1
|
Siranosian J, Lewis C, Hill M, Ormond KE. Exploring prenatal testing preferences among US pregnant individuals: A discrete choice experiment. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:699-708. [PMID: 37646199 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Although there are numerous benefits to diagnostic prenatal testing, such as fetal exome sequencing, there are also consequences, including the possibility of receiving variants of uncertain significance or identifying secondary findings. In this study, we utilized a survey-based discrete choice experiment to elicit the preferences of pregnant people in Northern California for hypothetical prenatal genomic tests. Pregnant individuals were invited to complete the survey through advertisements on social media. Five test attributes were studied: likelihood of getting a result, time taken to receive results, who explains results, reporting of uncertain results, and reporting of secondary findings. The survey also gathered information about the participants' demographics, current and past pregnancies, and tolerance of uncertainty using the IUS-12 scale. Participants were eligible if they were female, currently 24 or more weeks pregnant, and able to read/write enough English or Spanish to complete an online survey. Overall, participants (n = 56) preferred the option of having a prenatal test over not having a prenatal test (p < 0.01) and had substantially higher preferences for tests with the highest likelihood of getting a result (p < 0.01). There were also positive preferences for tests that reported secondary findings (p = 0.01) and those where results were returned by a genetic specialist (vs. their prenatal provider) (p = 0.04). These findings can be used to guide conversations between pregnant individuals and genetics specialists, such as genetic counselors, as they weigh the pros and cons of diagnostic prenatal testing options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Siranosian
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Celine Lewis
- Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lu D, Yang J, Shen W, Chen M. Attitudes toward uncertain results from prenatal exome sequencing: a national survey among healthcare professionals working in the prenatal setting. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1335649. [PMID: 38813373 PMCID: PMC11133618 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1335649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the attitudes of healthcare professionals (HPs) working in the prenatal setting toward uncertain results (UR) from prenatal exome sequencing (pES) in China. Methods We conducted a national survey among HPs working in the prenatal setting. UR in our study include variants of uncertain significance (VUS), variants with variable penetrance/expressivity (VVPE), and secondary findings unrelated to the indication for testing (SFs). A total of 285 questionnaires that met the inclusion criteria were collected. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26. Results When performing the pre-test counseling, only 7.4% of HPs mentioned the possibility of VUS, 6.3% discussed the possibility of VVPE, and 7.4% introduced the SFs with parents with the option to not report these variants. In post-test counseling, 73.0-82.8% HPs discussed with the parents but did not make any recommendations for managing the pregnancy after reporting UR (73.0% for VUS, 82.8% for VVPE, 74.7% for SFs, respectively). Conclusion Most parents did not have the option of opting out of reporting UR from pES in pre-test counseling. UR did not influence the pregnancy recommendation made by most HPs. Establishing national guidelines for reporting UR from pES and developing strategies to improve counseling skills may help HPs manage UR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongfang Lu
- Department of Obstetrics, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of Obstetrics, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei Shen
- Department of Obstetrics, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Min Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McInnes-Dean H, Mellis R, Daniel M, Walton H, Baple EL, Bertoli M, Fisher J, Gajewska-Knapik K, Holder-Espinasse M, Lafarge C, Leeson-Beevers K, McEwan A, Pandya P, Parker M, Peet S, Roberts L, Sankaran S, Smith A, Tapon D, Wu WH, Wynn SL, Chitty LS, Hill M, Peter M. 'Something that helped the whole picture': Experiences of parents offered rapid prenatal exome sequencing in routine clinical care in the English National Health Service. Prenat Diagn 2024; 44:465-479. [PMID: 38441167 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In October 2020, rapid prenatal exome sequencing (pES) was introduced into routine National Health Service (NHS) care in England. This study aimed to explore parent experiences and their information and support needs from the perspective of parents offered pES and of health professionals involved in its delivery. METHODS In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 42 women and 6 male partners and 63 fetal medicine and genetic health professionals. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Overall views about pES were positive and parents were grateful to be offered the test. Highlighted benefits of pES included the value of the additional information for pregnancy management and planning for future pregnancies. An anxious wait for results was common, often associated with the need to make decisions near to 24 weeks in pregnancy when there are legal restrictions for late termination. Descriptions of dealing with uncertainty were also common, even when results had been returned. Many parents described pES results as informing decision-making around whether or not to terminate pregnancy. Some professionals were concerned that a non-informative result could be overly reassuring and highlighted that careful counselling was needed to ensure parents have a good understanding of what the result means for their pregnancy. Emotional support from professionals was valued; however, some parents felt that post-test support was lacking. CONCLUSION Parents and professionals welcomed the introduction of pES. Results inform parents' decision-making around the termination of pregnancy. When there are no diagnostic findings or uncertain findings from pES, personalised counselling that considers scans and other tests are crucial. Directing parents to reliable online sources of information and providing emotional support throughout could improve their experiences of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah McInnes-Dean
- Antenatal Results and Choices, London, UK
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Rhiannon Mellis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Morgan Daniel
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Holly Walton
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emma L Baple
- RILD Wellcome Wolfson Centre, University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
