1
|
Robles JM, Ruiz J, Correa R, Dinescu-Munoz N, Patel C, Noyd D, Alvarez M, Frost E, Ledbetter L, LeBlanc TW. The impact of language discordance on pediatric cancer care outcomes: A systematic review. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2024:e31338. [PMID: 39323048 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.31338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2024] [Revised: 08/23/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
Language discordance between clinicians and families in pediatrics has been associated with adverse events and lower quality of care. We aimed to summarize the existing literature evaluating the impact of language discordance among healthcare professionals and families within pediatric oncology by conducting a systematic review. Of 8364 studies, 43 studies met eligibility for inclusion in this review. These studies highlight the impact of language discordance on pediatric cancer care outcomes, including communication challenges, obstacles to research participation, and potentially higher risk disease features at presentation. Healthcare professionals endorsed inconsistent professional interpreter use and lack of formal training on communicating via interpreters. Interventions to address barriers to language-appropriate care are sparse. Further research is warranted to design and implement interventions promoting language justice and provision of high-quality, equitable pediatric cancer care for all families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Robles
- Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jenny Ruiz
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ramon Correa
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Nicole Dinescu-Munoz
- Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida School of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Chandni Patel
- Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida School of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - David Noyd
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital/University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Monica Alvarez
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Erin Frost
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Leila Ledbetter
- Medical Center Library, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Thomas W LeBlanc
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carpenter K, Revette AC, Scavotto M, Mack JW, Greenzang KA. "A very difficult conversation": Challenges and opportunities for improvement in pediatric oncology clinician communication about late effects. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2024; 71:e31093. [PMID: 38840425 PMCID: PMC11282450 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.31093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Current approaches to communicating the potential late effects of pediatric oncology treatments leave many patients and families feeling unaware of risks and unprepared for the future. We aimed to identify provider perspectives on early communication about late effects. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with pediatric oncology providers at Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center from December 2021 to March 2022. Purposeful sampling ensured a diversity of clinical roles. Thematic analysis was conducted using deductive and inductive codes. RESULTS We interviewed nine pediatric oncology providers; all expressed discomfort discussing potential late effects in early treatment conversations. Barriers to late effects communication included (i) social-emotional factors, including lack of perceived importance to families, worry about emotional burden on families, and provider feelings of helplessness/wanting to provide hope; and (ii) suboptimal set-up/resources, including limitations of consent forms, time constraints, and lack of available data. All providers supported the creation of a communication tool to assist early discussions of late effects. CONCLUSIONS Communicating about late effect risks poses unique challenges to providers because of the perceived impact on families and the limitations of current practices and available resources. These findings support the need for a late effects communication tool to assist in early communication about late effects risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna C. Revette
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Madison Scavotto
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katie A. Greenzang
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beauchemin MP, Ortega M, Santacroce SJ, Robles JM, Ruiz J, Hall AG, Kahn JM, Fu C, Orjuela-Grimm M, Hillyer GC, Solomon S, Pelletier W, Montiel-Esparza R, Blazin LJ, Kline C, Seif AE, Aristizabal P, Winestone LE, Velez MC. Clinical trial recruitment of people who speak languages other than English: a Children's Oncology Group report. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae047. [PMID: 38889291 PMCID: PMC11272047 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persons who speak languages other than English are underrepresented in clinical trials, likely in part because of inadequate multilevel resources. We conducted a survey of institutions affiliated with the Children's Oncology Group (COG) to characterize current research recruitment practices and resources regarding translation and interpretation services. METHODS In October 2022, a 20-item survey was distributed electronically to institutions affiliated with COG to assess consent practices and resources for recruiting participants who speak languages other than English to COG trials. