Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy: Identification and Management at a Reference Center in Pakistan

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the causes of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy and its management along with the outcome in the COVID-19 era.

Methods: Recruitment for this prospective, cross-sectional observational study of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy (platelet counts <100x10⁹/L) was done from January 2017 to August 2020 at the National Institute of Blood Diseases (NIBD) after taking the patients’ informed consent. Complete clinical and lab profile of patients was also collected.

Results: A total of 150 pregnant women with thrombocytopenia were enrolled, with the mean age being 27.3±4.64 years. Mean platelet counts at baseline were 48.0±24. Main clinical manifestations at baseline included: anemia 65.9%, bruises 23.25%, and edema 9.3%. Causes of thrombocytopenia were gestational thrombocytopenia (GT) 72 (48%), acute fatty liver five (3.3%), pre-eclampsia in 11 (7.3%), and eclampsia seven (4.6%). Causes not specific to pregnancy included 30 (20%) cases of ITP, hepatitis C, and nutritional deficiency was reported in nine (6%) patients each. 72/150 received supportive care treatment to manage thrombocytopenia and were closely monitored and given supplements. Twenty (66.6%) ITP patients received treatment with steroids, with complete response in 70% of them seen. Overall, 38 (25.3%) women with bleeding symptoms and platelet count <50x10⁹/L received platelet transfusions.

Conclusion: The study shows that pre-eclampsia and eclampsia are serious conditions with a high risk for complications, while GT is a benign and the most common cause of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy which requires no active treatment. The other causes such as ITP and infections require individualized management.

Update on the Use of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Pregnancy

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was first administered to humans in the 1980s. The mechanism of action of IVIG is still a subject of debate but the pharmacokinetics have been well characterized, albeit outside of pregnancy. IVIG has been used in pregnancy to treat several nonobstetrical and obstetrical-related conditions. However, current evidence suggests that IVIG use during pregnancy can be recommended for 1) in utero diagnosis of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia; 2) gestational alloimmune liver disease; 3) hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn for early-onset severe intrauterine disease; 4) antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) when refractory to or contraindicated to standard treatment, or in catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome; and 5) immune thrombocytopenia when standard treatment is ineffective or rapid increase of platelet counts is needed. All recommendations are based on case series and cohort studies without randomized trials usually because of the rare prevalence of the conditions, the high incidence of adverse outcomes if left untreated, and ethical concerns. In contrast, IVIG therapy cannot be recommended for recurrent pregnancy loss, and the use of IVIG in subgroups of those with recurrent pregnancy loss requires further investigations. For non-obstetrical-related conditions, we recommend using IVIG as indicated for nonpregnant patients. In conclusion, the use of IVIG during pregnancy is an effective treatment in some obstetrical-related conditions with rare serious maternal side effects. However, the precise mechanisms of action and the long-term immunologic effects on the fetus and neonate are poorly understood and merit further investigations.

Thrombocytopenia in Neonates

Thrombocytopenia defined as platelet count below 150,000/μL is not an uncommon event at the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). In our region we calculated a prevalence of nearly 2 of 1000 live births. Early-onset neonatal thrombocytopenia (NT) occurring within the first 72 hours of life is more common than late-onset NT. Preterm infants are affected more often than term infants and bacterial infection is the most common diagnosis associated with NT. There are a lot of maternal, perinatal, and neonatal causes associated with NT and complications include bleedings with potentially life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage. Alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT) often presents with severe thrombocytopenia (<30,000/μL) in otherwise healthy newborns and needs careful evaluation regarding HPA-1a antigen status and HLA typing. Platelet transfusions are needed in severe NT and threshold platelet counts might be at ≤25,000/μL irrespective of bleeding or not. Immune mediated NT recovers within 2 weeks with a good prognosis when there happened no intracranial hemorrhage. This short review gives an overview on etiology and causes of NT and recommendations regarding platelet transfusions.