- Peninsula Clinical Genetics Service, School, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | | | - Katarzyna Gajewska-Knapik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Muriel Holder-Espinasse
- Clinical Genetics Department, Guy's Hospital, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline Lafarge
- School of Human and Social Sciences, University of West London, London, UK
| | | | - Alec McEwan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - Pranav Pandya
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Michael Parker
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Srividhya Sankaran
- School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Kings College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Women and Children Health, Evelina Women & Children's Hospital Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Audrey Smith
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Dagmar Tapon
- Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Wing Han Wu
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Sarah L Wynn
- Unique - Rare Chromosome Disorder Support Group, Oxted, UK
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Michelle Peter
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Bever Y, Groenenberg IAL, Knapen MFCM, Dessens AB, Hannema SE, Wolffenbuttel KP, Diderich KEM, Hoefsloot LH, Srebniak MI, Bruggenwirth HT. Prenatal ultrasound finding of atypical genitalia: Counseling, genetic testing and outcomes. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43:162-182. [PMID: 35808910 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report uptake of genetic counseling (GC) and prenatal genetic testing after the finding of atypical genitalia on prenatal ultrasound (US) and the clinical and genetic findings of these pregnancies. METHODS A retrospective cohort study (2017-2019) of atypical fetal genitalia in a large expert center for disorders/differences of sex development. We describe counseling aspects, invasive prenatal testing, genetic and clinical outcome of fetuses apparently without [group 1, n = 22 (38%)] or with [group 2, n = 36 (62%)] additional anomalies on US. RESULTS In group 1, 86% of parents opted for GC versus 72% in group 2, and respectively 58% and 15% of these parents refrained from invasive testing. Atypical genitalia were postnatally confirmed in 91% (group 1) and 64% (group 2), indicating a high rate of false positive US diagnosis of ambiguous genitalia. Four genetic diagnoses were established in group 1 (18%) and 10 in group 2 (28%). The total genetic diagnostic yield was 24%. No terminations of pregnancy occurred in group 1. CONCLUSIONS For optimal care, referral for an expert fetal US scan, GC and invasive diagnostics including broad testing should be offered after prenatal detection of isolated atypical genitalia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolande van Bever
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irene A L Groenenberg
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten F C M Knapen
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arianne B Dessens
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine E Hannema
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katja P Wolffenbuttel
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karin E M Diderich
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lies H Hoefsloot
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Malgorzata I Srebniak
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hennie T Bruggenwirth
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sparks TN, Dugoff L. How to choose a test for prenatal genetic diagnosis: a practical overview. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 228:178-186. [PMID: 36029833 PMCID: PMC9877133 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Establishing the diagnosis of a fetal genetic disease in utero expands decision-making opportunities for individuals during pregnancy and enables providers to tailor prenatal care and surveillance to disease-specific risks. The selection of prenatal genetic tests is guided by key details from fetal imaging, family and obstetrical history, suspected diagnoses and mechanisms of disease, an accurate understanding of what abnormalities each test is designed to detect, and, at times, the gestational age at which testing is initiated. Pre- and posttest counseling, by or in conjunction with providers trained in genetics, ensure an accurate understanding of genetic tests, their potential results and limitations, estimated turnaround time for results, and the clinical implications of their findings. As prenatal diagnosis and testing options continue to expand rapidly, it is increasingly important for obstetrical providers to understand how to choose appropriate genetic testing and contextualize the clinical implications of their results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa N Sparks
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Lorraine Dugoff
- Divisions of Reproductive Genetics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Next Generation Sequencing after Invasive Prenatal Testing in Fetuses with Congenital Malformations: Prenatal or Neonatal Investigation. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13091517. [PMID: 36140685 PMCID: PMC9498826 DOI: 10.3390/genes13091517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Congenital malformations diagnosed by ultrasound screening complicate 3–5% of pregnancies and many of these have an underlying genetic cause. Approximately 40% of prenatally diagnosed fetal malformations are associated with aneuploidy or copy number variants, detected by conventional karyotyping, QF-PCR and microarray techniques, however monogenic disorders are not diagnosed by these tests. Next generation sequencing as a secondary prenatal genetic test offers additional diagnostic yield for congenital abnormalities deemed to be potentially associated with an underlying genetic aetiology, as demonstrated by two large cohorts: the ‘Prenatal assessment of genomes and exomes’ (PAGE) study and ‘Whole-exome sequencing in the evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective cohort study’ performed at Columbia University in the US. These were large and prospective studies but relatively ‘unselected’ congenital malformations, with little Clinical Genetics input to the pre-test selection process. This review focuses on the incremental yield of next generation sequencing in single system congenital malformations, using evidence from the PAGE, Columbia and subsequent cohorts, with particularly high yields in those fetuses with cardiac and neurological anomalies, large nuchal translucency and non-immune fetal hydrops (of unknown aetiology). The total additional yield gained by exome sequencing in congenital heart disease was 12.7%, for neurological malformations 13.8%, 13.1% in increased nuchal translucency and 29% in non-immune fetal hydrops. This demonstrates significant incremental yield with exome sequencing in single-system anomalies and supports next generation sequencing as a secondary genetic test in routine clinical care of fetuses with congenital abnormalities.
