Thiotepa-melphalan myeloablative therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma

To transplant, or not to transplant? That is the question. A patient advocate evaluation of autologous stem cell transplant in neuroblastoma

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been a mainstay of high-risk neuroblastoma treatment for several decades, demonstrating improvements in event-free survival but with risks of serious or even life-threatening acute toxicities, severe long-term adverse health effects for survivors, and ongoing contention regarding overall survival benefit. The merits of ASCT in the modern era of immunotherapy are a source of debate among parents, advocates, and some physicians. Here we examine evidence for and against ASCT, explore parent attitudes and their turmoil over decision-making, and strongly encourage international research consortia to develop a coordinated strategy to accelerate progress toward a future that avoids the routine use of ASCT in high-risk neuroblastoma.

Oral Metronomic Maintenance Therapy Can Improve Survival in High-Risk Neuroblastoma Patients Not Treated with ASCT or Anti-GD2 Antibodies

Simple Summary

Low-dose metronomic chemotherapy has anti-angiogenic activity and inhibits tumor growth. Therefore, we investigated the benefits of low-dose metronomic maintenance therapy (MT) in high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) patients who are unable to undergo autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or anti-GD2 antibody therapy. A total of 217 high-risk NB patients were enrolled. One hundred and eighty-five (85%) had a complete/very good partial remission/partial remission (CR/VGPR/PR) to treatment, of them, 167 patients with stage 4, that did or did not receive oral metronomic MT, 3 years of event-free survival (EFS) were 42.5% versus 29.4%, and overall survival (OS) was 71.1% versus 59.4%, respectively. Totally, 117 high-risk patients with oral metronomic MT had an EFS rate of 42.7%. The results were similar to those of ASCT from other studies. The toxicities of metronomic MT were lower. Our study showed that oral metronomic MT is an optimal option for high-risk NB patients without ASCT or anti-GD2 antibody therapy.

Abstract

Despite aggressive treatment, the prognosis of high-risk NB patients is still poor. This retrospective study investigated the benefits of metronomic maintenance treatment (MT) in high-risk NB patients without ASCT or GD2 antibody therapy. Patients aged ≤ 21 years with newly diagnosed high-risk NB were included. Patients with complete/very good partial remission (CR/VGPR/PR) to conventional treatment received, or not, oral metronomic MT for 1 year. Two hundred and seventeen high-risk NB patients were enrolled. One hundred and eighty-five (85%) had a CR/VGPR/PR to conventional treatment, of the patients with stage 4, 106 receiving and 61 not receiving oral metronomic MT, and the 3-year event-free survival (EFS) rate was 42.5 ± 5.1% and 29.6 ± 6%, respectively (p = 0.017), and overall survival (OS) rate was 71.1 ± 4.7% and 59.4 ± 6.4%, respectively (p = 0.022). A total of 117 high-risk patients with oral metronomic MT had EFS rate of 42.7 ± 4.8%. The toxicity of MT was mild. For high-risk NB patients without ASCT or anti-GD2 antibody therapy, stage 4, MYCN amplication and patients with stage 4 not receiving oral metronomic MT after CR/VGPR/PR were independent adverse prognostic factors. Oral metronomic MT can improve survival in high-risk NB patients in CR/VGPR/PR without ASCT or anti-GD2 antibodies therapy.