1
|
Dang TH, Wickramasinghe N, Forkan ARM, Jayaraman PP, Burbury K, O'Callaghan C, Whitechurch A, Schofield P. Co-Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Mobile Solution to Improve Medication Adherence in Cancer: Design Science Research Approach. JMIR Cancer 2024; 10:e46979. [PMID: 38569178 PMCID: PMC11024750 DOI: 10.2196/46979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication nonadherence negatively impacts the health outcomes of people with cancer as well as health care costs. Digital technologies present opportunities to address this health issue. However, there is limited evidence on how to develop digital interventions that meet the needs of people with cancer, are perceived as useful, and are potentially effective in improving medication adherence. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to co-design, develop, and preliminarily evaluate an innovative mobile health solution called Safety and Adherence to Medication and Self-Care Advice in Oncology (SAMSON) to improve medication adherence among people with cancer. METHODS Using the 4 cycles and 6 processes of design science research methodology, we co-designed and developed a medication adherence solution for people with cancer. First, we conducted a literature review on medication adherence in cancer and a systematic review of current interventions to address this issue. Behavioral science research was used to conceptualize the design features of SAMSON. Second, we conducted 2 design phases: prototype design and final feature design. Last, we conducted a mixed methods study on patients with hematological cancer over 6 weeks to evaluate the mobile solution. RESULTS The developed mobile solution, consisting of a mobile app, a web portal, and a cloud-based database, includes 5 modules: medication reminder and acknowledgment, symptom assessment and management, reinforcement, patient profile, and reporting. The quantitative study (n=30) showed that SAMSON was easy to use (21/27, 78%). The app was engaging (18/27, 67%), informative, increased user interactions, and well organized (19/27, 70%). Most of the participants (21/27, 78%) commented that SAMSON's activities could help to improve their adherence to cancer treatments, and more than half of them (17/27, 63%) would recommend the app to their peers. The qualitative study (n=25) revealed that SAMSON was perceived as helpful in terms of reminding, supporting, and informing patients. Possible barriers to using SAMSON include the app glitches and users' technical inexperience. Further needs to refine the solution were also identified. Technical improvements and design enhancements will be incorporated into the subsequent iteration. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the successful application of behavioral science research and design science research methodology to design and develop a mobile solution for patients with cancer to be more adherent. The study also highlights the importance of applying rigorous methodologies in developing effective and patient-centered digital intervention solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thu Ha Dang
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Digital Cancer Care Innovation, Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nilmini Wickramasinghe
- Department of Health and Bio Statistics, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
- Optus Chair Digital Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Abdur Rahim Mohammad Forkan
- Digital Innovation Lab, Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, School Software and Electrical Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia
| | - Prem Prakash Jayaraman
- Factory of the Future and Digital Innovation Lab, School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kate Burbury
- Digital and Healthcare Innovation, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Clare O'Callaghan
- Caritas Christi and Psychosocial Cancer Care, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ashley Whitechurch
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre & Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Digital Cancer Care Innovation, Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salvador Á, Mansuklal SA, Moura M, Crespo C, Barros L. Facilitators and barriers to adherence to medical recommendations among adolescents with cancer: A systematic review. J Child Health Care 2023:13674935231208502. [PMID: 37864440 DOI: 10.1177/13674935231208502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to systematically review barriers/facilitators of adherence among adolescents with cancer (aged 10-24 years), following a comprehensive approach to adherence that goes beyond medication-taking. Empirical studies published in English exploring determinants of adherence to medical recommendations among adolescents with cancer were identified in MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Web of Science, up to October 2021. Records and full-text articles were reviewed by two independent reviewers, and results were classified according to the World Health Organization's (WHO) multidimensional adherence model. Eighteen studies were included. Despite heterogeneity in the definition and measurement of adherence, literature supported barriers/facilitators at patient, treatment, condition, healthcare team/system, and social/economic levels. Specifically, patient-related factors (i.e., psychological functioning and beliefs about disease and treatment) and social-related factors (i.e., family functioning) were major determinants of adolescent adherence. Few studies were conducted, and inconsistent findings were displayed for other dimensions (i.e., healthcare team/system, treatment, and condition-related factors). Adherence is a complex and multidetermined phenomenon. More research is needed to provide critical insights for policymakers and healthcare professionals in planning practices and interventions that effectively address meaningful barriers/facilitators of adolescents' adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ágata Salvador
- HEI-Lab, Lusófona University, Lisbon, Portugal
- Research Center for Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Maria Moura
- Research Center for Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carla Crespo
- Research Center for Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Luísa Barros