Collapse
|
7
|
Hill M, Ellard S, Fisher J, Fulop N, Knight M, Kroese M, Ledger J, Leeson-Beevers K, McEwan A, McMullan D, Mellis R, Morris S, Parker M, Tapon D, Baple E, Blackburn L, Choudry A, Lafarge C, McInnes-Dean H, Peter M, Ramakrishnan R, Roberts L, Searle B, Smith E, Walton H, Wynn SL, Han Wu W, Chitty LS. Optimising Exome Prenatal Sequencing Services (EXPRESS): a study protocol to evaluate rapid prenatal exome sequencing in the NHS Genomic Medicine Service. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2022; 2:10. [PMID: 35935673 PMCID: PMC7613246 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13247.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) for the diagnosis of fetal anomalies was implemented nationally in England in October 2020 by the NHS Genomic Medicine Service (GMS). is the GMS is based around seven regional Genomic Laboratory Hubs (GLHs). Prenatal ES has the potential to significantly improve NHS prenatal diagnostic services by increasing genetic diagnoses and informing prenatal decision-making. Prenatal ES has not previously been offered routinely in a national healthcare system and there are gaps in knowledge and guidance. Methods Our mixed-methods evaluation commenced in October 2020, aligning with the start date of the NHS prenatal ES service . Study design draws on a framework developed in previous studies of major system innovation. There are five interrelated workstreams. Workstream-1 will use interviews and surveys with professionals, non-participant observations and documentary analysis to produce in-depth case studies across all GLHs. Data collection at multiple time points will track changes over time. In Workstream-2 qualitative interviews with parents offered prenatal ES will explore experiences and establish information and support needs. Workstream-3 will analyse data from all prenatal ES tests for nine-months to establish service outcomes (e.g. diagnostic yield, referral rates, referral sources). Comparisons between GLHs will identify factors (individual or service-related) associated with any variation in outcomes. Workstream-4 will identify and analyse practical ethical problems. Requirements for an effective ethics framework for an optimal and equitable service will be determined. Workstream-5 will assess costs and cost-effectiveness of prenatal ES versus standard tests and evaluate costs of implementing an optimal prenatal ES care pathway. Integration of findings will determine key features of an optimal care pathway from a service delivery, parent and professional perspective. Discussion The proposed formative and summative evaluation will inform the evolving prenatal ES service to ensure equity of access, high standards of care and benefits for parents across England.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Hill
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Sian Ellard
- Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Exeter Genomics Laboratory, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Naomi Fulop
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marian Knight
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Kroese
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jean Ledger
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Alec McEwan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Dominic McMullan
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rhiannon Mellis
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael Parker
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dagmar Tapon
- Centre for Fetal Care, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emma Baple
- Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Peninsula Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Asya Choudry
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Caroline Lafarge
- School of Human and Social Sciences, University of West London, London, UK
| | - Hannah McInnes-Dean
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Antenatal Results and Choices, London, UK
| | - Michelle Peter
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Rema Ramakrishnan
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Beverly Searle
- Unique - Rare Chromosome Disorder Support Group, Oxted, UK
| | - Emma Smith
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Holly Walton
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah L. Wynn
- Unique - Rare Chromosome Disorder Support Group, Oxted, UK
| | - Wing Han Wu
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Lyn S. Chitty
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Outram SM, Brown JEH, Zamora AN, Sahin-Hodoglugil N, Ackerman SL. Parental Hopes and Understandings of the Value of Prenatal Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing: A Qualitative Analysis. Front Genet 2022; 13:883225. [PMID: 35923691 PMCID: PMC9339950 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.883225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To provide qualitative empirical data on parental expectations of diagnostic prenatal genomic sequencing and the value of the results to families. Methods: We interviewed 15 families—mothers and/or fathers—who had had prenatal genomic sequencing about their expectations and their respective evaluations of the benefits of genomic sequencing. Results: Families’ hopes for genetic sequencing clustered around three themes: hoping to identify the cause of the fetal anomaly in a terminated pregnancy; hopes for guidance as to the likely outcome of current pregnancy; and hopes for information to support future family planning. In addition, hopes were discussed in terms of the potential for results to be beneficial in acquiring greater knowledge, while at the same time recognizing that new knowledge may raise more questions. Assessment of the value of sequencing largely mirrored these expectations when positive results seen. Negative results can also be seen as valuable in ruling out a genetic cause and in providing certainty that families had done everything that they could to know about the cause of fetal demise. Conclusion: It would appear that with guidance from genetic counsellors, families were largely able to navigate the many uncertainties of prenatal genomic sequencing and thus see themselves as benefitting from sequencing. However, support structures are essential to guide them through their expectations and interpretations of results to minimize possible harms. Engaging in the process of genomic sequencing was seen as beneficial in of itself to families who would otherwise be left without any options to seek diagnostic answers.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kernie CG, Wynn J, Rosenbaum A, de Voest J, Galloway S, Giordano J, Stover S, Westerfield L, Gilmore K, Wapner RJ, Van den Veyver IB, Vora NL, Clifton RG, Caughey AB, Chung WK. Information is power: The experiences, attitudes and needs of individuals who chose to have prenatal genomic sequencing for fetal anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:947-954. [PMID: 35476893 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study sought to evaluate the experiences of individuals who chose to participate in a study and receive prenatal genomic sequencing (pGS) for fetuses with congenital structural anomalies. METHOD Individuals who received research results of prenatal sequencing were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews about their experiences. A constructivist grounded theory approach was used to code and analyze interviews. RESULTS Thirty-three participants from 27 pregnancies were interviewed. Participants were motivated to enroll in the study to find out more about their fetus' condition and prepare for the future. The waiting period was a time of significant anxiety for participants. Most participants felt relief and closure upon receiving results, regardless of the category of result, and had a clear understanding of the implications of the results. CONCLUSION Participants' experiences with pGS were often intertwined with the experience of having a fetus with an abnormality. Participants were satisfied with the decision to participate in research and the support they received from the healthcare team, although waiting for results was associated with anxiety. The healthcare team plays an integral role in setting expectations and validating feelings of anxiety, fear and uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine G Kernie