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses; responses were compared by institution size and type as well as respondent role. RESULTS The survey was sent to 230 institutions, and the response rate was 60% (n = 139). In total, 60% (n = 83) of those respondents had access to short-form consent forms. Full consent form translation was required at 50% of institutions, and 12% of institutional review boards restricted use of centrally translated consent forms. Forty-six percent (n = 64) of institutions reported insufficient funding to support translation costs; 19% (n = 26) had access to no-cost translation services. Forty-four percent (n = 61) were required to use in-person interpreters for consent discussions; the most frequently cited barrier (56%) to obtaining consent was lack of available in-person interpreters. Forty-seven percent (n = 65) reported that recruiting persons who speak languages other than English to clinical trials was somewhat or very difficult. CONCLUSIONS Institutions affiliated with COG face resource-specific challenges that impede recruitment of participants who speak languages other than English for clinical trials. These findings indicate an urgent need to identify strategies aimed at reducing recruitment barriers to ensure equitable access to clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa P Beauchemin
- Division of Research and Scholarship, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Ortega
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sheila J Santacroce
- School of Nursing and Linberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Joanna M Robles
- Pediatric Oncology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jenny Ruiz
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anurekha G Hall
- University of Washington School of Medicine and Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Justine M Kahn
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Pediatric Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Cecilia Fu
- Keck School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Manuela Orjuela-Grimm
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Pediatric Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Grace C Hillyer
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samrawit Solomon
- Division of Research and Scholarship, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Lindsay J Blazin
- Division of Oncology, Riley Children’s Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Cassie Kline
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alix E Seif
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Paula Aristizabal
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego/Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego and Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Lena E Winestone
- Division of Allergy, Immunology & BMT, University of California San Francisco Benioff Children’s Hospitals, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maria C Velez
- Children’s Hospital New Orleans/Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ouyang N, Feder SL, Baker JN, Knobf MT. Prognostic Communication Between Parents and Clinicians in Pediatric Oncology: An Integrative Review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2024; 41:545-557. [PMID: 37309610 DOI: 10.1177/10499091231183107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Prognostic communication between clinicians and parents in pediatric oncology is complex. However, no review has exclusively examined research on prognostic communication in pediatric oncology. In this review, we synthesize the evidence on prognostic communication in pediatric oncology and provide recommendations for future research. Methods: We conducted an integrative review searching six databases for studies on prognostic communication in pediatric oncology as of August 2022. We applied descriptive and narrative approaches to data analysis. Results: Fourteen quantitative and five qualitative studies were included. All studies were conducted in Western developed countries. In total, 804 parents of 770 children with cancer were included. Across studies, parents were predominately female, Non-Hispanic White, and had high school or higher levels of education. Most parents reported that prognostic communication was initiated in the first year after their children's diagnosis. High-quality prognostic communication was positively associated with trust and hope and negatively associated with parental distress and decisional regret. In qualitative studies, parents suggested that prognostic communication should be open, ongoing, and delivered with sensitivity. Most studies were of moderate quality. The main gaps included inconsistent definitions of prognostic communication, and a lack of comprehensive and validated measurements, high-quality longitudinal studies, and diverse settings and participants. Conclusions: Clinicians should initiate high-quality prognostic communication early on in clinical practice. Future research should consider conducting high-quality longitudinal studies, developing prognostic communication definitions and measurements, and conducting studies across settings with diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Ouyang
- School of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, CT, USA
| | - Shelli L Feder
- School of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, CT, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Justin N Baker
- Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - M Tish Knobf
