The Gynaecologic Leiden Questionnaire: psychometric properties of a self-report questionnaire of sexual function and vaginal changes for gynaecological cancer patients

Vaginal changes, sexual functioning and distress of women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated in the EMBRACE vaginal morbidity substudy

OBJECTIVE

The EMBRACE-vaginal morbidity substudy prospectively evaluated physician-assessed vaginal changes and patient-reported-outcomes (PRO) on vaginal and sexual functioning problems and distress in the first 2-years after image-guided radio(chemo)therapy and brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients had stage IB1-IIIB cervical cancer with ≤5 mm vaginal involvement. Assessment of vaginal changes was graded using CTCAE. PRO were assessed using validated Quality-of-Life and sexual questionnaires. Statistical analysis included Generalized-Linear-Mixed-Models and Spearman's rho-correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

113 eligible patients were included. Mostly mild (grade 1) vaginal changes were reported over time in about 20% (range 11-37%). At 2-years, 47% was not sexually active. Approximately 50% of the sexually active women reported any vaginal and sexual functioning problems and distress over time; more substantial vaginal and sexual problems and distress were reported by up to 14%, 20% and 8%, respectively. Physician-assessed vaginal changes and PRO sexual satisfaction differed significantly (p ≤ .05) between baseline and first follow-up, without further significant changes over time. No or only small associations between physician-assessed vaginal changes and PRO vaginal functioning problems and sexual distress were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Mild vaginal changes were reported after image-guided radio(chemo)therapy and brachytherapy, potentially due to the combination of tumors with limited vaginal involvement, EMBRACE-specific treatment optimization and rehabilitation recommendations. Although vaginal and sexual functioning problems and sexual distress were frequently reported, the rate of substantial problems and distress was low. The lack of association between vaginal changes, vaginal functioning problems and sexual distress shows that sexual functioning is more complex than vaginal morbidity alone.

Sexual Dysfunction in Cervical Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review

Sexual function in cervical cancer survivors declines significantly after treatments irrespective of the modality used. Only a few studies have looked at their psychosexual needs, perception, and acceptance of psychosexual support. This review summarizes findings of current qualitative as well as quantitative studies to understand the plight of cervical cancer survivors regarding sexual dysfunction and the management issues. The effect of gynecologic cancers on sexuality depends on multiple factors such as psychosexual factors, biologic factors, and age. Younger patients have poorer outcomes with a more pronounced impact on sexual well-being. Radicality of surgery has direct correlation with sexual dysfunction. Low or no sexual interest, lack of lubrication, dyspareunia, and reduced vaginal caliber are frequently found. For too long, researchers have focused on defining the prevalence and types of sexual problems after various cancer treatments. The area that continues to be neglected is the evaluation of effective interventions to prevent or treat cancer-related sexual dysfunction. In particular, mental health and medical specialists need to collaborate to create cost-effective treatment programs. Collaborative intervention with gynecologists, sexologists, radiotherapists, and nursing staff would be beneficial to optimize the sexual wellness of cancer survivors and their spouses.

Long-term Pelvic Floor Function and Quality of Life After Radical Surgery for Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Comparison Between Different Techniques for Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare urinary and bowel symptoms and quality of life (QoL) among women treated with a Wertheim-Meigs (WM, type III) or Wertheim-Okabayashi (WO, type IV) radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional observational study, patients treated with a WO or a (nerve sparing) WM radical hysterectomy (with or without adjuvant radiotherapy) between January 2000 and December 2010 in the Center for Gynaecological Oncology Amsterdam or Leiden University Medical Center were included. To assess QoL, urinary and bowel symptoms we used the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-CX24, and Leiden Questionnaire. We performed a multivariate analysis to identify factors associated with urinary symptoms.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-eight women were included (152 WO and 116 WM). Quality of life was not significantly different in patients treated by WO or WM. Urinary symptoms were more often reported by patients in the WO group compared to the WM group: "feeling of urine retention" (53% vs 32%), "feeling less/no urge to void" (59% vs 14%), and "timed voiding" (49% vs 10%). With regard to bowel symptoms, there was no difference between both. Multivariate analysis showed that surgical technique was an independent factor for differences in urinary symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing more radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer report significantly more urinary dysfunction, whereas bowel function and health-related QoL are not decreased.

Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Conventional Radical Hysterectomy Versus 2 Nerve-Sparing Modalities for Early Stage Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer was introduced to improve quality of life after treatment. Sparing the pelvic autonomic nerves reduces bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction. The Leiden nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (LNSRH) was modified to the Swift procedure, the latter being more radical regarding the sacrouterine and parametrial resection. We investigate whether nerve-sparing surgery has comparable oncological outcomes as the conventional radical hysterectomy (CRH). Concurrently, we investigate whether there is a difference regarding the oncological outcomes of the 2 nerve-sparing techniques.

