Off label use of prescription medicines in children in outpatient setting in Estonia is common

Paediatric off-label use of drugs in Gansu, China: a multicentre cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the current prevalence and cost of paediatric off-label drug prescriptions in Gansu, China, and the potential influencing factors.

DESIGN

The prevalence of off-label prescriptions in paediatrics was evaluated according to the National Medical Products Administration drug instructions in the China Pharmaceutical Reference (China Pharmaceutical Reference, MCDEX) database. The evidence of the prescription was determined by existing clinical practice guidelines and the Thomson Grade in the Micromedex 2021 compendium. We used logistic regression to investigate the characteristics that influence paediatric off-label drug use after single-factor regression analysis.

SETTING

A multicentre cross-sectional study of outpatient paediatric prescriptions in 196 secondary and tertiary hospitals in Gansu Province, China, in March and September 2020.

RESULTS

We retrieved 104 029 paediatric prescriptions, of which 39 480 (38.0%) contained off-label use. The most common diseases treated by off-label drugs were respiratory system diseases (n=15 831, 40.1%). A quarter of off-label prescriptions had adequate evidence basis (n=10 130, 25.6%). Unapproved indications were the most common type of off-label drug use (n=25 891, 65.6%). A total of 1177 different drugs were prescribed off-label, with multienzyme tablets being the most common drug (n=1790, 3.5%). The total cost of the prescribed off-label drugs was ¥106 116/day. Off-label prescriptions were less frequent in tertiary than in secondary hospitals. Topical preparations were more commonly prescribed off-label than other types of drugs. Senior-level clinicians prescribed drugs off-label more often than intermediate and junior clinicians.

CONCLUSION

Off-label drug use is widespread in paediatric practice in China. Three-quarters of the prescriptions may potentially include inappropriate medication use, resulting in a daily economic burden of about ¥81 000 in 2020 in Gansu Province with 25 million inhabitants. The management of off-label drug use in paediatrics in China needs improvement.

Off-label Prescription in Paediatric Dermatology: A Retrospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Hospital

Off-label prescription in paediatric patients is common, where some studies indicate that dermatological conditions are more prone to off-label treatment. This is the first study to analyse the prevalence of off-label prescription in paediatric dermatology consultation. This retrospective observational study was performed using the medical records of paediatric patients who were evaluated in a paediatric dermatological consultation in Pontevedra University Hospital, Pontevedra, Spain. Of the 468 patients reviewed, 186 prescriptions were issued and 51.10% were off-label prescription drugs. The dermatological conditions for which off-label prescription was most common were atopic dermatitis (29.0%), followed by warts (12.9%) and infantile haemangiomas (11.8%). With respect to drugs, topical tacrolimus (23.7%) was the most frequently prescribed off-label drug. The main reason for prescribing an off-label drug was for a disease not included on the label (62.4%), followed by issuing it at a lower age than authorized (55.9%). There was a significant association between a higher percentage of off-label prescription and younger age (p < 0.001), and the treatment of vitiligo, infantile haemangiomas and warts (p < 0.001). Likewise, the off-label prescription was significantly more common in the case of topical terbinafine, timolol, desloratadine and topical salicylic acid (p < 0.001). To conclude, off-label prescription is predominant in paediatric dermatology, as observed in 51.1% of our patients.

Medications used in paediatric intensive care by continuous infusion: Do the technical aspects of the package inserts corroborate scientific evidence?

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Hospitalized paediatric patients are three times more likely to experience medication errors with the potential to cause harm, when they are compared to adults. The lack of research in paediatrics, difficulties that are derived as indications and the parameters of safety and effectiveness of pharmacological therapy in children. To analyse whether the technical and legal aspects of the package insert for medicines used in paediatric intensive care units (ICU) using a continuous infusion (CI) pump corroborate the recommendations of clinical protocols and legal provisions.

METHODS

A documentary study, in which technical and legal information contained in the package inserts of medications commonly used via CI in neopediatric ICUs was analysed. The consultation of the medication package insert was carried out through the electronic portal of the National Health Surveillance Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária - ANVISA). Information on the use of medications in the neonatal and paediatric populations via CI was sought in the medication package insert. To analyse the legal aspects, ANVISA's RDC no. 47/2009 was used. In order to compare the technical information, the Micromedex NeoFax®, Micromedex Paediatrics®, and Lexicomp® databases were consulted.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Of the 13 medications analysed, 46% (n = 6) had some non-compliance with RDC 47/2009. Only 46% (n = 6) of the medications are indicated for paediatric use and only the medication package insert for midazolam (7.7%) contained the information considered essential for use via CI in paediatrics.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This is an innovative study that identifies the weaknesses of the medication package inserts for medications used by CI in paediatric ICUs. Failure to comply with legal recommendations can make medication administration difficult and increase the probability that errors will occur; and the absence of specific technical information can make care difficult and compromise patient safety. It is important that there is supervision by regulatory agencies and the contribution of health professionals so that non-conformities are reported and corrected, to guarantee safe care for paediatric patients in intensive care.

