Prenatal diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: parental counselling and support needs

An Observational Study of Dialogue about Uncertainty in Clinician-Family Counseling Conversations Following Prenatal Diagnosis of Complex Congenital Heart Disease

Objective

Families who receive a prenatal diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease (cCHD) often experience severe psychological distress and identify uncertainty as a key source of that distress. This study examined clinician-family conversations during initial fetal cardiology consultations to identify the topics of uncertainty discussed.

Methods

In this observational, qualitative study, initial fetal cardiology consultations were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded by two independent coders. A codebook was inductively and deductively developed and applied. This content analysis focused on uncertainty-related codes and associated themes.

Results

During 19 consultations including five clinicians, 13 different cardiac diagnoses were discussed (seven with high mortality risk). Median consultation length was 37 min (IQR: 26-51), with only 11% of words spoken by families. On average, 51% of total words spoken focused on uncertainty in relation to cardiac diagnosis, etiology, comorbidities, prognosis, childbirth, therapeutics, and logistics. Family-initiated discussion on uncertainty largely focused on childbirth and pregnancy and postpartum logistics.

Conclusions

Half of dialogue within initial fetal cardiology encounters discussed uncertainty surrounding prenatally diagnosed cCHD. Parent and clinician perspectives should be gathered on the essential content and optimal delivery of uncertainty-related topics.

Innovation

This study is conceptually and methodologically innovative as one of the first to examine audio-recorded dialogue between fetal cardiology clinicians and families.

Clinical Care Trajectory Assessment of Children With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia and Neurodevelopmental Impairment

BACKGROUND

Interdisciplinary long-term health surveillance identifies opportunities to mitigate CDH-related multisystem morbidity, particularly in patients with neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). However, no studies to date have assessed the impact of these morbidities on the patient/family. Our aim was to describe the clinical trajectory of patients with CDH and NDI (CDH-NDI), and to explore the lived experience and satisfaction of families with existing support resources.

METHODS

A multi-phase explanatory study (REB 2023-8964) was conducted. Phase 1: Review of clinical data for CDH-NDI patients attending a longitudinal follow-up clinic; Phase 2: Satisfaction assessment of CDH-NDI families with existing hospital resources. Standard statistical analyses were performed for Phases 1 and 2, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 91 patients included, 27 had NDI, stratified into mild (n = 2), moderate (n = 7), and severe (n = 18) cohorts. Ventilation (16 vs. 8; p < 0.001), ICU (34 vs. 18; p < 0.001) and hospital (41 vs. 22; p < 0.001) days were significantly longer in the severe cohort. The severe cohort required significantly more unscheduled visits, particularly in the first four years of life (p < 0.05). Despite high family satisfaction with existing resources, team communication during ICU-ward transfers could be improved. Parents also desired to share experiences with other CDH families.

CONCLUSION

CDH children with NDI require increased support, particularly in the first four years of life. While clinic satisfaction is high, improvement of team communication and access to support resources remain high priorities for parents.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II (prospectively collected data, retrospective analysis).

The promise and pitfalls of care standardization in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

The aim of standardizing care is to enhance patient outcomes and optimize healthcare delivery by minimizing variations in care and ensuring the efficient allocation of healthcare resources. Despite these potential benefits to patients, healthcare providers and the healthcare system, standardization may also disadvantage these groups. With a specific focus on congenital diaphragmatic hernia, this article will review the promise and pitfalls of standardization, as well as a potential path forward that uses standardization to improve outcomes in this rare and complex disease process.

Prenatal diagnostic and intervention considerations in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a life-threatening birth defect with significant morbidity and mortality. The prenatal management of a pregnancy with a fetus affected with CDH is complex and requires a multi-disciplinary team approach. An improved understanding of prenatal diagnosis and management is essential to developing strategies to optimize outcomes for these patients. In this review, we explore the current knowledge on diagnosis, severity stratification, prognostic prediction, and indications for fetal intervention in the fetus with CDH.

Organization of care of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia-Building a high-functioning CDH program

Infants born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia have high mortality and morbidity and require coordinated multidisciplinary care for optimal outcomes. Over the past several decades numerous articles have been published on the technical aspects of the care of these patients demonstrating both the variation in management across institutions as well as the desirability and need for standardization of care. Unfortunately, none have focused on the organization of care for CDH patients encompassing the range from early prenatal diagnosis to long-term postnatal care. However, to achieve optimal care and optimal outcomes, it is important to not only have excellent technical surgical and medical care but also to have an organized, systematic, and purposefully designed program for the delivery of healthcare to infants with this condition. In this article, based on our experience and drawing on general principles of building clinical programs, we describe the important elements of an ideal CDH program.

