Family bonding as a result of the family talk intervention in pediatric oncology: Siblings' experiences

"What about me?": lived experiences of siblings living with a brother or sister with a life-threatening or life-limiting condition

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of knowledge regarding siblings' experiences of being a brother or sister of a child with a life-threatening or life-limiting condition. Siblings' perspectives are often expressed through their parents and not by siblings themselves.

METHOD

This study has a qualitative design within hermeneutic phenomenology. Thirteen siblings (ages 3-29) of children with cancer or genetic conditions participated in semi-structured interviews. Analyses followed a thematic analysis guided by van Manen's lifeexistentials.

RESULTS

One overall theme, "What about me?", illustrates that siblings of children with LT/LL conditions are dealing with their own challenges and needs in the situation while also struggling to receive attention from their parents. The overall theme derives from three subthemes: living with heavy strains, feeling disregarded, and having needs of one's own.

CONCLUSION

The study revealed that siblings' own needs compete with the needs of the ill child, resulting in the risk of siblings taking a step back rather than expressing what they might actually need themselves. These findings can inform healthcare professionals on the importance of educating and supporting parents and the surrounding community close to the sibling, for example, by helping schoolteachers understand how to meet siblings' needs.

Living with the threat of losing a child: Parents' experiences of the transplantation process with a severely ill child who received stem cells from a sibling

PURPOSE

When a child needs a hematopoietic stem cell transplant, the seriousness of the child's illness is highlighted. The purpose of this study was to explore parents' experiences of the transplantation process when two children in the family are involved, one severely ill child as the recipient and the other as the donor.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, interviews were conducted with 18 parents of 13 healthy minor donors after successful stem cell transplants. Qualitative content analysis was used to explore parents' experiences.

FINDINGS

The parents described they were living with the threat of losing a child. They lived with an uncertain future as they were confronted with life-changing information. Whether the ill child would survive or not could not be predicted; thus, parents had to endure unpredictability, and to cope with this they chose to focus on positives. Finally, the parents managed family life in the midst of chaos, felt an inadequacy and a perception that the family became a fragmented although close team during hospital stays. They expressed a need for both tangible and emotional support.

CONCLUSIONS

When a child needs a stem cell transplant, the parents feel inadequate to their healthy children including the donating child. It is obvious that they experience an uncertain future and struggle to keep the family together amid the chaos.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Considering these results, psychosocial support should be mandatory for parents in connection with pediatric HSCT, to enable a process where parents can prepare for the outcome, whether successful or not.

Parenting a child with cancer and maintaining a healthy couple relationship: Findings from the Family Talk Intervention

BACKGROUND

Despite the challenges that caring for a child with cancer brings for parents, little knowledge is available concerning the effects on the parents' couple relationship. Furthermore, few interventions have been designed to support parents in their couple relationship. The aim of this paper was, therefore, to explore parents' experiences of their couple relationship while having a dependent child with cancer and the support they received from a family-based intervention, the Family Talk Intervention (FTI).

METHODS

Data for this paper were taken from semi-structured interviews performed in a pilot study of the FTI in the context of pediatric oncology. In total, 22 couples were interviewed after participating in the FTI. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Parents described how maintaining a couple relationship while living with childhood cancer could be very challenging and was not given the highest priority. The FTI was considered a way of providing important support to the couple and a chance for them to sit down together and listen to each other's perspectives on the situation. Parents described that the FTI had helped them gain an increased mutual understanding, sometimes also helping them to realize that they needed more extensive professional support in their relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

Living with childhood cancer and upholding a healthy couple relationship is challenging for parents. The FTI has the potential to support couples, mainly by providing opportunities for parents to communicate with each other. However, some couples may be in need of a tailored clinical intervention.

Psychosocial Well-Being of Siblings of Pediatric Patients in Palliative Home Care

CONTEXT

Despite the proposed high burden of siblings of children and adolescents with life-limiting conditions receiving pediatric palliative care (PPC) at home, little is known about their psychosocial well-being.

METHODS

In this prospective, cross-sectional trial siblings of patients of a large pediatric palliative home care team were asked to answer the KINDL survey of health-related quality of life, the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to assess problems and resources of children and adolescents as well as the LARES questionnaire, a potential tool for early screening of distress in siblings of chronically ill children. The results of the KINDL total and subdomains as well of the SDQ-subdomains were compared to recent German normative data using multiple t-tests.

RESULTS

In total, 44 siblings (28 female; age 7-18 years, mean 11.8 ± 3.03) of 29 families participated in this study. The subgroup which matches the age range of current normative data of 11-17 years old siblings (n = 25) reported a significant lower total quality of life as measured by KINDL in comparison to normative data. Subscale analyses revealed a significant lower physical and psychological well-being and self-esteem. Siblings of PPC patients yielded significant higher scores in the subdomain prosocial behavior compared to normative data as measured by the SDQ.

CONCLUSIONS

Siblings of children receiving PPC in a home care setting are at risk for a relevant impairment of their health-related quality of life. Future studies should address the potential for possible interventions specific for this population-at-risk.