The use of IVIg in fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia- Principles and mechanisms

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a rare neonatal disorder that is caused by alloimmunization against platelet antigens during pregnancy. Although rare, affecting only 1 in 1000 live births, it can cause intracranial hemorrhage and other bleeding complications that can lead to miscarriage, stillbirth and life-long neurological complications. One of the gold-standard therapies for at risk pregnancies is the administration of IVIg. Although IVIg has been used in a variety of different disorders for over 40 years, its exact mechanism of action is still unknown. In FNAIT, the majority of its therapeutic effect is thought the be mediated through the neonatal Fc receptor, however other mechanisms cannot be excluded. Due to safety, supply and other concerns that are associated with IVIg use, alternative therapies that could replace IVIg are additionally being investigated. This includes the possibility of a prophylaxis regimen for FNAIT, similarly to what has been successfully used in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn for over 50 years.

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia - The Norwegian management model

In Norway, the management strategy for fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) has for more than two decades differed from most other countries. The focus of this paper is to describe and discuss the Norwegian FNAIT management program. We recommend antenatal IVIg to women who previously have had a child with FNAIT-induced ICH, and usually not to HPA-1a alloimmunized pregnant women where a previous child had FNAIT, but not ICH. When deciding management strategy, we use not only the obstetric history but also the antenatal anti-HPA-1a antibody level as a tool for risk stratification. The Norwegian National Unit for Platelet Immunology (NNUPI) at the University Hospital of North Norway in Tromsø provides diagnostic and consulting service for the clinicians and the blood banks all over the country, and serves as a national reference laboratory for FNAIT investigations.

Prenatal Management of Pregnancies at Risk of Fetal Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia (FNAIT): Scientific Impact Paper No. 61

WHAT IS IT?: Fetal neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT), also known as neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT) or fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FMAIT), is a rare condition which affects a baby's platelets. This can put them at risk of problems with bleeding, particularly into the brain. One baby per week in the UK may be seriously affected and milder forms can affect one in every 1000 births. HOW IS IT CAUSED?: Platelets are blood cells that are very important in helping blood to clot. All platelets have natural proteins on their surface called human platelet antigens (HPAs). In babies, half of these antigens are inherited from the mother and half from the father. During pregnancy, some of the baby's platelets can cross into the mother's bloodstream. In most cases, this does not cause a problem. But in cases of FNAIT, the mother's immune system does not recognise the baby's HPAs that were inherited from the father and develops antibodies, which can cross the placenta and attack the baby's platelets. These antibodies are called anti-HPAs, and the commonest antibody implicated is anti-HPA-1a, but there are other rarer antibody types. If this happens, the baby's platelets may be destroyed causing their platelet count to fall dangerously low. If the platelet count is very low there is a risk to the baby of bleeding into their brain before they are born. This is very rare but if it happens it can have serious effects on the baby's health. HOW IS IT INHERITED?: A baby inherits half of their HPAs from its mother and half from its father. Consequently, a baby may have different HPAs from its mother. As the condition is very rare, and even if the baby is at risk of the condition we have no way of knowing how severely they will be affected, routine screening is not currently recommended. WHAT CAN BE DONE?: FNAIT is usually diagnosed if a previous baby has had a low platelet count. The parents are offered blood tests and the condition can be confirmed or ruled out. There are many other causes of low platelets in babies, which may also need to be tested for. As the condition is so rare, expertise is limited to specialist centres and normally a haematologist and fetal medicine doctor will perform and interpret the tests together. Fortunately, there is an effective treatment for the vast majority of cases called immunoglobulin, or IVIg. This 'blood product' is given intravenously through a drip every week to women at risk of the condition. It may be started from as early as 16 weeks in the next pregnancy, until birth, which would be offered at around 36-37 weeks. Less common treatments that may be considered depending on individual circumstances include steroid tablets or injections, or giving platelet transfusions to the baby. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER TELL YOU?: This paper considers the latest evidence in relation to treatment options in the management of pregnancies at risk of FNAIT. Specifically, we discuss the role of screening, when IVIg should be started, what dose should be used, and what evidence there is for maternal steroids. We also consider in very rare selected cases, the use of fetal blood sampling and giving platelet transfusions to the baby before birth. Finally, we consider the approaches to blood testing mothers to tell if babies are at risk, which is offered in some countries, and development of new treatments to reduce the risk of FNAIT.

