Development and targeted application of a rapid QF-PCR test for sex chromosome imbalance

The Use of Genetics for Reaching a Diagnosis in XY DSD

Reaching a firm diagnosis is vital for the long-term management of a patient with a difference or disorder of sex development (DSD). This is especially the case in XY DSD where the diagnostic yield is particularly low. Molecular genetic technology is playing an increasingly important role in the diagnostic process, and it is highly likely that it will be used more often at an earlier stage in the diagnostic process. In many cases of DSD, the clinical utility of molecular genetics is unequivocally clear, but in many other cases there is a need for careful exploration of the benefit of genetic diagnosis through long-term monitoring of these cases. Furthermore, the incorporation of molecular genetics into the diagnostic process requires a careful appreciation of the strengths and weaknesses of the evolving technology, and the interpretation of the results requires a clear understanding of the wide range of conditions that are associated with DSD.

Prenatal diagnosis of a de novo trisomy 20p detected by noninvasive prenatal testing

Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 20p seems to be difficult, considering the capacity of ultrasound to detect mild dysmorphic. NIPT has good performance in detecting fetal trisomy 20p combined with low coverage WGS and karyotype analysis.

Mosaic Fabry Disease in a Male Presenting as Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

We describe a 55 year old male diagnosed with cardiomyopathy due to Fabry disease. Biochemical testing of blood spot and plasma showed low-normal alpha-galactosidase A (α-Gal A) levels. Genetic testing revealed somatic mosaicism for GLA c.901C>T, p.(Arg301Ter). Usually, males with Fabry disease due to loss of function variants in GLA show symptoms of the multisystemic features of the condition early in life, and have very low levels of the α-Gal A enzyme. This demonstrates that the diagnosis of Fabry disease in males with cardiomyopathy should still be considered even in the context of a normal plasma enzyme assay.

Detection rates and residual risk for a postnatal diagnosis of an atypical chromosome aberration following combined first-trimester screening

OBJECTIVES

To determine the detection rates of all types of chromosome aberrations and the residual risk for postnatal diagnosis of an atypical chromosome aberration depending on the strategy for further investigation with either noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) or invasive testing in pregnancies with increased risk following combined first-trimester screening (cFTS).

METHODS

A review of all pregnancies examined with cFTS during 2010 to 2017.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 129 493 pregnancies. There were 852 (0.7%) clinically significant chromosome aberrations, including aberrations detected later on or after birth. A total of 12% were atypical chromosome aberrations. Considering that 40% were detected due to a miscarriage/intrauterine fetal death or a malformation on ultrasound there is a 0.05% (1:2000) background risk of a postnatal diagnosis of a liveborn child with an atypical chromosome aberration if no further invasive test is performed during pregnancy. If all women with an increased risk (≥1:200) had an invasive test and NIPT was performed up to a risk of 1:1000, 95% of common trisomies/sex chromosome aberrations and 55% of atypical aberrations would be detected.

CONCLUSIONS

If NIPT was offered to all women with an increased risk following cFTS it would imply that three times as many children would be born with an atypical chromosome aberration.

Prenatal Detection of Chromosome Aneuploidy by Quantitative Fluorescence PCR

Autosomal chromosome aneuploid pregnancies that survive to term, namely, trisomies 13, 18, and 21, account for 89% of chromosome abnormalities with a severe phenotype identified in prenatal samples. They are traditionally detected by full karyotype analysis of cultured cells. The average reporting time for a prenatal karyotype analysis is approximately 14 days, and in recent years, there has been increasing demand for more rapid prenatal results with respect to the common chromosome aneuploidies, to relieve maternal anxiety and facilitate options in pregnancy. The rapid tests that have been developed negate the requirement for cultured cells, instead directly testing cells from the amniotic fluid or chorionic villus sample, with the aim of generating results within 48 h of sample receipt. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization is the method of choice in some genetic laboratories, usually because the expertise and equipment are readily available. However, a quantitative fluorescence (QF)-PCR-based approach is now widely used and reported as a clinical diagnostic service in many studies. It may be used as a stand-alone test or as an adjunct test to full karyotype or array CGH analysis, which scan for other chromosome abnormalities not detected by the QF-PCR assay.

Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction for rapid prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies in chorionic villus sampling in a single institution

Objective

To validate quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) via chorionic villus sampling (CVS) for the diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive pregnant women who had undergone CVS at Cheil General Hospital between December 2009 and June 2014. Only cases with reported QF-PCR before long-term culture (LTC) for conventional cytogenetic analysis were included, and the results of these two methods were compared.

Results

A total of 383 pregnant women underwent QF-PCR and LTC via CVS during the study period and 403 CVS specimens were collected. The indications of CVS were as follows: abnormal first-trimester ultrasonographic findings, including increased fetal nuchal translucency (85.1%), advanced maternal age (6.8%), previous history of fetal anomalies (4.2%), and positive dual test results for trisomy 21 (3.9%). The results of QF-PCR via CVS were as follows: 76 (18.9%) cases were identified as trisomy 21 (36 cases), 18 (33 cases), or 13 (seven cases), and 4 (1.0%) cases were suspected to be mosaicism. All results of common autosomal trisomies by QF-PCR were consistent with those of LTC and there were no false-positive findings. Four cases suspected as mosaicism in QF-PCR were confirmed as non-mosaic trisomies of trisomy 21 (one case) or trisomy 18 (three cases) in LTC.

Conclusion

QF-PCR via CVS has the advantage of rapid prenatal screening at an earlier stage of pregnancy for common chromosomal trisomies and thus can reduce the anxiety of parents. In particular, it can be helpful for pregnant women with increased fetal nuchal translucency or abnormal first-trimester ultrasonographic findings.