Off-Label Drug Use in Pediatric Out-Patient Care: A Multi-Center Observational Study

Objective

Prescribing a drug for a child is not an easy task and requires using the best available evidence as a guide, especially when a drug is used off-label. The practice of prescribing a drug for off-label use is fairly widespread worldwide. The FDA does not regulate prescribing patterns or practices of individual practitioners and, therefore, allows off-label use. The main objective of this study is to evaluate off-label prescribing among the pediatric population in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

Method

This is a retrospective, simple random selection observational study of children (≤15 years) who visited pediatric clinics and had at least 1 drug prescribed over a 12-month period (January to December 2018).

Results

A total of 865 drugs (mean 1 and SD 0.24) were prescribed to 326 children. Off-label was identified in 39.4% of the drugs with a frequency of 512 (as 1 drug may belong to more than 1 off-label category). The most common reason for off-label prescribing was related to doses that were "higher or lower than the recommended use" (48.6%), and the most frequently identified drug class prescribed for off-label use was anti-infective drugs for systemic use (39.9%). The percentage of off-label drug use was found to be higher in girls and in the age group of 1 month to 2 years (P = .001) for both variables. In addition, a significant association was found between off label drug use and the total number of drugs prescribed, P < .001.

Conclusion

The findings of this study showed a high incidence of off-label prescribing mainly related to dosing and indication. The results of this observational study support the need to establish a unified national pediatric dosing formulary guide to ensure safe drug use in pediatrics.

Extent, reasons and consequences of off-labeled and unlicensed drug prescription in hospitalized children: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Off-label and unlicensed prescriptions pose a severe safety concern among the pediatric population. We aimed to summarize the up-to-date evidence on the extent, reasons, and consequences of off-label and unlicensed drugs in hospitalized pediatric patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Google Scholar between 1990 and 2020 in which the last search was conducted on 12 February 2021. We included studies with the following inclusion criteria: (1) observational studies in design; (2) target population was hospitalized pediatric patients whether admitted in the intensive care unit or in the general ward; (3) study reporting the prevalence of off-label, unlicensed prescriptions or both; and (4) published in English.

RESULTS

A total of 47 studies were eligible for inclusion. The proportion of off-label and unlicensed prescriptions ranged from 7.4% to 99.5% and 0.1% to 74.4%, respectively. The most frequent category of off-label prescriptions was prescription outside the age range, with the most commonly reported reason for off-label prescriptions being the lack of information specifically for pediatrics on the drug information leaflets. The consequences of off-label and unlicensed prescriptions ranged from minor and bearable skin reactions to debilitating renal failure, risking deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label and unlicensed prescriptions are extensive and require progressively meditative interventions. However, the pediatric population is currently a "therapeutic orphan". Unless adequate pediatric clinical trials and licensed drugs become available, off-label and unlicensed drug prescription should not entirely be banned but rather promoted in an organized manner.

Uso off-label de medicamentos segundo a idade em crianças brasileiras: um estudo populacional

RESUMO: Objetivo: Estimar a prevalência de uso off-label de medicamentos segundo a idade em crianças de 0 a 12 anos no Brasil. Métodos: Estudo transversal de base populacional (Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos - PNAUM), incluindo 7.528 crianças de 0 a 12 anos de idade. Entrevistas individuais face a face foram utilizadas para coletar os dados nos domicílios. A classificação off-label segundo a idade foi realizada por meio de consulta ao compêndio eletrônico da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). Características sociodemográficas, presença de doença crônica, uso de serviços de saúde e características do informante foram coletadas. Os dados foram expressos por frequências relativas e intervalos de confiança de 95% (IC95%). O teste do χ2 de Pearson foi usado para avaliar a significância estatística das diferenças entre os grupos, com um nível de significância de 5%. A principal medida de desfecho foi a prevalência de uso off-label segundo a idade. Resultados: A prevalência de uso off label por idade foi de 18,7% (IC95% 16,4 - 21,3). Crianças com menos de 2 anos apresentaram maior prevalência desse uso em relação às mais velhas. Os medicamentos com maior frequência de uso off-label segundo a idade foram amoxicilina, nimesulida e a combinação de fenilefrina com bronfeniramina. Conclusão: O uso off-label de medicamentos segundo a idade é comum na população pediátrica brasileira, especialmente nas crianças menores de 2 anos de idade.

