Longitudinal examination of family efficacy following pediatric stem cell transplant

Change in resilience among spousal caregivers of patients with newly-diagnosed advanced cancer over the first six months posttreatment in China

OBJECTIVE

A longitudinal observational study was conducted and aimed to examine the change in resilience among spousal caregivers of newly-diagnosed advanced cancer patients over the first six months after initial treatment.

METHODS

In total, 312 Chinese spousal caregivers who were taking care of their patients with newly-diagnosed advanced cancer were recruited. The level of resilience was measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale at the first month post-initial treatment (T1), three-month post-initial treatment (T2), and six-month post-initial treatment (T3). Latent growth modeling analyses were performed to examine changes in resilience using Mplus 8.3.

RESULTS

The mean scores of resilience in spousal caregivers were 54.01 ± 7.68 at T1, 56.20 ± 6.38 at T2, and 57.97 ± 6.70 at T3, respectively. Results of latent growth modeling indicated that spousal caregivers showed a significant increase in their resilience scores over the first six months post-treatment (Mean slope = 1.98, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a significant individual variation in the rate of changes in resilience scores allowed spouses to be categorized into two groups: 42.9% participants with fast growth and 57.1% participants with slight growth.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the importance that new knowledge about change patterns of resilience in the nursing field is beneficial to reveal different psychosomatic health. Acknowledging that resilience is a dynamic process that changes over time, it is crucial for healthcare providers to monitor the psychological adjustment and focus of vulnerable caregivers, particularly spouses.

Standardization of Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patient Discharge to Reduce Readmission Rates

Background: The time period after a pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (P-HSCT) is tenuous as the patient is severely immunocompromised and awaiting immune reconstitution. Managing activities of daily living and medication administration after discharge from the hospital requires 24-hour care placing a heavy burden on caregivers and patients. Patients who do not adhere to the posttransplant regimen are at a higher risk for hospital readmission within the first 30 days of initial discharge with serious potential for life-threatening complications. The objective of this project was to improve 30-day readmission rates and caregiver readiness for discharge through the implementation of an evidence-based discharge protocol for P-HSCT patients and caregivers. Methods: This quality improvement project included development and implementation of comprehensive Pediatric Blood & Marrow Transplant Guidelines and discharge protocol for patients who received an inpatient autologous or allogeneic HSCT and were scheduled for discharge from a 16-bed inpatient pediatric hematology-oncology unit of a children's hospital in the southeastern United States. Readmission rates were captured through the hospital-monitored system. Results: The comprehensive discharge protocol was implemented for six patients, and 30-day readmission rates decreased from 27.29% to 3.57% following the intervention. Discussion: Results suggest the combination of an evidence-based discharge protocol with a focus on caregiver readiness for discharge and a 24-hour Rooming-In period can influence caregiver confidence and reduce 30-day readmission rates after initial discharge from a P-HSCT.

Family resilience in cancer treatment and key influencing factors: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To identify the status quo and key influencing factors of family resilience in cancer treatment.

METHODS

Eight electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, CNKI, Wan Fang Database, VIP Database) were searched from 2000 to 10 May 2023. Inclusion criteria were the following: (a) study subjects were cancer patients or their family caregivers, (b) family resilience was measured as a variable, (c) reported factors associated with family resilience, (d) employed either quantitative or mixed methods design, (e) written in English or Chinese, (f) published in peer-reviewed journals. All included studies were evaluated for quality using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included in the systematic review. According to our analysis, the family resilience of cancer patients could be influenced by various factors associated with six clusters: (a) demographic characteristics, (b) severe staging and treatment of cancer, (c) psychological and health statuses, (d) family, and (e) social environment. Meanwhile, several specific protective factors and risk factors of family resilience were also identified.

