1
|
Aurich B, Jacqz-Aigrain E. Drug Safety in Translational Paediatric Research: Practical Points to Consider for Paediatric Safety Profiling and Protocol Development: A Scoping Review. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:pharmaceutics13050695. [PMID: 34064872 PMCID: PMC8151265 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Translational paediatric drug development includes the exchange between basic, clinical and population-based research to improve the health of children. This includes the assessment of treatment related risks and their management. The objectives of this scoping review were to search and summarise the literature for practical guidance on how to establish a paediatric safety specification and its integration into a paediatric protocol. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and websites of regulatory authorities and learned societies were searched (up to 31 December 2020). Retrieved citations were screened and full texts reviewed where applicable. A total of 3480 publications were retrieved. No article was identified providing practical guidance. An introduction to the practical aspects of paediatric safety profiling and protocol development is provided by combining health authority and learned society guidelines with the specifics of paediatric research. The paediatric safety specification informs paediatric protocol development by, for example, highlighting the need for a pharmacokinetic study prior to a paediatric trial. It also informs safety related protocol sections such as exclusion criteria, safety monitoring and risk management. In conclusion, safety related protocol sections require an understanding of the paediatric safety specification. Safety data from carefully planned paediatric research provide valuable information for children, parents and healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beate Aurich
- Department of Pharmacology, Saint-Louis Hospital, 75010 Paris, France;
| | - Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain
- Department of Pharmacology, Saint-Louis Hospital, 75010 Paris, France;
- Paris University, 75010 Paris, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lasky T, Carleton B, Horton DB, Kelly LE, Bennett D, Czaja AS, Gifkins D, Osokogu OU, McMahon AW. Real-World Evidence to Assess Medication Safety or Effectiveness in Children: Systematic Review. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2020; 7:97-107. [PMID: 32112359 PMCID: PMC7221095 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-020-00182-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The promise of real-world evidence (RWE) is especially relevant to pediatrics, where medicines prescribed for children are often used without evidence derived from randomized clinical trials. Objectives The aim of this systematic review was to describe the state of RWE in pediatrics by identifying observational studies published during 2016 that used RWE to assess medication safety or effectiveness in children. Methods An electronic search of PubMed was combined with an extended search of references within systematic reviews and expert suggestions. Studies were included if they reported on an infant or child under 18 years with exposure to medications; assessed safety or effectiveness; specified a comparison or control group, and were published in English in 2016. Data extraction was conducted by one team member using a standardized form and reviewed by a second team member. Study quality was assessed using the GRACE checklist for rating the quality of observational studies. Results After removing duplicates, 915 citations were screened and 29 studies met the eligibility criteria. Most of the eligible studies relied on primary data collection or chart review at a single institution and did not use the growing number of administrative or electronic health record databases available. One-quarter of the studies did not use well-established statistical methods to control for confounders. No single disease group or medication predominated, and age groups ranged from infants to adolescents. Conclusions A small body of observational studies published in 2016 were categorized by the study team as using real-world data to assess medication safety or effectiveness in children. Studies varied in age groups, diseases or conditions, and methods, and may not have fully met the FDA definition of RWE. Our review indicates that the use of RWE is not fully developed in pediatrics, and suggests an opportunity to further develop capabilities and more fully leverage administrative and electronic health record databases to study medication safety and effectiveness in children. Our systematic review appears generalizable to pediatrics broadly, and documents that the high level of activity in RWE in general has had less of an impact on pediatrics. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40801-020-00182-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar Lasky
- Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, White Oak-71, Room 1253, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA. .,MIE Resources, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Bruce Carleton
- Division of Translational Therapeutics, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Daniel B Horton
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.,Rutgers Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Lauren E Kelly
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.,Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, and Geroge and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Dimitri Bennett
- Department of Epidemiology, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Boston, MA, USA.,Perelman School of Medicine, Adjunct, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Angela S Czaja
- Department of Pediatrics, Critical Care University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Denver, USA
| | - Dina Gifkins
- Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Osemeke U Osokogu
- Department of Content and Innovation, Elsevier (Information Analytics), New York, USA
| | - Ann W McMahon
- Office of Pediatric Therapeutics, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Osokogu OU, Pacurariu A, Mosseveld M, Rijnbeek P, Weibel D, Verhamme K, Sturkenboom MCJM. Impact of different assumptions on estimates of childhood diseases obtained from health care data: A retrospective cohort study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2018; 27:612-620. [PMID: 29691919 PMCID: PMC6001570 DOI: 10.1002/pds.4413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Accurate estimates of disease incidence in children are required to support pediatric drug development. Analysis of electronic health care records (EHR) may yield such estimates but pediatric‐specific methods are lacking. We aimed to understand the impact of assumptions regarding duration of disease episode and length of run‐in period on incidence estimates from EHRs. Methods Children aged 0 to 17 years (5–17 years for asthma) registered in the Integrated Primary Care Information database between 2002 and 2014 were studied. We tested the impact of the following: maximum duration of disease episode (0, 14, 30, 60, and 90 days) on recurrent diseases (acute otitis media [common] and acute pyelonephritis [rare]); and database run‐in period on chronic diseases—asthma (common) and type 1 diabetes (DM) (rare). We calculated incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals and stratified using 1‐year age categories. Results Altogether, 503 495 children were registered. The incidence of acute otitis media was highest in <2‐year‐old children; using 30 days disease duration as reference, the rate increased with 8% if the duration was 14 days and decreased with 8% when extended to 60 days. Disease duration did not impact acute pyelonephritis (rare). No run‐in (to exclude prevalent cases) versus 24‐month run‐in period overestimated the incidence rate for asthma and DM by a factor of 2. Conclusions Analysis of EHR allows for estimation of disease incidence in children, but assumptions regarding episode length and run‐in period impact the incidence estimates. Such assumptions may be routinely explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osemeke U Osokogu
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Pacurariu
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mees Mosseveld
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Peter Rijnbeek
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daniel Weibel
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Katia Verhamme
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|