1
|
Corey SL, Ari A, Sonpatki M, Drizin JH, Gorman JR. "Infertility Isn't a Choice!": Conversations on Twitter about the Financial Burden of Oncofertility Care. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38738476 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2024.0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate how the adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer community utilized Twitter to discuss the financial challenges of oncofertility care and to advocate for change. Tweets related to oncofertility and finances (n = 166), collected over a 12-week time period encompassing AYA Cancer Awareness Week, were thematically analyzed. Conversations highlighted how the high cost of care contributed to already high emotional and social distress. Proposed actions included providing timely information more equitably, improving access to financial support, and continued advocacy of policy changes to improve access to oncofertility care. Future research can explore the potential impact on policy change and clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie L Corey
- Health Promotion and Health Behavior Program, College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Aya Ari
- College of Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Maya Sonpatki
- College of Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Julia H Drizin
- Health Promotion and Health Behavior Program, College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Jessica R Gorman
- Health Promotion and Health Behavior Program, College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klobodu C, Vitolins MZ, Deutsch JM, Fisher K, Nasser JA, Stott D, Murray MJ, Curtis L, Milliron BJ. Examining the Role of Nutrition in Cancer Survivorship and Female Fertility: A Narrative Review. Curr Dev Nutr 2024; 8:102134. [PMID: 38584676 PMCID: PMC10997918 DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.102134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Female cancer survivors have a higher chance of experiencing infertility than females without a history of cancer diagnosis. This risk remains high despite advances in fertility treatments. There is a need to augment fertility treatments with cost-effective methods such as nutritional guidance to improve fertility chances. The aim of this review article is to connect the current literature on cancer survivorship nutrition and fertility nutrition, focusing on the importance of integrating nutritional guidance into fertility counseling, assessment, and treatment for female cancer survivors. Consuming a healthful diet comprising whole grains, soy, fruits, vegetables, seafood, and unsaturated fats has improved both female fertility and cancer survivorship. Similarly, maintaining a healthy body weight also improves female fertility and cancer survivorship. Therefore, dietary interventions to support female cancer survivors with fertility challenges are of immense importance. The period of follow-up fertility counseling and assessment after cancer treatment may provide a unique opportunity for implementing nutritional guidance for female cancer survivors. Dietary interventions are a promising strategy to improve pregnancy chances and overall quality of life among female cancer survivors; thus, researchers should investigate perceptions regarding fertility, barriers, and challenges to changing nutrition-related behaviors, and preferences for nutritional guidance to support fertility treatments in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Klobodu
- Department of Nutrition and Food Science, California State University, Chico, College of Natural Sciences, CA, United States
| | - Mara Z Vitolins
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Jonathan M Deutsch
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Kathleen Fisher
- Department of Nursing, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jennifer A Nasser
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Dahlia Stott
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Michael J Murray
- Northern California Fertility Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Laura Curtis
- Department of Nutrition and Food Science, California State University, Chico, College of Natural Sciences, CA, United States
| | - Brandy-Joe Milliron
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Benedict C, Ford JS, Schapira L, Davis A, Simon P, Spiegel D, Diefenbach M. Preliminary testing of "roadmap to parenthood" decision aid and planning tool for family building after cancer: Results of a single-arm pilot study. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6323. [PMID: 38629761 PMCID: PMC11182040 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many young adult female cancer survivors need to use reproductive medicine, surrogacy, or adoption to have a child. This study pilot tested Roadmap to Parenthood, a web-based, self-guided decision aid and planning tool for family building after cancer (disease agnostic). METHODS A single-arm pilot study tested feasibility, acceptability, and obtained effect size estimates of the Roadmap tool. Participants, recruited via hospital-based and social media strategies, completed a baseline survey (T1), accessed the Roadmap tool (website), then completed surveys at one- and 3-months (T2 and T3, respectively). Feasibility and acceptability were evaluated with rates of eligibility, enrollment, and survey completion, and feedback. Pairwise t-tests and repeated measures ANOVA evaluated usage effects. Effect size estimates were calculated. RESULTS Participants (N = 98) averaged 31 years old (SD = 5.61); 71% were nulliparous. Enrollment rate was 73%, T1-T2 completion rate was 80%, and 93% accessed the website. From T1-T2, participants reported improvements in decisional conflict (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.85), unmet information needs (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.70), self-efficacy (p = 0.003; Cohen's d = 0.40), and self-efficacy for managing negative emotions (p = 0.03; Cohen's d = 0.29); effects were sustained at T3. There was no change in reproductive distress (p = 0.22). By T3, 94% reported increased consideration of preparatory actions and 20%-61% completed such actions. CONCLUSIONS The Roadmap intervention was feasible to conduct, acceptable to users, and led to improvements in key psychosocial outcomes. Future directions will test intervention efficacy in a randomized controlled trial with a larger sample and over a longer period. A web-based tool may help women make decisions about family building after cancer and prepare for potential challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Benedict