CONCLUSION

Family resilience plays an important role in promoting positive adaptation in the face of adversity in families of cancer patients/caregivers. This study classifies related influencing factors by analyzing both protective factors and risk factors (and some controversial factors of family resilience). We found that longitudinal studies are needed to further verify the dynamic changes of family resilience, and future research should focus on understanding family resilience from the dual perspectives of cancer patients and their caregivers, to provide comprehensive information for health professionals, and facilitate the development of effective family resilience intervention programs.

Dynamic changes in resilience among family caregivers in the face of healthcare challenges: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Resilience as a dynamic concept has already been described through various longitudinal studies. To better understand the changes in the resilience of caregivers over the course of care-providing, however, a scoping review can provide a clearer picture of their resilience process which, in turn, can be used to improve caregivers' well-being.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a comprehensive overview of dynamic change in the resilience of caregivers while caring for the family to enhance understanding and potential for future research.

METHODS

Following the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley, this scoping review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and the Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. Five electronic databases were searched for research published in English between January 2012 and May 2022, after which a manual search was performed. Key terms related to resilience and caregivers in longitudinal studies were included and screened for. Identified trajectories of patterns in resilience and factors associated with resilience process were categorized using content analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 24 longitudinal studies met the eligibility criteria. Conceptually, our findings demonstrate three modes of change following healthcare challenges, each of which varies substantially. Methodologically, the results reveal three subcategories of assessment tools that can be used to impact caregivers' resilience when confronted with significant healthcare challenges. Consequentially, personal traits and environmental resources interacting with the resilience process will then lead to various outcomes in their resilience, including stability, growth, or decline.

CONCLUSION

This review describes the change patterns of the resilience process, assessment instruments, and associated factors to offer a dynamic perspective for the investigation and intervention of psychological resilience. Major gaps nonetheless remain for future research regarding an operationalizing dynamic change in resilience.

Family resilience and its influencing factors among advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers: a multilevel modeling analysis

BACKGROUND

Cancer is highly prevalent worldwide. Family resilience is a positive variable that helps families burdened by advanced cancer to cope effectively. This study aimed to describe the family resilience of advanced cancer patients and caregivers in dyads and identify its influencing factors at the individual and dyadic levels.

METHODS

This multisite cross-sectional study was conducted in oncology units in five tertiary hospitals in China. A total of 270 advanced cancer patient-caregiver dyads were recruited between June 2020 and March 2021. Patients' and caregivers' family resilience was measured by the Family Resilience Assessment Scale. Data on potential influencing factors, including demographic and disease-related characteristics as well as family sense of coherence, psychological resilience, perceived social support, symptom burden, and caregiver burden, were collected. Multilevel modeling analysis was adopted to control for the interdependence of the dyads.

RESULTS

A total of 241 dyads were included in the data analysis. The mean ages of patients and caregivers were 53.96 (SD 15.37) and 45.18 (SD 13.79) years, respectively. Most caregivers were spouses and adult children (45.6% and 39.0%, respectively). Patients reported a higher mean family resilience score than caregivers (152.56 vs. 149.87, respectively). Undergoing fewer than two types of treatment and a lower symptom burden of patients predicted higher patient (B = -9.702, -0.134, respectively) and caregiver (B = -5.462, -0.096, respectively) family resilience. Patients also reported higher family resilience under the following conditions: 1) were on a medical insurance plan other than the new rural cooperative medical system (B = 6.089), 2) had a better family sense of coherence (B = 0.415), 3) whose caregivers were unmarried (B = 8.618), perceived lower social support (B = -0.145) and higher psychological resilience (B = 0.313). Caregivers who were ≤ 44 years old (B = -3.221), had similar previous caregiving experience (B = 7.706), and had a stronger family sense of coherence (B = 0.391) reported higher family resilience.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the importance of adopting a dyadic approach when caring for advanced cancer patients and their caregivers. Dyadic longitudinal research is suggested to discover more modifiable factors of family resilience and tailored interventions are needed to obtain optimal dyadic outcomes.

Audit of Psychosocial and Palliative Care Support for Children Having Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplants at the New Zealand National Allogeneic Transplant Centre

Psychosocial and palliative care support during stem cell transplants (SCT) is known to improve outcomes.

