulmonary embolism may be caused by protein C deficiency and the rare compound heterozygous mutation in intron 3 of the PROC gene could cause protein C deficiency via impairment of the secretory activity of protein C.

Laboratory Limitations of Excluding Hereditary Protein C Deficiency by Chromogenic Assay: Discrepancies of Phenotype and Genotype

Protein C (PC) deficiency is associated with an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). In daily practice, exclusion of a hereditary PC deficiency is often based on a single determination of PC activity, by either clotting time–based or mostly chromogenic assay. However, diagnosis of hereditary PC deficiency is challenging due to several laboratory and clinical limitations. We compared the potential of PC activity values measured by either chromogenic or clotting time–based assay to predict a variation in the PROC gene. One hundred one (35%) of 287 patients carried variations within the PROC gene, including 2 previously not published variations. In 20 (20%) patients with identified variation, PC activity, determined by chromogenic assay, was within the reference range. For prediction of an underlying genetic defect determined by chromogenic and clotting time–based assay, sensitivity was 80% versus 99%, specificity 75% versus 18%, positive predictive value 64% versus 39%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 88% versus 97%. The lower NPV of chromogenic versus clotting time–based PC assay can be mainly explained by the presence of PC deficiency type IIb. Following our proposed diagnostic algorithm, additional measurement of PC activity by clotting time–based assay in case of a positive VTE history improves detection of this subtype of PC deficiency. Considering potential therapeutic consequences for primary and especially for secondary VTE prophylaxis, genetic analysis is required not only for confirmation but also for clarification of PC deficiency.