1
|
Martin K, Norton ME, MacPherson C, Demko Z, Egbert M, Haeri S, Malone F, Wapner RJ, Roman AS, Khalil A, Faro R, Madankumar R, Strong N, Silver R, Vohra N, Hyett J, Kao C, Hakonarson H, Jacobson B, Dar P. Impact of high-risk prenatal screening results for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome on obstetric and neonatal management: Secondary analysis from the SMART study. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43:1574-1580. [PMID: 38066724 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE One goal of prenatal genetic screening is to optimize perinatal care and improve infant outcomes. We sought to determine whether high-risk cfDNA screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) affected prenatal or neonatal management. METHODS This was a secondary analysis from the SMART study. Patients with high-risk cfDNA results for 22q11.2DS were compared with the low-risk cohort for pregnancy characteristics and obstetrical management. To assess differences in neonatal care, we compared high-risk neonates without prenatal genetic confirmation with a 1:1 matched low-risk cohort. RESULTS Of 18,020 eligible participants enrolled between 2015 and 2019, 38 (0.21%) were high-risk and 17,982 (99.79%) were low-risk for 22q11.2DS by cfDNA screening. High-risk participants had more prenatal diagnostic testing (55.3%; 21/38 vs. 2.0%; 352/17,982, p < 0.001) and fetal echocardiography (76.9%; 10/13 vs. 19.6%; 10/51, p < 0.001). High-risk newborns without prenatal diagnostic testing had higher rates of neonatal genetic testing (46.2%; 6/13 vs. 0%; 0/51, P < 0.001), echocardiography (30.8%; 4/13 vs. 4.0%; 2/50, p = 0.013), evaluation of calcium levels (46.2%; 6/13 vs. 4.1%; 2/49, P < 0.001) and lymphocyte count (53.8%; 7/13 vs. 15.7%; 8/51, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS High-risk screening results for 22q11.2DS were associated with higher rates of prenatal and neonatal diagnostic genetic testing and other 22q11.2DS-specific evaluations. However, these interventions were not universally performed, and >50% of high-risk infants were discharged without genetic testing, representing possible missed opportunities to improve outcomes for affected individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary E Norton
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Cora MacPherson
- The Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | | | | | - Fergal Malone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rotunda Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ronald J Wapner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ashley S Roman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | - Asma Khalil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. George's Hospital, University of London, London, UK
| | - Revital Faro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersy, USA
| | - Rajeevi Madankumar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Noel Strong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert Silver
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nidhi Vohra
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Jon Hyett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Charlly Kao
- Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hakon Hakonarson
- Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bo Jacobson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Pe'er Dar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
D'Gama AM, Agrawal PB. Genomic medicine in neonatal care: progress and challenges. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:1357-1363. [PMID: 37789085 PMCID: PMC10689757 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01464-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
During the neonatal period, many genetic disorders present and contribute to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Genomic medicine-the use of genomic information in clinical care- has the potential to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in the neonatal period and improve outcomes for this population. Diagnostic genomic testing for symptomatic newborns, especially rapid testing, has been shown to be feasible and have diagnostic and clinical utility, particularly in the short-term. Ongoing studies are assessing the feasibility and utility, including personal utility, of implementation in diverse populations. Genomic screening for asymptomatic newborns has also been studied, and the acceptability and feasibility of such an approach remains an active area of investigation. Emerging precision therapies, with examples even at the "n-of-1" level, highlight the promise of precision diagnostics to lead to early intervention and improve outcomes. To sustainably implement genomic medicine in neonatal care in an ethical, effective, and equitable manner, we need to ensure access to genetics and genomics knowledge, access to genomic tests, which is currently limited by payors, feasible processes for ordering these tests, and access to follow up in the clinical and research realms. Future studies will provide further insight into enablers and barriers to optimize implementation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alissa M D'Gama
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Epilepsy Genetics Program, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pankaj B Agrawal
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Holtz Children's Hospital, Jackson Health System, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|