Prenatal findings and associated survival rates in fetal ventriculomegaly: A prospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

Fetal ventriculomegaly is associated with varying degrees of genetic and structural abnormalities. The objective was to present the experience of fetal ventriculomegaly in a large European center in relation to: 1. grade of ventriculomegaly; 2. additional chromosomal/structural abnormalities; and 3. perinatal survival rates.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of patients referred with fetal ventriculomegaly from January 2011 to July 2020. Data were obtained from the hospital database and analyzed to determine the rate of isolated ventriculomegaly, associated structural abnormalities, chromosomal/genetic abnormalities, and survival rates. Data were stratified into three groups; mild (Vp = 10-12 mm), moderate (Vp = 13-15 mm) and severe (Vp > 15 mm) ventriculomegaly.

RESULTS

There were 213 fetuses included for analysis. Of these 42.7% had mild ventriculomegaly, 44.6% severe and 12.7% had moderate ventriculomegaly. Initial ultrasound assessment reported isolated ventriculomegaly in 45.5% fetuses, with additional structural abnormalities in 54.5%. The rate of chromosomal/genetic abnormalities was high,16.4%. After all investigations, the true rate of isolated VM was 36.1%. The overall survival was 85.6%. Survival was higher for those with isolated VM across all groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ventriculomegaly is a complex condition and patients should be counselled that even with apparently isolated VM, there remains the possibility of additional genetic and/or structural problems being diagnosed in up to 10% of fetuses.

Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Fetal malformations occur in 2-3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. "Structural anomalies" include non-transient anatomic alterations. "Soft markers" are often transient minor ultrasound findings. Anomalies not fitting these definitions are categorized as "dynamic". This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in fetuses undergoing molecular testing (chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (WGS)) due to ultrasound findings. The CMA diagnostic yield was 2.15% in single soft markers (vs. 0.79% baseline risk), 3.44% in multiple soft markers, 3.66% in single structural anomalies and 8.57% in multiple structural anomalies. Rates for specific subcategories vary significantly. ES showed a diagnostic rate of 19.47%, reaching 27.47% in multiple structural anomalies. WGS data did not allow meta-analysis. In fetal structural anomalies, CMA is a first-tier test, but should be integrated with karyotype and parental segregations. In this class of fetuses, ES presents a very high incremental yield, with a significant VUSs burden, so we encourage its use in selected cases. Soft markers present heterogeneous CMA results from each other, some of them with risks comparable to structural anomalies, and would benefit from molecular analysis. The diagnostic rate of multiple soft markers poses a solid indication to CMA.

Progress and Challenges in Laboratory-Based Diagnostic and Screening Approaches for Aneuploidy Detection during Pregnancy

Aneuploidy is caused by problems during cellular division and segregation errors during meiosis that lead to an abnormal number of chromosomes and initiate significant genetic abnormalities during pregnancy or the loss of a fetus due to miscarriage. Screening and diagnostic technologies have been developed to detect this genetic condition and provide parents with critical information about their unborn child. In this review, we highlight the complexities of aneuploidy as a disease as well as multiple technological advancements in testing that help to identify aneuploidy at various time points throughout pregnancy. We focus on aneuploidy diagnosis during preimplantation genetic testing that is performed during in vitro fertilization as well as prenatal screening and diagnosis during pregnancy. This review focuses on DNA-based analysis and laboratory techniques for aneuploidy detection through reviewing molecular- and engineering-based technical advancements. We also present key challenges in aneuploidy detection during pregnancy, including sample collection, mosaic embryos, economic factors, and the social implications of this testing. The goal of this review is to synthesize broad information about aneuploidy screening and diagnostic sample collection and analysis during pregnancy and discuss major challenges the field is still facing despite decades of advancements.