Rapid Prenatal Diagnosis of Aneuploidy Using Quantitative Fluorescence-PCR (QF-PCR)

Molecular cytogenetic aneuploidy testing for pregnant women at increased risk of chromosome abnormality leads to rapid reassurance for those with normal results and earlier decisions on pregnancy management in the case of abnormality. We tested 9080 prenatal samples using a one-tube QF-PCR test for trisomies 13, 18, and 21; the abnormality rate was 5.9%. There were no misdiagnoses for non-mosaic trisomy. A sex chromosome multiplex was developed that detects structural sex chromosome abnormalities as well as aneuploidies. The sex chromosome test was targeted at pregnancies (272) with specific abnormalities suggestive of Turner syndrome; 13.2% showed 45,X, confirmed by follow-up analysis.

Fetal calcifications are associated with chromosomal abnormalities

Objective

The biological importance of calcifications occasionally noted in fetal tissues (mainly liver) at autopsy or ultrasound is largely unexplored. Previous reports hint at an association to infection, circulatory compromise, malformations or chromosomal abnormalities. To identify factors associated with calcifications, we have performed a case-control study on the largest cohort of fetuses with calcifications described thus far.

Methods

One-hundred and fifty-one fetuses with calcifications and 302 matched controls were selected from the archives of the Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital. Chromosome analysis by karyotyping or quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction was performed. Autopsy and placenta reports were scrutinized for presence of malformations and signs of infection.

Results

Calcifications were mainly located in the liver, but also in heart, bowel, and other tissues. Fetuses with calcifications showed a significantly higher proportion of chromosomal abnormalities than controls; 50% vs. 20% (p<0.001). The most frequent aberrations among cases included trisomy 21 (33%), trisomy 18 (22%), and monosomy X (18%). A similar distribution was seen among controls. When comparing cases and controls with chromosomal abnormalities, the cases had a significantly higher prevalence of malformations (95% vs. 77%, p=0.004). Analyzed the other way around, cases with malformations had a significantly higher proportion of chromosomal abnormalities compared with controls, (66% vs. 31%, p<0.001).

Conclusion

The presence of fetal calcifications is associated with high risk of chromosomal abnormality in combination with malformations. Identification of a calcification together with a malformation at autopsy more than doubles the probability of detecting a chromosomal abnormality, compared with identification of a malformation only. We propose that identification of a fetal tissue calcification at autopsy, and potentially also at ultrasound examination, should infer special attention towards co-existence of malformations, as this would be a strong indicator for a chromosomal abnormality.

Molecular and cytogenetic analysis in stillbirth: results from 481 consecutive cases

INTRODUCTION

The underlying causes of stillbirth are heterogeneous and in many cases unexplained. Our aim was to conclude clinical results from karyotype and quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis of all stillbirths occurring in Stockholm County between 2008 and 2012. By screening a subset of cases, we aimed to study the possible benefits of chromosomal microarray (CMA) in the analysis of the etiology of stillbirth.

METHODS

During 2008-2012, 481 stillbirths in Stockholm County were investigated according to a clinical protocol including karyotype or QF-PCR analysis. CMA screening was performed on a subset of 90 cases, corresponding to all stillbirths from 2010 without a genetic diagnosis.

RESULTS

Chromosomal aberrations were detected by karyotype or QF-PCR analysis in 7.5% of the stillbirths. CMA analysis additionally identified two known syndromes, one aberration disrupting a known disease gene, and 26 variants of unknown significance. Furthermore, CMA had a significantly higher success rate than karyotyping (100 vs. 80%, p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

In the analysis of stillbirth, conventional karyotyping is prone to failure, and QF-PCR is a useful complement. We show that CMA has a higher success rate and aberration detection frequency than these methods, and conclude that CMA is a valuable tool for identification of chromosomal aberrations in stillbirth.

Use of Quantitative Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction (QF PCR) in Prenatal Diagnostic of Fetal Aneuploidies in a 17 Month Period in Parallel with Karyotyping

Introduction:

QF PCR has recently entered diagnostic practice as a possible way to bypass culturing of the fetal cells, as well as to provide a rapid response following amniocentesis.

Material and methods:

The effective value of the QF PCR remains a much debated issue, positions ranging from that it makes classic kayotyping obsolete except in special occasions, to that it is no more than a guideline for a mandatory karyotype. Current practices of the gynecology specialists generates samples in such fashion that kariotyping of samples quickly falls behind to the point of obsoleteness, because, by the time a karyotype has been finished, a window of opportunity for termination of pregnancy has closed.

Results:

QF PCR provides a rapid response alternative, but it is necessary to establish its reproducibility, as well as an algorithm of its use along classic kariotyping. This study contains samples processed in a period from August 1, 2012 to December 31 2013 in both QF PCR and classic karyotype. Object of this study was compare results obtained by two methods, and establish confidence interval of the QF PCR testing. Overall, 661 amniotic fluid samples were processed and typed with QF PCR, out of which 221 were done in parallel with karyiotyping, as an confirmation of results.

Aneuploidy detection in paraffin embedded tissue from products of conception by mini-STR genotyping

Autosomal trisomy is the most common genetic abnormality observed in pregnancy loss. We designed a panel of mini-short tandem repeats (mini-STRs) for aneuploidy detection in chromosomes 13, 16, 18 and 21 from fresh and formalin fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples from products of conception (POC). FFPE POCs with trisomy 13 (n = 6), trisomy 18 (n = 6), trisomy 21 (n = 12), 6 euploid for the chromosomes of interest and two trisomy 16 samples from fresh tissue were tested. Concordance between cytogenetics and genotyping was 100% for non-mosaic samples. Mini-STR genotyping is a viable method for targeted aneuploidy detection in low quality DNA samples.

Toward optimal detection of the common prenatal aneuploidies by quantitative fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction: comparison of two commercial assays

BACKGROUND/AIM

To evaluate and compare the performance of the recently released Aneufast™ v2 (MolgentixSL) and QST*RplusV2 commercial assays (Gen-Probe), both designed for the quantitative fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of the common aneuploidies during pregnancy.