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Julia Wynn
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Allison Rosenbaum
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica de Voest
- George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Stephanie Galloway
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica Giordano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Samantha Stover
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren Westerfield
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly Gilmore
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ronald J Wapner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ignatia B Van den Veyver
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neeta L Vora
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rebecca G Clifton
- George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Aaron B Caughey
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brown JEH, Zamora AN, Outram S, Sparks TN, Lianoglou BR, Norstad M, Sahin Hodoglugil NN, Norton ME, Ackerman SL. “Let’s Just Wait Until She’s Born”: Temporal Factors That Shape Decision-Making for Prenatal Genomic Sequencing Amongst Families Underrepresented in Genomic Research. Front Genet 2022; 13:882703. [PMID: 35669190 PMCID: PMC9164104 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.882703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomic sequencing has been increasingly utilized for prenatal diagnosis in recent years and this trend is likely to continue. However, decision-making for parents in the prenatal period is particularly fraught, and prenatal sequencing would significantly expand the complexity of managing health risk information, reproductive options, and healthcare access. This qualitative study investigates decision-making processes amongst parents who enrolled or declined to enroll in the prenatal arm of the California-based Program in Prenatal and Pediatric Genome Sequencing (P3EGS), a study in the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium that offered whole exome sequencing for fetal anomalies with a focus on underrepresented groups in genomic research. Drawing on the views of 18 prenatal families who agreed to be interviewed after enrolling (n = 15) or declining to enroll (n = 3) in P3EGS, we observed that the timing of sequencing, coupled with unique considerations around experiences of time during pregnancy and prenatal testing, intersect with structural supports beyond the clinic to produce preferences for and against prenatal sequencing and to contain the threat of unwelcome, uncertain knowledge. Particularly for those without structural supports, finding out consequential information may be more palatable after the birth, when the first stage of the uncertain future has been revealed. Future research should examine the role of temporality in decision-making around prenatal genomic sequencing across diverse population cohorts, in order to observe more precisely the role that structural barriers play in patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E. H. Brown
- Program in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, United States
- Institute for Health and Aging, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Julia E. H. Brown,
| | - Astrid N. Zamora
- Program in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Simon Outram
- Program in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, United States
- Institute for Health and Aging, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Teresa N. Sparks
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Institute for Human Genetics, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Center for Maternal Fetal Precision Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Billie R. Lianoglou
- Center for Maternal Fetal Precision Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Matthew Norstad
- Program in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, United States
- Institute for Health and Aging, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | - Mary E. Norton
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Institute for Human Genetics, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Center for Maternal Fetal Precision Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Sara L. Ackerman
- Program in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mellis R, Tapon D, Shannon N, Dempsey E, Pandya P, Chitty LS, Hill M. Implementing a rapid fetal exome sequencing service: What do parents and health professionals think? Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:783-795. [PMID: 35383981 PMCID: PMC9324936 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prenatal exome sequencing (pES) for the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities is being introduced more widely in clinical practice. Here we explore parents' and professionals' views and experiences of pES, to identify perceived benefits, concerns, and support needs. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 parents and 20 health professionals (fetal medicine and clinical genetics) with experience of rapid pES prior to implementation in the English National Health Service. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. RESULTS Parents and professionals were largely positive about pES, emphasising clinical and psychosocial benefits of a timely, definitive diagnosis in pregnancy. Concerns included parental anxiety related to the timing of pES results or uncertain findings, a need for guidelines for case selection and reporting, and ensuring sufficient capacity for counselling, phenotyping and variant interpretation. Professionals were concerned non-genetics professionals may not be equipped to counsel parents on the complexities of pES. CONCLUSION These findings highlight important issues for clinical implementation of pES. Expert counselling is required to enable parents to make informed decisions during a stressful time. To achieve this, professionals need further education and training, and fetal medicine and genetics services must work closely together to ensure parental understanding and appropriate support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhiannon Mellis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory HubGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK,Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| | - Dagmar Tapon
- Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea HospitalImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Nora Shannon
- Clinical Genetics ServiceNottingham City HospitalNottinghamUK
| | - Esther Dempsey
- South West Thames Regional Genetics ServiceLondonUK,School of Biological and Molecular SciencesSt George's University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Pranav Pandya
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK,Fetal Medicine UnitUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Lyn S. Chitty
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory HubGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK,Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory HubGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK,Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Buchanan J, Hill M, Vass CM, Hammond J, Riedijk S, Klapwijk JE, Harding E, Lou S, Vogel I, Hui L, Ingvoldstad-Malmgren C, Soller MJ, Ormond KE, Choolani M, Zheng Q, Chitty LS, Lewis C. Factor's that impact on women's decision-making around prenatal genomic tests: An international discrete choice survey. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:934-946. [PMID: 35476801 PMCID: PMC9325352 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We conducted a survey-based discrete-choice experiment (DCE) to understand the test features that drive women's preferences for prenatal genomic testing, and explore variation across countries. METHODS Five test attributes were identified as being important for decision-making through a literature review, qualitative interviews and quantitative scoring exercise. Twelve scenarios were constructed in which respondents choose between two invasive tests or no test. Women from eight countries who delivered a baby in the previous 24 months completed a DCE presenting these scenarios. Choices were modeled using conditional logit regression analysis. RESULTS Surveys from 1239 women (Australia: n = 178; China: n = 179; Denmark: n = 88; Netherlands: n = 177; Singapore: n = 90; Sweden: n = 178; UK: n = 174; USA: n = 175) were analyzed. The key attribute affecting preferences was a test with the highest diagnostic yield (p < 0.01). Women preferred tests with short turnaround times (p < 0.01), and tests reporting variants of uncertain significance (VUS; p < 0.01) and secondary findings (SFs; p < 0.01). Several country-specific differences were identified, including time to get a result, who explains the result, and the return of VUS and SFs. CONCLUSION Most women want maximum information from prenatal genomic tests, but our findings highlight country-based differences. Global consensus on how to return uncertain results is not necessarily realistic or desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Buchanan