Neurodevelopmental outcomes in mild and moderate isolated ventriculomegaly originating in utero

OBJECTIVE

To determine the differences in outcomes between mild and moderate isolated ventriculomegaly (IVM).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study on 94 fetuses with IVM and evaluated the neurodevelopmental outcomes at 12 months of age using the ASQ-3 and BSID-I neurodevelopmental assessment tools. Progression of VM was defined as an increase in the width of the ventricular by at least 3 mm during sequential ultrasound monitoring. The population was divided into two groups according to ventricular width: mild (10-12 mm) and moderate (12.1-15 mm), which were further evaluated for VM progression in utero separately.

RESULTS

Neurodevelopmental assessments at 12 months were the main form of evaluations. Neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) was defined as a mental development index (MDI) or psychomotor development index (PDI) < 85. There were no significant differences in NDI values between the mild and moderate groups (p = .155). Compared with the non-in utero progression group (7.6%), the rate of NDI was significantly higher (p = .004) in the group with progression (33.3%). Using linear regression and correlation, no negative correlation was found between the maximum value of atrial diameter (AD) in utero and the PDI (r = -0.021, p = .914) or MDI (r = -0.073, p = .703) score. However, the maximum change in the AD in utero was negatively correlated with both PDI (r = -0.460, p = .011) and MDI (r=-0.422, p = .020) scores.

CONCLUSION

There were likely no differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes between mild and moderate IVM. In fetuses with mild to moderate VM, intrauterine progression may be a poor prognostic factor for neurodevelopmental outcomes.

A Chinese multicenter retrospective study of isolated increased nuchal translucency associated chromosome anomaly and prenatal diagnostic suggestions

Extensive researches involving fetuses with multiple ultrasound anomalies have been conducted over the years, but only few were focused on the isolated increased nuchal translucency (NT). On top of that, these limited number of researches were all designed as single-arm studies and the control group was missing. In this study, we conducted a multicenter, retrospective study using amniotic fluid samples collected from 1197 pregnant women having fetuses with isolated increased NT (INT group) or normal NT values (NNT group). Copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) was performed to determine their chromosome status and pathogenic variations were validated using SNP array. Overall, 59 chromosome aneuploidies, 34 pathogenic CNVs and 23 copy number variants of unknown significance (VOUS CNVs) were discovered. the INT group had a significantly higher proportion of aneuploidy (19.44%) and pathogenic CNV (8.33%) than the control group (3.49% and 2.30% respectively), and 88.89% of the pathogenic CNVs were related to heart defects. Additionally, more male fetuses were presented in the INT group (68.51%), but they did not have a higher risk (Relative Risk = 1.03) of carrying pathogenic chromosome variations than female fetuses. Our results demonstrated that fetuses with isolated increased NT had a distinct pattern of chromosome abnormality and majority of detected pathogenic CNVs could be linked to the congenital heart disease. Furthermore, because a considerable proportion of pathogenic CNVs were detected, we strongly recommend to perform a joint test of karyotyping and CNV analysis in prenatal diagnosis for fetuses with isolated increased NT in order to decrease the incident of missed diagnosis.

Diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with isolated increased nuchal translucency: a French multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency and nature of copy number variants (CNVs) identified by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in a large cohort of fetuses with isolated increased nuchal translucency thickness (NT) ≥ 3.5 mm.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicenter study, including 11 French hospitals, of data from the period between April 2012 and December 2015. In total, 720 fetuses were analyzed by rapid aneuploidy test and the fetuses identified as euploid underwent CMA. CNVs detected were evaluated for clinical significance and classified into five groups: pathogenic CNVs; benign CNVs; CNVs predisposing to neurodevelopmental disorders; variants of uncertain significance (VOUS); and CNVs not related to the phenotype (i.e. incidental findings).