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA
| | - Jennifer S. Ford
- Hunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY
| | | | - Alexandra Davis
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Pamela Simon
- Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA
| | - David Spiegel
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA
| | - Michael Diefenbach
- Center for Health Innovation and Outcomes Research, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jackson Levin N, Tan CY, Stelmak D, Iannarino NT, Zhang A, Ellman E, Herrel LA, Walling EB, Moravek MB, Chugh R, Haymart MR, Zebrack B. Banking on Fertility Preservation: Financial Concern for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients Considering Oncofertility Services. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2023; 12:710-717. [PMID: 36603107 PMCID: PMC10611956 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Financial concern is a major issue for adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients. Furthermore, unaddressed oncofertility challenges (e.g., infertility) are linked to psychological distress and decreased overall quality of life. Little is known about how financial concern in terms of oncofertility (i.e., concern regarding affording fertility preservation [FP] services) impacts AYAs' decision making and experiences. Methods: AYA cancer patients (n = 27) aged 12-25 years whose cancer treatment conferred risk of infertility were recruited through electronic health record query. Participants completed semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, transcribed, and deductively coded for themes related to information needs, knowledge of treatment effects on fertility, and reproductive concerns after cancer. Emergent, inductive themes related to financial concern were identified. The Institutional Review Board at the University of Michigan approved this study (HUM#00157267). Results: Financial concern was a dominant theme across the qualitative data. Emergent themes included (1) varied access to health insurance, (2) presence of parental/guardian support, (3) reliance upon financial aid, (4) negotiating infertility risk, and (5) lack of preparation for long-term costs. AYAs relied heavily upon parents for out-of-pocket and insurance coverage support. Some participants sought financial aid when guided by providers. Several participants indicated that no financial support existed for their circumstance. Conclusions: Financial consequences in terms of oncofertility are a major issue affecting AYA cancer patients. The incidence and gravity of financial concern surrounding affording oncofertility services merits attention in future research (measuring financial resources of AYAs' parental/support networks), clinical practice (strategically addressing short- and long-term costs; tailored psychosocial support), and health care policy (promoting legislation to mandate pre- and post-treatment FP coverage).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Jackson Levin
- Department of Anthropology, School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Chiu Yi Tan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Daria Stelmak
- School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Nicholas T. Iannarino
- Department of Language, Culture, and the Arts at University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, Michigan, USA
| | - Anao Zhang
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Erin Ellman
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Lindsey A. Herrel
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Emily B. Walling
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Molly B. Moravek
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Rashmi Chugh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology & Diabetes Clinic, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Megan R. Haymart
- Department of Metabolism, Endocrinology & Diabetes Clinic, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Brad Zebrack
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Benedict C, Thom B, Diefenbach M, Schapira L, Simon P, Ford JS. The Impact of Cancer-Related Financial Toxicity on Reproductive Concerns and Family-Building Decision-Making in Post-Treatment Survivorship. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2023; 12:408-415. [PMID: 36169520 PMCID: PMC10282808 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors are at-risk for cancer-related financial difficulties (i.e., financial toxicity [FT]). Family building after cancer often requires reproductive medicine or adoption with high costs; AYAs experience financial barriers to family building. This study evaluated the relationships among cancer FT, reproductive concerns, and decision-making processes about family building after cancer. Methods: AYA female (AYA-F) cancer survivors completed a cross-sectional survey including measures of FT, reproductive concerns, decisional conflict about family building, and decision-making self-efficacy. Differences across FT subgroups (i.e., no/mild, moderate, and severe FT) were tested. Linear regression evaluated the relationships between FT and reproductive concerns and decision-making processes. Results: Participants (N = 111) averaged 31.0 years (standard deviation [SD] = 5.49), 90% were nulliparous, and 84% were employed full/part-time. The overall FT levels were in the "moderate" range (M = 20.44, SD = 9.83); 48% worried quite a bit or very much about financial problems because of cancer. AYA-Fs reporting severe FT (24% of sample) experienced higher levels of reproductive concerns compared with those reporting no/mild and moderate FT. Those reporting moderate FT (46% of sample) reported greater decisional conflict about family-building options, compared with the no/mild FT subgroup. Both moderate and severe FT subgroups reported lower decision-making self-efficacy compared with the no/mild FT subgroup. In separate models controlling for covariates, greater FT related to higher levels of reproductive concerns (B = -0.39, p < 0.001), greater decisional conflict about family building (B = -0.56, p = 0.02), and lower decision-making self-efficacy (B = 0.60, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Given the high costs of reproductive medicine and adoption, fertility counseling pre- and post-treatment must address survivors' financial concerns and barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Benedict
