1
|
Siranosian J, Lewis C, Hill M, Ormond KE. Exploring prenatal testing preferences among US pregnant individuals: A discrete choice experiment. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:699-708. [PMID: 37646199 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Although there are numerous benefits to diagnostic prenatal testing, such as fetal exome sequencing, there are also consequences, including the possibility of receiving variants of uncertain significance or identifying secondary findings. In this study, we utilized a survey-based discrete choice experiment to elicit the preferences of pregnant people in Northern California for hypothetical prenatal genomic tests. Pregnant individuals were invited to complete the survey through advertisements on social media. Five test attributes were studied: likelihood of getting a result, time taken to receive results, who explains results, reporting of uncertain results, and reporting of secondary findings. The survey also gathered information about the participants' demographics, current and past pregnancies, and tolerance of uncertainty using the IUS-12 scale. Participants were eligible if they were female, currently 24 or more weeks pregnant, and able to read/write enough English or Spanish to complete an online survey. Overall, participants (n = 56) preferred the option of having a prenatal test over not having a prenatal test (p < 0.01) and had substantially higher preferences for tests with the highest likelihood of getting a result (p < 0.01). There were also positive preferences for tests that reported secondary findings (p = 0.01) and those where results were returned by a genetic specialist (vs. their prenatal provider) (p = 0.04). These findings can be used to guide conversations between pregnant individuals and genetics specialists, such as genetic counselors, as they weigh the pros and cons of diagnostic prenatal testing options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Siranosian
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Celine Lewis
- Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lu D, Yang J, Shen W, Chen M. Attitudes toward uncertain results from prenatal exome sequencing: a national survey among healthcare professionals working in the prenatal setting. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1335649. [PMID: 38813373 PMCID: PMC11133618 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1335649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the attitudes of healthcare professionals (HPs) working in the prenatal setting toward uncertain results (UR) from prenatal exome sequencing (pES) in China. Methods We conducted a national survey among HPs working in the prenatal setting. UR in our study include variants of uncertain significance (VUS), variants with variable penetrance/expressivity (VVPE), and secondary findings unrelated to the indication for testing (SFs). A total of 285 questionnaires that met the inclusion criteria were collected. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26. Results When performing the pre-test counseling, only 7.4% of HPs mentioned the possibility of VUS, 6.3% discussed the possibility of VVPE, and 7.4% introduced the SFs with parents with the option to not report these variants. In post-test counseling, 73.0-82.8% HPs discussed with the parents but did not make any recommendations for managing the pregnancy after reporting UR (73.0% for VUS, 82.8% for VVPE, 74.7% for SFs, respectively). Conclusion Most parents did not have the option of opting out of reporting UR from pES in pre-test counseling. UR did not influence the pregnancy recommendation made by most HPs. Establishing national guidelines for reporting UR from pES and developing strategies to improve counseling skills may help HPs manage UR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongfang Lu
- Department of Obstetrics, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of Obstetrics, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei Shen
- Department of Obstetrics, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Min Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wynn J, Karlsen A, Huber B, Levine A, Salem A, White LC, Luby M, Bezborodko E, Xiao S, Chung WK, Klitzman RL, Appelbaum PS. Impact of a Genetic Diagnosis for a Child's Autism on Parental Perceptions. J Autism Dev Disord 2024:10.1007/s10803-024-06273-x. [PMID: 38578549 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-024-06273-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Genetic testing is recommended as part of an autism assessment, and most parents support genetic testing for their minor children. However, the impact on parents of receiving a monogenetic/ copy number variant diagnosis for autism in their child is not well understood. To explore this, we surveyed and interviewed parents of children in the SPARK study, a study of autism that includes genetic testing. Surveys were administered one month before and one and 12 months after parents received their child's genetic result. Interviews were conducted approximately one month after results disclosure. A genetic diagnosis (GD) for their child appeared to reduce parents' sense of self-blame and feelings of guilt, and this impact was relatively stable. The data also indicate a modest impact on parents' actions related to the condition, perceptions of themselves, and some aspects of life planning for their child, as measured by quantitative instruments at one month and 12 months after receipt of results. Other measures of parental identity and expectations for their child, in contrast, showed little change following receipt of genetic findings. Overall, parents who were told that no GD was identified showed minimal changes in their responses over time. These results suggest a discernable but relatively limited impact of genetic test results on parents of children with autism. These results should be reassuring to clinicians caring for children with autism and are consistent with studies in other areas of medicine that have suggested that genetic results tend to have fewer effects-negative or positive-than were anticipated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Wynn
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Anna Karlsen
- Columbia University Genetic Counseling Graduate Program, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin Huber
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alina Levine
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amanie Salem
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Ekaterina Bezborodko
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Simons Foundation, New York, NY, USA
- Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert L Klitzman
- Department of Psychiatry and Masters of Bioethics Program, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul S Appelbaum
- Department of Psychiatry, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McInnes-Dean H, Mellis R, Daniel M, Walton H, Baple EL, Bertoli M, Fisher J, Gajewska-Knapik K, Holder-Espinasse M, Lafarge C, Leeson-Beevers K, McEwan A, Pandya P, Parker M, Peet S, Roberts L, Sankaran S, Smith A, Tapon D, Wu WH, Wynn SL, Chitty LS, Hill M, Peter M. 'Something that helped the whole picture': Experiences of parents offered rapid prenatal exome sequencing in routine clinical care in the English National Health Service. Prenat Diagn 2024; 44:465-479. [PMID: 38441167 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In October 2020, rapid prenatal exome sequencing (pES) was introduced into routine National Health Service (NHS) care in England. This study aimed to explore parent experiences and their information and support needs from the perspective of parents offered pES and of health professionals involved in its delivery. METHODS In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 42 women and 6 male partners and 63 fetal medicine and genetic health professionals. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Overall views about pES were positive and parents were grateful to be offered the test. Highlighted benefits of pES included the value of the additional information for pregnancy management and planning for future pregnancies. An anxious wait for results was common, often associated with the need to make decisions near to 24 weeks in pregnancy when there are legal restrictions for late termination. Descriptions of dealing with uncertainty were also common, even when results had been returned. Many parents described pES results as informing decision-making around whether or not to terminate pregnancy. Some professionals were concerned that a non-informative result could be overly reassuring and highlighted that careful counselling was needed to ensure parents have a good understanding of what the result means for their pregnancy. Emotional support from professionals was valued; however, some parents felt that post-test support was lacking. CONCLUSION Parents and professionals welcomed the introduction of pES. Results inform parents' decision-making around the termination of pregnancy. When there are no diagnostic findings or uncertain findings from pES, personalised counselling that considers scans and other tests are crucial. Directing parents to reliable online sources of information and providing emotional support throughout could improve their experiences of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah McInnes-Dean
