The diagnostic efficacy of exome data analysis using fixed neurodevelopmental gene lists: Implications for prenatal setting

Fetal whole genome sequencing as a clinical diagnostic tool: Advantages, limitations and pitfalls

Genome-wide sequencing, which includes exome sequencing and genome sequencing, has revolutionized the diagnostics of genetic disorders in both postnatal and prenatal settings. Compared to exome sequencing, genome sequencing enables the detection of many additional types of genomic variants, although this depends on the bioinformatics pipelines used. Variant classification might vary among laboratories. In the prenatal setting, variant classification may change if new fetal phenotypic features emerge as the pregnancy progresses. There is still a need to evaluate the incremental diagnostic yield of genome sequencing compared to exome sequencing in the prenatal setting. This article reviews the advantages and limitations of genome sequencing, with an emphasis on fetal diagnostics.

Antenatal counselling for prospective parents whose fetus has a neurological anomaly: part 2, risks of adverse outcome in common anomalies

After diagnosis of a fetal neurological anomaly, prospective parents want to know the best and worst-case scenarios and an estimation of the risk to their infant of having an atypical developmental outcome. The literature on developmental outcomes for fetal neurological anomalies is poor: studies are characterized by retrospective design, small sample size, often no standardized assessment of development, and differing definitions of anomalies. This review provides an aide-memoir on the risks of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome for ventriculomegaly, cortical anomalies, microcephaly, macrocephaly, agenesis of the corpus callosum, posterior fossa anomalies, and myelomeningocele, to assist healthcare professionals in counselling. The data in this review should be used alongside recommendations on counselling and service design described in part 1 to provide antenatal counselling.

Challenges in variant interpretation in prenatal exome sequencing

The use of exome sequencing (ES) in the prenatal setting improves the diagnostic yield of genetic testing for fetuses with ultrasound anomalies. However, while the purpose of ES is to explain the fetal phenotype, secondary or incidental findings unrelated to the observed abnormalities might be detected. Recently, requests for ES in fetuses with no sonographic abnormalities have been increasing, raising serious ethical and medico-legal concerns. Variant interpretation is complex even in the postnatal setting and performing broad genomic data analyses in the prenatal setting presents additional dilemmas. This article discusses challenges and questions related to prenatal ES, including variant interpretation of incidental findings in cases of indicated prenatal ES, as well as in situations where ES is performed in asymptomatic fetuses.

Implementation of fetal clinical exome sequencing: Comparing prospective and retrospective cohorts

PURPOSE

We compared the diagnostic yield of fetal clinical exome sequencing (fCES) in prospective and retrospective cohorts of pregnancies presenting with anomalies detected using ultrasound. We evaluated factors that led to a higher diagnostic efficiency, such as phenotypic category, clinical characterization, and variant analysis strategy.

METHODS

fCES was performed for 303 fetuses (183 ongoing and 120 ended pregnancies, in which chromosomal abnormalities had been excluded) using a trio/duo-based approach and a multistep variant analysis strategy.

RESULTS

fCES identified the underlying genetic cause in 13% (24/183) of prospective and 29% (35/120) of retrospective cases. In both cohorts, recessive heterozygous compound genotypes were not rare, and trio and simplex variant analysis strategies were complementary to achieve the highest possible diagnostic rate. Limited prenatal phenotypic information led to interpretation challenges. In 2 prospective cases, in-depth analysis allowed expansion of the spectrum of prenatal presentations for genetic syndromes associated with the SLC17A5 and CHAMP1 genes.

CONCLUSION

fCES is diagnostically efficient in fetuses presenting with cerebral, skeletal, urinary, or multiple anomalies. The comparison between the 2 cohorts highlights the importance of providing detailed phenotypic information for better interpretation and prenatal reporting of genetic variants.