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Bridgette Thom
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Diefenbach
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | | | - Pam Simon
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jennifer S. Ford
- Hunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
El Alaoui-Lasmaili K, Nguyen-Thi PL, Demogeot N, Lighezzolo-Alnot J, Gross MJ, Mansuy L, Chastagner P, Koscinski I. Fertility discussions and concerns in childhood cancer survivors, a systematic review for updated practice. Cancer Med 2023; 12:6023-6039. [PMID: 36224740 PMCID: PMC10028046 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide ways to improve the clinical practice of fertility preservation (FP) for children, adolescents, and young adults (AYA) with cancer. DESIGN A systematic research of online databases was undertaken in March 2020 following the PRISMA criteria, including Medline and Web of Science. RESULTS Fifty-nine articles were included. Surveys, interviews, and focus groups were used to collect data from patients, parents, and health care providers (HCPs). Four themes worth exploring emerged: (a) what do patients and professionals think of and know about FP? (b) what makes the fertility discussion happen or not? (c) what, retrospectively, led to FP being pursued or not? and (d) how do patients and HCPs feel about fertility issues? CONCLUSION A minority of AYAs preserve their fertility (banking assay for 45% of boys and 23% of girls). Yet fertility concerns have a significant impact on the quality of life of young cancer survivors. Although recommendations and guidelines regarding FP are available internationally, there are no specific guidelines as to how to conduct fertility counseling for children and adolescents. Some barriers are not removable, such as a poor prognosis of an obvious severe disease, time constraints for starting treatment, and cultural and religious beliefs. In response to aspects hindering patients and families to be receptive to any discussion at the time of diagnosis, psychological support could reduce the level of emotional distress and help restore a degree of open-mindedness to open a window for discussion. Moreover, as the lack of knowledge of professionals about fertility is frequently pointed out as a limiting factor for fertility discussion, reinforcing professional training regarding FP could be proposed to promote fertility discussion and eventually referral for FP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Phi Linh Nguyen-Thi
- Unité d'évaluation médicale, Unité de Méthodologie, Data management et Statistique - UMDS, CHRU de Nancy
| | - Nadine Demogeot
- Interpsy Laboratory (UR4432), University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | | | | - Ludovic Mansuy
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Pascal Chastagner
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Isabelle Koscinski
- Laboratory of Biology of Reproduction-CECOS Lorraine, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
- INSERM U1256, NGERE, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pesce C. Donor Egg, Surrogacy, and Adoption for Breast Cancer Survivors. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-023-00477-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
|
8
|
Benedict C, Dauber-Decker KL, Ford JS, King D, Spiegel D, Schapira L, Simon P, Diefenbach M. Development of a Web-Based Decision Aid and Planning Tool for Family Building After Cancer (Roadmap to Parenthood): Usability Testing. JMIR Cancer 2022; 8:e33304. [PMID: 35639461 PMCID: PMC9198824 DOI: 10.2196/33304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Owing to gonadotoxic cancer treatments, young adult female survivors often report uncertainty about their fertility, reproductive potential, and family-building options after treatment. Roadmap to Parenthood is a web-based decision aid and planning tool for family building after cancer. Objective As part of a patient-centered development process, this study evaluated the usability of the decision aid website to inform design modifications and improve user experience. Methods In total, 2 rounds of usability testing were conducted with the target population of young adult female cancer survivors. During the testing sessions, participants viewed the website twice; first, as a think-aloud exercise, and second, while a researcher interrupted at key points to obtain user feedback. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected to assess website usability. Quantitative measures included the System Usability Scale, WebQual, and eHealth Impact Questionnaire. An exit interview with open-ended questions gathered feedback on likes and dislikes and suggestions for improvement. Results Participants (N=10) were young adult women, with average age of 30.9 (SD 4.51) years, and average time since treatment was 4.44 (SD 3.56) years. Website usability scores improved on the System Usability Scale from “acceptable” in round 1 to “excellent” in round 2 after making design changes based on user feedback (scores of 68 and 89.4, respectively). WebQual scores showed similar improvement from round 1 to round 2 of testing (mean 5.6 to 6.25; range 1-7). On the eHealth Impact Questionnaire, the information and presentation of the website was perceived as comprehensive, easy to understand, and trustworthy. Participants also reported improved confidence to discuss and manage fertility and family-building issues and felt encouraged to play a more active role in managing their fertility. In all, 3 usability themes were identified from the qualitative feedback: ease of use, visibility and navigation, and informational content and usefulness. Overall feedback was positive, and participants reported intentions to use the decision aid website in the future. In total, 10% (1/10) of the participants reported negative emotions when learning about infertility risks and potential family-building challenges. Conclusions Website usability improved after design changes were made in response to user feedback. Young adult female survivors reported positive views about the website and indicated that the decision aid would be useful in decision-making about family building after cancer. Future studies will include further design modifications to consider the emotional experiences of users and any additional navigational features or content to optimize the ease of use and support provided by the tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Benedict