- Antenatal Results and Choices, London, UK
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Rhiannon Mellis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Morgan Daniel
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Holly Walton
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emma L Baple
- RILD Wellcome Wolfson Centre, University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
- Peninsula Clinical Genetics Service, School, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | | | - Katarzyna Gajewska-Knapik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Muriel Holder-Espinasse
- Clinical Genetics Department, Guy's Hospital, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline Lafarge
- School of Human and Social Sciences, University of West London, London, UK
| | | | - Alec McEwan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - Pranav Pandya
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Michael Parker
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Srividhya Sankaran
- School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Kings College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Women and Children Health, Evelina Women & Children's Hospital Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Audrey Smith
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Dagmar Tapon
- Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Wing Han Wu
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Sarah L Wynn
- Unique - Rare Chromosome Disorder Support Group, Oxted, UK
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Michelle Peter
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sahin-Hodoglugil NN, Lianoglou BR, Ackerman S, Sparks TN, Norton ME. Access to prenatal exome sequencing for fetal malformations: A qualitative landscape analysis in the US. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43:1394-1405. [PMID: 37752660 PMCID: PMC10846391 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is increasing evidence supporting the clinical utility of next generation sequencing for identifying fetal genetic disorders. However, there are limited data on the demand for and accessibility of these tests, as well as payer coverage in the prenatal context. We sought to identify clinician perspectives on the utility of prenatal exome sequencing (ES) and on equitable access to genomic technologies for the care of pregnancies complicated by fetal structural anomalies. METHOD We conducted two focus group discussions and six interviews with a total of 13 clinicians (11 genetic counselors; 2 Maternal Fetal Medicine/Geneticists) from U.S. academic centers and community clinics. RESULTS Participants strongly supported ES for prenatal diagnostic testing in pregnancies with fetal structural anomalies. Participants emphasized the value of prenatal ES as an opportunity for a continuum of care before, during, and after a pregnancy, not solely as informing decisions about abortions. Cost and coverage of the test was the main access barrier, and research was the main pathway to access ES in academic centers. CONCLUSION Further integrating the perspectives of additional key stakeholders are important for understanding clinical utility, developing policies and practices to address access barriers, and assuring equitable provision of prenatal diagnostic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuriye N. Sahin-Hodoglugil
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Center for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Billie R. Lianoglou
- Center for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Division of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sara Ackerman
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Institute for Health & Aging, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Teresa N. Sparks
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Center for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mary E. Norton
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Center for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Bever Y, Groenenberg IAL, Knapen MFCM, Dessens AB, Hannema SE, Wolffenbuttel KP, Diderich KEM, Hoefsloot LH, Srebniak MI, Bruggenwirth HT. Prenatal ultrasound finding of atypical genitalia: Counseling, genetic testing and outcomes. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43:162-182. [PMID: 35808910 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report uptake of genetic counseling (GC) and prenatal genetic testing after the finding of atypical genitalia on prenatal ultrasound (US) and the clinical and genetic findings of these pregnancies. METHODS A retrospective cohort study (2017-2019) of atypical fetal genitalia in a large expert center for disorders/differences of sex development. We describe counseling aspects, invasive prenatal testing, genetic and clinical outcome of fetuses apparently without [group 1, n = 22 (38%)] or with [group 2, n = 36 (62%)] additional anomalies on US. RESULTS In group 1, 86% of parents opted for GC versus 72% in group 2, and respectively 58% and 15% of these parents refrained from invasive testing. Atypical genitalia were postnatally confirmed in 91% (group 1) and 64% (group 2), indicating a high rate of false positive US diagnosis of ambiguous genitalia. Four genetic diagnoses were established in group 1 (18%) and 10 in group 2 (28%). The total genetic diagnostic yield was 24%. No terminations of pregnancy occurred in group 1. CONCLUSIONS For optimal care, referral for an expert fetal US scan, GC and invasive diagnostics including broad testing should be offered after prenatal detection of isolated atypical genitalia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolande van Bever
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irene A L Groenenberg
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten F C M Knapen
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arianne B Dessens
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine E Hannema
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katja P Wolffenbuttel
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karin E M Diderich
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lies H Hoefsloot
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Malgorzata I Srebniak
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hennie T Bruggenwirth
- DSD-Expert Center, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Application of Prenatal Whole Exome Sequencing for Structural Congenital Anomalies-Experience from a Local Prenatal Diagnostic Laboratory. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10122521. [PMID: 36554045 PMCID: PMC9778831 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Fetal structural congenital abnormalities (SCAs) complicate 2-3% of all pregnancies. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) has been increasingly adopted prenatally when karyotyping and chromosomal microarray do not yield a diagnosis. This is a retrospective cohort study of 104 fetuses with SCAs identified on antenatal ultrasound in Hong Kong, where whole exome sequencing is performed. Molecular diagnosis was obtained in 25 of the 104 fetuses (24%). The highest diagnostic rate was found in fetuses with multiple SCAs (29.2%), particularly those with involvement of the cardiac and musculoskeletal systems. Variants of uncertain significance were detected in 8 out of the 104 fetuses (7.7%). Our study shows the utility of WES in the prenatal setting, and the extended use of the technology would be recommended in addition to conventional genetic workup.
