1
|
Nulens K, Lorenzo AJ, Dos Santos J, Ellul K, Rickard M. Fetal urinary tract dilation: What to tell the parents. Prenat Diagn 2024; 44:148-157. [PMID: 38117007 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
Urinary tract dilation (UTD), which refers to the abnormal dilation of the urinary collection system, is the most common finding on prenatal ultrasound and presents with varying severity, presentation, etiology, and prognosis. Prenatal classification and risk stratification aim to prevent postnatal complications, such as urinary tract infections and further kidney dysfunction. Parents expecting a child with UTD should be counseled by a multidisciplinary team consisting of maternal-fetal medicine specialists, and pediatric urology and nephrology providers. This review summarizes the key points in the diagnostic evaluation and management during the prenatal and initial postnatal period, focusing on the information that should be provided to future parents. We address frequently asked parental questions and concerns that our multidisciplinary clinical practice faces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrien Nulens
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Armando J Lorenzo
- Division of Urology, Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joana Dos Santos
- Division of Urology, Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katie Ellul
- Ontario Fetal Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mandy Rickard
- Division of Urology, Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaplan R, Adams S. Incidental Fetal Ultrasound Findings: Interpretation and Management. J Midwifery Womens Health 2018; 63:323-329. [PMID: 29763964 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Revised: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Ultrasonography is a common component of prenatal care worldwide and is often used in early pregnancy to determine gestational age, number of fetuses, fetal cardiac activity, and placental location. Patients and their families may also consider ultrasonography a social event, as it provides confirmation and reassurance of a normal pregnancy. Ultrasound screening is typically scheduled in the second trimester to visualize fetal anatomy and confirm gestational age. Most ultrasound examinations are reassuring, but some incidentally identify structural anomalies and soft markers for aneuploidy, making it necessary for health care providers to correctly interpret these findings. The health care provider's ability to prepare patients prior to the ultrasound and deliver the necessary information needed to make informed decisions regarding any follow-up screening or diagnostic testing is critical to reducing parental anxiety. Preparation for the anatomic survey should include counseling for normal and abnormal findings. The ethical concepts of patient autonomy and shared decision making are used as a guide in providing this critical information and enabling informed choices during follow-up for incidental ultrasound findings.
Collapse
|
3
|
Temming LA, Dicke JM, Stout MJ, Rampersad RM, Macones GA, Tuuli MG, Cahill AG. Early Second-Trimester Fetal Growth Restriction and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130:865-869. [PMID: 28885423 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes among women with isolated fetal growth restriction from 17 to 22 weeks of gestation. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of all singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies undergoing ultrasonography to assess fetal anatomy between 17 and 22 weeks of gestation at a single center from 2010 to 2014. After excluding patients with fetal structural malformations, chromosomal abnormalities, or identified infectious etiologies, we compared perinatal outcomes between pregnancies with and without fetal growth restriction, defined as estimated fetal weight less than the 10th percentile for gestational age. Our primary outcome was small for gestational age (SGA) at birth, defined as birth weight less than the 10th percentile. Secondary outcomes included preterm delivery at less than 37 and less than 28 weeks of gestation, preeclampsia, abruption, stillbirth, neonatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admission, intraventricular hemorrhage, need for respiratory support, and necrotizing enterocolitis. RESULTS Of 12,783 eligible patients, 355 (2.8%) had early second-trimester fetal growth restriction. Risk factors for growth restriction were African American race and tobacco use. Early second-trimester growth restriction was associated with a more than fivefold increase in risk of SGA at birth (36.9% compared with 9.1%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.5, 95% CI 4.3-7.0), stillbirth (2.5% compared with 0.4%, OR 6.2, 95% CI 2.7-12.8), and neonatal death (1.4% compared with 0.3%, OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.6-13.5). Rates of indicated preterm birth at less than 37 weeks of gestation (7.3% compared with 3.3%, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.5) and less than 28 weeks of gestation (2.5% compared with 0.2%, OR 10.8, 95% CI 4.5-23.4), neonatal need for respiratory support (16.9% compared with 7.8%, adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.2), and necrotizing enterocolitis (1.4% compared with 0.2%, OR 7.7, 95% CI 2.3-20.9) were also significantly higher for those with growth restriction. Rates of preeclampsia, abruption, and other neonatal outcomes were not significantly different. CONCLUSION Although fetal growth restriction in the early second trimester occurred in less than 3% of our cohort and most of those with isolated growth restriction did not have adverse outcomes, it is a strong risk factor for SGA, stillbirth, neonatal death, and indicated preterm birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorene A Temming