Trends in Off-Label Drug Use in Ambulatory Settings: 2006-2015

BACKGROUND

Off-label drug use in children is common and potentially harmful. In most previous off-label use research, authors studied hospitalized children, specific drug classes, or non-US settings. We characterized frequencies, trends, and reasons for off-label systemic drug orders for children in ambulatory US settings.

METHODS

Using nationally representative surveys of office-based physicians (National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, 2006-2015), we studied off-label orders of systemic drugs for children age <18 based on US Food and Drug Administration-approved labeling for age, weight, and indication. We characterized the top classes and diagnoses with off-label orders and analyzed factors and trends of off-label orders using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Physicians ordered ≥1 off-label systemic drug at 18.5% (95% confidence interval: 17.7%-19.3%) of visits, usually (74.6%) because of unapproved conditions. Off-label ordering was most common proportionally in neonates (83%) and in absolute terms among adolescents (322 orders out of 1000 visits). Off-label ordering was associated with female sex, subspecialists, polypharmacy, and chronic conditions. Rates and reasons for off-label orders varied considerably by age. Relative and absolute rates of off-label orders rose over time. Among common classes, off-label orders for antihistamines and several psychotropics increased over time, whereas off-label orders for several classes of antibiotics were stable or declined.

CONCLUSIONS

US office-based physicians have ordered systemic drugs off label for children at increasing rates, most often for unapproved conditions, despite recent efforts to increase evidence and drug approvals for children. These findings can help inform education, research, and policies around effective, safe use of medications in children.

Two decades of off-label prescribing in children: a literature review

BACKGROUND

In the past two decades, many legislative and regulatory initiatives were taken globally to improve drug use in children. However, children are still found to be prescribed with off-label drugs. This study was conducted to provide an overview of the worldwide trend in off-label prescribing in children from the year 1996 to 2016.

DATA SOURCES

The articles published in PubMed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar were searched using text words: off-label, unlicensed, paediatric and children. Additional articles were identified by reviewing the bibliography of the retrieved articles. Full-text articles published in English which reported on the prevalence of off-label prescribing in children between January 1996 and December 2016 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 101 studies met the inclusion criteria. Off-label prescribing definition included four main categories: age, indication, dose and route of administration. The three most common reference sources used in the studies were summary of product characteristics, national formularies and package inserts. Overall, the off-label prescribing rates in children ranged from 1.2 to 99.7%. The most common category of off-label prescribing in children was dose and age.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlighted that off-label prescribing in children was found to be highly prevalent throughout the past two decades, persistently in the neonatal intensive care units. This suggests that besides legislative and regulatory initiatives, behavioural, knowledge aspects and efforts to integrate evidence into practice related to off-label prescribing also need to be evaluated and consolidated as part of the concerted efforts to narrow the gaps in prescribing for children.

A survey of medicine use in children and adolescents in Austria

Aims of this survey were to evaluate prescription patterns for children and adolescents in primary and hospital care settings in Austria and to identify the medicines used most frequently in this population. Prescription data were assessed for the year 2014: for primary care, reimbursement data were obtained from Austrian health insurances; for hospital care, information on medicines dispensed to pediatric wards from hospital pharmacies. Frequencies of medicine use were analyzed by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system, age groups, and care setting. In primary care, anti-infectives (25%) and medicines for the respiratory system (14%) and for the nervous system (13%); in hospitals, anti-infectives (23%) and medicines for the nervous system (13%) and alimentary tract (12%) were prescribed most frequently. Amoxicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitor, ibuprofen, and paracetamol were the most frequent substances in both primary and hospital care settings. Based on the top 80% prescribed substances, a hit list of 150 pediatric medicines was defined for Austria.

CONCLUSION

This is the first representative and comprehensive survey of medicine use in children and adolescents in Austria, allowing comparison of prescription patterns to other European countries and assessing temporal trends in the future. Moreover, it serves as basis for planned measures to improve rational use of pediatric medicines. What is Known: • Large knowledge gaps exist for medicine use in children and adolescents concerning appropriate dosing, efficacy, and safety aspects. • Off-label medicine use is common in the treatment of children and adolescents. What is New: • We present a comprehensive survey of current prescription patterns for children and adolescents in Austria and define a hit list of pediatric medicines, as basis for developing an evidence-based information platform for health care professionals. • Anti-infectives, medicines for respiratory tract system, and pain medication are most frequently prescribed.