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.,Genetic and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Vass
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, UK
| | - Jennifer Hammond
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.,Genetic and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Sam Riedijk
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eleanor Harding
- BSc Paediatrics and Child Health, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Stina Lou
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,DEFACTUM - Public Health & Health Services Research, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ida Vogel
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lisa Hui
- Reproductive Epidemiology Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Perinatal Medicine, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
| | - Charlotta Ingvoldstad-Malmgren
- Center for Research and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Center for Fetal Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Johansson Soller
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Health Ethics and Policy Lab, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mahesh Choolani
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Qian Zheng
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.,Genetic and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Celine Lewis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.,Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hammond J, Klapwijk JE, Riedijk S, Lou S, Ormond KE, Vogel I, Hui L, Sziepe EJ, Buchanan J, Ingvoldstad-Malmgren C, Soller MJ, Harding E, Hill M, Lewis C. Assessing women’s preferences towards tests that may reveal uncertain results from prenatal genomic testing: Development of attributes for a discrete choice experiment, using a mixed-methods design. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0261898. [PMID: 35089945 PMCID: PMC8797177 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Prenatal DNA tests, such as chromosomal microarray analysis or exome sequencing, increase the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis when fetal structural anomalies are identified. However, some parents will receive uncertain results such as variants of uncertain significance and secondary findings. We aimed to develop a set of attributes and associated levels for a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) that will examine parents’ preferences for tests that may reveal uncertain test results. A two phase mixed-methods approach was used to develop attributes for the DCE. In Phase 1, a “long list” of candidate attributes were identified via two approaches: 1) a systematic review of the literature around parental experiences of uncertainty following prenatal testing; 2) 16 semi-structured interviews with parents who had experienced uncertainty during pregnancy and 25 health professionals who return uncertain prenatal results. In Phase 2, a quantitative scoring exercise with parents prioritised the candidate attributes. Clinically appropriate levels for each attribute were then developed. A final set of five attributes and levels were identified: likelihood of getting a result, reporting of variants of uncertain significance, reporting of secondary findings, time taken to receive results, and who tells you about your result. These attributes will be used in an international DCE study to investigate preferences and differences across countries. This research will inform best practice for professionals supporting parents to manage uncertainty in the prenatal setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Hammond
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sam Riedijk
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stina Lou
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kelly E. Ormond
- Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States America
| | - Ida Vogel
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lisa Hui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Perinatal Medicine, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Northern Health, Epping, VIC, Australia
| | - Emma-Jane Sziepe
- Reproductive Epidemiology, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - James Buchanan
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kindom
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, England, United Kindom
| | - Charlotta Ingvoldstad-Malmgren
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Center for Fetal Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Johansson Soller
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eleanor Harding
- BSc Paediatrics and Child Health, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Celine Lewis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alanazi EM, Alanzi TM, Wu M, Luo J. Patients’ unmet information needs and gaps of obstetric ultrasound exam: A qualitative content analysis of social media platforms. INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE UNLOCKED 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
15
|
Plantinga M, Zwienenberg L, van Dijk E, Breet H, Diphoorn J, El Mecky J, Bouman K, Verheij J, Birnie E, Ranchor AV, Corsten-Janssen N, van Langen IM. Parental experiences of rapid exome sequencing in cases with major ultrasound anomalies during pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2021; 42:762-774. [PMID: 34643287 PMCID: PMC9298392 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adding rapid exome sequencing (rES) to conventional genetic tests improves the diagnostic yield of pregnancies showing ultrasound abnormalities but also carries a higher chance of unsolicited findings. We evaluated how rES, including pre- and post-test counseling, was experienced by parents investigating its impact on decision-making and experienced levels of anxiety. METHODS A mixed-methods approach was adopted. Participating couples (n = 46) were asked to fill in two surveys (pre-test and post-test counseling) and 11 couples were approached for an additional interview. RESULTS All couples accepted the rES test-offer with the most important reason for testing emphasizing their hope of finding an underlying diagnosis that would aid decision-making. The actual impact on decision-making was low, however, since most parents decided to terminate the pregnancy based on the major and multiple fetal ultrasound anomalies and did not wait for their rES results. Anxiety was elevated for most participants and decreased over time. CONCLUSION Major congenital anomalies detected on ultrasound seem to have more impact on prenatal parental decision-making and anxiety then the offer and results of rES. However, the impact of rES on reproductive decision-making and experienced anxiety requires further investigation, especially in pregnancies where less (severe) fetal anomalies are detected on ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam Plantinga
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lauren Zwienenberg
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Eva van Dijk
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hanna Breet
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Janouk Diphoorn
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Julia El Mecky