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Temming LA, Durst JK, Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Dicke JM, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Universal cervical length screening: implementation and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214:523.e1-523.e8. [PMID: 26874299 PMCID: PMC4810783 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2015] [Revised: 01/16/2016] [Accepted: 02/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transvaginal measurement of cervical length (CL) has been advocated as a screening tool to prevent preterm birth, but controversy remains regarding the overall utility of universal screening. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the acceptability of a universal CL screening program. Additionally we evaluated risk factors associated with declining screening and subsequent delivery outcomes of women who accepted or declined screening. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study of transvaginal CL screening at a single institution from July 1, 2011, through December 31, 2014. Institutional protocol recommended transvaginal CL measurement at the time of anatomic survey between 17-23 weeks in all women with singleton, viable pregnancies, without current or planned cerclage, with patients able to opt out. Patients with CL ≤20 mm were considered to have clinically significant cervical shortening and were offered treatment. We assessed acceptance rate, risk factors for declining CL screening, and the trend of acceptance of CL screening over time. We also calculated the prevalence of CL ≤25, ≤20, and ≤15 mm, and estimated the association between CL screening and spontaneous preterm birth. RESULTS Of 12,740 women undergoing anatomic survey during the study period, 10,871 (85.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 84.7-85.9%) underwent CL screening. Of those, 215 (2.0%) had a CL ≤25 mm and 131 (1.2%) had a CL ≤20 mm. After the first 6 months of implementation, there was no change in rates of acceptance of CL screening over time (P for trend = .15). Women were more likely to decline CL screening if they were African American (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.17; 95% CI, 1.93-2.44), obese (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.31), multiparous (aOR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.29-1.64), age <35 years (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.43), or smokers (aOR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.20-1.68). Rates of spontaneous preterm birth <28 weeks were higher in those who declined CL screening (aOR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.33-3.02). CONCLUSION Universal CL screening was implemented successfully with 85% of women screened. Overall incidence of short cervix was low and women with significant risk factors for preterm birth were more likely to decline screening. Patients who declined CL screening were more likely to be African American, obese, multiparous, age <35 years, and smokers. Rates of early, but not late, spontaneous preterm birth were significantly higher among women who did not undergo CL screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorene A Temming
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
| | - Jennifer K Durst
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Methodius G Tuuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Molly J Stout
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Jeffrey M Dicke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 123:1070-1082. [PMID: 24785860 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000000245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Given that practice variation exists in the frequency and performance of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pregnancy, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development hosted a workshop to address indications for ultrasound and MRI in pregnancy, to discuss when and how often these studies should be performed, to consider recommendations for optimizing yield and cost effectiveness, and to identify research opportunities. This article is the executive summary of the workshop.
Collapse
|
6
|
Nguyen HT, Benson CB, Bromley B, Campbell JB, Chow J, Coleman B, Cooper C, Crino J, Darge K, Herndon CDA, Odibo AO, Somers MJG, Stein DR. Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). J Pediatr Urol 2014; 10:982-98. [PMID: 25435247 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 275] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2014] [Accepted: 10/08/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Urinary tract (UT) dilation is sonographically identified in 1-2% of fetuses and reflects a spectrum of possible uropathies. There is significant variability in the clinical management of individuals with prenatal UT dilation that stems from a paucity of evidence-based information correlating the severity of prenatal UT dilation to postnatal urological pathologies. The lack of correlation between prenatal and postnatal US findings and final urologic diagnosis has been problematic, in large measure because of a lack of consensus and uniformity in defining and classifying UT dilation. Consequently, there is a need for a unified classification system with an accepted standard terminology for the diagnosis and management of prenatal and postnatal UT dilation. METHODS A consensus meeting was convened on March 14-15, 2014, in Linthicum, Maryland, USA to propose: 1) a unified description of UT dilation that could be applied both prenatally and postnatally; and 2) a standardized scheme for the perinatal evaluation of these patients based on sonographic criteria (i.e. the classification system). The participating societies included American College of Radiology, the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, the American Society of Pediatric Nephrology, the Society for Fetal Urology, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, the Society for Pediatric Urology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasounds. RESULTS The recommendations proposed in this consensus statement are based on a detailed analysis of the current literature and expert opinion representing common clinical practice. The proposed UTD Classification System (and hence the severity of the UT dilation) is based on six categories in US findings: 1) anterior-posterior renal pelvic diameter (APRPD); 2) calyceal dilation; 3) renal parenchymal thickness; 4) renal parenchymal appearance; 5) bladder abnormalities; and 6) ureteral abnormalities. The classification system is stratified based on gestational age and whether the UT dilation is detected prenatally or postnatally. The panel also proposed a follow-up scheme based on the UTD classification. CONCLUSION The proposed grading classification system will require extensive evaluation to assess its utility in predicting clinical outcomes. Currently, the grading system is correlated with the risk of postnatal uropathies. Future research will help to further refine the classification system to one that correlates with other clinical outcomes such as the need for surgical intervention or renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiep T Nguyen
- Society for Fetal Urology (SFU), Linthicum, MD, USA; Society for Pediatric Urology (SPU), Beverly, MA, USA.