RESULTS

In 121 (16.8%) fetuses, an aneuploidy involving chromosome 13, 18 or 21 was detected by rapid aneuploidy test and the remaining 599 fetuses were euploid. Among these, 53 (8.8%) had a CNV detected by CMA: 16/599 (2.7%) were considered to be pathogenic, including 11/599 (1.8%) that were cryptic (not visible by karyotyping); 7/599 (1.2%) were CNVs predisposing to neurodevelopmental disorders; and 8/599 (1.3%) were VOUS. Additionally, there was one (0.2%) CNV that was unrelated to the reason for referral diagnosis (i.e. an incidental finding) and the remaining 21 were benign CNVs, without clinical consequence. Interestingly, we identified five genomic imbalances of the 1q21.1 or 15q11.2 regions known to be associated with congenital heart defects.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the benefit of CMA in the etiological diagnosis of fetuses with isolated increased NT. It is worth noting that most (69%) of the detected pathogenic CNVs were cryptic. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Mild fetal ventriculomegaly: diagnosis, evaluation, and management

Ventriculomegaly is defined as dilation of the fetal cerebral ventricles and is a relatively common finding on prenatal ultrasound. The purpose of this document is to review the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of mild fetal ventriculomegaly. When enlargement of the lateral ventricles (≥10 mm) is identified, a thorough evaluation should be performed, including detailed sonographic evaluation of fetal anatomy, amniocentesis for karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis, and a workup for fetal infection. In some cases, fetal magnetic resonance imaging may identify other central nervous system abnormalities and should be considered when this technology as well as expert interpretation is available. Follow-up ultrasound examination should be performed to assess for progression of the ventricular dilation. In the setting of isolated ventriculomegaly of 10-12 mm, the likelihood of survival with normal neurodevelopment is >90%. With moderate ventriculomegaly (13-15 mm), the likelihood of normal neurodevelopment is 75-93%. The following are Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommendations: We suggest that ventriculomegaly be characterized as mild (10-12 mm), moderate (13-15 mm), or severe (>15 mm) for the purposes of patient counseling, given that the chance of an adverse outcome and potential for other abnormalities are higher when the ventricles measure 13-15 mm vs 10-12 mm (GRADE 2B); we recommend that diagnostic testing (amniocentesis) with chromosomal microarray analysis should be offered when ventriculomegaly is detected (GRADE 1B); we recommend testing for cytomegalovirus and toxoplasmosis when ventriculomegaly is detected, regardless of known exposure or symptoms (GRADE 1B); we suggest that magnetic resonance imaging be considered in cases of mild or moderate fetal ventriculomegaly when this modality and expert radiologic interpretation are available; magnetic resonance imaging is likely to be of less value if the patient has had a detailed ultrasound performed by an individual with specific experience and expertise in sonographic imaging of the fetal brain (GRADE 2B); we recommend that timing and mode of delivery be based on standard obstetric indications (GRADE 1C); we recommend that with isolated mild ventriculomegaly of 10-12 mm, after a complete evaluation, women be counseled that the outcome is favorable, and the infant is likely to be normal (GRADE 1B); we recommend that with isolated moderate ventriculomegaly of 13-15 mm, after a complete evaluation, women be counseled that the outcome is likely to be favorable but that there is an increased risk of neurodevelopmental disabilities (GRADE 1B).

Cut-off value of nuchal translucency as indication for chromosomal microarray analysis

OBJECTIVES

An association between isolated, increased nuchal translucency thickness (NT) and pathogenic findings on chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has been reported. A recent meta-analysis reported that most studies use a NT cut-off value of 3.5 mm. However, considering NT distribution and the commonly accepted 5% false-positive rate in maternal serum screening, NT cut-off levels should be reconsidered. The aim of this study was to assess different NT cut-off levels as indication for CMA and to determine whether CMA should be recommended for mildly increased NT of 3.0-3.4 mm.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicenter study of singleton pregnancies with CMA results and either normal NT and no other finding or with increased NT as the only medical indication for CMA at the time of an invasive procedure (increased NT was considered an isolated finding in cases of advanced maternal age). Women with normal fetal NT who underwent CMA did so at their own request. A single laboratory performed all genetic analyses. Comparative genomic hybridization microarray analysis or single nucleotide polymorphism array technology was used for CMA. If combined first-trimester screening (NT and biochemistry) indicated increased risk for common aneuploidies, the case was excluded. NT was used to divide cases into three groups (≤ 2.9 mm, 3.0-3.4 mm and ≥ 3.5 mm) and their CMA results were compared.