Collapse
|
8
|
Outram SM, Brown JEH, Zamora AN, Sahin-Hodoglugil N, Ackerman SL. Parental Hopes and Understandings of the Value of Prenatal Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing: A Qualitative Analysis. Front Genet 2022; 13:883225. [PMID: 35923691 PMCID: PMC9339950 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.883225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To provide qualitative empirical data on parental expectations of diagnostic prenatal genomic sequencing and the value of the results to families. Methods: We interviewed 15 families—mothers and/or fathers—who had had prenatal genomic sequencing about their expectations and their respective evaluations of the benefits of genomic sequencing. Results: Families’ hopes for genetic sequencing clustered around three themes: hoping to identify the cause of the fetal anomaly in a terminated pregnancy; hopes for guidance as to the likely outcome of current pregnancy; and hopes for information to support future family planning. In addition, hopes were discussed in terms of the potential for results to be beneficial in acquiring greater knowledge, while at the same time recognizing that new knowledge may raise more questions. Assessment of the value of sequencing largely mirrored these expectations when positive results seen. Negative results can also be seen as valuable in ruling out a genetic cause and in providing certainty that families had done everything that they could to know about the cause of fetal demise. Conclusion: It would appear that with guidance from genetic counsellors, families were largely able to navigate the many uncertainties of prenatal genomic sequencing and thus see themselves as benefitting from sequencing. However, support structures are essential to guide them through their expectations and interpretations of results to minimize possible harms. Engaging in the process of genomic sequencing was seen as beneficial in of itself to families who would otherwise be left without any options to seek diagnostic answers.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kernie CG, Wynn J, Rosenbaum A, de Voest J, Galloway S, Giordano J, Stover S, Westerfield L, Gilmore K, Wapner RJ, Van den Veyver IB, Vora NL, Clifton RG, Caughey AB, Chung WK. Information is power: The experiences, attitudes and needs of individuals who chose to have prenatal genomic sequencing for fetal anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:947-954. [PMID: 35476893 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study sought to evaluate the experiences of individuals who chose to participate in a study and receive prenatal genomic sequencing (pGS) for fetuses with congenital structural anomalies. METHOD Individuals who received research results of prenatal sequencing were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews about their experiences. A constructivist grounded theory approach was used to code and analyze interviews. RESULTS Thirty-three participants from 27 pregnancies were interviewed. Participants were motivated to enroll in the study to find out more about their fetus' condition and prepare for the future. The waiting period was a time of significant anxiety for participants. Most participants felt relief and closure upon receiving results, regardless of the category of result, and had a clear understanding of the implications of the results. CONCLUSION Participants' experiences with pGS were often intertwined with the experience of having a fetus with an abnormality. Participants were satisfied with the decision to participate in research and the support they received from the healthcare team, although waiting for results was associated with anxiety. The healthcare team plays an integral role in setting expectations and validating feelings of anxiety, fear and uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine G Kernie
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Julia Wynn
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Allison Rosenbaum
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica de Voest
- George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Stephanie Galloway
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica Giordano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Samantha Stover
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren Westerfield
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly Gilmore
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ronald J Wapner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ignatia B Van den Veyver
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neeta L Vora
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rebecca G Clifton
- George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Aaron B Caughey
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Same performance of exome sequencing before and after fetal autopsy for congenital abnormalities: toward a paradigm shift in prenatal diagnosis? Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:967-975. [PMID: 35577939 PMCID: PMC9349205 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01117-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Prenatal exome sequencing could be complex because of limited phenotypical data compared to postnatal/portmortem phenotype in fetuses affected by multiple congenital abnormalities (MCA). Here, we investigated limits of prenatal phenotype for ES interpretation thanks to a blindly reanalysis of postmortem ES data using prenatal data only in fetuses affected by MCA and harboring a (likely)pathogenic variant or a variant of unknown significance (VUS). Prenatal ES identified all causative variant previously reported by postmortem ES (22/24 (92%) and 2/24 (8%) using solo-ES and trio-ES respectively). Prenatal ES identified 5 VUS (in four fetuses). Two of them have been previously reported by postmortem ES. Prenatal ES were negative for four fetuses for which a VUS were diagnosed after autopsy. Our study suggests that prenatal phenotype is not a limitation for implementing pES in the prenatal assessment of unsolved MCA to personalize fetal medicine and could influence indication of postmortem examination.
