Proteomic Response of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells to Histamine Stimulation

Integrative phosphoproteomic analyses reveal hemostatic-endothelial signaling interplay

BACKGROUND

The vascular endothelial cell (EC) monolayer plays a crucial part in maintaining hemostasis. An extensive array of G protein-coupled receptors allows ECs to dynamically act on key hemostatic stimuli such as thrombin and histamine. The impact of these individual stimuli on EC signal transduction has been the subject of various studies, but insight into discordant and concordant EC signaling between different G protein-coupled receptors remains limited.

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate histamine and protease-activated receptor (PAR1-4) signaling cascades in ECs, discern overlapping and diverging regulation between these stimuli and their effect on the EC monolayer.

METHODS

We employed stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics on in vitro cultured blood outgrowth ECs stimulated with histamine and different PAR1 to 4 peptides. We investigated key phosphosites through immuno(fluorescence) staining and determined effects on barrier function through transendothelial resistance assays.

RESULTS

EC histamine activation initiated an extensive (kinase) signaling network (including MAPK3, STAT3, and CTNND1). PAR1 and PAR2 receptors induced highly similar signaling cascades, whereas PAR3 and PAR4 induced minimal phospho-regulation. Integration of all applied stimuli indicated uniquely activated proteins between both stimuli, as well as a general overlapping activation of cell junction and actin cytoskeletal proteins.

CONCLUSION

We provide an integrative phosphoproteomic analysis of histamine and PAR agonists in the endothelium that highlights the endothelial response programs that are at the basis of regulating hemostasis.

Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins and Modifications Induced by Formaldehyde Using LC-MS/MS

Formaldehyde (FA) is a toxic compound that is considered to have a carcinogenic effect due to its damage to biological macromolecules. However, the influence of FA at the protein level remains to be explored. Here, we used LC-MS/MS to identify the differentially expressed proteins and modifications to proteins between FA-treated and untreated HeLa cells. Among 2021 proteins identified, 196 proteins were significantly down-regulated and 152 up-regulated. The differentially expressed proteins were further analyzed using bioinformatics tools for annotating the characterization of their localizations and functions. To evaluate the interaction of FA with proteins, we performed proteomic analysis for a mass shift of 12 Da on the side chains of lysine, cysteine and tryptophan, which are induced by FA as noticeable signals. We identified the modified proteins and sites, suggesting direct interaction between FA and proteins. Motif analysis further showed the characterization of amino acid sequences that react with FA. Cluster analysis of the modified proteins indicated that the FA-interacting networks are mostly enriched in the nuclei, ribosomes and metabolism. Our study presents the influence of FA on proteomes and modifications, offering a new insight into the mechanisms underlying FA-induced biological effects.

Functionally selective activation of the dopamine receptor D2 is mirrored by the protein expression profiles

The development of functionally selective or biased ligands is a promising approach towards drugs with less side effects. Biased ligands for G protein-coupled receptors can selectively induce G protein activation or β-arrestin recruitment. The consequences of this selective action on cellular functions, however, are not fully understood. Here, we investigated the impact of five biased and balanced dopamine D₂ receptor agonists and antagonists on the global protein expression in HEK293T cells by untargeted nanoscale liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The proteome analysis detected 5290 protein groups. Hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis based on the expression levels of 1462 differential proteins led to a separation of antagonists and balanced agonist from the control treatment, while the biased ligands demonstrated larger similarities to the control. Functional analysis of affected proteins revealed that the antagonists haloperidol and sulpiride regulated exocytosis and peroxisome function. The balanced agonist quinpirole, but not the functionally selective agonists induced a downregulation of proteins involved in synaptic signaling. The β-arrestin-preferring agonist BM138, however, regulated several proteins related to neuron function and the dopamine receptor-mediated signaling pathway itself. The G protein-selective partial agonist MS308 influenced rather broad functional terms such as DNA processing and mitochondrial translation.

The complex functioning of the complement system in xenotransplantation

The role of complement in xenotransplantation is well-known and is a topic that has been reviewed previously. However, our understanding of the immense complexity of its interaction with other constituents of the innate immune response and of the coagulation, adaptive immune, and inflammatory responses to a xenograft is steadily increasing. In addition, the complement system plays a function in metabolism and homeostasis. New reviews at intervals are therefore clearly warranted. The pathways of complement activation, the function of the complement system, and the interaction between complement and coagulation, inflammation, and the adaptive immune system in relation to xenotransplantation are reviewed. Through several different mechanisms, complement activation is a major factor in contributing to xenograft failure. In the organ-source pig, the detrimental influence of the complement system is seen during organ harvest and preservation, for example, in ischemia-reperfusion injury. In the recipient, the effect of complement can be seen through its interaction with the immune, coagulation, and inflammatory responses. Genetic-engineering and other therapeutic methods by which the xenograft can be protected from the effects of complement activation are discussed. The review provides an updated source of reference to this increasingly complex subject.