Management of neonatal thrombocytopenia in a context of maternal antiplatelet alloimmunization: Expert opinion of the French-speaking working group

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a potentially devastating disease, seen in 1/800-1000 neonates. FNAIT is the most common cause of early-onset isolated severe neonatal thrombocytopenia in maternity wards. The most feared complication of this disorder is intracranial hemorrhage, leading to death or neurological sequelae. There is no systematic screening of at-risk pregnancies and FNAIT is often discovered when fetal or neonatal bleeding is observed. A working group on fetomaternal platelet alloimmunization was created in 2017, under the auspices on the French Group of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (GFHT). The first objective of this group was to survey clinical practices for treatment of thrombocytopenic neonates in a context of suspected or confirmed FNAIT.

Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy: Mechanisms and Management

Thrombocytopenia is a common hematologic issue encountered by obstetricians and hematologists, detected in about 10% of all pregnancies. In the vast majority of cases, the thrombocytopenia will be attributed to gestational thrombocytopenia (GT), where the thrombocytopenia is mild, does not necessitate active management, and does not introduce maternal or fetal bleeding risk. Although GT is common, the specific mechanism responsible for it is not known with certainty, and therefore, differentiating it from other causes of thrombocytopenia can be challenging. Previously proposed explanations for GT suggest that a decrease in platelet count is universal in pregnancy, and women diagnosed with GT are simply those with a baseline platelet count on the lower end of normal range. This concept is challenged in this review, and a possible mechanism for GT is proposed. Additionally, a framework for approaching the diagnosis and management of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy is presented.

Identification and follow-up of pregnant women with platelet-type human platelet antigen (HPA)-1bb alloimmunized with fetal HPA-1a

INTRODUCTION

Pregnant women negative for human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a) are at risk of alloimmunization with fetal HPA-1a antigen inherited from the father, and their offspring may develop fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT). The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of HPA-1a alloimmunization in pregnant Polish women, the feasibility of using maternal platelets for intrauterine transfusions in women subjected to diagnostic fetal blood sampling (FBS) and to discuss potential consequences of alloimmunization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen thousand two hundred and four pregnant women were typed for HPA-1a; HPA-1a negative were screened for anti-HPA-1a. Alloimmunized women received specialist perinatology care; some of them were subjected to FBS, followed by transfusion of HPA-1a negative platelet concentrates (PC) prepared from maternal blood.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-three (2.5%) women were HPA-1a negative, and 32 (8.6%) tested positively for anti-HPA-1a. Antibodies were detected in 22 women during pregnancy. Diagnostic FBS followed by PC transfusion was performed in 14 woman, who were platelet donors for their 16 unborn babies. Blood donations were tolerated well by the patients, and also intrauterine platelet transfusions were uneventful. Pharmacotherapy with intravenous immunoglobulins was implemented in 11/22 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

HPA-1a negative women (ca. 2.5% of all pregnant patients) are at risk of alloimmunization with HPA-1a antigen and developing FNAIT. Alloimmunized women can be donors of platelets for their offspring providing removal of antibodies from PC. Owing to potential complications, special care should be taken if an alloimmunized woman was qualified as a blood or stem cell recipient.

Intravenous immunoglobulin as monotherapy for myasthenia gravis during pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Pregnant women with myasthenia gravis (MG) are at increased risk of complications and adverse outcomes, including the teratogenic effects of many drugs used to treat MG women of childbearing age. The effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) on other autoimmune mediated diseases has been extensively reported in recent years, although little is known about the role of IVIg in the treatment of MG during pregnancy. We designed this study to determine the effectiveness of IVIg as monotherapy during pregnancy for women with MG.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Five pregnant MG patients (mean age at delivery 36.4years, SD 5.8, range 29.4-45.2) were studied in 2013-14. Their treatment was switched to monthly IVIg cycles 2months before the pregnancy. Follow-up included monthly neurological QMG throughout the pregnancy and postpartum, obstetrical monitoring during monthly visits in the first two trimesters of the pregnancy, fortnightly visits between week 32 and week 36, and weekly visits after 36weeks, and neonatal follow-up after delivery.

RESULTS

We observed no exacerbations during pregnancy, delivery or post-partum. The mean QMG score at baseline (before pregnancy) was 7.4 points in five women with generalized forms of MG. The maximum mean value reached during pregnancy was 8.6 points. The mean pregnancy duration was 38 w+5 d. No infant with transient neonatal myasthenia gravis.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that monotherapy with IVIg during pregnancy in MG patients could be promising, although confirmation is required in studies with larger populations.