Collapse
|
11
|
Talati AN, Gilmore KL, Hardisty EE, Lyerly AD, Rini C, Vora NL. Parental motivations for and adaptation to trio-exome sequencing in a prospective prenatal testing cohort: Beyond the diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:775-782. [PMID: 35132674 PMCID: PMC9175118 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To understand motivations for and parental interpretation of results from trio-exome sequencing (ES) for fetal anomalies with a negative standard genetic diagnosis. METHODS Analysis of an ongoing, prospective prenatal trio-ES study of pregnancies with ultrasound-identified congenital anomalies and lack of a standard genetic diagnosis. After determination of pregnancy disposition, participants completed questionnaires and a semi-structured interview pre- and post-sequencing. Interviews were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory methodology to identify themes. Associations between themes and ES result were also examined. RESULTS One hundred twenty-six trios have been sequenced. Of those, 45 (36%) resulted in fetal diagnosis. One hundred twenty-five women completed pre-sequencing surveys, and 91 women completed post-sequencing surveys. The main themes identified include (1) variable reasons to pursue ES, (2) limited expectations but high hopes from ES, (3) parental adaptation to uncertain results, (4) impact on personal health and reproduction, and (5) gratitude for the process. CONCLUSION Participants pursued ES for various reasons, most often to identify a diagnosis and guide reproduction. Post-sequencing, most participants described the process, their interpretation of results, and the impact of receiving the results. Less frequently, but of most concern, participants expressed anxiety about testing and implications for themselves, relationships, and other family members, thus identifying an area of high need for additional support among patients undergoing prenatal ES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asha N. Talati
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kelly L. Gilmore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Emily E. Hardisty
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anne D. Lyerly
- Department of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christine Rini
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Neeta L. Vora
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mellis R, Tapon D, Shannon N, Dempsey E, Pandya P, Chitty LS, Hill M. Implementing a rapid fetal exome sequencing service: What do parents and health professionals think? Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:783-795. [PMID: 35383981 PMCID: PMC9324936 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prenatal exome sequencing (pES) for the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities is being introduced more widely in clinical practice. Here we explore parents' and professionals' views and experiences of pES, to identify perceived benefits, concerns, and support needs. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 parents and 20 health professionals (fetal medicine and clinical genetics) with experience of rapid pES prior to implementation in the English National Health Service. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. RESULTS Parents and professionals were largely positive about pES, emphasising clinical and psychosocial benefits of a timely, definitive diagnosis in pregnancy. Concerns included parental anxiety related to the timing of pES results or uncertain findings, a need for guidelines for case selection and reporting, and ensuring sufficient capacity for counselling, phenotyping and variant interpretation. Professionals were concerned non-genetics professionals may not be equipped to counsel parents on the complexities of pES. CONCLUSION These findings highlight important issues for clinical implementation of pES. Expert counselling is required to enable parents to make informed decisions during a stressful time. To achieve this, professionals need further education and training, and fetal medicine and genetics services must work closely together to ensure parental understanding and appropriate support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhiannon Mellis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory HubGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK,Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| | - Dagmar Tapon
- Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea HospitalImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Nora Shannon
- Clinical Genetics ServiceNottingham City HospitalNottinghamUK
| | - Esther Dempsey
- South West Thames Regional Genetics ServiceLondonUK,School of Biological and Molecular SciencesSt George's University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Pranav Pandya
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK,Fetal Medicine UnitUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Lyn S. Chitty
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory HubGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK,Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory HubGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK,Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hammond J, Klapwijk JE, Riedijk S, Lou S, Ormond KE, Vogel I, Hui L, Sziepe EJ, Buchanan J, Ingvoldstad-Malmgren C, Soller MJ, Harding E, Hill M, Lewis C. Assessing women’s preferences towards tests that may reveal uncertain results from prenatal genomic testing: Development of attributes for a discrete choice experiment, using a mixed-methods design. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0261898. [PMID: 35089945 PMCID: PMC8797177 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Prenatal DNA tests, such as chromosomal microarray analysis or exome sequencing, increase the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis when fetal structural anomalies are identified. However, some parents will receive uncertain results such as variants of uncertain significance and secondary findings. We aimed to develop a set of attributes and associated levels for a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) that will examine parents’ preferences for tests that may reveal uncertain test results. A two phase mixed-methods approach was used to develop attributes for the DCE. In Phase 1, a “long list” of candidate attributes were identified via two approaches: 1) a systematic review of the literature around parental experiences of uncertainty following prenatal testing; 2) 16 semi-structured interviews with parents who had experienced uncertainty during pregnancy and 25 health professionals who return uncertain prenatal results. In Phase 2, a quantitative scoring exercise with parents prioritised the candidate attributes. Clinically appropriate levels for each attribute were then developed. A final set of five attributes and levels were identified: likelihood of getting a result, reporting of variants of uncertain significance, reporting of secondary findings, time taken to receive results, and who tells you about your result. These attributes will be used in an international DCE study to investigate preferences and differences across countries. This research will inform best practice for professionals supporting parents to manage uncertainty in the prenatal setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Hammond
