PROMIS Physical and Emotional Health Scores Are Worse in Musculoskeletal Patients Presenting to Physiatrists than to Other Orthopedic Specialists

The Canadian version of the National Institutes of Health minimum dataset for chronic low back pain research: reference values from the Quebec Low Back Pain Study

ABSTRACT

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) minimum dataset for chronic low back pain (CLBP) was developed in response to the challenge of standardizing measurements across studies. Although reference values are critical in research on CLBP to identify individuals and communities at risk of poor outcomes such as disability, no reference values have been published for the Quebec (Canada) context. This study was aimed to (1) provide reference values for the Canadian version of the NIH minimum dataset among individuals with CLBP in Quebec, both overall and stratified by gender, age, and pain impact stratification (PIS) subgroups, and (2) assess the internal consistency of the minimum data set domains (pain interference, physical function, emotional distress or depression, sleep disturbance, and PIS score). We included 2847 individuals living with CLBP who completed the baseline web survey of the Quebec Low Back Pain Study (age: 44.0 ± 11.2 years, 48.1% women) and were recruited through social media and healthcare settings. The mean score was 6.1 ± 1.8 for pain intensity. Pain interference, physical function, emotional distress or depression, sleep disturbance, and PIS scores were 12.9 ± 4.1, 14.4 ± 3.9, 9.8 ± 4.4, 13.0 ± 3.6, and 26.4 ± 6.6, respectively. Emotional distress or depression showed floor effects. Good-to-excellent internal consistency was found overall and by language, gender, and age subgroups for all domains (alpha: 0.81-0.93) and poor-to-excellent internal consistency for PIS subgroups (alpha: 0.59-0.91). This study presents reference values and recommendations for using the Canadian version of the NIH minimum dataset for CLBP that can be useful for researchers and clinicians.

Musculoskeletal Pain Management and Thermotherapy: An Exploratory Analysis of Italian Physicians' Attitude, Beliefs, and Prescribing Habits

Purpose

In Italy, musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders are pervasive with one-third of adults seeking medical consultation for a MSK issue in the past year. MSK pain is often treated with local heat applications (LHAs) which can be integrated into MSK care by different specialists and in different settings. Compared to analgesia and physical exercise, LHAs have been less evaluated, and the quality of randomized clinical trials is generally low. The aim of the survey is to assess the knowledge, attitude, perception/practices of general practitioners (GPs), physiatrists and sports medicine doctors towards thermotherapy as delivered by superficial heat pads or wraps.

Patients and Methods

The survey was conducted between June and September 2022 in Italy. An online questionnaire with 22 multiple-choice questions was administered to explore the demographics and prescribing habits of the participants; the clinical profile of MSK patients; and physicians' attitude and beliefs about the use of thermotherapy/superficial heat applications in MSK pain management.

Results

GPs are at the forefront of the MSK patient journey and preferentially select NSAIDs as first-line option in arthrosis, muscle stiffness, and strain while prescribing heat wraps as preferred choice in presence of muscle spasm/contracture. Similar pattern of prescribing habits was found among specialists who, in contrast to GPs, adopted more frequently ice/cold therapy to relieve pain due to muscle strain and limited paracetamol use. Generally, survey participants agreed on the benefits of thermotherapy in MSK care management, namely increased blood flow and local tissue metabolism as well as connective tissue elasticity and pain relief which all may be of help in attaining pain control and improvement of function.

Conclusion

Our findings provided the basis for further investigations aimed at optimizing the MSK patient journey while building up additional evidence supporting the benefit of using superficial heat applications to effectively manage patients with MSK disorders.

Opioid use and social disadvantage in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain

BACKGROUND

Historically, marginalized patients were prescribed less opioid medication than affluent, white patients. However, because of persistent differential access to nonopioid pain treatments, this direction of disparity in opioid prescribing may have reversed.

OBJECTIVE

To compare social disadvantage and health in patients with chronic pain who were managed with versus without chronic opioid therapy. It was hypothesized that patients routinely prescribed opioids would be more likely to live in socially disadvantaged communities and report worse health.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of a retrospective cohort defined from medical records from 2000 to 2019.

SETTING

Single tertiary safety net medical center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain who were managed longitudinally by a physiatric group practice from at least 2011 to 2015 (n = 1173), subgrouped by chronic (≥4 years) adherent opioid usage (n = 356) versus no chronic opioid usage (n = 817).

INTERVENTION

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the unadjusted between-group difference in social disadvantage, defined by living in the worst national quartile of the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). An adjusted effect size was also calculated using logistic regression, with age, sex, race, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Physical Function scores as covariates. Secondary outcomes included adjusted differences in health by chronic opioid use (measured by PROMIS).

RESULTS

Patients managed with chronic opioid therapy were more likely to live in a zip code within the most socially disadvantaged national quartile (34.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 29.9-39.9%; vs. 24.9%; 95% CI 21.9-28.0%; P < .001), and social disadvantage was independently associated with chronic opioid use (odds ratio [OR] 1.01 per ADI percentile [1.01-1.02]). Opioid use was also associated with meaningfully worse PROMIS Depression (3.8 points [2.4-5.1]), Anxiety (3.0 [1.4-4.5]), and Pain Interference (2.6 [1.7-3.5]) scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients prescribed chronic opioid treatment were more likely to live in socially disadvantaged neighborhoods, and chronic opioid use was independently associated with worse behavioral health. Improving access to multidisciplinary, nonopioid treatments for chronic pain may be key to successfully overcoming the opioid crisis.

Differences in Self-Reported Physical and Behavioral Health in Musculoskeletal Patients Based on Physician Gender

BACKGROUND

Differences in patient-physician interactions based on physician gender have been demonstrated. However, the association between patients' self-perceived health and their decision to see a female versus male physician is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if self-reported physical or behavioral health is different in musculoskeletal patients who present to female vs male physicians. We hypothesized that patients who present to female physicians report worse physical and behavioral health.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive 21 980 adult patients who presented to a musculoskeletal medicine specialist for initial evaluation of a musculoskeletal condition between April 1, 2016 and November 1, 2017.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Physical Function, Pain Interference, Anxiety, and Depression Computer Adaptive Test domains of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The primary study outcome was the mean difference (MD) in PROMIS scores by physician gender.

RESULTS

Patients who presented to female physicians self-reported slightly worse health in all domains: Physical Function (female physicians 40.2, male physicians 42.4, MD -2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.5 to -1.8), Pain Interference (female physicians 61.6, male physicians 60.4, MD 1.3 [1.0-1.5]), Anxiety (female physicians 52.5, male physicians 51.4, MD 1.1 [0.8-1.5]), and Depression (female physicians 47.5, male physicians 46.2, MD 1.3 [0.9-1.6]) (all P < .001). Patients who presented to female physicians were also slightly younger (51.9 vs 52.4 years, P = .034) and more likely to be female (63% vs 56%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who presented to female physicians self-reported slightly worse physical and behavioral health compared to those patients who presented to male physicians. Further investigation into this finding may provide insight into drivers of patients' preferences, which may enable physicians of both genders to optimize patient care.