METHODS

A series of 160 consecutive fetal samples referred for rapid aneuploidy detection testing and an additional 25 samples enriched for the presence of an abnormality were selected for comparison.

RESULTS

To confidently rule out a chromosome abnormality, a second round of short tandem repeat typing was required for 14.1% (26) and 9.7% (18) of the specimens analyzed with Aneufast v2 and QST*RplusV2, respectively. Reflex testing was required for 7.6% (14) and 5.9% (11) of the specimens analyzed with respective assays to confidently rule out an autosomal trisomy. For the sex chromosomes, the difference in the amount of follow-up testing is greater between the assays, as a result of the inclusion in the initial PCR of the TAF9L paralogous marker in the QST*RplusV2 assay.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, both assays performed similarly in the detection of aneuploidies. In this sample set, the QST*RplusV2 kit required less frequent reflex testing, which translates into shorter turnaround time and cost savings. The incorporation of the TAF9L paralogous sequence in the initial PCR is advantageous for diagnostic use.

Molekularzytogenetische Methoden und Array-Diagnostik in der Pränatalmedizin

In der pränatalen Diagnostik kommen aktuell neben zytogenetischen Standardverfahren vermehrt molekulare Methoden zum Einsatz. Während die molekulare Zytogenetik im Rahmen der Fluoreszenz-in-situ-Hybridisierungs(FISH)-Technik seit Jahren routinemäßig in der invasiven vorgeburtlichen Diagnostik eingesetzt wird, wird die Array-Diagnostik gerade erst in dieses Feld eingeführt. FISH wird pränatal meist zur Bestimmung der Größe eines Zellmosaiks, zum Mikrodeletionsausschluss oder zur Abklärung von strukturellen Chromosomenaberrationen durchgeführt. Die Array-CGH („comparative genomic hybridization“, komparative genomische Hybridisierung) wird eher zurückhaltend verwendet, zumeist zur weiterführenden Abklärung bei sonographisch auffälligen Feten und zur Bruchpunktbestimmung bei zytogenetisch nachgewiesenen chromosomalen Umbauten. In Zukunft wird die Array-CGH sicher noch weiter an Bedeutung gewinnen, stellt aber bereits jetzt schon eine wertvolle Ergänzung zu den diagnostischen Verfahren der Zytogenetik und der bisher verwendeten molekulargenetischen Methoden dar.

Application of microsatellite loci on the chromosome X for rapid prenatal detection of the chromosome X numerical abnormalities

Aim

To determine the value of short-tandem repeat markers on the chromosome X (X-STR) for prenatal diagnostics of the chromosome X numerical disorders.

Methods

We investigated the genetic variability of 5 X-markers (DXS9895, DXS6810, DXS6803, GATA172D05, and HPRTB) in 183 healthy Croatian individuals (90 men and 93 women). We also tested 13 patients with X chromosome disorders (Turner syndrome – 6 cases; Klinefelter syndrome – 5 cases, and Triple X syndrome – 2 cases). The analysis was performed using polymerase chain reaction amplification with specific primers and electrophoresis on a polyacrylamide gel. The study was performed in 2010.

Results

Our sample showed no significant differences in allelic frequencies of the investigated X-markers from other European populations. A set of 5 X-STR markers was sufficiently informative for a successful determination of the chromosome X numerical abnormalities.

Conclusion

Since no false positive or negative results were observed, diagnostic value of the investigated X-STR loci for prenatal detection of chromosome X numerical disorders was confirmed. Our study represents an important step toward an improved prenatal diagnostics in Croatia.

Rapid aneuploidy detection or karyotyping? Ethical reflection

No consensus exists whether women at increased risk for trisomy 21, 13, and 18 should be offered stand-alone rapid aneuploidy detection (RAD) or karyotyping. In this paper, the ethical implications of a fast, relatively cheap and targeted RAD are examined. The advantages of RAD seem less robust than its proponents suggest. Fast test results only give a short-term psychological benefit. The cost advantage of RAD is apparent, but must be weighed against consequences like missed abnormalities, which are evaluated differently by professionals and pregnant women. Since pre-test information about RAD will have to include telling women about karyotyping as a possible alternative, the advantage of RAD in terms of the quantity of information that needs to be given may also be smaller than suggested. We conclude that none of the supposed arguments in favour of RAD is decisive in itself. Whether the case for RAD may still be regarded as convincing when taking these arguments together seems to depend on one's implicit view of what prenatal screening is about. Are we basically dealing with a test for trisomy 21 and a few conditions more? Or are there good grounds for also testing for the wider range of abnormalities that karyotyping can detect? As professionals and pregnant women may have different views about this, we suggest that the best approach is to offer women a choice between RAD and karyotyping. This approach is most in line with the general aim of prenatal screening: providing opportunities for autonomous reproductive choice.

Rapid methods for targeted prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies

Improvements in non-invasive screening methods for trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) and other aneuploidies during the first and second trimester of pregnancy have radically changed the indications for prenatal diagnosis over the last decade. Consequently, there was a need for rapid tests for the detection of common chromosome aneuploidies resulting in the development of molecular methods for the rapid, targeted detection of (an)euploidies of the chromosomes 13, 18, 21 and the sex chromosomes. The analysis of large series of prenatal samples has shown that such tests can detect the great majority of chromosome abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis. This resulted in lively discussions on whether conventional karyotyping should remain the standard method for the majority of prenatal cases or can be replaced by rapid tests only. This review gives an overview of different aspects of the three most common tests for rapid, targeted prenatal detection of (an)euploidies, i.e. interphase fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (iFISH), quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA).

Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidy by quantitative-fluorescence PCR

QF-PCR refers to the amplification of chromosome-specific polymorphic microsatellite markers using fluorescence-labelled primers, followed by semi-quantitative analysis of the products on a genetic analyser to determine copy number and/or imbalances of specific chromosomal material. This approach is now widely used for rapid prenatal diagnosis of the common trisomies. In addition, it can successfully detect maternal cell contamination and mosaicism in prenatal material.

