Cancer incidence and survival trends among infants in the United States from 1975 to 2014

Causal Relationship between Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin and Risk of Neuroblastoma: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

BACKGROUND

The causal relationship between sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and neuroblastoma remains unknown. This study aimed to explore the causality between SHBG and the risk of neuroblastoma using bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study.

METHODS

Instrumental variables associated with SHBG were obtained from the genome-wide association study (GWAS) of European containing 214,989 females and 185,221 males from the UK Biobank. Summary-level data for neuroblastoma were derived from the IEU OpenGWAS project with 1,627 patients and 3,254 controls. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method served as the primary analytic tool.

RESULTS

The IVW method revealed a significant positive causal relationship between male SHBG and the risk of neuroblastoma [OR, 2.169; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.207-3.897; P = 0.010]. Conversely, female SHBG showed no significant causal link with neuroblastoma (IVW OR, 1.004; 95% CI, 0.542-1.860; P = 0.990). No significant reverse causality was detected. Sensitivity analyses validated these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated SHBG levels in males, but not in females, can causally increase the risk of neuroblastoma. This gender-specific effect indicates a potential differential role of SHBG in the etiology of neuroblastoma. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this gender disparity. Monitoring SHBG levels, especially in males, could be pivotal in neuroblastoma risk assessment and management.

IMPACT

This study highlights a novel gender-specific aspect in the risk of neuroblastoma, emphasizing the potential role of male SHBG levels in neuroblastoma incidence, and sets the stage for targeted preventative strategies and further investigation into gender-based biological mechanisms.

Counts, incidence rates, and trends of pediatric cancer in the United States, 2003-2019

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a leading cause of death by disease among children and adolescents in the United States. This study updates cancer incidence rates and trends using the most recent and comprehensive US cancer registry data available.

METHODS

We used data from US Cancer Statistics to evaluate counts, age-adjusted incidence rates, and trends among children and adolescents younger than 20 years of age diagnosed with malignant tumors between 2003 and 2019. We calculated the average annual percent change (APC) and APC using joinpoint regression. Rates and trends were stratified by demographic and geographic characteristics and by cancer type.

RESULTS

With 248 749 cases reported between 2003 and 2019, the overall cancer incidence rate was 178.3 per 1 million; incidence rates were highest for leukemia (46.6), central nervous system neoplasms (30.8), and lymphoma (27.3). Rates were highest for males, children 0 to 4 years of age, Non-Hispanic White children and adolescents, those in the Northeast census region, the top 25% of counties by economic status, and metropolitan counties with a population of 1 million people or more. Although the overall incidence rate of pediatric cancer increased 0.5% per year on average between 2003 and 2019, the rate increased between 2003 and 2016 (APC = 1.1%), and then decreased between 2016 and 2019 (APC = -2.1%). Between 2003 and 2019, rates of leukemia, lymphoma, hepatic tumors, bone tumors, and thyroid carcinomas increased, while melanoma rates decreased. Rates of central nervous system neoplasms increased until 2017, and then decreased. Rates of other cancer types remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of pediatric cancer increased overall, although increases were limited to certain cancer types. These findings may guide future public health and research priorities.

Clinical pharmacology of cytotoxic drugs in neonates and infants: Providing evidence-based dosing guidance

Cancer in neonates and infants is a rare but challenging entity. Treatment is complicated by marked physiological changes during the first year of life, excess rates of toxicity, mortality, and late effects. Dose optimisation of chemotherapeutics may be an important step to improving outcomes. Body size–based dosing is used for most anticancer drugs used in infants. However, dose regimens are generally not evidence based, and dosing strategies are frequently inconsistent between tumour types and treatment protocols. In this review, we collate available pharmacological evidence supporting dosing regimens in infants for a wide range of cytotoxic drugs. A systematic review was conducted, and available data ranked by a level of evidence (1–5) and a grade of recommendation (A–D) provided on a consensus basis, with recommended dosing approaches indicated as appropriate. For 9 of 29 drugs (busulfan, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, etoposide, fludarabine, isotretinoin, melphalan and vincristine), grade A was scored, indicating sufficient pharmacological evidence to recommend a dosing algorithm for infants. For busulfan and carboplatin, sufficient data were available to recommend therapeutic drug monitoring in infants. For eight drugs (actinomycin D, blinatumomab, dinutuximab, doxorubicin, mercaptopurine, pegaspargase, thioguanine and topotecan), some pharmacological evidence was available to guide dosing (graded as B). For the remaining drugs, including commonly used agents such as cisplatin, cytarabine, ifosfamide, and methotrexate, pharmacological evidence for dosing in infants was limited or non-existent: grades C and D were scored for 10 and 2 drugs, respectively. The review provides clinically relevant evidence-based dosing guidance for cytotoxic drugs in neonates and infants.

•

Treating cancer in neonates and infants is challenging.

•

Dose optimisation of cytotoxic drugs is an important step to improving outcomes.

•

Clinical pharmacological evidence supporting dosing regimens in infants was collated.

•

All available pharmacological evidence was ranked by a level of evidence.

•

A grade of recommendation was derived and a recommended dose per agent provided.

Prognostic Value of c-MYC Expression in Patients with Peripheral Neuroblastic Tumors

Objective

Neuroblastic tumors are the most common solid tumors in children. The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic value of immunostaining for cellular-myelocytomatosis viral oncogene (c-MYC) expression in patients with peripheral neuroblastic tumors (NTs).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted to compare the expression of c-MYC detected by immunohistochemistry and v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene neuroblastoma derived homolog (MYCN) by fluorescence in situ hybridization among 177 cases of NTs and determine the associations of c-MYC and MYCN with the clinical stages, morphological types, and survival rates of NTs.

Results

The cases positive for c-MYC were mainly the favorable histology type in stage 3 or 4 with a poor NT prognosis, but no morphological changes related to the poor prognosis were observed in their samples under a microscope. The cases with positive c-MYC expression did not overlap those with MYCN amplification.

Conclusion

Positive c-MYC expression portends a poor prognosis in patients with NTs.