Technology-assisted reading fluency interventions for students with reading difficulties: evidence from a meta-analytic approach of single case design studies

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article was to provide a quantitative review of technology-assisted reading fluency interventions for students with disabilities and select moderator variables that may modify the effects of the interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All reviewed 13 studies employed a single-case research design, targeting technology-assisted reading fluency interventions for students with learning disabilities (LDs) or learning difficulties. Studies were descriptively analysed and evaluated for methodological quality. Additionally, to examine the level and trend of reading fluency outcomes, Tau-U was calculated across the studies by measuring the impact of various moderator variables on the intervention effects.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Overall, studies showed a moderate to strong effect on reading fluency and there was a significant difference in moderator variables such as student status, type of technology, and features of technology. While the current study found positive outcomes from technology-based fluency interventions for struggling readers suggesting the effectiveness of using technology for the improvement of reading fluency, educators should consider using a rubric when utilising tablets because of the limited instructional components. Possible explanations about intervention effects, moderator effects, and study qualities along with limitations and future research were discussed. Implications for rehabilitationThis article examined a quantitative review of technology-assisted reading fluency interventions for students with disabilities and those considered at-risk. From this examination, we suggest the following implications:More research is needed to explore the effectiveness of technology-assisted reading fluency interventions. Some studies exist exploring the effect of overall reading interventions, but more specific analyses are needed related specifically to fluency and technology-assisted fluency interventions.Due to continuous advancements in technology, more research is also needed related to the integration of tablets and applications (or apps) on reading fluency.The use of technology to teach fluency has a general positive outcome for at-risk students. However, these types of interventions are more effective if they also provide vocabulary support.

Teacher Perceptions of Implementation Climate Related to Feasibility of Implementing Schoolwide Positive Behavior Supports and Interventions

For Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) to be effective, educators must use the practices as intended. Whether a teacher uses a practice as intended can depend, in part, on how feasible the practice is perceived to be. Identifying malleable factors associated with teachers’ perceptions of SWPBIS feasibility can help schools identify targeted supports to improve feasibility. Implementation climate, or the shared perception among implementers that their school supports implementation efforts, is known to promote high quality implementation. However, little is known about how individuals’ perceptions of their school’s implementation climate may influence their perceptions of feasibility. The lack of empirical evidence points to a need to explore whether educators’ shared and individual perceptions of implementation climate influence feasibility of implementing SWPBIS. Therefore, this study examines the link between teachers’ individual and shared perceptions of implementation climate related to the feasibility of implementing SWPBIS in a sample of 348 K-5 general education teachers across 39 elementary schools in the pacific northwestern United States. Results indicate that teachers who experience their schools’ implementation climate as positive are more likely to report SWPBIS as feasible, controlling for teachers’ shared perceptions of implementation climate. Implications for schools aiming to improve their implementation of SWPBIS, including the development of individualized implementation supports (e.g., tailoring implementation strategies to support each and every teacher), are discussed.