MRI prediction of fetal lung volumes and the impact on counselling

AIM

To assess whether lung volume percentages in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) differ depending on which formula is used to calculate the expected volume for gestation and any potential impact this may have on perinatal counselling.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-seven patients with left-sided CDH who had undergone fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals were reviewed. The lung volumes were measured on MRI and compared with the volumes that would be expected at the given gestation for each patient. Expected values were calculated using four formulae from the literature and the authors' in-house method. These measurements were used to calculate the percentage total lung volume observed compared with the expected lung volume in a healthy fetus of the same gestation. The differences in percentage lung volumes using these five methods were then compared with how they relate to predicted rates of survival. How predicted survival would change depending on which formula was used to calculate the percentage lung volume was investigated with a view to how this may change the counselling given to a family.

RESULTS

In 10/47 (21%) patients, there was no change in the predicted percentage chance of survival depending on which formula was used to calculate the predicted lung volume. In 37/47 (79%), the predicted chance of survival changed depending on which formula was used to calculate the expected lung volume at the given gestation. In 20 (47%) of these cases, the change in predicted survival depending on which formula used was 45% (i.e., from 25% to 70% survival in four and from 50% to 95% survival in 16) and in two cases (4%) this difference was 70% (i.e., from 25% predicted survival to 95% predicted survival).

CONCLUSION

There are several different methods for calculating expected lung volumes for any given gestation. When used to estimate the percentage lung volume in patients with CDH, there is a large difference in values depending on which method is used. This in turn leads to a large variation in predicted survival with some patients in this study having either a 25% or 95% chance of survival depending on which method is used. This has a huge impact on perinatal counselling and the difficult decisions made by families.

Exploring professionals' views regarding prenatal counselling in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

OBJECTIVES

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a congenital malformation in which the diaphragm and lungs are underdeveloped, leading to cardiorespiratory and other problems. This study aimed to explore professionals' views regarding prenatal counselling in CDH.

METHODS

A qualitative study was performed among healthcare professionals involved in the care of CDH patients in Radboud university medical center Amalia Children's Hospital. Semi-structured interviews were conducted until saturation was achieved. Transcripts were qualitatively analysed to gain insight into professionals' views regarding counselling.

RESULTS

Eighteen professionals with various backgrounds were included. The professionals agreed that the first counselling session should be soon after diagnosis and additional sessions should be offered. Concerning counselling content, participants considered explanation of the diagnosis, prognosis, short- and long-term consequences, treatment options and practical aspects important. As for decision-making about possible termination of pregnancy, all professionals emphasised the importance of the parental role, but the preferred parental involvement varied. Regarding practical aspects, preferred counsellors were a neonatologist, obstetrician, paediatric surgeon and/or medical social worker. Participants emphasised that the counselling should be adjusted to parents' needs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study gained insight into professionals' views regarding the timeline, content, decision-making process, and practical aspects of prenatal counselling in CDH.

Patient-reported outcomes for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To identify Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for parents with a lived experience of a prenatal diagnosis of isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).

METHOD

Thematic analysis of in-depth interview transcripts.

RESULTS

Interviews (n = 26) identified 11 PROs for given time points throughout the CDH trajectory. At the time of diagnosis, acceptable quality of life was selected as relevant PRO to decide whether to continue or terminate the pregnancy. During pregnancy, (neonatal) survival chances and the eligibility for foetal therapy were prominent outcomes with foetal and maternal complications adding distress. After birth, postnatal management options became the next milestone. When survival was deemed likely, post-hospital discharge complications and future care for infant and child became important. In retrospect, impact on family, bonding, parental mental health, and parental satisfaction with care were reported as relevant outcomes.

CONCLUSION

PROs are relevant in addition to hard medical outcomes, as they help parents to make decisions suiting their unique needs and personal situation. Given the knowledge inherently related to the parent's perspective, our findings provide relevant directions for clinicians to support parents and their family in facing challenging decisions in healthcare. The outcomes impacting parents are essential to prepare parents for the steep journey ahead.

Termination of pregnancy after a prenatal diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Factors influencing the parental decision process

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of termination of pregnancies (TOP) and factors associated with the decision for TOP in prenatally detected congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).

STUDY DESIGN

Single-centre retrospective cohort includes all prenatally detected CDH cases born between January 2009 and December 2021. Parental factors, such as parity, and fetal characteristics, such as disease severity, were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data. Differences between terminated and continued pregnancies were analysed.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 278 prenatally detected CDH cases of which 80% detected <24 weeks of gestation. The TOP rate was 28% in cases that were detected <24 weeks of gestation. Twenty continued pregnancies resulted in either intrauterine fetal demise (n = 6), preterm birth <24 weeks (n = 2), or comfort care after birth (n = 12). The survival rate was 70% in the remaining 195 live born cases. Factors associated with the decision for TOP were additional fetal genetic or anatomical abnormalities (p < 0.0001) and expected severity of pulmonary hypoplasia in left-sided CDH (p = 0.0456).

CONCLUSION

The decision to terminate a pregnancy complicated by fetal CDH depends on the severity of pulmonary hypoplasia and the presence of additional abnormalities. This emphasises the importance of early referral to expertise centres for detailed evaluation and multidisciplinary counselling.