Women's attitude towards routine human platelet antigen-screening in pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia is a potentially life-threatening disease with excellent preventative treatment available for subsequent pregnancies. To prevent index cases, the effectiveness of a population-based screening program has been suggested repeatedly. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate women's attitude towards possible future human platelet antigen-screening in pregnancy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional questionnaire study among healthy pregnant women receiving prenatal care in one of seven participating midwifery practices. Attitude was assessed using a questionnaire based on the validated Multidimensional Measurement of Informed Choice model, containing questions assessing knowledge, attitude and intention to participate.

RESULTS

A total of 143 of the 220 women (65%) completed and returned the questionnaire. A positive attitude towards human platelet antigen-screening was expressed by 91% of participants, of which 94% was based on sufficient knowledge. Attitude was more likely to be negatively influenced by the opinion that screening can be frightening. Informed choices were made in 87% and occurred significantly less in women from non-European origin, 89% in European women vs. 60% in non-European women (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women in the Netherlands expressed a positive attitude towards human platelet antigen-screening in pregnancy. We therefore expect a high rate of informed uptake when human platelet antigen-screening is implemented. In future counseling on human platelet antigen-screening, ethnicity and possible anxiety associated with a screening test need to be specifically addressed.

Current perspectives on fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia - increasing clinical concerns and new treatment opportunities

Differences in platelet type between the fetus and the mother can lead to maternal immunization and destruction of the fetal platelets, a condition named fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT). FNAIT is reported to occur in ~1 per 1,000 live born neonates. The major risk is intracranial hemorrhage in the fetus or newborn, which is associated with severe neurological complications or death. Since no countries have yet implemented a screening program to detect pregnancies at risk, the diagnosis is typically established after the birth of a child with symptoms. Reports on broader clinical impact have increased clinical concern and awareness. Along with new treatment options for FNAIT, the debate around antenatal screening to detect pregnancies at risk of FNAIT has been revitalized.

Low-dose prednisone and immunoglobulin G treatment for woman at risk for neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia and T helper 1 immunity

PROBLEM

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia is an alloimmune disorder resulting from platelet opsonization by maternal antibodies that destroy fetal platelets. As there is no antenatal screening or immunization to prevent sensitization, selection of high-risk population or the prevention of antenatal sensitization is significantly limited.

METHOD OF STUDY

(i) A case report of ante- and postnatal management of a woman with paternal homozygosity for human platelet antigen-1(HPA) incompatibility. (ii) A retrospective case-control study of 11 confirmed FNAIT patients, 8 possible-FNAIT women, and 10 women with confirmed ITP.

RESULT

Antenatal screening, prevention of maternal sensitization by serial monitoring and immunosuppression with prednisone and intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG) infusion resulted in two successful pregnancies without sensitization.

CONCLUSION

Screening for couples at risk and prednisone and/or IVIG treatment is an option for women with paternal homozygosity for offending HPA antigen to prevent antenatal sensitization. HPA incompatibility is associated with increased Th1 immunity and NK cell cytotoxicity.

Maternal HLA genotyping is not useful for predicting severity of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

Lack of reliable laboratory parameters is the main challenge in the management of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT). Despite the long-known association between the HLA-DRB3*01:01 allele and human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a) alloimmunisation, maternal human leucocyte antigen (HLA) typing has been of little clinical value. Recently, other DRB3 allele variants have been suggested to predict the severity of FNAIT. In this nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study, we performed extensive HLA typing of 96 women, accounting for 87% of our cohort of 110 families with confirmed or possible HPA-1a-immunisation. The HLA type was compared with anti-HPA-1a levels, severity of neonatal disease and responsiveness to maternally administrated intravenous gammaglobulin (IVIG). HLA haplotypes were constructed to investigate further HLA associations. Despite significantly lower anti-HPA-1a levels in DRB3*01:01-negative women, the carrier status of this particular allele could not be used to confirm or rule out FNAIT in the absence of detectable antibodies. In the haplotype analysis, the DRB3*01:01 allele was the actual factor associated with FNAIT. No other HLA allele was shown to be of additional value as a predictor of severe FNAIT or non-responsiveness to IVIG treatment. Thus, HLA genotyping was not found useful in differentiating high- and low-risk pregnancies or in guiding antenatal treatment in affected families.