RESULTS

CMA results were recorded in 1588 pregnancies, among which 770 fetuses had either normal NT with no other finding or isolated increased NT. Of these, 462 had NT ≤ 2.9 mm, 170 had NT of 3.0-3.4 mm and 138 had NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Pathogenic copy number variants were found in 1.7%, 6.5% and 13.8% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that CMA should be recommended when fetuses have isolated, mildly increased NT (3.0-3.4 mm). Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Microarrays in prenatal diagnosis

In prenatal diagnosis, chromosomal microarray (CMA) has not yet fully replaced conventional karyotyping but has rapidly become the recommended test in pregnancies with ultrasound abnormalities. In this review, we provide an overview of the published data concerning this technology and the controversies concerning its use in the prenatal setting. There is abundant evidence indicating the added detection of pathogenic abnormalities with CMA in comparison to the traditional karyotyping, especially in fetuses with multiple or isolated ultrasound abnormalities such as congenital heart disease, increased nuchal translucency, or oral cleft. On the other hand, there is also a risk to detect variants of unknown significance, late-onset disorders, and variants in susceptibility loci. However, it has been shown that pregnant couples tend to prefer a maximum of information about the health of their unborn child. Taken together, CMA has considerable diagnostic and prognostic values during pregnancy and should therefore be the test of choice.

Clinical experience of unexpected findings in prenatal array testing

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether unexpected diagnoses (UD) made by prenatal array testing contribute to pregnancy management.

PATIENTS & METHODS

In 2010-2015 in 19/4043 (0.5%) pregnancies an UD was made. The clinical usefulness of UDs was assessed based on the couple's responses during post-test counseling and their decisions.

RESULTS

In 16/19 cases, the UD was helpful either for the couples in making a decision about the course of their pregnancy, for perinatal management or family genetic counseling.

CONCLUSION

The majority of the pregnant couples found the UDs relevant for pregnancy management and genetic counseling. This adds another motive for offering whole genome array during pregnancy in patients who wish broad testing of their fetus.

Identification of minor chromosomal defects causing abnormal foetus and spontaneous abortions

BACKGROUND

Chromosomal abnormalities are the most common cause of recurrent abortions and miscarriages (RAM), but micro-variations on chromosomes causing RAM have never been previously studied. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the single nucleotide variations frequently present at genome with the density of at least one common (>20% allele frequency) SNP per kilobase pair. It has already been reported that SNP array examination for chromosomal abnormalities has better performance than the conventional cytogenetic karyotyping.

METHODS

We applied SNP array to detect the chromosomal defects in 80 placental villi and foetal tissues of abnormal foetus and spontaneous abortions.

RESULTS

The analyses of data revealed that total 52.5% (42/80) cases were found to have chromosomal abnormalities. The trisomies were most commonly found 26/42 (61.9%) in current samples. Total 8/42 (19.1%) cases were found to have other structural aberrations including translocations in 2/8 (25%), duplications and deletions in 3/8 (37.5%) cases, respectively. SNP analysis also successfully detected triploidy 69,XXX and tetraploidy 92,XXXY. Total 12/80 cases were performed by cytogenetic karyotyping and results were compared with SNP data. Total 5/12 (41.7%) cases were found to have same findings with SNP data while results of 2/12 (16.7%) cases had partial similarity between both techniques. Four cases were declared as karyotypically normal (46,XY or 46,XX) by cytogenetic examination, but later on these four cases were found to have small chromosomal variation which could be the cause of RAM in women.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, we conclude that use of a high-density SNP platform in diagnosis can give better understanding of molecular causes of pregnancy loss and foetal abnormalities.

Prenatal Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Fetuses With Structural Cardiac Anomalies

OBJECTIVES

To examine the diagnostic performance of array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) for fetal cardiac anomalies in two medium-sized Canadian prenatal genetics clinics.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 22 pregnant women with fetal structural cardiac anomalies, normal rapid aneuploidy detection, and FISH for 22q11.2 testing for array CGH analysis.