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Clinical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Katelijne Bouman
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joke Verheij
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Erwin Birnie
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Adelita V Ranchor
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Corsten-Janssen
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Irene M van Langen
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Castleman JS, Wall E, Allen S, Williams D, Doyle S, Kilby MD. The prenatal exome - a door to prenatal diagnostics? Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2021; 21:465-474. [PMID: 33877000 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2021.1920398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) allows parents the opportunity to obtain arapid molecular diagnosis of monogenic etiology when their fetus is found to have structural anomalies detected on prenatal ultrasound. Such information can improve antenatal and neonatal counseling, decision-making and management, and expand reproductive options in subsequent pregnancies.Areas covered: This review appraises the evidence, from acomprehensive search of bibliographic databases, for the introduction of ES into the fetal medicine care pathway when investigating congenital malformations. The perspectives of clinical geneticists, clinical scientists, fetal medicine specialists, and patients are explored in relation to the novel investigation and the benefits and challenges of its use in ongoing pregnancies with particular reference to UK medical practice.Expert opinion: ES provides agenetic diagnosis for more than 1 in 10 fetuses with structural differences on ultrasound and normal conventional tests (karyotype or chromosomal microarray) in carefully selected cases. The diagnostic rate increases for certain phenotypes and can range between 6% and 80% where conventional cytogenetics have not detected adiagnosis. Expert oversight is required to ensure that patients receive high-quality, evidence-based care and accurate counseling, supported by amultidisciplinary team familiar with the test and its implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James S Castleman
- West Midlands Fetal Medicine Centre, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elizabeth Wall
- Clinical Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stephanie Allen
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston. Birmingham, UK
| | - Denise Williams
- Clinical Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samantha Doyle
- Clinical Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mark D Kilby
- West Midlands Fetal Medicine Centre, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lou S, Jensen AH, Vogel I. How are uncertain prenatal genetic results perceived and managed two years after they were received? A qualitative interview study. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:1191-1202. [PMID: 33830585 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Chromosomal microarray has considerably improved our ability to identify or dismiss genetic conditions in the unborn child. However, this detailed analysis also reveals copy number variants (CNVs) of unknown or uncertain significance, in which the specific child's prognosis can be difficult to predict. Little is known about the longer-term impacts of receiving an uncertain prenatal CNV result. Our qualitative study explored how such a result was perceived and managed in everyday life, 2 years after it was received. From an original sample of 16 couples, nine women participated in a semi-structured follow-up phone interview. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. The results show that these women did not perceive the CNV result to be a part of their everyday lives. They managed the CNV result by focusing on the child's positive development, by not sharing the CNV information in wider social networks, and by emphasizing parental values such as taking life as it comes, welcoming human variation, and accepting that dealing with a child's struggles is an inherent part of parenthood. Overall, the women expressed a positive attitude toward prenatal genetic information about serious disorders but considered 'their' CNV to be close to normal; several women suggested that such findings should not be reported. However, they also recognized the difficulties in making such decisions, given variable penetrance and that couples' definitions of 'serious' could vary significantly. The diagnostic process during pregnancy was remembered as being highly stressful, and many expressed a need for more control in a future pregnancy. Our study provides insight into how mothers reconfigure CNV results to fit their values and everyday lives. When delivering uncertain CNV results in a prenatal setting, genetics healthcare providers should present and discuss long-term coping strategies with expecting parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stina Lou
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,DEFACTUM-Public Health & Health Services Research, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Amalie Hahn Jensen
- DEFACTUM-Public Health & Health Services Research, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ida Vogel
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kilby MD. The role of next-generation sequencing in the investigation of ultrasound-identified fetal structural anomalies. BJOG 2021; 128:420-429. [PMID: 32975887 PMCID: PMC8607475 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Fetal structural anomalies have an impact on fetal mortality and morbidity. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may be incorporated into clinical pathways for investigation of paediatric morbidity but can also be used to delineate the prognosis of fetal anomalies. This paper reviews the role of NGS in the investigation of fetal malformations, the literature defining the clinical utility, the technique most commonly used and potential promise and challenges for implementation into clinical practice. Prospective case selection with informative pre-test counselling by multidisciplinary teams is imperative. Regulated laboratory sequencing, bioinformatic pathways with potential variant identification and conservative matching with the phenotype is important. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Prenatal exome sequencing in fetal structural anomalies yields diagnostic information in up to 20% of cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D Kilby
- Fetal Medicine Centre, Birmingham Women's and Children's Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Beyond diagnostic yield: prenatal exome sequencing results in maternal, neonatal, and familial clinical management changes. Genet Med 2021; 23:909-917. [PMID: 33442022 PMCID: PMC7804210 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01067-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Previous studies have reported that prenatal exome sequencing (pES) can detect monogenic diseases in fetuses with congenital anomalies with diagnostic yields ranging from 6% to 81%, but there are few reports of its clinical utility. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who had pES to determine whether results led to clinical management changes. Results Of 20 patients, 8 (40%) received a definitive diagnosis. Seven patients (35%) had medical management changes based on the pES results, including alterations to their delivery plan and neonatal management (such as use of targeted medications, subspecialty referrals, additional imaging and/or procedures). All patients who received a definitive diagnosis and one who received a likely pathogenic variant (n = 9; 45%) received specific counseling about recurrence risk and the medical/developmental prognosis for the baby. In five (25%) cases, the result facilitated a diagnosis in parents and/or siblings. Conclusion pES results can have significant impacts on clinical management, some of which would not be possible if testing is deferred until after birth. To maximize the clinical utility, pES should be prioritized in cases where multiple care options are available and the imaging findings alone are not sufficient to guide parental decision-making, or where postnatal testing will not be feasible.