MLPA for confirmation of array CGH results and determination of inheritance

Background

Array CGH has recently been introduced into our laboratory in place of karyotype analysis for patients with suspected genomic imbalance. Results require confirmation to check sample identity, and analysis of parental samples to determine inheritance and thus assess the clinical significance of the abnormality. Here we describe an MLPA-based strategy for the follow-up of abnormal aCGH results.

Results

In the first 17 months of our MLPA-based aCGH follow-up service, 317 different custom MLPA probes for novel aCGH-detected abnormalities were developed for inheritance studies in 164 families. In addition, 110 samples were tested for confirmation of aCGH-detected abnormalities in common syndromic or subtelomeric regions using commercial MLPA kits. Overall, a total of 1215 samples have been tested by MLPA. A total of 72 de novo abnormalities were confirmed.

Conclusions

Confirmation of aCGH-detected abnormalities and inheritance of these abnormalities are essential for accurate diagnosis and interpretation of aCGH results. The development of a new service utilising custom made MLPA probes and commercial MLPA kits for follow-up studies of array CGH results has been found to be efficient and flexible in our laboratory.

QF-PCR as a stand-alone test for prenatal samples: the first 2 years' experience in the London region

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the results of the first 2 years of a QF-PCR stand-alone testing strategy for the prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy in the London region and to determine the advantages and disadvantages of this policy.

METHODS

A review of the results of 9737 prenatal samples received for exclusion of chromosome abnormalities. All samples were subjected to QF-PCR testing for common aneuploidies but only samples fulfilling specific criteria subsequently had a full karyotype analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 9737 samples received, 10.3% had a chromosome abnormality detected by QF-PCR testing. Of the 7284 samples received with no indication for karyotype analysis, 25 (0.3%) received a normal QF-PCR result but subsequently had an abnormal karyotype detected either prenatally as a privately funded test or postnatally. Of these samples, without subsequent abnormal ultrasound findings, five had a chromosome abnormality associated with a poor prognosis, representing 0.069% of samples referred for Down syndrome testing.

CONCLUSION

While back-up karyotyping is required for some samples, using QF-PCR as a stand-alone prenatal test for pregnancies without ultrasound abnormalities reduces costs, provides rapid delivery of results, and avoids ambiguous and uncertain karyotype results, reducing parental anxiety.

Combined QF-PCR and MLPA molecular analysis of miscarriage products: an efficient and robust alternative to karyotype analysis

OBJECTIVES

To replace G-banded chromosome analysis for miscarriage products with a combined molecular approach: QF-PCR and MLPA, to increase efficiency, reduce costs, and improve the diagnostic success rate for these samples.

METHODS

A review of 10 years of karyotype results for miscarriages products indicated that 2.7% of nonmosaic chromosome imbalance would not be detected by the molecular approach. The molecular approach was validated on 117 samples in parallel with karyotype analysis; no discrepancies were detected. The molecular approach was implemented in September 2007, and in the first 18 months 500 samples were processed.

RESULTS

In 500 samples, 117 samples (23%) were abnormal. Of these abnormalities, 64% were trisomies, 12% triploid, 11% monosomy X and 13% other abnormalities. When compared to karyotype analysis, the success rate was higher (95% cf 70%) and the reporting time was lower (88% within 28 days cf 79%). In addition, efficiency was higher as labour-intensive cell culture and karyotyping were replaced by batch testing and automated analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This molecular approach is less labour-intensive, allows a higher sample throughput and has a higher success rate than karyotype analysis; it is therefore an efficient and cost-effective diagnostic testing strategy for miscarriage products.

Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR, results of 9 years of clinical experience

BACKGROUND

Despite being deliberately targeted to common chromosome aneuploidies, the rapid quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) tests can detect the majority of chromosome abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis. The main advantages of this assay are low cost, speed and automation allowing large-scale application.

METHODS

We developed a QF-PCR test that was applied on 43 000 clinical samples reporting results in 24 h. Most common indications were biochemical risk (32%) and advanced maternal age (30%). Samples were also tested by cytogenetic analysis and the results compared.

RESULTS

Aneuploidies involving chromosomes 21, 18, 13, X and Y were detected with 100% specificity. Several cases of partial trisomies and mosaicism were also identified. Overall 95% of clinically relevant abnormalities were readily detected and termination of affected pregnancies could be performed without waiting for the cytogenetic results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the possibility of reducing the load of prenatal cytogenetic tests if the pregnancies are carefully monitored by non-invasive screening. In case of abnormal QF-PCR results, medical action can be taken within few hours from sampling. In cases of negative QF-PCR results, cytogenetic analyses might only be performed for fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities. In countries where large-scale cytogenetic tests are not available, QF-PCR may be used as the only prenatal diagnostic procedure.

Rapid aneuploidy detection with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: a prospective study of 4000 amniotic fluid samples

The introduction of prenatal screening requires rapid high-throughput diagnosis of common aneuploidies. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) allows for quick, easily automated multiplex testing of these aneuploidies in one polymerase chain reaction. We performed a large prospective study using MLPA on 4000 amniotic fluid (AF) samples including all indications and compared its value to karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). MLPA can reliably determine common aneuploidies with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Moreover, some mosaic cases and structural chromosome aberrations were detected as well. In cases of a male fetus, triploidies can be detected by an aberrant pattern of probe signals, which mimics maternal cell contamination (MCC). Macroscopic blood contamination was encountered in 3.2% of the AF samples. In 20% of these samples, an MLPA pattern was found consistent with MCC, although there were no false negatives of the most common aneuploidies. As the vast majority of inconclusive results (1.7%) is due to potential MCC, we designed a protocol in which we determine whether MLPA can be performed on blood-contaminated AF samples by testing if blood is of fetal origin. Then, the number of inconclusive results could be theoretically reduced to 0.05%. We propose an alternative interpretation of relative probe signals for rapid aneuploidy diagnosis (RAD). We discuss the value of MLPA for the detection of (submicroscopic) structural chromosome anomalies. MLPA is a reliable method that can replace FISH and could be used as a stand-alone test for RAD instead of karyotyping.

Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidy by quantitative fluorescence PCR

Autosomal chromosome aneuploid pregnancies that survive to term, namely, trisomies 13, 18, and 21, account for 89% of chromosome abnormalities with a severe phenotype. They are normally detected by full karyotype analysis of cultured cells. The average reporting time for a prenatal karyotype analysis is approximately 14 days, and in recent years, there has been increasing demand for more rapid prenatal results with respect to the common chromosome aneuploidies, to relieve maternal anxiety and facilitate options in pregnancy. The rapid tests that have been developed negate the requirement for cultured cells, instead directly testing cells from the amniotic fluid or chorionic villus sample, with the aim of generating results within 48 h of sample receipt. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization is the method of choice in some genetic laboratories, usually because the expertise and equipment are readily available. However, a quantitative fluorescence (QF)-PCR-based approach is more suited to a high-throughput diagnostic service. This approach has been investigated in a small number of pilot studies and reported as a clinical diagnostic service in many studies. It may be used as a stand-alone test or as an adjunct test to full karyotype analysis, which subsequently confirms the rapid result and scans for other chromosome abnormalities not detected by the QF-PCR assay.

Application of QF-PCR for the prenatal assessment of discordant monozygotic twins for fetal sex

OBJECTIVE

To establish the utility of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) in order to determine the zygosity of multiple pregnancies, as well as to define the origin of the most frequent aneuploidies in amniotic fluid samples.

METHODS

We describe the case of a monochorionic (MC) diamniotic (DA) pregnancy with phenotypically discordant twins (nuchal cystic hygroma and non-immune hydrops in twin A and no anomalies in twin B). QF-PCR was performed for rapid prenatal diagnosis in uncultured amniocytes and subsequently in cultured cells. Polymorphic markers for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18 and 21 were used for determination of zygosity as well as sex chromosome aneuploidy.

RESULTS

Twin A showed a Turner Syndrome (TS) mosaicism pattern by QF-PCR in uncultured amniocytes. The monozygotic origin of the pregnancy was determined. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (I-FISH) in this sample showed a mosaicism X0/XY (83/17%). Cytogenetic analysis revealed a 45,X0 karyotype in twin A and a 46,XY karyotype in twin B.

CONCLUSIONS

QF-PCR is a reliable tool for the determination of the zygosity independently of the chorionicity and the fetal sex in case of twin pregnancy. Testing both direct and cultured cells can provide useful results for genetic counselling in chromosomal mosaicisms.

External quality assessment of rapid prenatal detection of numerical chromosomal aberrations using molecular genetic techniques: 3 years experience

OBJECTIVES

Prenatal diagnosis using rapid molecular genetic techniques is now a widely used method for detecting the most prevalent chromosomal aneuploidies. The object of this work was to develop a methodology for delivering external quality assessment (EQA) appropriate to the needs of routine diagnostic testing laboratories.

METHODS

We have provided three rounds of EQA using 15 different samples over 3 years. The scheme has developed to assess both the genotyping accuracy of the results and the appropriateness of the clinical reports issued to the referring clinician.

RESULTS

Participation in the EQA scheme has increased from 9 to 27 laboratories from across Europe over the three sample distributions. All laboratories have used quantitative fluorescence-PCR (QF-PCR) to analyse these samples except for a sole participant in 2006 who used multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). In total 265 samples have been distributed, of which four (1.5%) were not reported due to technical failures and one (0.4%) was reported incorrectly and must be regarded as a genotyping error.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated a significant and increasing demand for EQA in the rapid detection of aneuploidies in UK and other European laboratories. Using the methodologies described, we have had a very low rate of technical failures and demonstrated a high level of genotyping accuracy. However, the quality of the clinical reports was variable and suggestions are made for improvement.

Validation of QF-PCR for prenatal aneuploidy screening in the United States

OBJECTIVE

QF-PCR is an inexpensive and reliable method for aneuploidy screening; however, despite its obvious advantages, it is not in routine use in the United States. Our objective in the present study was to validate QF-PCR as a means for prenatal aneuploidy screening in our institution.

METHODS

A QF-PCR assay using 15 primer pairs located on chromosomes 13, 18, 21 X and Y was established for aneuploidy screening. Amniotic fluid (AF) and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) samples consisting only of the cells recovered from the plasticware discarded by our institutional cytogenetics laboratory were collected and DNA was prepared by a simple and inexpensive microwave procedure. QF-PCR was then performed and interpreted using established criteria.

RESULTS

687 consecutive prenatal samples were screened in a blinded prospective manner, and results were compared to those obtained by conventional cytogenetics. 100% of autosomal trisomies were detected, and there were zero false positives. A single case each of XXY and 45X were missed.

CONCLUSIONS

QF-PCR for prenatal aneuploidy screening was validated in our laboratory and has now been approved by the New York State Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Program. We propose a simple protocol for integrating QF-PCR into the normal cytogenetics laboratory workflow.

Complete discrepancy between QF-PCR analysis of uncultured villi and karyotyping of cultured cells in the prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in three CVS

OBJECTIVE

To investigate complete discrepancies in the prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 between QF-PCR analysis of uncultured villi and karyotyping of cultured cells in three chorion villus samples.

METHODS

Clinical details were obtained from all three patients. Follow-up studies were undertaken where possible by evaluation of chromosome 21 copy number with QF-PCR, interphase FISH, MLPA and karyotyping, and by post-mortem examination.