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sam Riedijk
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stina Lou
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kelly E. Ormond
- Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States America
| | - Ida Vogel
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lisa Hui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Perinatal Medicine, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Northern Health, Epping, VIC, Australia
| | - Emma-Jane Sziepe
- Reproductive Epidemiology, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - James Buchanan
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kindom
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, England, United Kindom
| | - Charlotta Ingvoldstad-Malmgren
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Center for Fetal Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Johansson Soller
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eleanor Harding
- BSc Paediatrics and Child Health, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Celine Lewis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vears D, Amor DJ. A framework for reporting secondary and incidental findings in prenatal sequencing: When and for whom? Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:697-704. [PMID: 35032068 PMCID: PMC9306573 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
As the use of genomic sequencing (GS) in the prenatal setting becomes more widespread, laboratories and clinicians will be tasked with making decisions about whether to offer incidental and secondary findings to expectant parents and, if so, which ones. Unfortunately, few guidelines or position statements issued by professional bodies address the return of secondary findings specifically in the context of prenatal GS, nor do they offer clear guidance on whether, and which types of incidental findings should be reported. Laboratories and clinicians will also need to navigate other challenges, such as how to obtain sufficiently informed consent, workload burdens for both laboratories and clinicians, and funding. Here we discuss these, and other challenges associated with offering incidental and secondary findings in the context of prenatal GS. We outline existing guidelines for return of these findings, prenatally and in children. We review the existing literature on stakeholder perspectives on return of incidental and secondary findings and discuss the main practical and ethical challenges that require consideration. We then propose a framework to help guide decision-making, suggesting a baseline routine analysis, with additional layers of analysis that could be offered, according to local laboratory policy, with additional opt-in consent from the parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya Vears
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - David J Amor
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Peter M, McInnes-Dean H, Fisher J, Tapon D, Chitty LS, Hill M. What's out there for parents? A systematic review of online information about prenatal microarray and exome sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2021; 42:97-108. [PMID: 34747021 PMCID: PMC9298227 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Objective To identify what online patient information (presented in English) is available to parents about prenatal microarray (CMA) and exome sequencing (ES), and evaluate its content, quality, and readability. Method Systematic searches (Google and Bing) were conducted, and websites were categorised according to their purpose. Websites categorised as patient information were included if they were: in English, directed at patients, or were a text, video, or online version of an information leaflet. Author‐developed content checklists, the DISCERN Genetics tool, and readability tests (the Flesch Reading Ease Score, the Gunning Fog Index, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index) were then used to assess those sources of patient information. Results Of the 665 websites screened, 18 met the criteria. A further 8 sources were found through a targeted search of professional organisations, resulting in 26 sources available for further evaluation. In general, this was found to be low in quality, omitted details recommended by national or international guidance, and was written at a level too advanced for average readers. Conclusion Improvements should be made to the content, quality, and readability of online information so that it both reinforces and complements the discussions between parents and clinicians about testing options during pregnancy.
What's already known about this topic?
The Internet is an important source of information for parents during pregnancy Little is known about the availability and standard of online information about newer prenatal genetic tests like chromosomal microarray (CMA) and prenatal exome sequencing (ES)
What does this study add?Our results revealed limited online information aimed at parents about CMA and ES The information we did identify was lacking the details recommended by professional guidelines, had low quality scores, and was written at an advanced level Improvements to online information for parents are needed to support informed decision‐making regarding prenatal genetic tests
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Peter
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Hannah McInnes-Dean
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.,Antenatal Results and Choices, London, UK
| | | | - Dagmar Tapon
- Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Melissa Hill
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Plantinga M, Zwienenberg L, van Dijk E, Breet H, Diphoorn J, El Mecky J, Bouman K, Verheij J, Birnie E, Ranchor AV, Corsten-Janssen N, van Langen IM. Parental experiences of rapid exome sequencing in cases with major ultrasound anomalies during pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2021; 42:762-774. [PMID: 34643287 PMCID: PMC9298392 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adding rapid exome sequencing (rES) to conventional genetic tests improves the diagnostic yield of pregnancies showing ultrasound abnormalities but also carries a higher chance of unsolicited findings. We evaluated how rES, including pre- and post-test counseling, was experienced by parents investigating its impact on decision-making and experienced levels of anxiety. METHODS A mixed-methods approach was adopted. Participating couples (n = 46) were asked to fill in two surveys (pre-test and post-test counseling) and 11 couples were approached for an additional interview. RESULTS All couples accepted the rES test-offer with the most important reason for testing emphasizing their hope of finding an underlying diagnosis that would aid decision-making. The actual impact on decision-making was low, however, since most parents decided to terminate the pregnancy based on the major and multiple fetal ultrasound anomalies and did not wait for their rES results. Anxiety was elevated for most participants and decreased over time. CONCLUSION Major congenital anomalies detected on ultrasound seem to have more impact on prenatal parental decision-making and anxiety then the offer and results of rES. However, the impact of rES on reproductive decision-making and experienced anxiety requires further investigation, especially in pregnancies where less (severe) fetal anomalies are detected on ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam Plantinga