Can Registration Procedures of Pharmaceuticals Inadvertently Contribute to Off-Label Prescribing in Children?

BACKGROUND

In Malta, off-label prescribing of medicines in children stands at 45%, mainly because of failure by prescribers to follow the dosing recommendations in the product literature. In addition, registration procedures of pharmaceuticals may inadvertently contribute to this high incidence of off-label prescribing.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted to identify regulatory provisions relating to the registration of medicines in Malta that could give rise to off-label use. Furthermore, the product literature of the 2 classes of medicines most commonly prescribed in children, antibiotics and respiratory medicines, were reviewed. This was done in order to gauge whether the different registration routes implemented in Malta to market these medicines could give rise to off-label use.

RESULTS

The national registration procedure relating to Article 126a of Directive 2001/83/EC and, to a lesser extent, line extensions, parallel importation, and the provision detailed in Article 11 of Directive 2001/83/EC were found to lead to discrepancies and potentially misleading inclusions in the product literature. These, in turn, may well contribute to off-label use of medicines in children.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label prescribing does not necessarily mean that efficacy and safety data are unavailable. Variances in the product literature of medicines having the same active ingredients but imported from different countries may cause divergent prescribing practices, leading to inadvertent off-label use. The various stakeholders, including member states such as Malta, should devise strategies to harmonize the most recent labeling information in order to support the safe and effective use of pediatric medicines, thereby decreasing off-label use.

Antihistamines prescribed off-label among paediatric patients at a tertiary care hospital setting in Malaysia

Background Antihistamines are widely prescribed to children but should be used with caution in young children. Objective To determine the paediatric prescribing pattern of antihistamines with a focus on the off-label prescribing and factors that influence such prescribing. Setting Paediatric wards of a tertiary care hospital setting in Malaysia. Methods The pharmacy-based computer system and medical records were used to collect the required data. Labelling status of each antihistamine was determined based on the information provided in the product leaflets. Main outcome measure Antihistamines prescribed off-label and factors associated with such prescribing. Results Of the 176 hospitalised children aged <18 years prescribed with an antihistamine in the year 2012, 60.8 % received it in an off-label manner. Of 292 antihistamine prescription items, 55.5 % were prescribed off-label. Loratadine (35.3 %) was the most frequently prescribed antihistamine and chlorpheniramine maleate (34.0 %) was the most common antihistamine prescribed off-label. The main reason for the off-label prescribing of antihistamines was prescribing at higher than the recommended dose (30.2 %). Binary logistic regression showed that children aged <2 years (OR 12.65; 95 % CI 2.87-55.67) and the number of medications received (OR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.00-1.29) were significant predictors for the off-label prescribing of antihistamines. Conclusion Prescribing antihistamines for children in an off-label manner was prevalent at the studied locations and warrants further investigation on the consequences of such prescribing.

Frequency of prescriptions of off-label drugs and drugs not approved for pediatric use in primary health care in a southern municipality of Brazil

Objective:

To determine the frequency of prescriptions of off-label drugs and drugs not approved for pediatric use in primary health care in medium-sized municipality of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Methods:

Cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection, which analyzed prescriptions issued to 326 patients from August to December/2012 in two basic health units in the city of Viamão, state of Rio Grande do Sul. It included all prescriptions of patients whose medical records or service records were available and complete in relation to the date of presence, weight and date of birth. Off-label prescriptions were those which, in relation to the drug leaflet, showed dose different the recommended range, frequency of prescription and/or different form of administration and younger age than the indicated range. Descriptive statistics with absolute frequencies, means and standard deviations were used.

Results:

During the study period, a total of 731 drug prescriptions were issued and the frequency of off-label medications prescribed was 31.7%, especially antihistamines and antiasthmatics (32.3% and 31.5%, respectively). The main type of off-label prescription was dose (38.8%), followed by age range (31.5%) and frequency of administration (29.3%). Regarding the dose off-label prescription, overdose was more frequent (93.3%) than the underdose (6.7%). Prescriptions of unapproved drugs were not identified.

Conclusions:

The study showed that off label prescription is common in both assessed units. The observed percentage of off label prescription was higher than that reported by European studies carried out in primary care. On the other hand, the prescription of drugs not approved for children was not observed.