| | - Carol B Benson
- Society of Radiologists in Ultrasounds (SRU), Reston, VA, USA; American College of Radiology (ACR), Reston, VA, USA
| | - Bryann Bromley
- American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), Laurel, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey B Campbell
- Society for Fetal Urology (SFU), Linthicum, MD, USA; Society for Pediatric Urology (SPU), Beverly, MA, USA
| | - Jeanne Chow
- Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR), Reston, VA, USA
| | - Beverly Coleman
- American College of Radiology (ACR), Reston, VA, USA; Society of Radiologists in Ultrasounds (SRU), Reston, VA, USA
| | - Christopher Cooper
- Society for Fetal Urology (SFU), Linthicum, MD, USA; Society for Pediatric Urology (SPU), Beverly, MA, USA
| | - Jude Crino
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Washington, D.C., USA
| | - Kassa Darge
- Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR), Reston, VA, USA
| | - C D Anthony Herndon
- Society for Fetal Urology (SFU), Linthicum, MD, USA; Society for Pediatric Urology (SPU), Beverly, MA, USA
| | - Anthony O Odibo
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Washington, D.C., USA
| | | | - Deborah R Stein
- American Society of Pediatric Nephrology (ASPN), The Woodlands, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, Saade GR. Fetal imaging: Executive summary of a Joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging Workshop. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210:387-97. [PMID: 24793721 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2014] [Accepted: 02/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Given that practice variation exists in the frequency and performance of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development hosted a workshop to address indications for ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy, to discuss when and how often these studies should be performed, to consider recommendations for optimizing yield and cost-effectiveness and to identify research opportunities. This article is the executive summary of the workshop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uma M Reddy
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD; Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX.
| | - Alfred Z Abuhamad
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD; Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | - Deborah Levine
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD; Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | - George R Saade
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD; Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, Saade GR. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging Workshop. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2014; 33:745-757. [PMID: 24764329 DOI: 10.7863/ultra.33.5.745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Given that practice variation exists in the frequency and performance of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pregnancy, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development hosted a workshop to address indications for ultrasound and MRI in pregnancy, to discuss when and how often these studies should be performed, to consider recommendations for optimizing yield and cost effectiveness, and to identify research opportunities. This article is the executive summary of the workshop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uma M Reddy
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Blvd, Room 4B03F, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510 USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Odibo AO, Ghidini A. Role of the second-trimester ‘genetic sonogram’ for Down syndrome screen in the era of first-trimester screening and noninvasive prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34:511-7. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.4329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2013] [Revised: 12/24/2013] [Accepted: 01/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony O. Odibo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Washington University School of Medicine; St. Louis MO USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Orzechowski KM, Berghella V. Isolated fetal pyelectasis and the risk of Down syndrome: a meta-analysis. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2013; 42:615-621. [PMID: 23712390 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/13/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We performed a meta-analysis to examine the performance of second-trimester (14-24 weeks' gestation) isolated fetal pyelectasis as a marker for trisomy 21 and to calculate its associated weighted pooled likelihood ratios. METHODS PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched using the terms 'pyelectasis' and 'pelviectasis'. Studies were included if fetuses with isolated pyelectasis were reported separately from fetuses with other soft markers of aneuploidy and/or structural anomalies and if knowledge of the fetal karyotype was unknown at the time of ultrasound examination. RESULTS Individual study statistics were pooled as weighted positive and negative likelihood ratios with 95% CIs, using a random-effects model. Ten observational studies were included (2148 cases of isolated pyelectasis). Isolated fetal pyelectasis was defined in seven out of 10 studies as a renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter of ≥ 4 mm. Isolated fetal pyelectasis was associated with pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios of 2.78 (95% CI, 1.75-4.43) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The detection of isolated fetal pyelectasis on mid-trimester ultrasound is associated with an increased likelihood of trisomy 21. If the finding of isolated fetal pyelectasis is used to adjust the trisomy 21 risk from maternal serum screening tests, a positive likelihood ratio of 2.78 should be used in the calculation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Orzechowski
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Sonographic soft markers of fetal Down syndrome were first reported in the 1980s. With improvements in aneuploidy screening, detection rates of 90% and higher are possible, and such screening is offered to women of all ages. The utility of sonographic detection and reporting of soft markers, particularly to women at low risk of fetal aneuploidy, is controversial. Some soft markers have no additional significance beyond an association with aneuploidy, while some potentially indicate other pathology, and therefore require sonographic follow-up or other evaluation. The definitions of soft markers vary among reported series, and any practice using such markers to adjust the risk of aneuploidy should carefully determine the most appropriate definitions as well as likelihood ratios and how to apply these in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E Norton
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, HH333, Stanford, CA 94305.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Estroff JA. Imaging clues in the prenatal diagnosis of syndromes and aneuploidy. Pediatr Radiol 2012; 42 Suppl 1:S5-23. [PMID: 22395717 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-011-2264-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2011] [Revised: 09/07/2011] [Accepted: 09/13/2011] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Advances in fetal sonography and MRI have increased both the range and diagnostic accuracy of detectable fetal anomalies, with many anomalies detectable earlier in pregnancy. The presence of structural anomalies greatly raises the risk that the fetus has a syndrome or abnormal karyotype. In addition, new techniques in maternal serum screening have greatly increased the ability to identify pregnant patients at risk for anomalies and syndromes. This paper reviews maternal first- and second-trimester serum screening and imaging and covers many of the most common fetal karyotypic and structural anomalies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judy A Estroff
- Fetal-Neonatal Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lichtenbelt K, Knoers N, Schuring-Blom G. From Karyotyping to Array-CGH in Prenatal Diagnosis. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011; 135:241-50. [DOI: 10.1159/000334065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
|