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lauren Zwienenberg
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Eva van Dijk
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hanna Breet
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Janouk Diphoorn
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Julia El Mecky
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Clinical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Katelijne Bouman
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joke Verheij
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Erwin Birnie
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Adelita V Ranchor
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Corsten-Janssen
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Irene M van Langen
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hayeems RZ, Luca S, Assamad D, Bhatt A, Ungar WJ. Utility of Genetic Testing from the Perspective of Parents/Caregivers: A Scoping Review. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 8:259. [PMID: 33801725 PMCID: PMC8067127 DOI: 10.3390/children8040259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In genomics, perceived and personal utility have been proposed as constructs of value that include the subjective meanings and uses of genetic testing. Precisely what constitutes these constructs of utility and how they vary by stakeholder perspective remains unresolved. To advance methods for measuring the value of genetic testing in child health, we conducted a scoping review of the literature to characterize utility from the perspective of parents/caregivers. Peer reviewed literature that included empiric findings from parents/caregivers who received genetic test results for an index child and was written in English from 2016-2020 was included. Identified concepts of utility were coded according to Kohler's construct of personal utility. Of 2142 abstracts screened, 33 met inclusion criteria. Studies reflected a range of genetic test types; the majority of testing was pursued for children with developmental or neurodevelopmental concerns. Coding resulted in 15 elements of utility that mapped to Kohler's four domains of personal utility (affective, cognitive, behavioural and social) and one additional medical management domain. An adapted construct of utility for parents/caregivers may enable specific and standardized strategies for researchers to use to generate evidence of the post-test value of genetic testing. In turn, this will contribute to emerging methods for health technology assessment and policy decision making for genomics in child health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Z. Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Stephanie Luca
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
| | - Daniel Assamad
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
| | - Ayushi Bhatt
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
| | - Wendy J. Ungar
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Beyond diagnostic yield: prenatal exome sequencing results in maternal, neonatal, and familial clinical management changes. Genet Med 2021; 23:909-917. [PMID: 33442022 PMCID: PMC7804210 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01067-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Previous studies have reported that prenatal exome sequencing (pES) can detect monogenic diseases in fetuses with congenital anomalies with diagnostic yields ranging from 6% to 81%, but there are few reports of its clinical utility. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who had pES to determine whether results led to clinical management changes. Results Of 20 patients, 8 (40%) received a definitive diagnosis. Seven patients (35%) had medical management changes based on the pES results, including alterations to their delivery plan and neonatal management (such as use of targeted medications, subspecialty referrals, additional imaging and/or procedures). All patients who received a definitive diagnosis and one who received a likely pathogenic variant (n = 9; 45%) received specific counseling about recurrence risk and the medical/developmental prognosis for the baby. In five (25%) cases, the result facilitated a diagnosis in parents and/or siblings. Conclusion pES results can have significant impacts on clinical management, some of which would not be possible if testing is deferred until after birth. To maximize the clinical utility, pES should be prioritized in cases where multiple care options are available and the imaging findings alone are not sufficient to guide parental decision-making, or where postnatal testing will not be feasible.
Collapse
|
19
|
Impact of prenatal exome sequencing for fetal genetic diagnosis on maternal psychological outcomes and decisional conflict in a prospective cohort. Genet Med 2020; 23:713-719. [PMID: 33214710 PMCID: PMC8503913 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01025-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate associations between prenatal trio exome sequencing (trio-ES) and psychological outcomes among women with an anomalous pregnancy. METHODS Trio-ES study enrolling patients with major fetal anomaly and normal microarray. Women completed self-reported measures and free response interviews at two timepoints: pre- (1) and post- (2) sequencing. Pre-sequencing responses were compared with post-sequencing responses; post-sequencing responses were stratified by women who received trio-ES results that may explain fetal findings, secondary findings (medically actionable or couples with heterozygous variants for the same recessive disorder), or negative results. RESULTS One hundred fifteen trios were enrolled. Of those, 41/115 (35.7%) received results from trio-ES, including 36 (31.3%) who received results that may explain the fetal phenotype. These women had greater post-sequencing distress compared with women who received negative results, including generalized distress (p = 0.03) and test-related distress (p = 0.2); they also had worse psychological adaptation to results (p = 0.001). Genomic knowledge did not change from pre- to post-sequencing (p = 0.51). CONCLUSION Women show more distress after receiving trio-ES results compared with those who do not, suggesting that women receiving results may need additional support or counseling to inform current and future reproductive decisions.