The Differential Diagnosis of Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia is, after anemia, the second most common abnormality of the complete blood count in pregnancy, with a reported frequency of 6.6% to 11.2%. It has many causes. Thrombocytopenia should be diagnostically evaluated as early as possible in pregnancy, so that the obstetrical management can be accordingly planned to minimize harm to the mother and child. As the various underlying diseases share clinical features and laboratory findings, the differential diagnosis is often a difficult interdisciplinary challenge.

METHODS

In this article, we review pertinent literature (2000-January 2015) retrieved by a selective search in PubMed.

RESULTS

Gestational thrombocytopenia is the most common type, accounting for 75% of cases, followed by severe pre-eclampsia/HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count) in 15-22% and autoimmune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in 1-4%. Gestational thrombocytopenia and ITP differ in the bleeding history, the severity of thrombocytopenia, the frequency of neo - natal thrombocytopenia, and the rate of normalization of the platelet count after delivery. The HELLP syndrome and rarer microangiopathic hemolytic anemias (e.g., thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura) can be differentiated on the basis of their main clinical features, such as hypertension/proteinuria and upper abdominal pain, the severity of hemolysis and thrombocytopenia, the degree of transaminase elevation, and the rapidity of postpartum remission of the clinical and laboratory findings. A stepwise diagnostic procedure should be followed to distinguish further causes, e.g., to differentiate thrombocytopenia due to infection, autoimmune disease, or drugs from thrombocytopenia due to a rare hereditary disease.

CONCLUSION

The early interdisciplinary evaluation of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy is a prerequisite for the optimal care of the mother and child. The development of evidence-based recommendations for interdisciplinary management should be a goal for the near future.

Fetal/Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia: Pathogenesis, Diagnostics and Prevention

Fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a relatively rare condition (1/1000–1/2000) that was granted orphan status by the European Medicines Agency in 2011. Clinical consequences of FNAIT, however, may be severe. A thrombocytopenic fetus or new-born is at risk of intracranial hemorrhage that may result in lifelong disability or death. Preventing such bleeding is thus vital and requires a solution. Anti-HPA1a antibodies are the most frequent cause of FNAIT in Caucasians. Its pathogenesis is similar to hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) due to anti-RhD antibodies, but is characterized by platelet destruction and is more often observed in the first pregnancy. In 75 % of these women, alloimmunization by HPA-1a antigens, however, occurs at delivery, which enables development of antibody-mediated immune suppression to prevent maternal immunization. As for HDN, the recurrence rate of FNAIT is high. For advancing diagnostic efforts and treatment, it is thereby crucial to understand the pathogenesis of FNAIT, including cellular immunity involvement. This review presents the current knowledge on FNAIT. Also described is a program for HPA-1a screening in identifying HPA-1a negative pregnant women at risk of immunization. This program is now performed at the Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine in cooperation with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical Centre of Postgraduate Education in Warsaw as well as the UiT The Arctic University of Norway.

Platelets and platelet alloantigens: Lessons from human patients and animal models of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

Platelets play critical roles in hemostasis and thrombosis. Emerging evidence indicates that they are versatile cells and also involved in many other physiological processes and disease states. Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a life threatening bleeding disorder caused by fetal platelet destruction by maternal alloantibodies developed during pregnancy. Gene polymorphisms cause platelet surface protein incompatibilities between mother and fetus, and ultimately lead to maternal alloimmunization. FNAIT is the most common cause of intracranial hemorrhage in full-term infants and can also lead to intrauterine growth retardation and miscarriage. Proper diagnosis, prevention and treatment of FNAIT is challenging due to insufficient knowledge of the disease and a lack of routine screening as well as its frequent occurrence in first pregnancies. Given the ethical difficulties in performing basic research on human fetuses and neonates, animal models are essential to improve our understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of FNAIT. The aim of this review is to provide an overview on platelets, hemostasis and thrombocytopenia with a focus on the advancements made in FNAIT by utilizing animal models.

Low-Dose versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Immunoglobulin to Prevent Fetal Intracranial Hemorrhage in Fetal and Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia: A Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE

Pregnancies at risk of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) are commonly treated using weekly intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) at 1 g/kg maternal weight. IVIG is an expensive multidonor human blood product with dose-related side effects. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of IVIG at a lower dose, i.e., 0.5 g/kg.