- School of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abu-Odah H, Chan EA, Molassiotis A. Factors Impacting on Patient-Centered Communication Skills and Their Opportunities to Be Involved in Decision-making From the Perspective of Patients With Cancer, Informal Caregivers, and/or Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review. Cancer Nurs 2024:00002820-990000000-00246. [PMID: 38652461 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active participation of cancer patients and their caregivers in decision-making, along with high-quality communication, is crucial in patient-centered cancer management. Although numerous factors affecting patients' communication and decision-making involvement have been identified, it is still unclear which ones are the most prevalent and critical. OBJECTIVE To identify factors that contribute to high-quality patient-centered communication and decision-making participation from the perspectives of cancer patients, informal caregivers, and/or healthcare professionals. METHODS A systematic review was conducted, using 9 databases to retrieve primary research articles published from 2010 to February 17, 2023, updated on December 13, 2023. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (version 18). The socioecological model of communication was utilized as analytical framework for summarizing the results. RESULTS Fifty-two studies were included. The most frequently reported factors were predominantly articulated at the individual, interpersonal, and societal levels. Although the patients' lack of knowledge and limited language proficiency were the frequent patient-level barriers, the perceived lack of knowledge and lack of training of professionals were the crucial and current professional-level barriers, as reported in studies published in 2016 onward. To circumvent these factors, it is critical to enhance professionals' knowledge, communication skills, and patient relationships. CONCLUSIONS Recognizing barriers and facilitators could help in the development of strategies to overcome these barriers and enhance patient participation in clinical communication. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE The findings could guide the development of programs to enhance patient-professional communication skills. Further cross-cultural studies are needed to understand culture's impact on communication effectiveness and decision-making participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hammoda Abu-Odah
- Author Affiliations: School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR (Dr Abu-Odah and Prof. Chan); and College of Arts, Humanities and Education, University of Derby, Derby, UK (Prof. Molassiotis)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Iweka E, Holmes S. Addressing the communication needs of cancer patients for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) investigations-A phenomenological study on the experiences of MRI radiographers. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:6-12. [PMID: 37864988 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A higher demand in MRI services could increase the pressure on MRI departments to increase scanning efficiency. This presents the risk of downplaying person-centred care especially for cancer patients with increased communication needs that result from anxiety associated with the nature of their disease. This study explored the experiences of MRI radiographers in addressing the communication needs of cancer patients attending for MRI examinations. METHODS The study adopted a descriptive phenomenological methodology. Single contact interviews were conducted on eight MRI specialist radiographers, and these were recorded and transcribed using Microsoft Teams conferencing platform. Thematic analysis of the transcribed data was done through an inductive approach, breaking down the data into meaningful codes and thereafter, into themes and sub-themes. RESULTS Common themes generated from the interview data included: identified communication needs, approach to communication needs, support for radiographers and factors affecting communication. Experiences of MRI radiographers indicated increased communication needs in anxious cancer patients and approaches adopted in addressing these were mainly through listening and use of empathetic gestures. Some radiographers admitted to using "blocking" strategies to avoid being drawn into emotionally exhausting conversations. Both intrinsic factors such as radiographers' personality and experience; and extrinsic factors such as time constraints, demanding workload, inadequate staffing, and skill mix were noted to influenced MRI radiographers in addressing these communication needs. CONCLUSION Cancer patients can present with communication needs due to anxieties related to their disease. For the radiographer to deal with these needs, adequate support is needed, and necessary steps taken to address the identified influencing factors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE MRI departments should encourage enabling environment and services that address communication needs of patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Iweka
- Research/Clinical Trials, Radiology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
| | - S Holmes
- Scottish Academy of Breast Imaging (SABI), Glasgow, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Özdemir Koyu H, Algül G, Kilicarslan Törüner E. Realities and ideals: Experiences and needs of pediatric oncology nurses in communication processes with children and their families at the end-of-life period: A photovoice qualitative study. Nurs Health Sci 2023; 25:685-699. [PMID: 37931643 DOI: 10.1111/nhs.13062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Effective communication in end-of-life care for pediatric cancer patients is crucial. Yet, limited research focuses on the communication experiences of pediatric oncology nurses during this period. This study aims to investigate the communication experiences and needs of these nurses with children and their families during the end-of-life period. A qualitative study design with photo voice methodology was followed. The research was conducted with 16 pediatric oncology nurses working in the pediatric oncology wards of a university hospital between January and May 2023. Data were collected the "Characteristic Information Form", "Semi-Structured Interview Form", and photovoice methodology. Data were analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis. Most of the nurses are at the undergraduate level, and their working experience in pediatric oncology wards ranges from 4 months to 17 years. Seven main themes emerged: Optimistic Communication-Interaction, Mindfulness, Active Coping, Behavioral Actions, Death Uncertainty Dilemma, Interpersonal and Environmental Factors, and Discrepancy between Ideals and Reality. The study sheds light on the importance of pediatric oncology nurses' ideals versus realities upstream approach in communicating with end-of-life children and their families, empowering pediatric oncology nurses on the journey to ideal end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazal Özdemir Koyu