Collapse
|
20
|
Application of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis: a rapid scoping review. Genet Med 2020; 22:1925-1934. [PMID: 32747765 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0918-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic diagnosis provides important information for prenatal decision-making and management. Promising results from exome sequencing (ES) for genetic diagnosis in fetuses with structural anomalies are emerging. The objective of this scoping review was to identify what is known about the use of ES for genetic testing in prenatal cases with known or suspected genetic disease. A rapid scoping review was conducted over a six-week timeframe of English-language peer-reviewed studies. Search strategies for major databases (e.g., Medline) and gray literature were developed, and peer reviewed by information specialists. Identified studies were categorized and charted using tables and diagrams. Twenty-four publications were included from seven countries published between 2014 and 2019. Most commonly reported outcomes were diagnostic yields, which varied widely from 5% to 57%, and prenatal phenotype. Few studies reported clinical outcomes related to impact, decision-making, and clinical utility. Qualitative studies (n = 6) provided useful insights into patient and health-care provider experiences with ES. Findings suggest prenatal ES is beneficial, but more research is needed to better understand the clinical utility, circumstances for ideal use, feasibility, and costs of offering rapid ES as a routine option for prenatal genetic testing.
Collapse
|
21
|
Hammond J, Klapwijk JE, Hill M, Lou S, Ormond KE, Diderich KEM, Riedijk S, Lewis C. Parental experiences of uncertainty following an abnormal fetal anomaly scan: Insights using Han's taxonomy of uncertainty. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:198-210. [PMID: 32638447 PMCID: PMC8432163 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
For a number of prospective parents, uncertainty during pregnancy starts when an anomaly is found during a routine fetal anomaly scan. This may be followed by numerous tests to determine the etiology and nature of the anomaly. In this study, we aimed to understand how prospective parents perceive and manage uncertainty after being confronted with a structural anomaly during their routine ultrasound. Han's taxonomy of uncertainty was used as a framework to identify and understand the different types of uncertainty experienced. Interviews were held in the UK (n = 8 women and n = 1 male partner) and in the Netherlands (n = 7 women) with participants who had experienced uncertainty in their pregnancy after a fetal scan. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and the uncertainties experienced by parents were mapped against the dimensions of the Han taxonomy (sources, issues, and locus). Participants' experience of uncertainty was relevant to all dimensions and subcategories of the Han taxonomy, showing its applicability in the prenatal setting. Sources of uncertainty included receiving probabilistic or ambiguous information about the anomaly, or information that was complex and challenging to understand. Issues of uncertainty included were those that were scientific—such as a probable diagnosis with no further information, personal—such as the emotional impact of uncertainty, and practical—such as limited information about medical procedures and practical aspects of care. Additionally, participants described what helped them to manage uncertainty. This included active coping strategies such as searching for information on the Internet, external coping resources such as seeking social support, and internal coping resources such as using positivity and hope. Several recommendations for the healthcare professional to minimize uncertainty and help the patient deal with uncertainty have been proposed based on these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Hammond
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetic and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | | | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetic and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Stina Lou
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Sam Riedijk
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Celine Lewis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Population, Policy and Practice Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Harding E, Hammond J, Chitty LS, Hill M, Lewis C. Couples experiences of receiving uncertain results following prenatal microarray or exome sequencing: A mixed-methods systematic review. Prenat Diagn 2020; 40:1028-1039. [PMID: 32362033 PMCID: PMC8425413 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Tests in pregnancy such as chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing are increasing diagnostic yield for fetal structural anomalies, but have greater potential to result in uncertain findings. This systematic review investigated the experiences of prospective parents about receiving uncertain results from these tests. Methods A systematic search of three electronic databases was conducted. Data extraction was performed for studies that met the eligibility and quality criteria. Results were synthesised following the principles of thematic analysis. Results Fourteen studies (10 qualitative, 4 quantitative) were included. Findings were grouped into three overarching themes. Sources of uncertainty included the testing procedure, the diagnosis and prognosis, and health professionals' own uncertainty. The clinical impact of the uncertainty included parents struggling to make clinical decisions with the information available, the emotional impact included decisional‐regret, shock, worry and feeling overwhelmed. To manage the uncertainty, parents sought support from healthcare professionals, friends, family, the internet and other parents as well as remaining hopeful. Conclusions Prospective parents experience a myriad of uncertainties in the prenatal setting, which must be handled sensitively. Future research should explore optimal ways of managing uncertainty to minimise harm. Recommendations are made for discussing uncertainty during pre‐ and post‐test counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Harding
- BSc Paediatrics and Child Health, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.,London North Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Hammond
- London North Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- London North Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Melissa Hill
- London North Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Celine Lewis