METHODS

This was a randomized controlled multicenter trial conducted in Sweden, the Netherlands and Australia. Pregnant women with human platelet antigen alloantibodies and an affected previous child without intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were enrolled. The participants were randomized to IVIG at 0.5 or 1 g/kg per week. The analyses were per intention to treat. The primary outcome was fetal or neonatal ICH. Secondary outcomes were platelet count at birth, maternal and neonatal IgG levels, neonatal treatment and bleeding other than ICH.

RESULTS

A total of 23 women were randomized into two groups (low dose: n = 12; standard dose: n = 11). The trial was stopped early due to poor recruitment. No ICH occurred. The median newborn platelet count was 81 × 10(9)/l (range 8-269) in the 0.5 g/kg group versus 110 × 10(9)/l (range 11-279) in the 1 g/kg group (p = 0.644).

CONCLUSION

The risk of adverse outcomes in FNAIT pregnancies treated with IVIG at 0.5 g/kg is very low, similar to that using 1 g/kg, although our uncompleted trial lacked the power to conclusively prove the noninferiority of using the low dose.

Is dosing of therapeutic immunoglobulins optimal? A review of a three-decade long debate in europe

The consumption of immunoglobulins (Ig) is increasing due to better recognition of antibody deficiencies, an aging population, and new indications. This review aims to examine the various dosing regimens and research developments in the established and in some of the relevant off-label indications in Europe. The background to the current regulatory settings in Europe is provided as a backdrop for the latest developments in primary and secondary immunodeficiencies and in immunomodulatory indications. In these heterogeneous areas, clinical trials encompassing different routes of administration, varying intervals, and infusion rates are paving the way toward more individualized therapy regimens. In primary antibody deficiencies, adjustments in dosing and intervals will depend on the clinical presentation, effective IgG trough levels and IgG metabolism. Ideally, individual pharmacokinetic profiles in conjunction with the clinical phenotype could lead to highly tailored treatment. In practice, incremental dosage increases are necessary to titrate the optimal dose for more severely ill patients. Higher intravenous doses in these patients also have beneficial immunomodulatory effects beyond mere IgG replacement. Better understanding of the pharmacokinetics of Ig therapy is leading to a move away from simplistic "per kg" dosing. Defective antibody production is common in many secondary immunodeficiencies irrespective of whether the causative factor was lymphoid malignancies (established indications), certain autoimmune disorders, immunosuppressive agents, or biologics. This antibody failure, as shown by test immunization, may be amenable to treatment with replacement Ig therapy. In certain immunomodulatory settings [e.g., idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)], selection of patients for Ig therapy may be enhanced by relevant biomarkers in order to exclude non-responders and thus obtain higher response rates. In this review, the developments in dosing of therapeutic immunoglobulins have been limited to high and some medium priority indications such as ITP, Kawasaki' disease, Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, myasthenia gravis, multifocal motor neuropathy, fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia, fetal hemolytic anemia, and dermatological diseases.

Neonatal thrombocytopenia: etiology, management and outcome

Thrombocytopenia is a very common hematological abnormality found in newborns, especially in preterm neonates. Two subgroups can be distinguished: early thrombocytopenia, occurring within the first 72 hours of life, and late thrombocytopenia, occurring after the first 72 hours of life. Early thrombocytopenia is associated with intrauterine growth restriction, whereas late thrombocytopenia is caused mainly by sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Platelet transfusions are the hallmark of the treatment of neonatal thrombocytopenia. Most of these transfusions are prophylactic, which means they are given in the absence of bleeding. However, the efficacy of these transfusions in preventing bleeding has never been proven. In addition, risks of platelet transfusion seem to be more pronounced in preterm neonates. Because of lack of data, platelet transfusion guidelines differ widely between countries. This review summarizes the current understanding of etiology and management of neonatal thrombocytopenia.

Neonatal hemochromatosis: management, outcome, and prevention

Neonatal hemochromatosis (NH) is a rare disorder but the most common cause of acute liver failure in neonates. NH is characterized by severe hepatic injury and iron overload and is associated with high perinatal mortality and morbidity rates. NH is often preceded by oligohydramnios and intrauterine growth restriction, suggesting an important impact of NH during fetal life. Stillbirth and prematurity are not uncommon. During the last decade, major discoveries on the etiology of NH have radically changed the management and outcome of this disease. NH is now regarded as an alloimmune disease and is, as such, often referred to as gestational alloimmune liver disease. Antenatal treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins starting at 14 weeks' gestation has been shown to prevent the development of NH in subsequent pregnancies. Postnatal treatment, previously based on the use of anti-oxidants and chelation therapy, has now successfully been replaced by exchange transfusions and intravenous immunoglobulins substitution. This review summarizes the latest discoveries on the etiology of NH and the new recommendations concerning its management and prevention.

