Prenatal diagnosis in advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis or CVS, a patient's choice or lack of information?

Impact of cell-free fetal DNA on early invasive prenatal diagnosis at a Chinese reference maternal medicine center

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the utility of maternal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) on the number of chorionic villus sampling (CVS) at a mainland Chinese maternal hospital.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in consecutive singleton pregnancies that underwent CVS between the 11th and 14th gestational weeks at a Chinese maternal hospital during a nine-year period. The indications, complications and prenatal diagnosis results were evaluated.Results: This study consisted of 5108 CVS procedures, including 2000 performed for fetal karyotyping, and 3108 performed for fetal single-gene genotyping. During the period with the introduction of cfDNA, the proportion of the number of CVS procedures for the indication of positive serum screening declined significantly, and abnormal ultrasound was the main indication for CVS performed for fetal karyotyping. Thalassemia was always the main indication for CVS, accounting for 50.5% of all CVS cases.Conclusions: cfDNA has changed the spectrum of CVS indications. CVS is now the invasive procedure performed for patients with a fetus having a very high risk of fetal genetic defects, including fetuses having major abnormal ultrasound or having a risk of single-gene disorder inherited from their parents.

A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions

OBJECTIVE

To identify the decision support needs of parents attempting to make an informed health decision on behalf of a child.

CONTEXT

The first step towards implementing patient decision support is to assess patients' information and decision-making needs.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A systematic search of key bibliographic databases for decision support studies was performed in 2005. Reference lists of relevant review articles and key authors were searched. Three relevant journals were hand searched.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Non-intervention studies containing data on decision support needs of parents making child health decisions.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted on study characteristics, decision focus and decision support needs. Studies were quality assessed using a pre-defined set of criteria. Data synthesis used the UK Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre approach.

MAIN RESULTS

One-hundred and forty nine studies were included across various child health decisions, settings and study designs. Thematic analysis of decision support needs indicated three key issues: (i) information (including suggestions about the content, delivery, source, timing); (ii) talking to others (including concerns about pressure from others); and (iii) feeling a sense of control over the process that could be influenced by emotionally charged decisions, the consultation process, and structural or service barriers. These were consistent across decision type, study design and whether or not the study focused on informed decision making.

Use of decision analysis to evaluate patients' choices of diagnostic prenatal test

Women with a family history of a chromosomal or genetic abnormality must weigh several factors in choosing between amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling. We compared the prenatal test choices of three such women with those of decision analytic models that incorporated their preferences. Patient preferences were assessed using visual linear rating scales. Threshold analysis was used to determine preference ranges, and stochastic sensitivity analysis to provide confidence levels, for each choice of test. The test choices of patients and decision analytic models agreed in one case, and disagreed in two cases. In one of the latter two cases, stochastic and threshold analyses showed the disagreement to be slight; for small shifts in preference differences for first- vs. second-trimester diagnosis, or first- vs. second-trimester therapeutic abortion, patient and decision model would have agreed. In the other, stochastic analysis showed their differences to be large; there were no thresholds for early diagnosis, or for early therapeutic abortion, that would have led to agreement between patient and model. In the two cases in which patient and decision model agreed or slightly disagreed, the patients had made their own choice of prenatal test. In the case in which patient and decision model strongly disagreed, the patient's physician had shared in the choice of test. Decision analysis can be useful in analyzing prenatal test choices based on individual preferences for pregnancy outcomes. When choices of patients and decision models do not agree, examination of the locus of decision making (patient vs. physician) may help resolve apparent differences.

Preferences of pregnant women for amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling for prenatal testing: comparison of patients' choices and those of a decision-analytic model

Decision analytic models have suggested that the choice of amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling for prenatal genetic testing is a utility-driven decision. We compared preferences for prenatal testing among 156 pregnant women who had chosen either amniocentesis (n = 82) or chorionic villus sampling (n = 74) for the indication of maternal age. We also compared their choices with those of a decision-analytic model based on their preferences, and age-specific rates of spontaneous abortion and chromosomal abnormalities. Preferences were assessed using written scenarios describing potential outcomes of prenatal testing, and were recorded on linear rating scales. The differences in preference ratings for first- vs second-trimester prenatal diagnosis of a normal child (4.2 vs -1.6, p = 0.0004), and for first- vs second-trimester abortion of an abnormal fetus (4.4 vs -1.6, p = 0.01), were significantly greater among women choosing chorionic villus sampling than among women choosing amniocentesis. There were no significant differences between chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis patients in their preference ratings for test-related miscarriage, disconfirmed results at pregnancy termination, or maternal morbidity from therapeutic abortion. After adjusting for demographic and obstetric factors, the difference in preferences for early vs late prenatal diagnosis was an independent predictor of the choice of chorionic villus sampling in a multivariate model. Among women whose decision analyses selected amniocentesis, 56.8% had chosen amniocentesis, and among women whose analyses selected chorionic villus sampling, 63.2% had chosen chorionic villus sampling (p = 0.05). We conclude that the preferences of pregnant women for the outcomes of prenatal testing were associated with their choice of amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling. In addition, the choice of prenatal test made by the majority of women was concordant with that of a decision-analytic model that incorporated their preferences. Nevertheless, because many women made choices that were discordant with their decision-analytic results, further research into the bases for their choices is warranted.