- London North Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Development and mixed-methods evaluation of an online animation for young people about genome sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 28:896-906. [PMID: 31896776 PMCID: PMC7316978 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0564-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Children and young people with rare and inherited diseases will be significant beneficiaries of genome sequencing. However, most educational resources are developed for adults. To address this gap in informational resources, we have co-designed, developed and evaluated an educational resource about genome sequencing for young people. The first animation explains what a genome is, genomic variation and genome sequencing ("My Genome Sequence": http://bit.ly/mygenomesequence), the second focuses on the limitations and uncertainties of genome sequencing ("My Genome Sequence part 2": http://bit.ly/mygenomesequence2). In total, 554 school pupils (11-15 years) took part in the quantitative evaluation. Mean objective knowledge increased from before to after watching one or both animations (4.24 vs 7.60 respectively; t = 32.16, p < 0.001). Self-rated awareness and understanding of the words 'genome' and 'genome sequencing' increased significantly after watching the animation. Most pupils felt they understood the benefits of sequencing after watching one (75.4%) or both animations (76.6%). Only 17.3% felt they understood the limitations and uncertainties after watching the first, however this was higher among those watching both (58.5%, p < 0.001). Twelve young people, 14 parents and 3 health professionals consenting in the 100,000 Genomes Project reported that the animation was clear and engaging, eased concerns about the process and empowered young people to take an active role in decision-making. To increase accessibility, subtitles in other languages could be added, and the script could be made available in a leaflet format for those that do not have internet access. Future research could focus on formally evaluating the animations in a clinical setting.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess pregnant women's views and preferences on noninvasive prenatal whole genome sequencing. METHODS A survey was offered to 805 pregnant women receiving prenatal care in practices affiliated with a large, tertiary care maternity hospital. Respondents were asked to envision undergoing prenatal whole genome sequencing and discuss their preferences and reasons for receiving different categories of genomic results, organized by actionability, severity, prevalence, and age of onset. The survey also queried respondents on their preferred role for clinicians in prenatal whole genome sequencing decision-making, and on their demographics and genetic literacy. RESULTS From June to August 2017, a total of 553 respondents returned the survey (response rate=68.7%). Respondents were most likely to want information regarding serious treatable childhood-onset conditions (89.7%) and least likely to want to receive information about nonmedical traits from prenatal whole genome sequencing (40%). The most frequently cited reason for wanting medical prenatal whole genome sequencing results was "to prepare financially, medically, or psychologically for a child with special needs." In total, 10.5% of respondents wanted clear recommendations from clinicians about the categories of information that are most appropriate to test for, 44.7% wanted clear recommendations plus all options presented, 26.2% wanted all options presented and joint decision-making, and 13.2% wanted all options presented and independent decision-making. CONCLUSION Respondents generally preferred to receive all categories of genetic results pertaining to medical conditions and wanted the information to prepare. More than half of respondents wanted (at minimum) clear recommendations from clinicians when deciding which prenatal whole genome sequencing results to receive.
Collapse
|
25
|
Ghidini A, Bianchi DW, Levy B, Van Mieghem T, Deprest J, Chitty LS. In case you missed it: The prenatal diagnosis editors bring you the most significant advances of 2018. Prenat Diagn 2019; 39:61-69. [PMID: 30593668 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Ghidini
- Antenatal Testing Center Alexandria Hospital, Alexandria, VA, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C., USA
| | - Diana W Bianchi
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Brynn Levy
- Departments of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tim Van Mieghem
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jan Deprest
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Update on the use of exome sequencing in the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities. Eur J Med Genet 2019; 62:103663. [PMID: 31085342 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Unexpected fetal abnormalities detected through ultrasound scanning in pregnancy may have a monogenic aetiology but are difficult to diagnose. Next generation sequencing now enables us to sequence fetal exomes, providing increased resolution and broader diagnostic capability compared to traditional cytogenetic prenatal tests, improving the yield and accuracy of diagnoses and allowing better counselling for expectant parents. Here we review published studies of exome sequencing (ES) for prenatal diagnosis over the last 5 years and address important questions for its clinical implementation, including clinical utility, which groups benefit most, and practical and ethical challenges for interpreting and reporting results. We observe that fetal ES substantially improves diagnostic yield relative to cytogenetic techniques. However, diagnostic rates vary widely between studies, largely attributable to differences in case selection. Recently several large studies report variations in diagnostic yield between phenotypic groups, with fetuses with multisystem abnormalities most likely to receive a diagnosis from fetal ES. Challenges for prenatal ES include the limitations of ultrasound-based fetal phenotyping, the need for rapid return of results in pregnancy, and technical limitations compared to whole genome sequencing. We also consider ethical issues around potential secondary findings and variants of uncertain significance and the complex counselling needs these present. Prenatal ES is a valuable tool to diagnose fetal abnormalities and, as it is implemented in the clinic, more large-scale research will serve to further delineate its clinical utility, as well as generating new knowledge about fetal phenotypes and informing guidelines for case selection, reporting results and genetic counselling.
Collapse
|
27
|
Brew CE, Castro BA, Pan V, Hart A, Blumberg B, Wicklund C. Genetics professionals' attitudes toward prenatal exome sequencing. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:229-239. [PMID: 30888706 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) currently has limited use in the clinical setting, but research suggests that it has added diagnostic utility over karyotyping and array techniques for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses presenting with ultrasound abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to assess the attitudes of genetics professionals toward the clinical implementation of prenatal ES in order to guide development of professional guidelines. A survey was developed using themes identified in previous qualitative studies and was distributed to members of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG), and the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC). A total of 498 participants completed some portion of the survey. There was consensus among participants that there would be clinical utility of prenatal ES when used for diagnosis, pregnancy management, and termination decisions. The majority also agreed that prenatal ES was distinct from its current use in the pediatric and adult settings. There were many areas of contention regarding which types of results should be returned to families and whether or not the current ACMG guidelines for return of incidental findings should also apply to the prenatal setting. Overall, professional guidance is needed to address the continuing concerns surrounding prenatal ES as its utilization in this setting is expected to grow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey E Brew
- Division of Genetics, Birth Defects and Metabolism, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Vivian Pan
- Kaiser Permanente Research Bank, Oakland, California
| | - Alexa Hart
- Fetal and Neonatal Medicine Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Bruce Blumberg
- Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, California
| | | |
Collapse
|