ACE inhibitors and the risk of acute pancreatitis-a population-based case-control study

Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis: An Evidence-Based Classification (Revised)

INTRODUCTION

Drug induced acute pancreatitis is a difficult diagnosis for clinicians. We previously published an "Evidence-Based Classification System" on Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis widely used by clinicians to assist in the identification of drugs. Unfortunately, this prior analysis based only on published case reports has been misunderstood. The prior review did not include studies with higher evidentiary value, such as randomized trials, case-control studies, and/or pharmacoepidemiologic studies. The use of the prior classification system has led to many patients being inappropriately labeled as having drug-induced acute pancreatitis. We now propose a "Revised" Evidence- Based Classification System for the purpose of determining which drugs cause acute pancreatitis based on the Grading of Recommendations, Development, and Evaluation criteria.

METHODS

A search of the English Language literature was performed to identify all case reports with medication and/or drug induced acute pancreatitis. We divided the drugs implicated as causing acute pancreatitis into four groups based on the quality of evidence as defined by GRADE quality parameters.

RESULTS

Although 141 drugs were identified in the literature as causing acute pancreatitis, only 106 drugs published in the literature as causing acute pancreatitis were high quality case reports. Only 3 drugs had evidence as causing acute pancreatitis from randomized controlled clinical trials, including 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine.

DISCUSSION

The vast majority of drugs implicated as causing acute pancreatitis in the literature have low or very low quality of evidence supporting those claims.

A Fatal Case of Lisinopril-Induced Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), such as lisinopril, are used as first-line therapy in the treatment of hypertension, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and proteinuric chronic kidney disease due to their beneficial effects on reducing morbidity and mortality. Commonly cited adverse effects of lisinopril include hyperkalemia, acute kidney injury, and angioedema, and while uncommon, there have been reports of lisinopril-induced necrotizing pancreatitis in the literature. The true incidence of drug-induced pancreatitis is unknown since establishing a causal relationship between medication's adverse effects and disease occurrence is difficult; however, there are validated tools such as the Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale that can aid in determining causality. Here, we present a case of a 63-year-old man with a history of hypertension who was being treated with lisinopril for eight months and developed a fatal case of lisinopril-induced severe necrotizing pancreatitis.

Pancreas and Adverse Drug Reactions: A Literature Review

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) affecting the pancreas are a heterogeneous group of side effects that cause damage to pancreatic cells. Various mechanisms such as hypersensitization, sphincter of Oddi constriction, direct cytotoxic and metabolic effects on pancreatic cells, and dose-dependent idiosyncrasy lead to intrapancreatic activation of pancreatic enzymes resulting in drug-induced acute pancreatitis. Several medications have been linked with the development of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer may result from proinflammatory, proliferative, and antiapoptotic effects. Diabetogenic effect of drugs, which is understood as impairment of insulin secretion, may occur due to direct destruction of β cells, systemic toxicity affecting pancreatic islets and cell membrane glucose transporters, induction of Th1-type autoimmune response, and impairment of voltage-gated calcium channels in β cells, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and insulin signaling. A better understanding of ADRs that affect the pancreas may contribute to improving the awareness of clinicians and patients and reducing potential harmful side effects of implemented therapies.

Drug-drug interactions involving antipsychotics and antihypertensives

INTRODUCTION

Antipsychotics represent the mainstay in the treatment of patients diagnosed with major psychiatric disorders. Hypertension, among other components of metabolic syndrome, is a common finding in these patients. For their psychiatric and physical morbidity, many patients receive polypharmacy, exposing them to the risk of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the knowledge regarding the known or potential drug-drug interactions between antipsychotics and the main drug classes used in the treatment of hypertension. We aimed to provide the clinician an insight into the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between these drugs for a better choice of combinations of drugs to treat both the mental illness and cardiovascular risk factors. For this, we performed a literature search in PubMed and Scopus databases, up to 31 July 2021.

EXPERT OPINION

The main pharmacokinetic interactions between antipsychotics and antihypertensive drugs involve mainly the cytochrome P450 system. The pharmacodynamic interactions are produced by multiple mechanisms, leading to concurrent binding to the same receptors. The data available regarding drug-drug interactions is mostly based on case reports and small studies and therefore should be interpreted with caution. The current knowledge is sufficiently strong to guide clinicians in selecting safer drug combinations as summarized here.

Another Case of Lisinopril-Induced Acute Pancreatitis

Lisinopril as a cause for acute drug-induced pancreatitis is an emerging phenomenon that due to its generally low-risk profile often goes unnoticed. The true incidence of drug-induced pancreatitis is unknown, probably because of its nonrecognition among differential diagnosis. Only a handful of lisinopril-induced pancreatitis has been discussed in the literature, and little epidemiological evidence exists to establish true causality. Additionally, many of these reports have been met with skepticism claiming that it is difficult to isolate a true cause since many of these patients had comorbidities or were concomitantly taking other medications that may have contributed to the pancreatitis. Here, we report a case in which a generally otherwise healthy patient presented with acute drug-induced pancreatitis caused by an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor taken eight weeks prior to the onset of symptoms. The drug was immediately stopped, and the patient recovered well, with no complications.

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Risk of Acute Pancreatitis: A Population-Based Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

There are conflicting reports on the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on acute pancreatitis incidence.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to determine whether use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs is associated with the incidence of acute pancreatitis, compared with use of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (dCCBs).