RESULTS

One case had an 8p deletion that was also visible on karyotype and included the GATA4 gene, which has been associated with congenital heart disease. Two cases had inherited pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) of variable expressivity and penetrance: one was a duplication of 16p11.2 and the other a deletion of 15q11.2. One case had the incidental finding of being a carrier of a recessive disease unrelated to the cardiac anomaly.

CONCLUSIONS

Of these prospectively recruited cases of fetal cardiac anomalies, 14% had a pathogenic result on array CGH. Pathogenic CNVs of variable penetrance and expressivity were a significant proportion of the positive results identified. These CNVs are generally associated with neurodevelopmental issues and may or may not have been associated with the fetus' underlying congenital heart disease. Array CGH increases the diagnostic yield in this group of patients; however, certain CNVs remain a challenge for counselling in the prenatal setting.

Genomic microarray in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and normal karyotype: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incremental yield of detecting copy number variants (CNVs) by genomic microarray over karyotyping in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT) diagnosed by first-trimester ultrasound.

METHODS

This was a systematic review conducted in accordance with PRISMA criteria. We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE and Web of Science for studies published between January 2009 and January 2015 that described CNVs in fetuses with increased NT, usually defined as ≥  3.5 mm, and normal karyotype. Search terms included: fetal or prenatal, nuchal translucency or cystic hygroma or ultrasound anomaly, array comparative genomic hybridization or copy number variants, with related search terms. Risk differences were pooled to estimate the overall and stratified microarray incremental yield using RevMan. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Quality Assessment tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Meta-analysis indicated an incremental yield of 5.0% (95% CI, 2.0-8.0%) for the detection of CNVs using microarray when pooling results. Stratified analysis of microarray results demonstrated a 4.0% (95% CI, 2.0-7.0%) incremental yield in cases of isolated NT and 7.0% (95% CI, 2.0-12.0%) when other malformations were present. The most common pathogenic CNVs reported were 22q11.2 deletion, 22q11.2 duplication, 10q26.12q26.3 deletion and 12q21q22 deletion. The pooled prevalence for variants of uncertain significance was 1%.

CONCLUSION

The use of genomic microarray provides a 5.0% incremental yield of detecting CNVs in fetuses with increased NT and normal karyotype.

Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing

OBJECTIVE

Chromosome microarray analysis is poised to take a significant place in the prenatal setting given its increased yield over standard karyotyping, but concerns regarding ethical and counseling challenges remain, especially associated with the risk of uncertain and incidental findings. Guidelines recommend patients receiving prenatal screening to undergo genetic counseling prior to testing, but little is known about women's specific pre-testing and post-testing informational needs, as well as their preference for return of various types of results.

METHODS

The present study surveys 199 prenatal genetic counselors who have counseled patients undergoing chromosome microarray analysis testing and 152 women who have undergone testing on the importance of understanding pre-test information, return of various types of results, and resources made available following an abnormal finding.

RESULTS

Counselors and patients agree on many aspects, although findings indicate patients consider all available information very important, while genetic counselors give more varying ratings.

CONCLUSION

Counseling sessions would benefit from information personalized to a patient's particular needs and a shared decision-making model, to reduce informational overload and avoid unnecessary anxiety. Additionally, policies regarding the return of various types of results are needed. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

ISPD gene homozygous deletion identified by SNP array confirms prenatal manifestation of Walker-Warburg syndrome

Walker-Warburg syndrome (WWS) is a rare form of autosomal recessive, congenital muscular dystrophy that is associated with brain and eye anomalies. Several genes encoding proteins involved in abnormal α-dystroglycan glycosylation have been implicated in the aetiology of WWS, most recently the ISPD gene. Typical WWS brain anomalies, such as cobblestone lissencephaly, hydrocephalus and cerebellar malformations, can be prenatally detected through routine ultrasound examinations. Here, we report two karyotypically normal foetuses with multiple brain anomalies that corresponded to WWS symptoms. Using a SNP-array examination on the amniotic fluid DNA, a homozygous microdeletion was identified at 7p21.2p21.1 within the ISPD gene. Published data and our findings led us to the conclusion that a homozygous segmental intragenic deletion of the ISPD gene causes the most severe phenotype of Walker-Warburg syndrome. Our results also clearly supports the use of chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line diagnostic test in patients with a foetus with one or more major structural abnormalities identified on ultrasonographic examination.