[Frequency of prescriptions of off-label drugs and drugs not approved for pediatric use in primary health care in a southern municipality of Brazil]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of prescriptions of off-label drugs and drugs not approved for pediatric use in primary health care in medium-sized municipality of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection, which analyzed prescriptions issued to 326 patients from August to December/2012 in two basic health units in the city of Viamão, state of Rio Grande do Sul. It included all prescriptions of patients whose medical records or service records were available and complete in relation to the date of presence, weight and date of birth. Off-label prescriptions were those which, in relation to the drug leaflet, showed dose different the recommended range, frequency of prescription and/or different form of administration and younger age than the indicated range. Descriptive statistics with absolute frequencies, means and standard deviations were used.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 731 drug prescriptions were issued and the frequency of off-label medications prescribed was 31.7%, especially antihistamines and antiasthmatics (32.3% and 31.5%, respectively). The main type of off-label prescription was dose (38.8%), followed by age range (31.5%) and frequency of administration (29.3%). Regarding the dose off-label prescription, overdose was more frequent (93.3%) than the underdose (6.7%). Prescriptions of unapproved drugs were not identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that off label prescription is common in both assessed units. The observed percentage of off label prescription was higher than that reported by European studies carried out in primary care. On the other hand, the prescription of drugs not approved for children was not observed.

Off-label prescribing in pediatric outpatients

OBJECTIVE

To study the characteristics of off-label prescribing and adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurrence in a sample of pediatric outpatients treated by general practitioners.

METHODS

A survey on pediatric drug prescribing was implemented in 46 general practices in southwestern France. All consecutive patients aged 0 to 16 years were included. Patient characteristics, reasons for consultation, and drug prescribed (including indications) were collected. ADRs occurring ≤10 days after the date of consultation were recorded by the general practitioners (spontaneous notification). Off-label prescription was defined as prescribing outside the specifications of the Summary of Product Characteristics.

RESULTS

Among the 2313 children seen between March 8, 2011 and July 31, 2011, 1960 were exposed to ≥1 prescribed drug. Mean age was 5.6 years, with a gender ratio of 1.1. Among children with prescriptions, 37.6% (n = 736) were exposed to ≥1 off-label prescription and 6.7% (n = 132) to ≥1 unlicensed drug. Off-label prescribing involved an unapproved indication in 56.4% of cases (n = 416), a lower dosage (26.5%, n = 195) or higher dosage (19.5%, n = 144) than specified, age not labeled (7.2%, n = 53), incorrect route of administration (3.5%, n = 26), and contraindication (0.3%, n = 2). A total of 23 ADRs were reported (1.5% of patients with off-label prescriptions). ADR occurrence was not significantly related to off-label drug prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the numerous initiatives implemented for promoting rational medicine use in children, the prevalence of off-label prescription in outpatient pediatric practice remains high.

[Drug prescriptions study in the outpatient setting: assessment of off-label uses in children]

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the prescription profile and to assess the off-label and unlicensed uses of medicines among non-hospitalised pediatric patients.

DESIGN

cross-sectional study.

SETTING

pediatric units in two urban health centers and general emergency room (Hospital Materno-Infantil, Málaga).

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

sociodemographics variables, reasons for consultation and information about therapeutic medications. The classification of prescriptions was established according to information requirements contained in the Summary of Products Characteristics (SPC).

RESULTS

A total of 388 children were included (a subsample of 105 treated in the emergency room). Four hundred sixty-two prescriptions (involving 74 different active ingredients) were evaluated. Each infant received and average of 1,7 drugs (95% CI: 1,6-1,9). The most prescribed medicines were ibuprofen, paracetamol, amoxicillin-clavulanate and budesonide. The therapeutic group with the greatest variety of drugs was the respiratory group. 27,4% (95% CI: 23,5-31) of prescriptions were off-label and the main cause was different age (60%; 95% CI: 54,1-63), followed by different dose (21,5%; 95% CI: 18-25), different indication (12%; 95% CI: 9,2-15) and different route of administration (7%; 95% CI: 5,4-10).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of off-label uses presents intermediate figures. Around one third of the paediatric outpatients in our sample are exposed to at least one off-label or unlicensed prescription. We should, however, point out that such usage is based on scant official, quality information, although it is not necessarily incorrect. Evidence-based medicine should be encouraged to improve drug therapy in children, as well as following the rules on drugs in special situations.

