Maternal obesity and Down syndrome in the offspring: is there a link?

Prevalence and risk factors for Down syndrome: A hospital-based single-center study in Western Mexico

Although Hispanics of Mexican origin in the United States have been identified as a population with a particularly higher rate of Down syndrome (DS), there is a paucity of studies concerning this topic in Mexico. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for DS in a population from Western Mexico. For prevalence, 230 liveborn infants with DS were included from a total of 89,332 births occurring during the period 2009-2017 at the Dr. Juan I. Menchaca Civil Hospital of Guadalajara (Mexico). In order to evaluate potential DS risks, a case-control study was conducted among 633 newborns, including those 211 DS patients with full trisomy 21 (cases) and 422 infants without birth defects (controls). Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The overall prevalence for DS was 25.7 per 10,000 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 22.4-29.1). Patients with DS had a significantly higher risk for family history of DS in distant relatives (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.4, 95% CI: 2.5-7.7), relatives with thyroid disease (aOR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2-4.0), maternal age ≤ 19 years (aOR = 5.1, 95% CI: 2.7-9.6) or ≥ 35 years (aOR = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.5-6.9), paternal age ≤ 19 years (aOR = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.7-7.4), pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² (aOR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.0-2.4), and pre-pregnancy alcohol consumption (aOR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-2.9). The identified risks in family history, and previously mentioned nutritional disadvantages were associated with DS in our sample and probably also to its increased prevalence in our population.

Aspirin and heparin in pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

A pro-coagulant state during pregnancy can be involved in the occurrence of gestational vascular complications (GVCs) and venous thromboembolism (VTE).

AREAS COVERED

Antithrombotic drugs are used to prevent GVCs and VTE. Aspirin is not efficacious to prevent recurrences in women with previous early loss, while it can prevent pre-eclampsia in some groups of women. Heparins are not effective in the prevention of early recurrent loss and there is uncertainty about their efficacy in women carrying inherited thrombophilias. They could be efficacious in the prevention of GVCs in carriers of inherited thrombophilias, as GVCs have heterogeneous causes, and future studies have to focus on more homogeneous groups of patients. Not enough data are available regarding prophylaxis with heparins to prevent pregnancy-related VTE, but an accurate risk stratification of women during pregnancy and puerperium is crucial for administering prophylaxis in moderate-/high-risk women. Aspirin does not improve live births after assisted reproductive technologies, while heparins increase the number of clinical pregnancies and live births.

EXPERT OPINION

Aspirin is efficacious in the prevention of GVCs in women at risk for pre-eclampsia and in those with antiphospholipid antibodies syndrome. Heparins could give benefit to women at risk for GVCs and/or pregnancy-related VTE.