Chromosomal microarray in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical value of using high-resolution chromosomal microarray (CMA) for the examination of genomic imbalances in prenatal uncultured chorionic villus samples from fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT) and a normal quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) result, in a clinical setting in which more than 95% of pregnant women receive first-trimester combined screening.

METHODS

From January 2013 to July 2014, we included 132 chorionic villus samples from consecutive ongoing pregnancies, with fetal NT ≥ 3.5  mm at 11-13 weeks' gestation, from obstetric units (publicly funded healthcare) in Central and North Denmark Regions. DNA was extracted directly from the samples and examined with QF-PCR (n = 132) and 180 kb oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization (n =  94).

RESULTS

In 38 cases, aneuploidies for chromosomes 18, 21 or X, or triploidy, were detected by QF-PCR. Among the 94 cases with a normal QF-PCR result, we detected pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) by CMA in 12 fetuses (12.8% (95% CI, 7.5-21.0%)). In an additional three (3.2%) cases, CNVs with uncertain clinical significance were detected.

CONCLUSION

CMA is a valuable diagnostic technique in pregnancies with isolated fetal NT ≥ 3.5 mm.

Array comparative genomic hybridization and fetal congenital heart defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a molecular cytogenetic technique that is able to detect the presence of copy number variants (CNVs) within the genome. The detection rate of imbalances by aCGH compared to standard karyotyping and 22q11 microdeletion analysis by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), in the setting of prenatally-diagnosed cardiac malformations, has been reported in several studies. The objective of our study was to perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to document the additional diagnostic gain of using aCGH in cases of congenital heart disease (CHD) diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound examination, with the aim of assisting clinicians to determine whether aCGH analysis is warranted when an ultrasonographic diagnosis of CHD is made, and to guide counseling in this setting.

METHODS

Articles in PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases from January 2007 to September 2014 describing CNVs in prenatal cases of CHD were included. Search terms were: 'array comparative genomic hybridization', 'copy number variants' and 'fetal congenital heart defects'. Articles regarding karyotyping or 22q11 deletion only were excluded.

RESULTS

Thirteen publications (including 1131 cases of CHD) met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. Meta-analysis indicated an incremental yield of 7.0% (95% CI, 5.3-8.6%) for the detection of CNVs using aCGH, excluding aneuploidy and 22q11 microdeletion cases. Subgroup results showed a 3.4% (95% CI, 0.3-6.6%) incremental yield in isolated CHD cases, and 9.3% (95% CI,  6.6-12%) when extracardiac malformations were present. Overall, an incremental yield of 12% (95% CI, 7.6-16%) was found when 22q11 deletion cases were included. There was an additional yield of 3.4% (95% CI, 2.1-4.6%) for detecting variants of unknown significance (VOUS).

CONCLUSIONS

In this review we provide an overview of published data and discuss the benefits and limitations of using aCGH. If karyotyping and 22q11 microdeletion analysis by FISH are normal, using aCGH has additional value, detecting pathogenic CNVs in 7.0% of prenatally diagnosed CHD, with a 3.4% additional yield of detecting VOUS.

Additional value of prenatal genomic array testing in fetuses with isolated structural ultrasound abnormalities and a normal karyotype: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To establish the prevalence of submicroscopic genetic copy number variants (CNVs) in fetuses with a structural ultrasound anomaly (restricted to one anatomical system) and a normal karyotype. The aim was to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of genomic array testing in these pregnancies.

METHODS

Embase and PubMed databases were systematically searched for all relevant articles on prevalence of pathogenic submicroscopic CNVs in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies. Reported cases were sorted into groups according to anatomical site of the detected ultrasound anomaly. The prevalence of causative submicroscopic CNVs was calculated for each group.