Collapse
|
20
|
Application of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis: a rapid scoping review. Genet Med 2020; 22:1925-1934. [PMID: 32747765 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0918-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic diagnosis provides important information for prenatal decision-making and management. Promising results from exome sequencing (ES) for genetic diagnosis in fetuses with structural anomalies are emerging. The objective of this scoping review was to identify what is known about the use of ES for genetic testing in prenatal cases with known or suspected genetic disease. A rapid scoping review was conducted over a six-week timeframe of English-language peer-reviewed studies. Search strategies for major databases (e.g., Medline) and gray literature were developed, and peer reviewed by information specialists. Identified studies were categorized and charted using tables and diagrams. Twenty-four publications were included from seven countries published between 2014 and 2019. Most commonly reported outcomes were diagnostic yields, which varied widely from 5% to 57%, and prenatal phenotype. Few studies reported clinical outcomes related to impact, decision-making, and clinical utility. Qualitative studies (n = 6) provided useful insights into patient and health-care provider experiences with ES. Findings suggest prenatal ES is beneficial, but more research is needed to better understand the clinical utility, circumstances for ideal use, feasibility, and costs of offering rapid ES as a routine option for prenatal genetic testing.
Collapse
|
21
|
Hammond J, Klapwijk JE, Hill M, Lou S, Ormond KE, Diderich KEM, Riedijk S, Lewis C. Parental experiences of uncertainty following an abnormal fetal anomaly scan: Insights using Han's taxonomy of uncertainty. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:198-210. [PMID: 32638447 PMCID: PMC8432163 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
For a number of prospective parents, uncertainty during pregnancy starts when an anomaly is found during a routine fetal anomaly scan. This may be followed by numerous tests to determine the etiology and nature of the anomaly. In this study, we aimed to understand how prospective parents perceive and manage uncertainty after being confronted with a structural anomaly during their routine ultrasound. Han's taxonomy of uncertainty was used as a framework to identify and understand the different types of uncertainty experienced. Interviews were held in the UK (n = 8 women and n = 1 male partner) and in the Netherlands (n = 7 women) with participants who had experienced uncertainty in their pregnancy after a fetal scan. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and the uncertainties experienced by parents were mapped against the dimensions of the Han taxonomy (sources, issues, and locus). Participants' experience of uncertainty was relevant to all dimensions and subcategories of the Han taxonomy, showing its applicability in the prenatal setting. Sources of uncertainty included receiving probabilistic or ambiguous information about the anomaly, or information that was complex and challenging to understand. Issues of uncertainty included were those that were scientific—such as a probable diagnosis with no further information, personal—such as the emotional impact of uncertainty, and practical—such as limited information about medical procedures and practical aspects of care. Additionally, participants described what helped them to manage uncertainty. This included active coping strategies such as searching for information on the Internet, external coping resources such as seeking social support, and internal coping resources such as using positivity and hope. Several recommendations for the healthcare professional to minimize uncertainty and help the patient deal with uncertainty have been proposed based on these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Hammond
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetic and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | | | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetic and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Stina Lou
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Sam Riedijk
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Celine Lewis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Population, Policy and Practice Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Harding E, Hammond J, Chitty LS, Hill M, Lewis C. Couples experiences of receiving uncertain results following prenatal microarray or exome sequencing: A mixed-methods systematic review. Prenat Diagn 2020; 40:1028-1039. [PMID: 32362033 PMCID: PMC8425413 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Tests in pregnancy such as chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing are increasing diagnostic yield for fetal structural anomalies, but have greater potential to result in uncertain findings. This systematic review investigated the experiences of prospective parents about receiving uncertain results from these tests. Methods A systematic search of three electronic databases was conducted. Data extraction was performed for studies that met the eligibility and quality criteria. Results were synthesised following the principles of thematic analysis. Results Fourteen studies (10 qualitative, 4 quantitative) were included. Findings were grouped into three overarching themes. Sources of uncertainty included the testing procedure, the diagnosis and prognosis, and health professionals' own uncertainty. The clinical impact of the uncertainty included parents struggling to make clinical decisions with the information available, the emotional impact included decisional‐regret, shock, worry and feeling overwhelmed. To manage the uncertainty, parents sought support from healthcare professionals, friends, family, the internet and other parents as well as remaining hopeful. Conclusions Prospective parents experience a myriad of uncertainties in the prenatal setting, which must be handled sensitively. Future research should explore optimal ways of managing uncertainty to minimise harm. Recommendations are made for discussing uncertainty during pre‐ and post‐test counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Harding
- BSc Paediatrics and Child Health, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.,London North Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Hammond
- London North Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- London North Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Melissa Hill
- London North Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Celine Lewis
- London North Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Update on the use of exome sequencing in the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities. Eur J Med Genet 2019; 62:103663. [PMID: 31085342 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Unexpected fetal abnormalities detected through ultrasound scanning in pregnancy may have a monogenic aetiology but are difficult to diagnose. Next generation sequencing now enables us to sequence fetal exomes, providing increased resolution and broader diagnostic capability compared to traditional cytogenetic prenatal tests, improving the yield and accuracy of diagnoses and allowing better counselling for expectant parents. Here we review published studies of exome sequencing (ES) for prenatal diagnosis over the last 5 years and address important questions for its clinical implementation, including clinical utility, which groups benefit most, and practical and ethical challenges for interpreting and reporting results. We observe that fetal ES substantially improves diagnostic yield relative to cytogenetic techniques. However, diagnostic rates vary widely between studies, largely attributable to differences in case selection. Recently several large studies report variations in diagnostic yield between phenotypic groups, with fetuses with multisystem abnormalities most likely to receive a diagnosis from fetal ES. Challenges for prenatal ES include the limitations of ultrasound-based fetal phenotyping, the need for rapid return of results in pregnancy, and technical limitations compared to whole genome sequencing. We also consider ethical issues around potential secondary findings and variants of uncertain significance and the complex counselling needs these present. Prenatal ES is a valuable tool to diagnose fetal abnormalities and, as it is implemented in the clinic, more large-scale research will serve to further delineate its clinical utility, as well as generating new knowledge about fetal phenotypes and informing guidelines for case selection, reporting results and genetic counselling.