AIM

evaluate the support provided to children and families at the New Zealand National Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant unit (NATC).

METHOD

the psychosocial and palliative care support for children who received SCT between December 2012 and April 2018 was audited.

RESULTS

of the 101 children who received SCT, 97% were reviewed by the social work team (SW) and 82% by the psychiatric consult liaison team (CLT) at least once during their illness. However, pre-transplant psychological assessment only occurred in 16%, and during the SCT admission, only 55% received SW support, and 67% received CLT support. Eight out of eighty-five families (9%) were offered support for siblings. Eight of the sixteen children who died were referred for pediatric palliative care (PPC) with all supported and half the families who experienced a death (n = 8; 50%) received bereavement follow up.

CONCLUSION

although the majority received some social work and psychological support, auditing against the standards suggests the consistency of involvement could be improved. Referrals for PPC were inadequate and largely for end-of-life phase. Sibling support, in particular donor siblings, had insufficient psychological assessment and support. Key recommendations are provided to address this underperformance.

Understanding differences in the long-term psychosocial adjustment of pediatric cancer patients and their parents: an individual differences resources model

The experience of childhood cancer is a major life stressor for children and their parents. There is substantial variability among pediatric cancer patients and their parents in their ability to cope with the cancer. Although other models typically focus on the psychological resources families use to broadly cope with a diagnosis of pediatric cancer, we present a model that focuses specifically how parents and children cope with the stress of invasive and often painful treatment episodes. Our resources model is further distinct with its focus on individual differences in personal (e.g., personality traits) and social (e.g., social support) resources and the role these differences may play in psychosocial adjustment of families confronting pediatric cancer. We use findings from the broader pediatric cancer research literature and our own 15-year program of research on individual differences in psychological resources and parents and children's responses to treatment episodes to provide empirical support for our model. Support was found for the six premises of the model: (a) parent resources influence their longer-term psychosocial adjustment, (b) parent resources influence children's responses to treatment episodes, (c) parent resources indirectly influence their longer-term psychosocial adjustment through their responses to treatment episodes, (d) children's personal resources influence how parent responses to treatment episodes, (e) children's resources influence their longer-term psychosocial adjustment, and (f) children's resources indirectly influence their longer-term psychosocial adjustment through their responses to treatment episodes. Understanding how the availability of resources influences parents and children confronting cancer provides a foundation for future research on individual differences in resources and offers other avenues through which clinicians can assess and treat families at risk for poor psychosocial adjustment during treatment and in their life beyond cancer treatments.

The Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms in Pediatric Oncology Nursing: A Conceptual and Empirical Fit?

Symptom management knowledge is a priority for pediatric oncology nursing research. Theories and models can frame the studies of symptoms experienced during childhood cancer. This article describes and analyzes the middle-range theory, theory of unpleasant symptoms (TOUS), for its conceptual and empirical fit with pediatric oncology nursing based on its current use in adult oncology research and its limited use to date in pediatric oncology. Searches in PubMed and CINAHL databases using the keywords theory of unpleasant symptoms and cancer and covering the time period 2000 to 2017 yielded 103 abstracts for review. Twenty published reports met eligibility criteria for review; only one included pediatric oncology patients. No study to date has tested all the components of the TOUS in pediatrics. The TOUS component of performance appears to be underaddressed across completed studies that instead include a focus on patient-reported quality of life rather than on perceived behavioral or performance indicators concurrent with the subjective symptom reports. Additionally, the influence of family, essential in pediatric oncology, is absent in the majority of studies guided by the TOUS. The TOUS is a structurally complicated framework that would be a conceptual fit for pediatric oncology if family influence and perceived function were included. Studies across this population and guided by the TOUS are needed, although testing all the theorized linkages in the TOUS would likely require a large sample size of patients and, thereby, multisite approaches given that cancer is a rare disease in childhood.