Efficacy of ready-to-use therapeutic food in malnourished children with cancer: Results of a randomized, open-label phase 3 trial

Curing pediatric cancer: A global view. Examples from acute lymphoblastic leukemia

There is a substantial difference in observed survival among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in high‐income countries versus those in low‐ and middle‐income countries. This gap can be reduced considerably by multilevel investing in health systems and services with innovative frameworks such as implementation science.

Clinician perspectives on nutritional impairment in children undergoing cancer chemotherapy in Thailand: A qualitative descriptive study

Objective

This study aimed to explore the perspectives of pediatric oncology clinicians in Thailand on children's gastrointestinal ​symptoms, eating habits, and nutrition during cancer chemotherapy. Additionally, it sought to identify factors influencing children's nutritional status, including the characteristics of the children, clinician-related factors, and hospital-level factors.

Methods

The study involved pediatric oncology clinicians working at a tertiary hospital in Bangkok. Data were collected through interviews, focusing on three key areas: (1) children's gastrointestinal symptoms, eating behaviors, and nutrition, (2) clinicians' cognitions and behaviors that impact children's nutrition, and (3) environmental factors. Each participating clinician also identified a colleague who could offer additional perspectives. Interviews were conducted in the Thai language and analyzed using directed content analysis.

Results

A total of 22 participants were enrolled in the study, comprising sixteen nurses, four physicians, one child life specialist, and one Hospital Nutrition Service staff member. The majority of participants were female (95.4%), with an average age of 37.77 years and an average of 15.55 years of experience in caring for children with cancer. Factors influencing children's nutritional status included the children's cancer diagnosis, treatment exposures, and symptoms. Clinicians attributed changes in children's weight and eating patterns to these symptoms. Influential clinician-related factors included current practices that impacted children's symptoms and food intake. Hospital-level factors included both direct influences on children and those arising from clinical practices.

Conclusions

To optimize the nutritional status of Thai children undergoing chemotherapy, multi-level interventions are needed. These interventions should target children's symptoms, clinician knowledge, role norms, and address issues related to the hospital environment, specifically those elements that contribute to unpleasant experiences.

Role of Nutrition in Pediatric Patients with Cancer

Children with cancer are at high risk for developing short-term and long-term nutritional problems related to their underlying disease and side effects of multimodal treatments. Nutritional status (NS) can influence several clinical outcomes, such as overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), treatment tolerance, risk of developing infections and quality of life (QoL). However, the importance of nutrition in children with cancer is still underestimated. This review focuses on alterations of NS that occurs in children during cancer treatment. In particular, we reviewed the pathogenesis of undernutrition in oncological children, as well as how NS affects treatment tolerance and response, the immune system and the risk of infections of children with cancer. Thanks to recent advances in all types of supportive therapy and to the progress of knowledge on this topic, it has been realized that NS is a modifiable prognostic factor that can be intervened upon to improve the outcome of these patients. Currently, there is a lack of a systematic approach and standard recommendations for nutritional care in the pediatric cancer population. Literature analysis showed that it is essential to define the NS and treat any alterations in a timely manner ensuring proper growth and development. Nutritional follow-up should become an integral part of the care pathway. Regular nutritional monitoring should be performed at diagnosis, during treatment and during follow-up. A close collaboration and sharing of expertise between pediatric oncologists and nutrition specialists, combined with careful and participatory sharing of the feeding experience with the family and the child (after age 6 years), is strongly required.

Malnutrition screening and treatment in pediatric oncology: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition and cachexia during pediatric cancer treatment worsen toxicity and quality-of-life. Clinical practice varies with lack of standard malnutrition definition and nutrition interventions. This scoping review highlights available malnutrition screening and intervention data in childhood cancer and the need for standardizing assessment and treatment.

METHODS

Ovid Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies containing malnutrition as the primary outcome with anthropometric, radiographic, or biochemical measurements. Secondary outcomes included validated nutritional assessment or screening tools. Two authors reviewed full manuscripts for inclusion. Narrative analysis was chosen over statistical analysis due to study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The search yielded 234 articles and 17 articles identified from reference searching. Nine met inclusion criteria with six nutritional intervention studies (examining appetite stimulants, nutrition supplementation, and proactive feeding tubes) and three nutritional screening studies (algorithms or nutrition support teams) each with variable measures and outcomes. Both laboratory evaluations (albumin, prealbumin, total protein) and body measurement (weight loss, mid-upper arm circumference) were used. Studies demonstrated improved weight, without difference between formula or appetite stimulant used. Screening studies yielded mixed results on preventing weight loss, weight gain, and survival.

CONCLUSION

Our review demonstrated a paucity of evidence for malnutrition screening and intervention in pediatric cancer treatment. While a variety of malnutrition outcomes, interventions, and screening tools exist, nutritional interventions increased weight and decreased complications. Screening tools decreased malnutrition risk and may improve weight gain. Potential age- and disease-specific nutritional benefits and toxicities also exist, further highlighting the benefit of standardizing malnutrition definitions, screening, and interventions.

Addition of arm anthropometry to body mass index for age, but not serum albumin, improves the accuracy of the nutritional assessment in severely and moderately malnourished children with cancer

Arm anthropometry is a more sensitive measure of nutritional status than body mass index for age (BMI) in children with cancer, but the added utility of serum albumin remains uncertain. Concordance was determined among four forms of classifying nutritional status in a cohort of undernourished children with cancer: method 1: BMI-for-age Z score; method 2: method 1 + mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) percentile; method 3: method 2 + triceps skinfold thickness (TSFT) percentile; and method 4: method 3 + serum albumin. Concordance was highest between methods 2 and 3, followed closely by 3 and 4, indicating that addition of arm anthropometry, but not serum albumin, to BMI increased the sensitivity of baseline nutritional assessment.

Impact of a pediatric oncology nutrition program: Lessons learnt over a decade

BACKGROUND

The management of malnutrition in children with cancer remains a challenge in low-middle-income countries (LMICs). We describe our pediatric oncology nutrition program and its impact over the past decade.

METHODS

We evaluated the impact of our nutrition program in accordance with the International Society of Paediatric Oncology-Paediatric Oncology in Developing Countries (SIOP PODC) Nutritional Program Evaluation in the areas of service delivery (number served, increments in delivery, number of trained care providers), patients at-risk (proportion identified with malnutrition at diagnosis/follow-up), and efficiency of nutritional interventions (proportion assessed, proportion achieved healthy weight, clinicians trained). We analyzed available data for trends between 2009 and 2020, and comparisons were made using the Fisher t test. This study was approved by our institutional ethics committee.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2020, 17 749 children treated at our center were beneficiaries of the nutritional program, including assessment and intervention. During this period, trained pediatric nutritionists increased from 2 to 8; SIOP PODC level from 2 to 3-4, and nutrition budget increased 15-fold. At diagnosis (n = 5618) and six-month follow-up (n = 2674), 59.6% and 51.2% children were undernourished, 34.8% and 43% well nourished, and 4.7% and 5.7% overnourished. From 2016 onward, fewer children were undernourished at follow-up-69.5% (2016), 60% (2018), 54% (2019), and 55% (2020, P < 0.001). The program helped train over 500 clinicians in nutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved financial support and capacity building have helped build and sustain an effective nutrition program. Priority areas include implementation of best practices, early nutritional intervention, continued education, and locally relevant research.