METHODS

We assembled two population-based, new-user, active comparator cohorts using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics repository and Office for National Statistics from 1998 to 2018, with follow-up until 2019. The first cohort included 304,083 ACE inhibitor initiators and 194,431 dCCB initiators. The second cohort included 29,160 ARB initiators and 203,610 dCCB initiators. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of acute pancreatitis, comparing ACE inhibitors and ARBs, separately, with dCCBs. Models were weighted using standardized mortality ratio weights generated from calendar time-specific propensity scores.

RESULTS

ACE inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis, compared with dCCBs (64.3 vs 45.2 per 100,000 person-years, respectively; HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.15-1.83). The number needed to harm after 2 and 5 years of use was 2438 and 1019, respectively. In contrast, ARBs were not associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis, compared with dCCBs (40.1 vs 47.6 per 100,000 person-years, respectively; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.60-1.31).

CONCLUSIONS

ACE inhibitors were associated with a modest increased risk of acute pancreatitis compared with dCCBs. This association should be balanced with the known clinical benefits of ACE inhibitors in hypertension management. In contrast, no association was observed with ARBs.

Quantifying the Risk of Drug-Induced Pancreatitis With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Statins Using a Large Electronic Medical Record Database

OBJECTIVES

Quantify the risk of drug-induced pancreatitis (DIP) from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis using IBM Explorys (1999-2019), a pooled, deidentified clinical database of more than 63 million patients across the United States. Odds ratios were calculated to determine the risk of DIP from ACEi, statins, and both medications together. χ2 testing assessed the relationship between age, sex, ethnicity, insurance status, and mortality among patients with DIP from ACEi, statins, or both combined.

RESULTS

Acute pancreatitis (AP) was found in 280,740 patients. Odds ratios for ACEi, statins, and both combined were 6.12, 4.97, and 5.72, respectively. Thirty-eight percent of all-cause AP occurs in adults older than 65 years. Acute pancreatitis from ACEi and statins occurs in 49% and 56% of patients older than 65 years, respectively. Men and patients older than 65 years are at higher risk of DIP from ACEi and statins. Patients on Medicaid are at higher risk of DIP from statins, and Asian patients are at highest risk of DIP from ACEi.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that ACEi and statins increase the odds of DIP. Although ACEis and statins are critical medications for many patients, clinicians should consider using alternatives in patients with AP of unclear etiology.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors and Pancreatitis: A Potential Dose-dependent Relationship

Acute pancreatitis (AP) remains one of the most common causes of emergency department visits in the USA. The literature supports an association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), mainly at steady-state doses, and AP^[1]. We present a case of recurrent AP and pseudocyst formation following multiple ACEi dose adjustments after a steady-state period lasting for over a decade. Previous reports have rarely described ACEi-induced pancreatitis and pseudocyst development. ACEi can cause significant ductal obstruction^[2] and fluid retention due to its angioedema effects. Consequently, it may trigger AP complicated by pseudocyst formation. Therefore, ACEi administration must be considered in the appropriate clinical context.

LEARNING POINTS

Although rare, ACEi is an emerging cause of drug-induced pancreatitis and often goes unrecognized.Multiple dose changes within a short period of time can lead to acute drug-induced pancreatitis (DIP), in addition to classic DIP caused by steady-state doses.ACEi-induced angioedema damages the ductal architecture and also has longer-lasting effects such as pseudocyst formation.

DO-HEALTH: Vitamin D3 - Omega-3 - Home exercise - Healthy aging and longevity trial - Design of a multinational clinical trial on healthy aging among European seniors

DO-HEALTH is a multi-center clinical trial among 2157 community-dwelling European men and women age 70 and older. The 2x2x2 randomized-control factorial design trial tested the individual and additive benefit, as well as the cost-effectiveness, of 3 interventions: vitamin D 2000 IU/day, omega-3 fatty acids 1000 mg/day (EPA + DHA, ratio 1:2), and a 30-minute 3 times/week home exercise (strength versus flexibility). Each treatment tested has shown considerable prior promise from mechanistic studies, small clinical trials, or large cohort studies, in the prevention of common age-related chronic diseases, but definitive data are missing. DO-HEALTH will test these interventions in relation to 6 primary endpoints (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, non-vertebral fractures, Short Physical Performance Battery score, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and risk of infections), plus several secondary endpoints explored in ancillary studies (i.e. rate of any falls and injurious falls, joint pain, oral health, quality of life, and incident frailty). As the 3 interventions have distinct mechanisms of action for each of the 6 primary endpoints, a maximum benefit is expected for their additive benefit as a "multi-modal" intervention. The trial duration is 3 years with in-person contacts with all participants at 4 clinical visits and by quarterly phone calls. Baseline and follow-up blood samples were collected in all participants to measure changes in 25-hydroxyvitamin D and poly-unsaturated fatty acid concentrations. Our objective was to test interventions that are expected to promote healthy aging and longer life expectancy and that can be easily and safely implemented by older community-dwelling adults.

Losartan-induced Pancreatitis

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis (DIAP) is a rare gastrointestinal condition but well-known in the medical literature. The medications have been classified into four subgroups (Classes I-IV) depending upon the propensity of the cases discussed in the literature, interval time period between drug initiation to pancreatitis, and reaction to the drug with reintroduction. Our clinical case is one such example where losartan was described as the agent of recurrent pancreatitis after excluding all other possible causes with laboratory and imaging studies.