METHODS

This is a single-center, observational prospective cohort study analyzing oncological outcomes in women undergoing CRH (1994-1999), LNSRH (2001-2005), or Swift procedure (2006-2010) for early stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IA2-IIA).

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-three patients (124 CRH, 122 LNSRH, and 117 Swift) were included. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2 or higher (P = 0.005) was significantly more prevalent in the CRH cohort. The 5-year pelvic relapse-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between the 3 cohorts (P = 0.116). Regarding the nerve-sparing cohorts, the Swift cohort showed a significant better 5-year overall survival (87.2%) compared with the LNSRH cohort (78.8%) (P = 0.04). In the LNSRH cohort, resection planes less than 5 mm free and need for adjuvant therapy were significantly higher than in the Swift cohort (P = 0.026 and 0.046, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy shows a similar oncological outcome compared with the CRH. The more radical Swift version of nerve-sparing techniques is preferable to the former LNSRH procedure.

A systematic review of quality of life and sexual function of patients with cervical cancer after treatment

OBJECTIVES

Quality of life (QoL) and sexual health have become increasingly important in cervical cancer survivors (CCSs). The aims of this review were to summarize research findings of QoL and sexual function in CCSs after treatment on the basis of self-reported questionnaires and to update the current knowledge of overall QoL and sexual function in CCSs.

METHODS

Studies from electronic database between May 1966 and May 2013 were rated on their internal validity as methodological assessment. Thirty-two studies were included, wherein 15 studies had a relatively good methodology.

RESULTS

Anorectal function, urinary symptoms, and lymphedema were commonly reported as physical symptoms. As to psychosocial domains, the studies illustrated that anxiety decreased with age, whereas depression generally increased with age. Sexual function was involved in most of the studies. Vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, short vagina, and sexual dissatisfaction were prominent issues of sexual dysfunction and vaginal changes in CCSs. In terms of treatment modality, radiotherapy was thought to be associated with worse QoL and sexual function in CCSs.

CONCLUSIONS

The studies showed that QoL and sexual function in CCSs were compromised compared with the general population to different extents. Quality of life and sexual function should be paid with more attention in patients with cervical cancer after treatment.

Validated questionnaires on intimacy in patients who have had cancer

Problems with intimacy in patients with cancer of the head and neck may not be recognised. Our aim was to review published papers on patient-reported outcomes that record concerns about intimacy, sex, and function, to help develop a tool for use in head and neck cancer. We specifically looked for instruments with evidence of validation in patients with cancer, which could be used to identify problems with intimacy and sexuality. After evaluating 2563 papers, we identified 20 that satisfied our inclusion criteria, and these have been presented in a tabulated form. This review has shown the need to develop a questionnaire on intimacy that is specific to patients with cancer of the head and neck. It is an important issue that must be addressed by clinical and research teams, and will be done most effectively if it is linked to specific interventions.

Self-Reported Sexual, Bowel and Bladder Function in Cervical Cancer Patients Following Different Treatment Modalities: Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study

Objective

Conventional radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHL) for early-stage cervical cancer is associated with significant bladder, anorectal, and sexual dysfunction. Nerve-sparing modification of RHL (NS-RHL) has been developed with the aim to reduce surgical treatment-related morbidity. Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is offered to patients with unfavorable prognostic features to improve local control. The aim of the study was to assess self-reported morbidity of various types of treatment in cervical cancer patients.

Methods

Self-reported symptoms were prospectively assessed before and 1 and 2 years after treatment by the Dutch Gynaecologic Leiden Questionnaire.

Results

Included were 229 women (123 NS-RHL and 106 conventional RHL). Ninety-four (41%) received RT. Up to 2 years (response rate, 81%), women reported significantly more bowel, bladder, and sexual symptoms compared with the pretreatment situation. No significant difference was found between the conventional RHL and NS-RHL with the exception of the unexpected finding that a smaller percentage in the NS-RHL group (34% vs 68%) complained about numbness of the labia and/ or thigh. Radiation therapy had a negative impact on diarrhea, urine incontinence, lymphedema, and sexual symptoms (especially a narrow/short vagina).

Conclusions

In the current longitudinal cohort study, treatment for early-stage cervical cancer was associated with worse subjective bladder, anorectal, and sexual functioning, irrespective of the surgical procedure used. Postoperative RT resulted in a significant deterioration of these functions. The results have to be interpreted with caution in view of the study design and method used.