Predicting risk severity and response of fetal neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

Fetal neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a devastating bleeding disorder in the fetus or neonate caused by transplacental transport of maternal alloantibodies to paternal-derived antigen on fetal platelets. In Caucasians, up to 80% of FNAIT cases result from maternal immunization to human platelet antigen (HPA)-1a. New methods have developed facilitating detection of common and private antibodies against HPAs triggering FNAIT. Understanding the pathogenesis of FNAIT made it possible to develop a novel strategy to treat this disorder. To date, recombinant monoclonal antibodies directed against the β3 integrin and Fc receptors have been tested in a mouse model of FNAIT, and seem to be promising. Whether those novel treatments will eventually replace the conventional high dose immunoglobulin G in women with FNAIT is yet unknown.

Recombinant HPA-1a antibody therapy for treatment of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: proof of principle in human volunteers

Fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia, caused by the maternal generation of antibodies against fetal human platelet antigen-1a (HPA-1a), can result in intracranial hemorrhage and intrauterine death. We have developed a therapeutic human recombinant high-affinity HPA-1a antibody (B2G1Δnab) that competes for binding to the HPA-1a epitope but carries a modified constant region that does not bind to Fcγ receptors. In vitro studies with a range of clinical anti-HPA-1a sera have shown that B2G1Δnab blocks monocyte chemiluminescence by >75%. In this first-in-man study, we demonstrate that HPA-1a1b autologous platelets (matching fetal phenotype) sensitized with B2G1Δnab have the same intravascular survival as unsensitized platelets (190 hours), while platelets sensitized with a destructive immunoglobulin G1 version of the antibody (B2G1) are cleared from the circulation in 2 hours. Mimicking the situation in fetuses receiving B2G1Δnab as therapy, we show that platelets sensitized with a combination of B2G1 (representing destructive HPA-1a antibody) and B2G1Δnab survive 3 times as long in circulation compared with platelets sensitized with B2G1 alone. This confirms the therapeutic potential of B2G1Δnab. The efficient clearance of platelets sensitized with B2G1 also opens up the opportunity to carry out studies of prophylaxis to prevent alloimmunization in HPA-1a-negative mothers.

Maternal hemolysis after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a therapeutic agent used to prevent fetal thrombocytopenia in those pregnancies identified to be at risk for fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Although generally considered a safe medication, hemolytic anemia is a known side effect of IVIG treatment that may result in maternal medical complications.

CASES

We present three cases of IVIG-induced maternal anemia from separate institutions that occurred during treatment for fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia and resolved after discontinuation or alteration of therapy. None of the treated fetuses had thrombocytopenia at birth.

CONCLUSION

There is a potential for hemolysis when prescribing IVIG. We recommend laboratory monitoring for hemolytic anemia and suggest options for management including drug modification or cessation of therapy.

Fetal intracranial haemorrhages caused by fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: an observational cohort study of 43 cases from an international multicentre registry

OBJECTIVE

To characterise pregnancies where the fetus or neonate was diagnosed with fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) and suffered from intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), with special focus on time of bleeding onset.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study of all recorded cases of ICH caused by FNAIT from the international No IntraCranial Haemorrhage (NOICH) registry during the period 2001-2010.

SETTING

13 tertiary referral centres from nine countries across the world.

PARTICIPANTS

37 mothers and 43 children of FNAIT pregnancies complicated by fetal or neonatal ICH identified from the NOICH registry was included if FNAIT diagnosis and ICH was confirmed.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Gestational age at onset of ICH, type of ICH and clinical outcome of ICH were the primary outcome measures. General maternal and neonatal characteristics of pregnancies complicated by fetal/neonatal ICH were secondary outcome measures.

RESULTS

From a total of 592 FNAIT cases in the registry, 43 confirmed cases of ICH due to FNAIT were included in the study. The majority of bleedings (23/43, 54%) occurred before 28 gestational weeks and often affected the first born child (27/43, 63%). One-third (35%) of the children died within 4 days after delivery. 23 (53%) children survived with severe neurological disabilities and only 5 (12%) were alive and well at time of discharge. Antenatal treatment was not given in most (91%) cases of fetal/neonatal ICH.

