Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 2: The 59 genes ACMG recommends reporting as secondary findings when sequencing postnatally should be reported when detected on fetal (and parental) sequencing

Implementation of Public Funded Genome Sequencing in Evaluation of Fetal Structural Anomalies

With the advancements in prenatal diagnostics, genome sequencing is now incorporated into clinical use to maximize the diagnostic yield following uninformative conventional tests (karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis). Hong Kong started publicly funded prenatal genomic sequencing as a sequential test in the investigation of fetal structural anomalies in April 2021. The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance and usefulness of this new service over one year. We established a web-based multidisciplinary team to facilitate case selection among the expert members. We retrospectively analyzed the fetal phenotypes, test results, turnaround time and clinical impact in the first 15 whole exome sequencing and 14 whole genome sequencing. Overall, the molecular diagnostic rate was 37.9% (11/29). De novo autosomal dominant disorders accounted for 72.7% (8/11), inherited autosomal recessive disorders for 18.2% (2/11), and inherited X-linked disorders for 9.1% (1/11). The median turnaround time for ongoing pregnancy was 19.5 days (range, 13-31 days). Our study showed an overall clinical impact of 55.2% (16/29), which influenced reproductive decision-making in four cases, guided perinatal management in two cases and helped future family planning in ten cases. In conclusion, our findings support the important role of genome sequencing services in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies in a population setting. It is important to adopt a multidisciplinary team approach to support the comprehensive genetic service.

Factor's that impact on women's decision-making around prenatal genomic tests: An international discrete choice survey

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a survey-based discrete-choice experiment (DCE) to understand the test features that drive women's preferences for prenatal genomic testing, and explore variation across countries.

METHODS

Five test attributes were identified as being important for decision-making through a literature review, qualitative interviews and quantitative scoring exercise. Twelve scenarios were constructed in which respondents choose between two invasive tests or no test. Women from eight countries who delivered a baby in the previous 24 months completed a DCE presenting these scenarios. Choices were modeled using conditional logit regression analysis.

RESULTS

Surveys from 1239 women (Australia: n = 178; China: n = 179; Denmark: n = 88; Netherlands: n = 177; Singapore: n = 90; Sweden: n = 178; UK: n = 174; USA: n = 175) were analyzed. The key attribute affecting preferences was a test with the highest diagnostic yield (p < 0.01). Women preferred tests with short turnaround times (p < 0.01), and tests reporting variants of uncertain significance (VUS; p < 0.01) and secondary findings (SFs; p < 0.01). Several country-specific differences were identified, including time to get a result, who explains the result, and the return of VUS and SFs.

CONCLUSION

Most women want maximum information from prenatal genomic tests, but our findings highlight country-based differences. Global consensus on how to return uncertain results is not necessarily realistic or desirable.

A framework for reporting secondary and incidental findings in prenatal sequencing: When and for whom?

As the use of genomic sequencing (GS) in the prenatal setting becomes more widespread, laboratories and clinicians will be tasked with making decisions about whether to offer incidental and secondary findings to expectant parents and, if so, which ones. Unfortunately, few guidelines or position statements issued by professional bodies address the return of secondary findings specifically in the context of prenatal GS, nor do they offer clear guidance on whether, and which types of incidental findings should be reported. Laboratories and clinicians will also need to navigate other challenges, such as how to obtain sufficiently informed consent, workload burdens for both laboratories and clinicians, and funding. Here we discuss these, and other challenges associated with offering incidental and secondary findings in the context of prenatal GS. We outline existing guidelines for return of these findings, prenatally and in children. We review the existing literature on stakeholder perspectives on return of incidental and secondary findings and discuss the main practical and ethical challenges that require consideration. We then propose a framework to help guide decision-making, suggesting a baseline routine analysis, with additional layers of analysis that could be offered, according to local laboratory policy, with additional opt-in consent from the parents.