RESULTS

Case 1: severe oligohydramnios and microcephaly on scan. QF-PCR: trisomy 21; MLPA: trisomy 21; cultured karyotype: 46,XY[48]. Placental and fetal tissue results and post-mortem examination indicated a euploid fetus with trisomy 21 mosaicism confined to the placenta. Case 2: Down screen risk 1:16; NT = 4.4 mm; absent nasal bone (Caucasian mother). QF-PCR: disomy 21; cultured karyotype: 47,XY,+ 21[23]. Neck thickening noted at delivery-post-mortem refused, no fetal tissue available. Placental tissue indicated mosaicism for trisomy 21. Case 3: Down screen risk 1:91; NT = 6.7 mm. QF-PCR: disomy 21; cultured karyotype: 46,XX,der(21;21)(q10;q10)[60]. No follow-up possible. PCR genotyping of cultured cells confirmed sample identity in all three cases. Chromosome 21 markers observed by PCR were biallelic in all three cases, indicating that a mitotic error could account for the presence of the abnormal cell lines in each case.

CONCLUSION

QF-PCR analysis of uncultured villi and cultured karyotyping may rarely show complete discrepancy in the prediction of fetal trisomy 21 in CVS. Within-biopsy sample mosaicism, together with the testing of different cell populations, provide an explanation for these results. Practical ways to minimise the risk of such discrepancy are proposed.

A novel diagnostic strategy for trisomy 21 using short tandem repeats

Molecular technique with STRs can rapidly diagnose aneuploidy. In order to improve its fidelity, we developed a novel STR-based strategy for fast diagnosis of trisomy 21 and constructed a multimarker diagnostic system according to it. The system is based on nine STRs, of which two were previously known and seven were newly identified from the genomic sequence of the long arm of chromosome 21. They were confirmed to be highly polymorphic in the Chinese population by PCR amplification and gel electrophoresis. The combination of nine STR markers, when applied to DNA from 102 Chinese individuals with normal karyotype, did not yield any false-positives, and clearly revealed three different alleles in DNA from 15 out of 18 trisomy 21 patients. The results show that our new strategy can provide an alternative molecular technique for the rapid detection of aneuploidy.

Prenatal detection of a de novo Yqh-acrocentric translocation

OBJECTIVES

To identify the extra chromosomal material on 46,XX,21p+ for prenatal diagnosis.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Conventional cytogenetic studies using GTG (G bands by trypsin using Giemsa) and CBG (C bands by barium hydroxide using Giemsa) techniques were performed on chromosomes at metaphase obtained from cultured amniocytes and parental blood lymphocytes. Molecular cytogenetic techniques, QF-PCR (quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction), FISH (fluorescent in-situ hybridization), and DA-DAPI (Distamycin A and 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole) staining, were then used to clarify the extra material present on fetal chromosome 21 p.

RESULTS

The extra material on fetal chromosome 21 p has originated from Yqh, most likely at PAR2 (the secondary pseudoautosomal region). The karyotype should be 46,XX,der(21)t(Y;21)(q12;p13)de novo.ish der(21)t(Y;21)(q12;p13) (EST Cdy16c07+).

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates the usefulness of molecular techniques in the investigation of rare chromosomal rearrangements.

Full karyotyping, rapid aneuploidy diagnosis or both when invasive prenatal testing is performed for diagnosis of thalassaemia?

A retrospective study was performed to compare the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities by different approaches of full karyotyping, rapid aneuploidy diagnosis (RAD) or both when invasive prenatal testing is performed for diagnosis of thalassaemia. The karyotype results of 1120 prenatal samples obtained from thalassaemia couples from January 1985 to December 2002 in a referral centre for prenatal diagnosis were studied. The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities by four different approaches were compared: (i) karyotyping for all samples; (ii) RAD (21,18,13,X,Y) for all samples; (iii) RAD for all samples + karyotyping for cases with ultrasound abnormalities; and (iv) RAD (21,18,13) for all + RAD (X,Y) for cases with ultrasound abnormalities consistent with Turner syndrome + karyotyping for cases with ultrasound abnormalities. Normal karyotypes were found in 1103 samples (98.5%). There were 17 cases (1.5%) of chromosomal abnormalities: four cases (0.36%) were clinically significant, eight cases (0.7%) were of borderline clinical significance and five cases (0.44%) were not confirmed by subsequent prenatal or postnatal tests. The incidences of autosomal (7/1120 = 0.63%) and sex chromosomal (5/1120 = 0.45%) abnormalities were not higher than those (0.41 and 0.22%, respectively) from newborn surveys (Hook and Hamerton, 1977) (P = 0.398 and 0.216, respectively). Approach 1 would detect all 17 chromosomal abnormalities. Approach 2 would detect three of four clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities but not detect six of eight chromosomal abnormalities of borderline clinical significance and three of five chromosomal abnormalities not confirmed by subsequent prenatal or postnatal tests. Approach 3, in addition, would be able to detect all four clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities. Approach 4 would detect all four clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities but would not detect seven of eight chromosomal abnormalities of borderline clinical significance and four of five chromosomal abnormalities not confirmed by subsequent prenatal or postnatal tests. RAD (21,18,13) for all + RAD (X,Y) for cases with ultrasound abnormalities consistent with Turner syndrome + karyotyping for cases with ultrasound abnormalities seemed to be the best approach for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities when invasive prenatal testing is performed for diagnosis of thalassaemia.

Heterozygosity mapping by quantitative fluorescent PCR reveals an interstitial deletion in Xq26.2-q28 associated with ovarian dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Deletions of Xq chromosome are reported for a number of familial conditions exhibiting premature ovarian failure (POF) and early menopause (EM).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We describe the inheritance of an interstitial deletion of the long arm of the X chromosome associated with either POF or EM in the same family. Cytogenetic studies and heterozygosity mapping by quantitative fluorescent PCR revealed a 46,X,del(X)(q26.2-q28) karyotype in a POF female, in her EM mother, and also in her aborted fetus with severe cardiopathy. Applying a microsatellite approach, we have narrowed the extension of an identical interstitial deletion located between DXS1187 and DXS1073. These data, in line with other mapped deletions, single out the proximal Xq28 as the region most frequently involved in ovarian failure. We also propose that other factors may influence the phenotypic effect of this alteration. Indeed, skewed X inactivation has been ascertained in EM and POF to be associated with different X haplotypes.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis indicates that Xq26.2-q28 deletion is responsible for gonad dysgenesis in a family with EM/POF. The dissimilar deletion penetrance may be due to epigenetic modifications of other X genes that can contribute to human reproduction, highlighting that ovarian failure should be considered as a multifactorial disease.