RESULTS

Combined data of the reviewed studies (n = 18) indicated that fetuses with an ultrasound anomaly restricted to one anatomical system (n = 2220) had a 3.1-7.9% chance of carrying a causative submicroscopic CNV, depending on the anatomical system affected. This chance increased to 9.1% for fetuses with multiple ultrasound anomalies (n = 1139).

CONCLUSION

This review indicates that 3.1-7.9% of fetuses with a structural ultrasound anomaly restricted to one anatomical system and a normal karyotype will show a submicroscopic CNV, which explains its phenotype and provides information for fetal prognosis. Therefore, we conclude that microarray has considerable diagnostic and prognostic value in these pregnancies.

Best diagnostic approach for the genetic evaluation of fetuses after intrauterine death in first, second or third trimester: QF-PCR, karyotyping and/or genome wide SNP array analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the best diagnostic approach for the genetic analysis of samples from first, second and third trimester intrauterine fetal deaths (IUFDs). We examined a total of 417 IUFD samples from fetuses with and without congenital anomalies. On 414 samples, karyotyping (N = 46) and/or rapid aneuploidy testing by QF-PCR (N = 371) was performed). One hundred sixty eight samples with a normal test result were subsequently tested by genome wide Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) array analysis. Three samples were only analyzed by array.

RESULTS

In 50 (12.0%) samples an aneuploidy was detected by QF-PCR and/or karyotyping, representing 47.1% of first, 13.2% of second and 3.4% of third trimester pregnancies. Karyotyping and QF-PCR failed in 4 (8.7%) and 7 (1.9%) samples, respectively, concerning mostly contaminated amniotic fluid samples from third trimester pregnancies.Clinically relevant aberrations were identified in 4.2% (all fetuses with malformations) of the 168 samples tested by SNP array. Inherited copy number variants (CNVs) were detected in 5.4% and 8.9% showed CNVs of unknown clinical relevance as parental inheritance could not be studied yet. In a sample from a fetus suspect for Meckel-Grüber syndrome, the genotype information from the SNP array revealed various stretches of homozygosity, including one stretch encompassing the CEP290 gene. Subsequent CEP290 mutation analysis revealed a homozygous, pathogenic mutation in this gene.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our experience we recommend QF-PCR as the first-line test in IUFD samples of first and second trimester pregnancies to exclude aneuploidy before performing array analysis. The chance to detect aneuploidy in third trimester pregnancies is relatively low and therefore array analysis can be performed as a first-tier test. A tissue sample, instead of amniotic fluid, is preferred because of a higher success rate in testing.We emphasize the need for analysis of parental samples whenever a rare, unique CNV is detected to allow for better interpretation of such findings and to improve future pregnancy management. Furthermore, we illustrate the strength of SNP arrays for genotype analysis, even though we realize it is crucial to have detailed phenotypic information to make optimal use of the genotype data in finding candidate recessive genes that may be related to the fetal phenotype.

Implementation of high-resolution SNP arrays in the investigation of fetuses with ultrasound malformations: 5 years of clinical experience

Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) has proven to be a powerful tool in postnatal patients with intellectual disabilities, and it is increasingly used in prenatal diagnosis. However, its diagnostic capabilities in prenatal diagnosis vary, and clinical experiences have failed to establish a consensus regarding CMA indications, the design and resolution of microarrays, and the notification and interpretation of copy number variations (CNVs). We present our 5 years of clinical experience using whole-genome high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays to investigate 446 fetuses that had structural malformations detected with ultrasound but for which standard karyotyping analysis showed normal karyotypes. CMA revealed genomic CNVs in 323 (72.4%) cases and clinically significant CNVs in 11.4% of the fetuses (51/446), including 2 cases of uniparental disomy (UPD) as well as 1 case of cryptic mosaic monosomy of chromosome X. Variants of unknown significance (VOUS) existed in 2.0% of the tested fetuses (9/446). Our results demonstrate the value of whole-genome high-resolution SNP arrays in fetuses with congenital malformations and give a higher detection rate of clinically significant genomic imbalance, especially for detecting UPD. Sufficient communication between technicians and genetic counselors, along with parental testing and comparison with data from in-house or international sources, can significantly reduce VOUS.

