Barriers to participation in a sexual health intervention for men following treatment for rectal and anal cancer

A psychoeducational intervention to improve sexual functioning in male rectal and anal cancer patients: A pilot randomized controlled trial study

OBJECTIVES

Male rectal and anal cancer patients demonstrate high rates of sexual dysfunction. This pilot randomized controlled trial tested a psychoeducational intervention designed to improve psychosexual adjustment.

METHODS

Rectal or anal cancer patients were randomized to a Sexual Health Intervention for Men (intervention) or to a referral and information control (control). The intervention included control activities plus 4 sexual health intervention sessions every 4-6 weeks and 3 brief telephone calls timed between these sessions. Assessments were completed pre-intervention (baseline) and 3 months (follow-up 1) and 8 months (follow-up 2) post-intervention. Differences were assessed with statistical significance and Cohen's d effect sizes (d = 0.2, small effect; d = 0.5, moderate effect; d = 0.8, large effect).

RESULTS

Ninety subjects enrolled. Forty-three participants completed at least 1 follow-up assessment (intervention, n = 14; control n = 29). At follow-up 1, men in intervention, compared to control, improved on all domains of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) (p < 0.001 to p < 0.05) and demonstrated large effects (d = 0.8 to d = 1.5). Similarly, at follow-up 2, changes in all domains of the IIEF except the orgasm domain were either statistically significant or marginally statistically significant (p = 0.01 to p = 0.08) and demonstrated moderate to large treatment effects for intervention versus control (d = 0.5 to d = 0.8). Men in the intervention, compared to control, demonstrated decreased sexual bother at follow-up 1 (p = 0.009, d = 1.1), while Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) total scores and the SEAR sexual relationship subscale demonstrated moderate increases for intervention versus control (d = 0.4 to d = 0.6).

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

This study provides initial evidence for combining a psychoeducational intervention with medical interventions to address sexual dysfunction following rectal and anal cancer. Trials register number: NCT00712751 (date of registration: 7/10/2008).

The flourishing scholarship of psychosocial oncology viewed across 30 years through the lens of this journal, Psycho-Oncology

OBJECTIVE

This issue celebrates the 30th anniversary of Psycho-Oncology as a journal, a home for scholarship integrating the psychological, social and behavioural dimensions of cancer. Psycho-oncology developed as an evidence-based discipline to offer an alternative to unproven therapies and to optimise coping and support for patients with cancer and their families.

METHODS

A review of key articles was undertaken for this editorial.

RESULTS

Empirical studies have defined the prevalence of morbidity arising from cancer and the acute, longer-term and late effects of its varied treatments. Interventions have been adapted to respond to existential challenges, death anxiety, fear of recurrence, disease progression, palliative care and have been continued into bereavement. Mixed modality treatments have combined psychotropic and psychotherapeutic interventions. Survivorship studies have examined rehabilitation, fertility, sexuality, body image and relational impacts of illness.

CONCLUSION

This journal has helped the discipline to flourish by publishing the innovative outputs of its community of researchers.

Effectiveness trial of an online self-help intervention for sexual problems after cancer

Sexual dysfunction affects over 60% of cancer survivors. Internet interventions have improved sexual function, but with considerable clinician guidance, restricting scalability. This pragmatic trial evaluated an online, self-help intervention. As with many unguided digital interventions, attrition was high. Given low numbers in other groups, this paper focuses on 30% of female patient participants who completed 3-month questionnaires and visited the intervention site (N = 60). Benefits included increased sexually active individuals at follow-up (p < 0.001, Effect size = 0.54), improved sexual function (p < 0.001, Effect size = -0.76, N = 41), and increased use of sexual aids (p = 0.01, Effect size=-0.14, N = 58). The intervention has been revised to improve patient engagement.

Sexual quality of life in men and women after cancer

More than 60% of people treated for cancer have long-term sexual dysfunction. However, fewer than 25% of those with sexual problems get help from a health professional. Although cancer-related sexual problems usually begin with physiological damage from cancer treatment, a patient's coping skills and the quality of the sexual relationship are crucial in sexual rehabilitation. Barriers to care for people treated for cancer include a lack of discussion with the oncology team. In repeated surveys, fewer than half of patients recall discussing sex or fertility with their care providers, even during informed consent. Practice guidelines on sexuality and cancer were published in 2017 by the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Both agree the following: The oncology team should initiate discussions of sexuality and cancer during treatment planning and at follow-up visits. Psychosocial and medical assessment should take place when a concern or problem is identified. Referrals should be offered for multidisciplinary treatment, since sexual problems frequently have both psychosocial and physiological causes.This article describes a system of care that can meet the guidelines while providing sustainable revenue.