The future of prenatal diagnosis: rapid testing or full karyotype? An audit of chromosome abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes for women referred for Down's Syndrome testing

OBJECTIVE

To assess the implications of a change in prenatal diagnosis policy from full karyotype analysis to rapid trisomy testing for women referred primarily for increased risk of Down's Syndrome.

DESIGN

Retrospective collection and review of data.

SETTING

The four London Regional Genetics Centres.

POPULATION

Pregnant women (32,674) in the London area having invasive prenatal diagnosis during a six-year three-month period.

METHODS

Abnormal karyotypes and total number of samples referred for raised maternal age, raised risk of Down's Syndrome following serum screening or maternal anxiety were collected. Abnormal karyotypes detected by molecular trisomy detection were removed, leaving cases with residual abnormal karyotypes. These were assessed for their clinical significance. Pregnancy outcomes were ascertained by reviewing patient notes or by contacting obstetricians or general practioners.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of prenatal samples with abnormal karyotypes that would not have been detected by rapid trisomy testing, and the outcome of those pregnancies with abnormal karyotypes.

RESULTS

Results from 32,674 samples were identified, of which 24,891 (76.2%) were from women referred primarily for Down's Syndrome testing. There were 118/24,891 (0.47%) abnormal sex chromosome karyotypes. Of the samples with autosomal abnormalities that would not be detected by rapid trisomy testing, 153/24,891 (0.61%) were in pregnancies referred primarily for Down's Syndrome testing. Of these, 98 (0.39%) had a good prognosis (46/98 liveborn, 3/98 terminations, 1/98 intrauterine death, 1/98 miscarriage, 47/98 not ascertained); 37 (0.15%) had an uncertain prognosis (20/37 liveborn, 5/37 terminations; 12/37 not ascertained) and 18 (0.07%) had a poor prognosis (1/18 liveborn, 2/18 miscarriage, 11/18 terminations, 4/18 not ascertained).

CONCLUSIONS

For pregnant women with a raised risk of Down's Syndrome, a change of policy from full karyotype analysis to rapid trisomy testing would result in the failure to detect chromosome abnormalities likely to have serious clinical significance in approximately 0.06% (1 in 1659) cases. However, it should be noted that this figure may be higher (up to 0.12%; 1 in 833) if there were fetal abnormalities in some of the pregnancies in the uncertain prognosis group for which outcome information was not available.

How unexpected are unexpected findings in prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis? A literature review

The objective of this review was to gain understanding about unexpected findings in prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis. This category of results might be excluded from prenatal testing when new molecular tests such as I-FISH and QF-PCR will be applied in a future scenario of targeted testing. The literature was systematically searched for publications wherein the term unexpected or a synonym refers to testing results with specific problems. On the selected articles a qualitative analysis was performed, using the methods of cross-case analysis and within-case analysis. Sixteen articles published between 1979 and 2003 were selected. Analysis led to the classification of four problems of unexpected findings: I. unexpected for professionals; II. unexpected for patients; III. uncertainty; IV. other difficult counselling issues. We conclude that currently the problems of unexpected findings relate only slightly to their unexpected character. Instead, the main problems of unexpected findings relate to uncertainty and other aspects which create difficult counselling issues. As such, unexpected findings can be distinguished only gradually from standard results. Before targeted testing can be applied it is necessary to establish exact criteria in order to discern unexpected findings from standard testing results.

Detection of mosaicism for primary trisomies in prenatal samples by QF-PCR and karyotype analysis

OBJECTIVES

QF-PCR can be used to rapidly diagnose primary trisomy in prenatal samples. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of primary trisomy mosaicism for chromosomes 13, 18 or 21 in a cohort of prenatal samples, and to compare and contrast the detection of this mosaicism using both QF-PCR and karyotype analysis.

METHODS

Data was collated from all prenatal samples displaying mosaicism for a primary trisomy between June 2000 and March 2004. Levels of mosaicism were estimated and samples were categorised according to the cell population in which the mosaicism was detected.

RESULTS

In a total of 8983 samples, 18 samples (0.20%) displaying mosaicism were detected, including trisomy 13 (three samples), trisomy 18 (seven samples), trisomy 21 (seven samples) and mosaic triploidy (one sample). This included 7 amniotic fluid and 11 chorionic villus samples. Mosaicism was detected by QF-PCR in 12 samples and by karyotype analysis in 8 samples.

CONCLUSIONS

QF-PCR can detect mosaicism when the abnormal cell line contributes at least 15% of the whole sample. Use of both karyotype and QF-PCR analysis leads to the detection of more cases of mosaicism than either test alone.

Maternal cell contamination of prenatal samples assessed by QF-PCR genotyping

OBJECTIVES

To establish the genotype of cultured cells from a cohort of amniotic fluid and chorionic villus samples, and compare this genotype with that obtained from uncultured material from the same sample, in order to assess the frequency and significance of maternal cell contamination of prenatal samples.

METHODS

Quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) was carried out by amplification of microsatellite markers using fluorescence-labelled primers, followed by quantitative analysis of the allele peaks on a genetic analyser. A multiplex of 12 primer pairs for four loci on each of chromosomes 13, 18 and 21 was used.