Challenges in variant interpretation in prenatal exome sequencing

The use of exome sequencing (ES) in the prenatal setting improves the diagnostic yield of genetic testing for fetuses with ultrasound anomalies. However, while the purpose of ES is to explain the fetal phenotype, secondary or incidental findings unrelated to the observed abnormalities might be detected. Recently, requests for ES in fetuses with no sonographic abnormalities have been increasing, raising serious ethical and medico-legal concerns. Variant interpretation is complex even in the postnatal setting and performing broad genomic data analyses in the prenatal setting presents additional dilemmas. This article discusses challenges and questions related to prenatal ES, including variant interpretation of incidental findings in cases of indicated prenatal ES, as well as in situations where ES is performed in asymptomatic fetuses.

From late fatherhood to prenatal screening of monogenic disorders: evidence and ethical concerns

BACKGROUND

With the help of ART, an advanced parental age is not considered to be a serious obstacle for reproduction anymore. However, significant health risks for future offspring hide behind the success of reproductive medicine for the treatment of reduced fertility associated with late parenthood. Although an advanced maternal age is a well-known risk factor for poor reproductive outcomes, understanding the impact of an advanced paternal age on offspring is yet to be elucidated. De novo monogenic disorders (MDs) are highly associated with late fatherhood. MDs are one of the major sources of paediatric morbidity and mortality, causing significant socioeconomic and psychological burdens to society. Although individually rare, the combined prevalence of these disorders is as high as that of chromosomal aneuploidies, indicating the increasing need for prenatal screening. With the help of advanced reproductive technologies, families with late paternity have the option of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for multiple MDs (MD-NIPT), which has a sensitivity and specificity of almost 100%.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The main aims of the current review were to examine the effect of late paternity on the origin and nature of MDs, to highlight the role of NIPT for the detection of a variety of paternal age-associated MDs, to describe clinical experiences and to reflect on the ethical concerns surrounding the topic of late paternity and MD-NIPT.

SEARCH METHODS

An extensive search of peer-reviewed publications (1980-2021) in English from the PubMed and Google Scholar databases was based on key words in different combinations: late paternity, paternal age, spermatogenesis, selfish spermatogonial selection, paternal age effect, de novo mutations (DNMs), MDs, NIPT, ethics of late fatherhood, prenatal testing and paternal rights.

OUTCOMES

An advanced paternal age provokes the accumulation of DNMs, which arise in continuously dividing germline cells. A subset of DNMs, owing to their effect on the rat sarcoma virus protein-mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling pathway, becomes beneficial for spermatogonia, causing selfish spermatogonial selection and outgrowth, and in some rare cases may lead to spermatocytic seminoma later in life. In the offspring, these selfish DNMs cause paternal age effect (PAE) disorders with a severe and even life-threatening phenotype. The increasing tendency for late paternity and the subsequent high risk of PAE disorders indicate an increased need for a safe and reliable detection procedure, such as MD-NIPT. The MD-NIPT approach has the capacity to provide safe screening for pregnancies at risk of PAE disorders and MDs, which constitute up to 20% of all pregnancies. The primary risks include pregnancies with a paternal age over 40 years, a previous history of an affected pregnancy/child, and/or congenital anomalies detected by routine ultrasonography. The implementation of NIPT-based screening would support the early diagnosis and management needed in cases of affected pregnancy. However, the benefits of MD-NIPT need to be balanced with the ethical challenges associated with the introduction of such an approach into routine clinical practice, namely concerns regarding reproductive autonomy, informed consent, potential disability discrimination, paternal rights and PAE-associated issues, equity and justice in accessing services, and counselling.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Considering the increasing parental age and risks of MDs, combined NIPT for chromosomal aneuploidies and microdeletion syndromes as well as tests for MDs might become a part of routine pregnancy management in the near future. Moreover, the ethical challenges associated with the introduction of MD-NIPT into routine clinical practice need to be carefully evaluated. Furthermore, more focus and attention should be directed towards the ethics of late paternity, paternal rights and paternal genetic guilt associated with pregnancies affected with PAE MDs.

The prenatal exome - a door to prenatal diagnostics?