Collapse
|
24
|
Horn R, Parker M. Health professionals' and researchers' perspectives on prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing: 'We can't shut the door now, the genie's out, we need to refine it'. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0204158. [PMID: 30240445 PMCID: PMC6150486 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Prenatal Assessment of Genome and Exomes (PAGE) project is a UK-wide study aiming to gain a better understanding of genetic variants causing developmental problems during pregnancy. A further aim of the study is to provide an evidence-base for the introduction of prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing (PWGES) into prenatal diagnostics provided by the NHS, which is expected in 2018. This paper presents the findings of a qualitative interview study undertaken with 20 health professionals and researchers involved in the PAGE project, and explores their implications for understandings of 'good practice' in the uses of prenatal genomics clinically. A number of critical issues are identified that will need to be addressed in the development of a model of good ethical practice for prenatal genomics: consent, management of expectations, return of results, and professional duties in the context of PWGES. The analysis presented identifies and illustrates a great deal of complexity and qualitative richness in these issues as they arise in the day-to-day work of genomics professionals. Inclusive, critical discussion of these findings, together with the findings from other empirical studies, normative analysis and scientific discoveries resulting from PAGE, will be required to inform the development of appropriate guidelines of good ethical practice that address the needs and concerns to be encountered in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Horn
- Department of Population Health, The Ethox Centre and Wellcome Trust Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Parker
- Department of Population Health, The Ethox Centre and Wellcome Trust Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Harris S, Gilmore K, Hardisty E, Lyerly AD, Vora NL. Ethical and counseling challenges in prenatal exome sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2018; 38:897-903. [PMID: 30171820 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 08/18/2018] [Accepted: 08/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ethical and counseling challenges are expected with the introduction of prenatal whole exome sequencing. In this study, we describe specific challenges identified through the UNC-Chapel Hill Prenatal Exome Sequencing Study. METHODS Participants were a subset of women participating in the fetal exome study, which has enrolled 73 mother-father-fetus trios in pregnancies diagnosed with structural anomalies and normal standard genetic testing results. In this descriptive study, cases were reviewed by members of the research team, including a bioethicist, to identify counseling challenges. Illustrative cases were chosen by group consensus. RESULTS Four illustrative cases were identified for further analysis. Challenges included need for adequate counseling and informed consent, challenges in prenatal variant interpretation, performing prenatal diagnosis in subsequent pregnancies, inability to identify a genetic etiology, and identifying parental secondary findings. CONCLUSION Our study illustrates several challenges identified in an ongoing prenatal exome study. While genomic medicine is a powerful tool for prenatal diagnosis, it is important that clinicians understand the ethical implications and parental perceptions of this testing modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Harris
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kelly Gilmore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Emily Hardisty
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Anne Drapkin Lyerly
- Department of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Neeta L Vora
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mellis R, Chandler N, Chitty LS. Next-generation sequencing and the impact on prenatal diagnosis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2018; 18:689-699. [PMID: 29962246 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1493924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advent of affordable and rapid next-generation sequencing has been transformative for prenatal diagnosis. Sequencing of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has enabled the development of not only a highly sensitive screening test for fetal aneuploidies, but now definitive noninvasive prenatal diagnosis for monogenic disorders at an early gestation. Sequencing of fetal exomes offers broad diagnostic capability for pregnancies with unexpected fetal anomalies, improving the yield and accuracy of diagnoses and allowing better counseling for parents. The challenge now is to translate these approaches into mainstream use in the clinic. Areas covered: Here, the authors review the current literature to describe the technologies available and how these have evolved. The opportunities and challenges at hand, including considerations for service delivery, counseling, and development of ethical guidelines, are discussed. Expert commentary: As technology continues to advance, future developments may be toward noninvasive fetal whole exome or whole genome sequencing and a universal method for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis without the need to sequence both parents or an affected proband. Expansion of cell-free fetal DNA analysis to include the transcriptome and the methylome is likely to yield clinical benefits for monitoring other pregnancy-related pathologies such as preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhiannon Mellis
- a Genetics and Genomic Medicine , Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK
| | - Natalie Chandler
- b North Thames NHS Regional Genetics Service , Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- a Genetics and Genomic Medicine , Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.,c Genetics and Genomic Medicine , UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health , London , UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Narayanan S, Blumberg B, Clayman ML, Pan V, Wicklund C. Exploring the Issues Surrounding Clinical Exome Sequencing in the Prenatal Setting. J Genet Couns 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0245-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
28
|
Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome in a newborn infant with developmental abnormalities and low endogenous cholesterol. Clin Chim Acta 2018; 479:208-211. [PMID: 29355488 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 01/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome (SLOS) have defective endogenous cholesterol synthesis, and present with decreased cholesterol levels and multiple developmental dysmorphologies. CASE DESCRIPTION A newborn infant with normal XY karyotype and normal microarray was born with multiple developmental defects and ambiguous genitalia. The patient was diagnosed with SLOS, following biochemical genetic analysis of serum 7-DHC concentrations. The clinical course of the patient was further complicated by the comorbidities associated with SLOS and the bacterial infections. CONCLUSION We provide a detailed biochemical profile of the SLOS patient. The report can help us further understand the pathological impacts of cholesterol synthesis deficiency and provide relevant clinical management with outcome of this rare genetic disorder.
Collapse
|