RESULTS

A total of 307 prenatal samples were tested. Of the 254 amniotic fluid samples, 39.8% had some degree of bloodstaining, ranging from 5% bloodstaining in the cell pellet to heavily bloodstained fluid. Uncultured samples were tested by QF-PCR analysis and the cultured cells were tested by both QF-PCR and karyotype analysis. Of the samples, 90.2% had the same single genotype on direct and cultured material. Two samples (0.65%) were mosaic for an aneuploidy cell line. A second genotype, interpreted as maternal cell contamination, was identified in direct and/or cultured preparations in 9.1% of samples, 17.8% of which were not bloodstained. Seven amniotic fluid samples (2.8%) showed maternal cell contamination in cultured material.

CONCLUSIONS

For heavily bloodstained amniotic fluid samples, a maternal blood specimen may help interpret the results of rapid trisomy testing, followed by confirmation of the fetal origin of cultured cells. QF-PCR analysis has established a higher incidence of maternal cell contamination of cultured amniocytes than previous reports; the presence of MCC (maternal cell contamination) in cultured cells from samples with no bloodstaining underlines the need for karyotype analysis of more than one XX culture.

The introduction of QF-PCR in prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: time for reconsideration

Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) has recently entered the field of prenatal diagnosis to overcome the need to culture fetal cells, hence to allow rapid diagnosis of some selected chromosomal anomalies. We reviewed the studies on the accuracy of QF-PCR in detecting chromosomal anomalies at prenatal diagnosis. Overall, 22 504 samples have been analysed. The detection rate of aneuploidies of the selected chromosomes (13, 18 and 21, and X and Y) was 98.6% (95% confidence interval 97.8-99.3). QF-PCR might play a major role and be considered a valid alternative to the full karyotype. Being less expensive, and almost entirely automated, more women could undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis without significant increase in health expenditure. By using QF-PCR as a stand-alone test, the chances of non diagnosing the commonest, and the only chromosome anomalies which do increase in frequency with maternal age, are approximately one in 150 abnormal karyotypes, or one in 10-30 000 samples, based on the age distribution. These error rates might be deemed acceptable, although most structural chromosomal anomalies will be missed. At present, women are rarely informed about the full spectrum of the conditions which might be diagnosed via amniocentesis or chorionic villous sampling. Some of these anomalies might be acceptable, in view of their limited or uncertain clinical relevance, and decision analysis might, in the majority of cases, confine the full karyotype to selected women who have specific indications.

Prenatal Diagnosis of Common Aneuploidies Using Multiplex Quantitative Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction

OBJECTIVE

Prenatal diagnosis of foetal trisomies is usually performed by cytogenetic analysis. This requires lengthy laboratory procedures and it is expensive. Here, we report a retrospective study of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) for prenatal detection of trisomies 13, 18 and 21.

METHODS

QF-PCR was performed on a total of 447 amniotic fluids blindly analysed without any knowledge of the cytogenetic results and 43 samples with known karyotype. All samples were tested with at least 4 small tandem repeat markers specific for each chromosome 13, 18 or 21.

RESULTS

QF-PCR results on amniotic fluid were consistent with conventional cytogenetic data. QF-PCR detected 5 cases of trisomy 21, 2 cases of trisomy 18, 1 case of trisomy 13 and 1 case with Klinefelter's syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

QF-PCR has proved to be very useful in clinical settings, since it allows the detection of major numerical disorders in a few hours after sampling and thus reduces parental anxiety.

Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR. Assessment on 18 000 consecutive clinical samples

The quantitative fluorescent PCR (QF-PCR) assay, introduced during the last few years, allows prenatal diagnoses of common chromosome aneuploidies in a few hours after sampling. We report the first assessment of QF-PCR performed on a large cohort of 18,000 consecutive clinical specimens analysed in two different Centres. All samples were analysed by QF-PCR using several selected STR markers together with amelogenin and, occasionally, SRY for fetal sexing. Results were compared with those obtained by conventional cytogenetic analysis. In 17,129 tests, normal fetuses were detected by QF-PCR. No false positives were observed. All 732 cases of trisomy 21, 18, 13, triploidies, double trisomies as well as all but one fetuses with X and Y aneuploidies were correctly diagnosed. Chromosome mosaicism could also be suspected in several samples. In some cases of in vitro culture failures, QF-PCR was the only evidence of fetal X, Y, 21, 18 and 13 chromosome complement. QF-PCR proved to be efficient and reliable in detecting major numerical chromosome disorders. The main advantages of the molecular assay are its very low cost, speed and automation enabling a single operator to perform up to 40 assays per day. QF-PCR relieves anxiety of most parents within 24 h from sampling and accelerates therapeutic interventions in the case of an abnormal result. In countries where large scale conventional cytogenetics is hampered by its high cost and lack of technical expertise, QF-PCR may be used as the only prenatal diagnostic test.

Strategies for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy

Rapid diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies in raised risk pregnancies, usually prior to full karyotype analysis, is now carried out in a number of European genetic centres; several techniques for detecting genomic copy number changes have been described. Prenatal diagnosis of genetic disease requires accurate and robust assays; the invasive procedures are associated with a risk of pregnancy loss and an abnormal result may lead to termination of the pregnancy. The testing of prenatal material (amniotic fluid, chorionic villi or, more rarely, fetal blood) is associated with specific problems, including the quality and quantity of the tissue and difficulties of interpretation due to phenomena such as maternal cell contamination and mosaicism. In addition, there are 24-h, high-throughput demands on centres offering such a service. The extent to which existing and proposed strategies, including different PCR-based assays, a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification approach, and microarrays, fulfil the requirements of rapid prenatal testing is discussed. In the past 3 years, we have tested 7720 prenatal samples for trisomies 13, 18 and 21 using a quantitative fluorescence-PCR (QF-PCR) approach. The abnormality rate was 5.7%. There were no misdiagnoses for nonmosaic trisomy, the amplification failure rate was 0.09% of samples, and 97% of samples received a report on the working day following sample receipt. Maternal cell contamination and mosaicism were also detected. Our data recommend a QF-PCR approach as the current method of choice for rapid aneuploidy testing.