CONCLUSIONS

ICH caused by FNAIT often occurs during second trimester and the clinical outcome is poor. In order to prevent ICH caused by FNAIT, at-risk pregnancies must be identified and prevention and/or interventions should start early in the second trimester.

ITP in children: pathophysiology and current treatment approaches

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is one of the most common bleeding disorders of childhood. In most cases, it presents with sudden widespread bruising and petechiae in an otherwise well child. Thought to be mainly a disorder of antibody-mediated platelet destruction, ITP can be self-limited or develop into a chronic condition. In this review, we discuss current concepts of the pathophysiology and treatment approaches to pediatric ITP.

Review of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT), with an incidence of one in 1000 live births, is the most common cause of severe thrombocytopenia and intra-cerebral haemorrhage in term neonates. NAIT results from trans-placental passage of maternal antibodies against a paternally derived fetal platelet alloantigen. Clinical presentation varies from unexpected thrombocytopenia on a blood film in a well newborn to intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). In contrast to haemolytic disease of the newborn, NAIT can present in a first pregnancy, and subsequent pregnancies are usually more severely affected. The role of antenatal screening for maternal alloantibodies instead of fetal blood sampling to identify at-risk fetuses remains uncertain, but there is a trend towards less invasive maternally directed treatment for at-risk pregnancies. Neonatal management is aimed at preventing or limiting thrombocytopenic bleeding with transfusion of antigen-matched platelets.

Determination of human platelet antigen typing by molecular methods: Importance in diagnosis and early treatment of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT) is the most common cause of severe thrombocytopenia and intracranial hemorrhage in the perinatal period. While the gold standard for making a diagnosis of NAIT is detection of a human platelet antigen (HPA)-specific antibody in maternal serum, together with identifying an incompatibility between the parents for the cognate HPA antigen, platelet genotyping is the gold standard method for HPA typing. Platelet genotyping is critical in screening at-risk fetuses for the presence ofthe HPA corresponding to the maternal antibody. In addition, platelet genotyping may play a role in population screening to identify women at risk for sensitization, and thus, fetuses at risk for NAIT. The most commonly used methods of platelet genotyping are sequence-specific primer-polymerase chain reaction (PCR-SSP), restriction fragment length polymorphism-PCR (PCR-RFLP), and TaqMan real-time PCR. PCR-SSP and PCR-RFLP are relatively inexpensive and technically simple methods, but they are not easily automated and require expertise for reliable interpretation of results. Newer methods that allow for multiplexing, automation, and easily interpretable results, such as bead arrays, are currently in development and available for research purposes.

A review of the contemporary management of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia in an Australian tertiary obstetric hospital

BACKGROUND

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is the most common cause of severe perinatal thrombocytopenia, arising from the transplacental passage of maternal antibodies directed at paternally inherited antigens on fetal platelets.

AIM

To review the occurrence, management and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by FNAIT from a single tertiary obstetric hospital in Western Australia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted as a retrospective review of cases with prenatally recognised FNAIT between 2001 and 2011, with the treatment modalities and outcomes analysed.

RESULTS

Over the 10-year period, 20 cases of clinically significant FNAIT in 13 women were managed at our centre. Three cases were complicated by antenatal intracranial haemorrhage (15%), and in all 3, this was the presenting feature leading to diagnosis. In 17/20 (85%) cases, anti-HPA 1a was the responsible antibody, with the remainder being anti-HPA 5b. In 16/17 cases with pre-pregnancy recognition, intravenous gammaglobulin (IVGG) was administered antenatally (gestation at commencement ranging from 13 to 26 weeks) with adjuvant prednisolone in three cases. Postnatal treatment (IVGG or platelet transfusion) was provided in 4/16 cases. There was no intracranial haemorrhage or demise in any case receiving prenatal therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

FNAIT is a rare and serious condition. In our small single-centre study, there was variability in the therapeutic strategies, although IVGG was central to all prenatally managed pregnancies. None of the treated pregnancies was complicated by intracranial haemorrhage or fetal death. There is a need for ongoing refinement of FNAIT management protocols, both in the prenatal and in the postnatal period.