0.5 Mb array as a first-line prenatal cytogenetic test in cases without ultrasound abnormalities and its implementation in clinical practice

Using whole-genome array testing instead of karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis for all indications may be desirable because of the higher diagnostic yield and shorter reporting time. The goal of this research was finding the optimal array resolution that could replace routine prenatal karyotyping in cases without ultrasound abnormalities, for example, referred for advanced maternal age or abnormal first trimester screening. As variants of unknown clinical significance (VOUS), if reported, might complicate decision-making about continuation of pregnancy, such an optimal array resolution should have a high abnormality detection rate and reveal a minimal amount of VOUS. The array data of 465 fetuses were retrospectively evaluated with several resolution levels, and the Decipher microdeletion/microduplication syndrome list was reviewed to assess what could be theoretically missed with a lower resolution. A 0.5-Mb resolution showed a high diagnostic yield potential and significantly minimized the number of VOUS. Based on our experience, we recommend genomic SNP array as a first-tier test in prenatal diagnosis. The resolution should be chosen based on the indication. In cases of fetal ultrasound abnormalities or intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), high-resolution analysis should be done. In other cases, we advise replacing karyotyping by SNP array analysis with 0.5 Mb resolution.

Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings: evaluation of chromosomal microarray-based analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the frequency of karyotype abnormalities and chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome among fetuses with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings, and to evaluate the clinical value of chromosomal microarray-based analysis (CMA) in the study of such pregnancies.

METHODS

First, we carried out retrospective analysis of karyotype abnormalities and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome cases diagnosed between January 2009 and December 2011 in our center among fetuses with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings (n = 276). Second, CMA was performed in 51 of the fetuses with such findings, normal karyotype and negative or no 22q11.2 deletion syndrome study, and in the only fetus with a heart defect and an apparently balanced de novo chromosomal rearrangement.

RESULTS

Out of the 276 pregnancies with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings, karyotyping revealed a chromosomal abnormality in 44 (15.9%). Of fetuses with normal karyotype in which 22q11.2 deletion syndrome studies were performed, 6.4% (5/78) had this microdeletion syndrome. Among fetuses with abnormal cardiac findings, normal karyotype and negative or no 22q11.2 deletion syndrome study that underwent CMA, the detection rate of pathogenic copy number variants not detected by conventional cytogenetics was 2.0% (1/51), and no variants of uncertain clinical significance were found. In the fetus with a heart defect and an apparently balanced de novo chromosomal rearrangement, CMA revealed that the rearrangement was not truly balanced.

CONCLUSIONS

In the assessment of genetic abnormalities in pregnancies with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings, the diagnostic yield may be increased by 2% if CMA is used as a complementary tool to conventional cytogenetics. Our results suggest that CMA could be a good alternative to karyotyping in these pregnancies.

Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis: a survey of prenatal genetic counselors' experiences and attitudes

OBJECTIVE

Studies showing the efficacy and accuracy of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in prenatal diagnosis may position it as a first-tier prenatal test. This study seeks to characterize the practices and attitudes of North American prenatal genetic counselors regarding CMA.

METHOD

Genetic counselors (N = 196) in Canada and the USA responded to an anonymous online survey. Completed surveys were analyzed (n = 160).

RESULTS

Most respondents viewed CMA as useful (73%), presented CMA to patients (84%), and had ordered CMA at least once (69%). The use of full versus targeted arrays varied. Logistic regression analyses identified three significant predictors for the view that prenatal CMA is useful: more prenatal counseling experience, younger age, and previously presenting CMA to a patient. Three factors predicted the likelihood of offering CMA to prenatal patients: percentage of time spent in prenatal practice, belief that CMA is useful, and practicing in the USA (versus Canada). Reasons cited for not using CMA included financial concerns, the possibility of ambiguous results, and ethical concerns. Most respondents (n = 111) believed that ambiguous results are an ethical issue.

CONCLUSION

Clinical guidelines for prenatal CMA, further research on specific copy number variants, and broader availability of targeted arrays to reduce ambiguous results are needed.