- Research Center for Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dang TH, Forkan ARM, Wickramasinghe N, Jayaraman PP, Alexander M, Burbury K, Schofield P. Investigation of intervention solutions to enhance adherence to oral anti-cancer medicines in adults: an overview of reviews (Preprint). JMIR Cancer 2021; 8:e34833. [PMID: 35475978 PMCID: PMC9096640 DOI: 10.2196/34833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adherence to anticancer medicines is critical for the success of cancer treatments; however, nonadherence remains challenging, and there is limited evidence of interventions to improve adherence to medicines in patients with cancer. Objective This overview of reviews aimed to identify and summarize available reviews of interventions to improve adherence to oral anticancer medicines in adult cancer survivors. Methods A comprehensive search of 7 electronic databases was conducted by 2 reviewers who independently conducted the study selection, quality assessment using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2, and data extraction. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist was adapted to report the results. Results A total of 29 reviews were included in the narrative synthesis. The overall quality of the systematic reviews was low. The 4 main strategies to promote adherence were focused on education, reminders, behavior and monitoring, and multicomponent approaches. Digital technology–based interventions were reported in most reviews (27/29, 93%). A few interventions applied theories (10/29, 34%), design frameworks (2/29, 7%), or engaged stakeholders (1/29, 3%) in the development processes. The effectiveness of interventions was inconsistent between and within reviews. However, interventions using multiple strategies to promote adherence were more likely to be effective than single-strategy interventions (12/29, 41% reviews). Unidirectional communication (7/29, 24% reviews) and technology alone (11/29, 38% reviews) were not sufficient to demonstrate improvement in adherence outcomes. Nurses and pharmacists played a critical role in promoting patient adherence to oral cancer therapies, especially with the support of digital technologies (7/29, 24% reviews). Conclusions Multicomponent interventions are potentially effective in promoting patient adherence to oral anticancer medicines. The seamless integration of digital solutions with direct clinical contacts is likely to be effective in promoting adherence. Future research for developing comprehensive digital adherence interventions should be evidence-based, theory-based, and rigorously evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thu Ha Dang
- Department of Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Abdur Rahim Mohammad Forkan
- Digital Innovation Lab, School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nilmini Wickramasinghe
- Department Health and Bio Statistics, School of Health Sciences and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Prem Prakash Jayaraman
- Digital Innovation Lab, School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marliese Alexander
- Pharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kate Burbury
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Digital and Healthcare Innovation, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Psychology, and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Skeens MA, Dietrich MS, Ryan-Wenger N, Gilmer MJ, Mulvaney SA, Foster Akard T. Transplantation and Adherence: Evaluating Tacrolimus Usage in Pediatric Patients With Cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2020; 24:E57-E64. [PMID: 32945801 DOI: 10.1188/20.cjon.e57-e64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Researchers have estimated that about 50% of pediatric patients with chronic illness adhere to tacrolimus therapy, a medication responsible for preventing critical side effects in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to describe patient adherence to tacrolimus by reviewing documentation from the electronic health record and therapeutic drug levels. METHODS This retrospective descriptive study examined 357 clinic visits by 57 patients undergoing HSCT. Direct (tacrolimus levels) and indirect (subjective reporting) measures were evaluated. FINDINGS The authors found that, in 51% of visits, adherence was not documented. The overall nontherapeutic drug level rate was 60%. Because of the small sample size, nonadherence did not statistically correlate with nontherapeutic levels. The findings highlight the need for adherence awareness, assessment, and documentation in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bérard S, Morel S, Teasdale E, Shivappa N, Hebert JR, Laverdière C, Sinnett D, Levy E, Marcil V. Diet Quality Is Associated with Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Survivors of Childhood Leukemia. Nutrients 2020; 12:nu12072137. [PMID: 32708379 PMCID: PMC7400871 DOI: 10.3390/nu12072137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
There is little information about how diet influences the health of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (cALL) survivors. This study explores the associations between diet quality indices, cardiometabolic health indicators and inflammatory biomarkers among cALL survivors. Participants were part of the PETALE study (n = 241, median age: 21.7 years). Adherence to 6 dietary scores and caloric intake from ultra-processed foods were calculated. Multivariate logistirac regressions, Student t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests were performed. We found that 88% of adults and 46% of children adhered poorly to the Mediterranean diet, 36.9% had poor adherence to the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations and 76.3% had a diet to be improved according to the HEI-2015 score. On average, ultra-processed foods accounted for 51% of total energy intake. Low HDL-C was associated with a more inflammatory diet (E-DIITM score) and higher intake of ultra-processed foods. A greater E-DII score was associated with elevated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and consumption of ultra-processed foods was correlated with high triglycerides. Circulating levels of TNF-α, adiponectin and IL-6 were influenced by diet quality indices, while CRP and leptin were not. In conclusion, survivors of cALL have poor adherence to dietary recommendations, adversely affecting their cardiometabolic health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Bérard
- Research Centre, Sainte-Justine University Health Center, Department of Nutrition, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada; (S.B.); (S.M.); (E.T.); (E.L.)
- Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Sophia Morel
- Research Centre, Sainte-Justine University Health Center, Department of Nutrition, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada; (S.B.); (S.M.); (E.T.); (E.L.)
- Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Emma Teasdale
- Research Centre, Sainte-Justine University Health Center, Department of Nutrition, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada; (S.B.); (S.M.); (E.T.); (E.L.)
| | - Nitin Shivappa
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; (N.S.); (J.R.H.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - James R. Hebert
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; (N.S.); (J.R.H.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Caroline Laverdière
- Research Centre, Sainte-Justine University Health Center, Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada; (C.L.); (D.S.)
| | - Daniel Sinnett
- Research Centre, Sainte-Justine University Health Center, Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada; (C.L.); (D.S.)
| | - Emile Levy
- Research Centre, Sainte-Justine University Health Center, Department of Nutrition, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada; (S.B.); (S.M.); (E.T.); (E.L.)
- Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Valérie Marcil
- Research Centre, Sainte-Justine University Health Center, Department of Nutrition, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada; (S.B.); (S.M.); (E.T.); (E.L.)
- Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-514-345-4931 (ext. 3272)
| |
Collapse
|