- Nursing Faculty Department of Pediatric Nursing, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gökce Algül
- Health Research and Application Center, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Graetz D, Ahmad A, Raza MR, Hameed A, Naheed A, Najmi A, tul Quanita A, Munir S, Ferrara G, Staples C, Rodriguez Galindo C, Hamid SA, Jeha S, Mack JW. Barriers and Facilitators of Quality Family-Centered Communication in Pakistan. JCO Glob Oncol 2023; 9:e2300178. [PMID: 38085038 PMCID: PMC10664852 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Communication is a fundamental aspect of patient- and family-centered care. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of evidence regarding pediatric cancer communication in low- and middle-income countries, where over 90% of all children with childhood cancer live. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators of quality communication within two pediatric cancer centers in Pakistan. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 multidisciplinary pediatric cancer clinicians and 18 caregivers of children with cancer at Children's Hospital of Lahore and Indus Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Interviews were conducted in English or Urdu, audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated to English. Two researchers coded each transcript using an inductively derived codebook. Thematic content analysis focused on barriers and facilitators of high-quality communication. RESULTS Pakistani clinicians and caregivers identified factors that affected the quality of patient-centered cancer communication. These included structural factors including setting, available interpreters, documentation, patient volume, teamwork, and financial support. Clinician-level communication barriers and facilitators included communication training, clinician distress/boundaries, and the ability to have recurrent conversations. Patient or family characteristics affecting communication included education, income status, primary language, and geography; the child's specific disease type; and relational elements such as social support, empowerment, and split decision makers. Participants identified existing or potential interventions related to each factor. CONCLUSION Multilevel factors serve as either barriers or facilitators for pediatric cancer communication in Pakistan. Identification of these elements of communication is an essential step toward interventions aimed at improving patient- and family-centered care in resource limited settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Graetz
- St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Alia Ahmad
- Children's Hospital Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gia Ferrara
- St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | | | | | | | - Sima Jeha
- St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boeriu E, Borda A, Miclea E, Boeriu AI, Vulcanescu DD, Bagiu IC, Horhat FG, Kovacs AF, Avram CR, Diaconu MM, Vlaicu LF, Sirb OD, Arghirescu ST. Prognosis Communication in Pediatric Oncology: A Systematic Review. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 10:972. [PMID: 37371204 DOI: 10.3390/children10060972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While communication plays an important role in medicine, it also often represents a challenge when the topic at hand is the prognosis of a high-risk condition. When it comes to pediatric oncology, the challenge becomes even greater for physicians who have to adapt their discourse to both the child and their family. METHODS Following the PRISMA guidelines, an advanced search on PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library was performed, from 1 January 2017 to 31 October 2022. Demographic data for caregivers, pediatric patients and physicians were extracted, as well as diagnosis, prognosis, presence at discussion, emotional states and impact on life, trust, decision roles, communication quality and other outcomes. RESULTS A total of 21 articles were analyzed. Most studies (17) focused on caregivers, while only seven and five studies were focused on children and physicians, respectively. Most parents reported high trust in their physicians (73.01%), taking the leading role in decision making (48%), moderate distress levels (46.68%), a strong desire for more information (78.64%), receiving high-quality information (56.71%) and communication (52.73%). Most children were not present at discussions (63.98%); however, their desire to know more was expressed in three studies. Moreover, only two studies observed children being involved in decision making. Most physicians had less than 20 years of experience (55.02%) and reported the use of both words and statistics (47.3%) as a communication method. CONCLUSIONS Communication research is focused more on caregivers, yet children may understand more than they seem capable of and want to be included in the conversation. More studies should focus on and quantify the opinions of children and their physicians. In order to improve the quality of communication, healthcare workers should receive professional training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estera Boeriu
