Effects of subtelomeric copy number variations in miscarriages

PURPOSE

This study was performed on miscarriage samples for chromosome analysis to detect copy number variations (CNVs) related to subtelomeric regions, and with these results we aimed to adapt multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) method for prenatal diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cell cultures and DNA isolations were performed on 60 miscarriage samples. For maternal contamination analysis, DNA isolations and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reactions were done using peripheric blood of mothers who had miscarriages. We compared short tandem repeat peak profiles of miscarriage samples and mothers. The subtelomeric regions of the chromosomes were assessed using the MLPA method.

RESULTS

Of 43 miscarriage samples, 19 had normal karyotype (44.2%), 10 had numerical abnormalities (23.3%), and 2 had structural abnormalities (4.7%). Subtelomeric 16q duplication was determined in 2 of the 30 miscarriage samples investigated with MLPA method (6.6%).

CONCLUSION

There is no statistically significant difference between two groups (p > 0.05). However, the fact that the 6.6% subtelomeric CNV found in miscarriage samples was not found in controls, showed that further studies are required. We recommend that the miscarriage samples of the couples with recurrent miscarriage should be analyzed in terms of subtelomeric CNV after the exclusion of other clinical reasons.

Subtelomeric multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification as a supplement for rapid prenatal detection of fetal chromosomal aberrations

Background

Pregnant women with high-risk indications are highly suspected of fetal chromosomal aberrations. To determine whether Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) using subtelomeric probe mixes (P036-E2 and P070-B2) is a reliable method for rapid detection of fetal chromosomal aberrations. The subtelomeric MLPA probe mixes were used to evaluate 50 blood samples from healthy individuals. 168 amniocytes and 182 umbilical cord blood samples from high-risk fetuses were analyzed using the same subtelomeric MLPA probe sets. Karyotyping was also performed in all cases of high-risk pregnancies, and single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis was used to confirm submicroscopic and ambiguous results from MLPA/karyotyping.

Results

Subtelomeric MLPA analysis of normal samples showed normal result in all cases by use of P036-E2 probe mix, while P070-B2 probe mix gave normal results for all but one case. In one normal control case P070-B2 produced a duplicated signal of probe for 13q34. In the high-risk group, totally 44 chromosomal abnormalities were found by karyotyping and MLPA, including 23 aneuploidies and 21 rearrangements or mosaics. MLPA detected all 23 aneuploidies, 12 rearrangements and 1 mosaic. Importantly, MLPA revealed 4 chromosomal translocations, 2 small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs), and 3 subtelomeric imbalances that were not well characterized or not detectable by karyotyping. However, MLPA showed negetive results for the remaining 8 rearrangements or mosaics, including 3 low mosaic aneuploidies, 1 inherited sSMC, and 4 paracentric inversions.

Conclusions

Results suggest that combined use of subtelomeric MLPA and karyotyping may be an alternative method for using karyotype analyses alone in rapid detection of aneuploidies, rearrangements, and sSMCs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13039-014-0096-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and prenatal diagnosis

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is a recent technique for the relative quantitation of up to 40 to 45 nucleic acid targets. Due to its relative simplicity, low cost, and availability of laboratory-developed and more than 300 commercially-developed assays, MLPA has become more widely used for both research and diagnostic applications. The MLPA platform is now extensively applied for postnatal diagnosis of genetic disorders and has recently been used for prenatal diagnosis. The published uses of MLPA for prenatal diagnosis include detection of aneuploidies, common microdeletion syndromes and subtelomeric copy-number changes, identification of marker chromosomes, and detection of familial copy-number changes in single genes. This review describes the technique of MLPA in detail and offers considerations for the interpretation of results in the clinical diagnostic setting. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

MLPA: a prenatal diagnostic tool for the study of congenital heart defects?

Congenital heart defects (CHD) represent the most common birth defects, so they are not a rare finding when performing routine ultrasound examinations during pregnancy. Once chromosome abnormalities have been excluded in a fetus with a CHD, chromosome 22q11.2 deletion is usually investigated by FISH, as it is the most frequent microdeletion syndrome and is generally associated with cardiac malformations. If 22q11.2 microdeletion is ruled out, the etiology of the CHD remains generally unexplained, making familial genetic counseling difficult. To evaluate the usefulness of Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) kits designed for the study of 22q11.2 and other genomic regions previously associated with syndromic CHD, we performed MLPA in 55 pregnancies with fetuses presenting CHD, normal karyotype and negative FISH results for 22q11.2 microdeletion, which constitutes the largest prenatal series reported. Definitive MLPA results were obtained in 50 pregnancies, and in this setting such MLPA kits did not detect any imbalance. On the other hand, to compare FISH and MLPA techniques for the study of 22q11.2 microdeletions, we performed MLPA in 4 pregnancies known to have 22q11.2 deletions (by FISH). All four 22q11.2 microdeletions were also detected by MLPA, which corroborates that it is a reliable technique for the diagnosis and characterization of 22q11.2 deletions. Finally, we evaluated the possibility of replacing conventional FISH by MLPA for the prenatal diagnosis of CHD, comparing the diagnostic potential, results delivery times, repetition and failure rates and cost of both techniques, and concluded that FISH should still be the technique of choice for the prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with CHD.

Increased nuchal translucency and normal karyotype: perinatal and pediatric outcomes at 2 years of age

OBJECTIVE

To assess the perinatal and pediatric outcomes up to 2 years of age in singleton karyotypically normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT) above the 99(th) percentile.

METHODS

Singleton fetuses with NT above the 99(th) percentile and normal karyotype scanned in our center from 2002 to 2006 were included. Work-up included first- and second-trimester anomaly scan, first- and second-trimester fetal echocardiography, and in selected cases infection screening and genetic testing. Among survivors, a pediatric follow-up up to 2 years of age was undertaken.

RESULTS

During this 4-year period, 171 singleton fetuses with NT above the 99(th) percentile and normal karyotype were included in the study. There were seven spontaneous fetal losses, 38 terminations of pregnancy and two postnatal deaths. Among the 124 (72.5%) survivors, 12 (9.7%) were born with structural abnormalities. Neurodevelopmental follow-up was completed in 108 (87.1%) of the 124 survivors and four (3.7%) showed moderate to severe impairment. Overall, a structural abnormality or genetic syndrome was diagnosed in 50 fetuses/newborns. Prenatal diagnosis was achieved for 83.8% (31/37) of the structural abnormalities and 69.2% (9/13) of the genetic syndromes. Interestingly, a single umbilical artery was found in six fetuses with no structural defects at birth, five of which had a long-term favorable outcome (4.5%), and in one 22q11 microdeletion syndrome was diagnosed at 2 years of age.

CONCLUSION

Singleton fetuses with an increased NT above the 99(th) percentile and normal karyotype showed a 63% intact survival. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome among survivors did not appear to differ from that reported for the general population.