Introduction: Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) allows parents the opportunity to obtain arapid molecular diagnosis of monogenic etiology when their fetus is found to have structural anomalies detected on prenatal ultrasound. Such information can improve antenatal and neonatal counseling, decision-making and management, and expand reproductive options in subsequent pregnancies.Areas covered: This review appraises the evidence, from acomprehensive search of bibliographic databases, for the introduction of ES into the fetal medicine care pathway when investigating congenital malformations. The perspectives of clinical geneticists, clinical scientists, fetal medicine specialists, and patients are explored in relation to the novel investigation and the benefits and challenges of its use in ongoing pregnancies with particular reference to UK medical practice.Expert opinion: ES provides agenetic diagnosis for more than 1 in 10 fetuses with structural differences on ultrasound and normal conventional tests (karyotype or chromosomal microarray) in carefully selected cases. The diagnostic rate increases for certain phenotypes and can range between 6% and 80% where conventional cytogenetics have not detected adiagnosis. Expert oversight is required to ensure that patients receive high-quality, evidence-based care and accurate counseling, supported by amultidisciplinary team familiar with the test and its implications.

Massively Parallel Sequencing for Rare Genetic Disorders: Potential and Pitfalls

There have been two major eras in the history of gene discovery. The first was the era of linkage analysis, with approximately 1,300 disease-related genes identified by positional cloning by the turn of the millennium. The second era has been powered by two major breakthroughs: the publication of the human genome and the development of massively parallel sequencing (MPS). MPS has greatly accelerated disease gene identification, such that disease genes that would have taken years to map previously can now be determined in a matter of weeks. Additionally, the number of affected families needed to map a causative gene and the size of such families have fallen: de novo mutations, previously intractable by linkage analysis, can be identified through sequencing of the parent-child trio, and genes for recessive disease can be identified through MPS even of a single affected individual. MPS technologies include whole exome sequencing (WES), whole genome sequencing (WGS), and panel sequencing, each with their strengths. While WES has been responsible for most gene discoveries through MPS, WGS is superior in detecting copy number variants, chromosomal rearrangements, and repeat-rich regions. Panels are commonly used for diagnostic purposes as they are extremely cost-effective and generate manageable quantities of data, with no risk of unexpected findings. However, in instances of diagnostic uncertainty, it can be challenging to choose the right panel, and in these circumstances WES has a higher diagnostic yield. MPS has ethical, social, and legal implications, many of which are common to genetic testing generally but amplified due to the magnitude of data (e.g., relationship misattribution, identification of variants of uncertain significance, and genetic discrimination); others are unique to WES and WGS technologies (e.g., incidental or secondary findings). Nonetheless, MPS is rapidly translating into clinical practice as an extremely useful part of the clinical armamentarium.

A report on the impact of rapid prenatal exome sequencing on the clinical management of 52 ongoing pregnancies: a retrospective review

OBJECTIVE

Studies have shown that prenatal exome sequencing (PES) improves diagnostic yield in cases of fetal structural malformation. We have retrospectively analysed PES cases from two of the largest fetal medicine centres in the UK to determine the impact of results on management of a pregnancy.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of clinical case notes.

SETTING

Two tertiary fetal medicine centres.

POPULATION

Pregnancies with fetal structural abnormalities referred to clinical genetics via a multidisciplinary team.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the notes of all patients who had undergone PES. DNA samples were obtained via chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. Variants were filtered using patient-specific panels and interpreted using American College of Medical Genetics guidelines.

RESULTS

A molecular diagnosis was made in 42% (18/43) ongoing pregnancies; of this group, there was a significant management implication in 44% (8/18). A positive result contributed to the decision to terminate a pregnancy in 16% (7/43) of cases. A negative result had a significant impact on management in two cases by affirming the decision to continue pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that the results of PES can inform pregnancy management. Challenges include variant interpretation with limited phenotype information. These results emphasise the importance of the MDT and collecting phenotype and variant data. As this testing is soon to be widely available, we should look to move beyond diagnostic yield as a measure of the value of PES.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Prenatal exome sequencing can aid decision-making in pregnancy management; review ahead of routine implementation in NHS.