- Department of Pediatrics, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, "Louis Turcanu" Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Iosif Nemoianu Street 2, 300011 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Alexandra Borda
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, "Louis Turcanu" Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Iosif Nemoianu Street 2, 300011 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Eunice Miclea
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, "Louis Turcanu" Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Iosif Nemoianu Street 2, 300011 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Amalia-Iulia Boeriu
- Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Klinikum Rechts der Isar Der Technischen, Universitat Munchen, Ismaninger Street 22, 81675 Munchen, Germany
| | - Dan Dumitru Vulcanescu
- Multidisciplinary Research Center on Antimicrobial Resistance (MULTI-REZ), Microbiology Department, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Iulia Cristina Bagiu
- Multidisciplinary Research Center on Antimicrobial Resistance (MULTI-REZ), Microbiology Department, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Florin George Horhat
- Multidisciplinary Research Center on Antimicrobial Resistance (MULTI-REZ), Microbiology Department, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Alexandra Flavia Kovacs
- Department of Oncology, Onco-Help Association, Ciprian Porumbescu Street 56-59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Cecilia Roberta Avram
- Department of Residential Training and Post-University Courses, "Vasile Goldis" Western University, Liviu Rebreanu Street 86, 310414 Arad, Romania
| | - Mircea Mihai Diaconu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Luiza Florina Vlaicu
- Department of Social Assistance, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, Western University, Vasile Parvan Boulevard 4, 300223 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Otniel Dorian Sirb
- Multidisciplinary Research Center on Antimicrobial Resistance (MULTI-REZ), Microbiology Department, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Eduard Pamfil Psychiatry Clinic Timisoara, Iancu Vacarescu Street 21, 300425 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Smaranda Teodora Arghirescu
- Department of Pediatrics, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, "Louis Turcanu" Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Iosif Nemoianu Street 2, 300011 Timisoara, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Oh AY, Rising CJ, Gaysynsky A, Tsakraklides S, Huang GC, Chou WYS, Blake KD, Vanderpool RC. Advancing multi-level health communication research: A Delphi study on barriers and opportunities. Transl Behav Med 2022; 12:1133-1145. [PMID: 36378100 PMCID: PMC9802573 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibac068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Adopting a multi-level perspective that considers the many interrelated contexts influencing health could make health communication interventions more effective and equitable. However, despite increasing interest in the use of multi-level approaches, multi-level health communication (MLHC) interventions are infrequently utilized. We therefore sought to conduct a modified Delphi study to better understand how researchers conceptualize MLHC interventions and identify opportunities for advancing MLHC work. Communication and health behavior experts were invited to complete two rounds of surveys about the characteristics, benefits, pitfalls, best practices, barriers, and facilitators of MLHC interventions; the role of technology in facilitating MLHC interventions; and ways to advance MLHC intervention research (46 experts completed the first survey, 44 completed both surveys). Survey data were analyzed using a mixed-methods approach. Panelists reached consensus on two components of the proposed definition of MLHC interventions and also put forward a set of best practices for these interventions. Panelists felt that most health intervention research could benefit from a multi-level approach, and generally agreed that MLHC approaches offered certain advantages over single-level approaches. However, they also expressed concern related to the time, cost, and complexity of MLHC interventions. Although panelists felt that technology could potentially support MLHC interventions, they also recognized the potential for technology to exacerbate disparities. Finally, panelists prioritized a set of methodological advances and practical supports that would be needed to facilitate future MLHC intervention research. The results of this study point to several future directions for the field, including advancing how interactions between levels are assessed, increasing the empirical evidence base demonstrating the advantages of MLHC interventions, and identifying best practices for the use of technology. The findings also suggest that researchers may need additional support to overcome the perceived practical challenges of conducting MLHC interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April Y Oh
- Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Camella J Rising
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Anna Gaysynsky
- Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
- ICF Next, ICF, Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | - Grace C Huang
- Public Health and Epidemiology, Westat, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou
- Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Kelly D Blake
- Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Robin C Vanderpool
- Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yamaji N, Suzuki D, Suto M, Sasayama K, Ota E. Communication Tools Used in Cancer Communication with Children: A Scoping Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194624. [PMID: 36230548 PMCID: PMC9563078 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Despite the potential benefits of effective communication, telling children about unpredictable and life-threatening conditions such as cancer is challenging. This scoping review aimed to map the potential communication tools for children with cancer, their families, and healthcare professionals. We found 25 studies and 21 communication tools. Communication tools might support children to improve their knowledge and psychological outcomes. However, we found a lack of communication tools that were (1) accessible and validated, (2) designed for healthcare professionals, (3) targeted children, families, and healthcare professionals, and (4) were designed to meet the needs of children and families. This review identified areas for further research. Abstract Background: Although communication tools might guide healthcare professionals in communicating with children about cancer, it is unclear what kind of tools are used. This scoping review aimed to map the communication tools used in cancer communication among children with cancer, families, and healthcare professionals. Methods: A comprehensive search using PubMed (including MEDLINE), Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and CINAHL was conducted on 1 August 2021. We mapped communication tools and their impacts. Results: We included 25 studies (9 experimental studies and 16 feasibility studies) of 29 reports and found 21 communication tools. There was a lack of communication tools that were (1) accessible and validated, (2) designed for healthcare professionals, (3) targeted children, families, and healthcare professionals, and (4) were designed to meet the needs of children and families. Experimental studies showed that the communication tools improved children’s knowledge and psychological outcomes (e.g., health locus of control, quality of life, self-efficacy). Conclusion: We mapped communication tools and identified areas that needed further research, including a lack of tools to guide healthcare professionals and share information with children and families. Further research is needed to develop and evaluate these communication tools. Moreover, it is necessary to investigate how communication tools support children, families, and healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noyuri Yamaji
- Global Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, 10-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan
- Correspondence:
| | - Daichi Suzuki
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kanagawa Institute of Technology, 1030 Shimo-ogino, Atsugi 243-0292, Japan
| | - Maiko Suto
- Department of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 157-8535, Japan
| | - Kiriko Sasayama
- Global Health Nursing, International University of Health and Welfare, 4-3 Kozunomori, Narita, Chiba 286-8686, Japan
| | - Erika Ota
- Global Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, 10-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan
- Tokyo Foundation for Policy Research, Roppongi Grand Tower 34F, 3-2-1 Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-6234, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Laronne A, Granek L, Wiener L, Feder-Bubis P, Golan H. "Some things are even worse than telling a child he is going to die": Pediatric oncology healthcare professionals perspectives on communicating with children about cancer and end of life. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29533. [PMID: 34958524 PMCID: PMC9369103 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study explored pediatric oncology healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perspectives on direct communication with children with advanced disease about their disease, palliative care, and end-of-life (EOL) communication. METHODS Forty-six pediatric oncologists, nurses, psychosocial team members, and other HCPs from six hospital centers in Israel participated in semi-structured interviews. The Grounded Theory method was used. Data were analyzed line-by-line with codes and categories developed inductively from participants' narratives. RESULTS HCPs viewed communication about disease progression and EOL as vital because children were often aware of their prognosis, because lack of communication could lead to emotional distress, and because communication is a prerequisite for shared decision-making. HCPs identified several barriers for communication including HCP barriers (such as emotional strains, lack of training), parental barriers, guardianship law, and language and culture. HCPs also described strategies to promote EOL communication. Direct strategies include tailoring communication, allowing for silence, echoing children's questions, giving information gradually, and answering direct questions honestly. Indirect strategies included encouraging parents to talk to their children and teamwork with colleagues. CONCLUSIONS Open communication with children who have cancer is essential. Nevertheless, multiple barriers persist. The rising accessibility of online information calls for urgent training of HCPs in communication so that children will not turn to unmediated and potentially misleading information online in the absence of HCP communication. Evidence-based effective communication training modules and emotional support should be offered to HCPs. Knowledge about children's development, age-appropriate communication, and cultural sensitivity should be included in this training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat Laronne
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Leeat Granek
- School of Health Policy and Management and Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lori Wiener
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Paula Feder-Bubis
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health Sciences and Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Hana Golan
- Pediatric Hematology Oncology Department, Safra Children’s Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|