1
|
Kurzawa-Akanbi M, Tzoumas N, Corral-Serrano JC, Guarascio R, Steel DH, Cheetham ME, Armstrong L, Lako M. Pluripotent stem cell-derived models of retinal disease: Elucidating pathogenesis, evaluating novel treatments, and estimating toxicity. Prog Retin Eye Res 2024; 100:101248. [PMID: 38369182 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2024.101248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Blindness poses a growing global challenge, with approximately 26% of cases attributed to degenerative retinal diseases. While gene therapy, optogenetic tools, photosensitive switches, and retinal prostheses offer hope for vision restoration, these high-cost therapies will benefit few patients. Understanding retinal diseases is therefore key to advance effective treatments, requiring in vitro models replicating pathology and allowing quantitative assessments for drug discovery. Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) provide a unique solution given their limitless supply and ability to differentiate into light-responsive retinal tissues encompassing all cell types. This review focuses on the history and current state of photoreceptor and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cell generation from PSCs. We explore the applications of this technology in disease modelling, experimental therapy testing, biomarker identification, and toxicity studies. We consider challenges in scalability, standardisation, and reproducibility, and stress the importance of incorporating vasculature and immune cells into retinal organoids. We advocate for high-throughput automation in data acquisition and analyses and underscore the value of advanced micro-physiological systems that fully capture the interactions between the neural retina, RPE, and choriocapillaris.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bogan CM, Kaczmarek JV, Pierce JM, Chen SC, Boyd KL, Calcutt MW, Bridges TM, Lindsley CW, Nadelmann JB, Liao A, Hsieh T, Abramson DH, Francis JH, Friedman DL, Richmond A, Daniels AB. Evaluation of intravitreal topotecan dose levels, toxicity and efficacy for retinoblastoma vitreous seeds: a preclinical and clinical study. Br J Ophthalmol 2021; 106:288-296. [PMID: 33972235 PMCID: PMC8788260 DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Current melphalan-based intravitreal regimens for retinoblastoma (RB) vitreous seeds cause retinal toxicity. We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of topotecan monotherapy compared with melphalan in our rabbit model and patient cohort. Methods Rabbit experiments: empiric pharmacokinetics were determined following topotecan injection. For topotecan (15 μg or 30 µg), melphalan (12.5 µg) or saline, toxicity was evaluated by serial electroretinography (ERG) and histopathology, and efficacy against vitreous seed xenografts was measured by tumour cell reduction and apoptosis induction. Patients: retrospective cohort study of 235 patients receiving 990 intravitreal injections of topotecan or melphalan. Results Intravitreal topotecan 30 µg (equals 60 µg in humans) achieved the IC90 across the rabbit vitreous. Three weekly topotecan injections (either 15 µg or 30 µg) caused no retinal toxicity in rabbits, whereas melphalan 12.5 µg (equals 25 µg in humans) reduced ERG amplitudes 42%–79%. Intravitreal topotecan 15 µg was equally effective to melphalan to treat WERI-Rb1 cell xenografts in rabbits (96% reduction for topotecan vs saline (p=0.004), 88% reduction for melphalan vs saline (p=0.004), topotecan vs melphalan, p=0.15). In our clinical study, patients received 881 monotherapy injections (48 topotecan, 833 melphalan). Patients receiving 20 µg or 30 µg topotecan demonstrated no significant ERG reductions; melphalan caused ERG reductions of 7.6 μV for every injection of 25 µg (p=0.03) or 30 µg (p<0.001). Most patients treated with intravitreal topotecan also received intravitreal melphalan at some point during their treatment course. Among those eyes treated exclusively with topotecan monotherapy, all eyes were salvaged. Conclusions Taken together, these experiments suggest that intravitreal topotecan monotherapy for the treatment of RB vitreous seeds is non-toxic and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carley M Bogan
- Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jessica V Kaczmarek
- Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Janene M Pierce
- Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sheau-Chiann Chen
- Center for Quantitative Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kelli L Boyd
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Thomas M Bridges
- Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Craig W Lindsley
- Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Albert Liao
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Terry Hsieh
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - David H Abramson
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jasmine H Francis
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Debra L Friedman
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ann Richmond
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Program in Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Anthony B Daniels
- Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA .,Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Program in Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|