Off-label prescribing for allergic diseases in children

The majority of drugs prescribed have not been tested in children and safety and efficacy of children's medicines are frequently supported by low quality of evidence. Therefore, a large percentage of prescriptions for children in the clinical daily practice are used off label. Despite the several recent legislation and regulatory efforts performed worldwide, they have not been successful in increasing availability of medicines adapted to children. Moreover, if we consider that 30% of the prescribed drugs for children are for the respiratory field and only 4% of new investigation projects for children research were proposed to access drugs for respiratory and allergy treatment, there is a clear imbalance of the children needs in this therapeutic area. This narrative review aimed to describe and discuss the off-label use of medicines in the treatment and control of respiratory and allergic diseases in children. It was recognized that a large percentage of prescriptions performed for allergy treatment in daily clinical practice are off label. The clinicians struggle on a daily basis with the responsibility to balance risk-benefits of an off-label prescription while involving the patients and their families in this decision. It is crucial to increase awareness of this reality not only for the clinician, but also to the global organizations and competent authorities. New measures for surveillance of off-label use should be established, namely through population databases implementation. There is a need for new proposal to correct the inconsistency between the priorities for pediatric drug research, frequently dependent on commercial motivations, in order to comply to the true needs of the children, especially on the respiratory and allergy fields.

Off-label medicine use in children and adolescents: results of a population-based study in Germany

Background

Population-based self-reported data on off-label medicine use independent from health care provisions are lacking. The purpose of this study is to investigate off-label medicine use in children and adolescents in Germany in a non-clinical setting and to identify prevalence, determinants and spectrum of off-label medicine use.

Methods

Data were obtained from the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS) conducted by the Robert Koch Institute (2003–2006). 17,450 randomly selected children aged 0–17 years took part in the drug interviews. Of those, 8,899 took at least one medicine during the 7 days preceding the interview. Off-label medicine use was defined as the discrepancy between actual use and the intended use described in the summary of product characteristics. Off-label medicine use was stratified into off-label indication, off-label age, off-label over-dosing, and off-label under-dosing.

Results

The prevalence rate of off-label medicine use among those who used medicines amount of is 40.2%. The prevalence rate is significantly higher in boys (41.4%), in children aged 3 to 6 years (48.7%), without migration background (40.9%), with high social status (42.5%), living in small (42.0%) and medium sized cities (41.6%), and with a poor parents rated health status (41.7%). 12,667 preparations (attributable in respect to off-label use) were taken by 8,899 children. 30% of the medicines have been used off-label. Off-label medicine use was highest in preparations of the ATC-class “C00 Cardiovascular System”. In all origins of medicine, all age groups and all ATC-classes under-dosing was the most frequent reason for off-label medicine use.

Conclusions

There is a considerable level of self-reported off-label medicines use in the general paediatric population. Further investigations are needed to examine in how far off-label medicine use is based on lack of knowledge or on empiricism in paediatric pharmacotherapy. Attention also needs to be paid to under-dosing which potentially exposes drug users to risks of side effects without the benefit of a therapeutic effect. Clinical trials for licensing of paediatric medicines, education of health care professionals, but also of parents and carers are needed to ensure the rational use of medicines.

Antibiotic prescription preferences in paediatric outpatient setting in Estonia and Sweden

Aims of the study were to compare the paediatric outpatient antibiotic use in two countries with low overall antibiotic consumption and antibacterial resistance levels - Sweden and Estonia - and to describe the adherence to Estonian treatment guideline. All prescriptions for systemic antibiotics for children less than 18 years during 2007 from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and Estonian Health Insurance Fund database were identified to conduct a descriptive drug utilisation study. The total paediatric antibiotic use was 616 and 353 per 1000 in Estonia and Sweden, respectively. The greatest between country differences occurred in the age group 2 to 6 years -Estonian children received 1184 and Swedish children 528 prescriptions per 1000. Extended spectrum penicillin amoxicillin (189 per 1000) or its combination with beta-lactamase inhibitor (81 per 1000) and a newer macrolide clarithromycin (127 per 1000) were prescribed most often in Estonia whereas narrow spectrum penicillin phenoxymethylpenicillin (169 per 1000) and older generation macrolide erythromycin (21 per 1000) predominated in Sweden. For acute bronchitis, 17 different antibiotics (most commonly clarithromycin) were prescribed in Estonia despite the guideline recommendation not to use antibiotics. The higher rate of antibiotic use especially of extended spectrum antibiotics in Estonia compared to Sweden emphasizes the need for national activities to promote appropriate use of antibiotics while treating children, even when the overall antibiotic consumption is low.