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.,Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | | | - Jennifer S Ford
- Hunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, United States
| | - D'Arcy King
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, United States
| | - David Spiegel
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.,Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Lidia Schapira
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.,Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Pamela Simon
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Michael Diefenbach
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meernik C, Mersereau JE, Baggett CD, Engel SM, Moy LM, Cannizzaro NT, Peavey M, Kushi LH, Chao CR, Nichols HB. Fertility Preservation and Financial Hardship among Adolescent and Young Adult Women with Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:1043-1051. [PMID: 35506248 PMCID: PMC9074091 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-1305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial hardship among adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer who receive gonadotoxic treatments may be exacerbated by the use of fertility services. This study examined whether AYA women with cancer who used fertility preservation had increased financial hardship. METHODS AYA women with cancer in North Carolina and California completed a survey in 2018-2019. Cancer-related financial hardship was compared between women who cryopreserved oocytes or embryos for fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis (n = 65) and women who received gonadotoxic treatment and reported discussing fertility with their provider, but did not use fertility preservation (n = 491). Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Women were a median age of 33 years at diagnosis and 7 years from diagnosis at the time of survey. Women who used fertility preservation were primarily ages 25 to 34 years at diagnosis (65%), non-Hispanic White (72%), and had at least a Bachelor's degree (85%). In adjusted analysis, use of fertility preservation was associated with 1.50 times the prevalence of material financial hardship (95% CI: 1.08-2.09). The magnitude of hardship was also substantially higher among women who used fertility preservation: 12% reported debt of ≥$25,000 versus 5% in the referent group. CONCLUSIONS This study provides new evidence that cryopreserving oocytes or embryos after cancer diagnosis for future family building is associated with increased financial vulnerability. IMPACT More legislation that mandates insurance coverage to mitigate hardships stemming from iatrogenic infertility could improve access to fertility preservation for young women with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Meernik
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer E. Mersereau
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Christopher D. Baggett
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie M. Engel
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lisa M. Moy
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Nancy T. Cannizzaro
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Mary Peavey
- Atlantic Reproductive Medicine Associates, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Lawrence H. Kushi
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Chun R. Chao
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Hazel B. Nichols
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND A cancer diagnosis as an adolescent and young adult (AYA) poses exceptional challenges, including potential greater financial toxicity than older survivors experience who have had more time for career establishment and to build financial assets. Costs to patients have increased more than the past decade; prospects for AYA long-term survival have also increased. A better understanding of what financial toxicity is, how it presents, and the immediate and longer-term implications for AYAs is needed. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to analyze the concept financial toxicity in AYAs diagnosed with cancer. METHODS We used Rodgers' evolutionary method and articles published between January 2013 and December 2020. RESULTS We identified key antecedents, attributes, and consequences of financial toxicity in AYAs and review its related terms that have often been used as surrogate terms. Attributes were financial burden, financial distress, and competing financial pressures. Consequences were mostly adverse and persistent and included engaging in various financial problem-solving behaviors, material hardship and poor financial well-being, and deteriorated quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Results of this analysis clarify financial toxicity and provide guidance for a conceptual framework in the context of AYA cancer survivorship. Its consequences in AYAs with cancer are profound and will continue to evolve over time with changes in health systems and the economy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Oncology nurses should understand the attributes and consequences of financial toxicity for AYAs throughout the cancer trajectory. Future research on financial toxicity should extend across AYAs living with other chronic illnesses and cancer survivors in other age groups.
Collapse
|
11
|
Himelhoch AC, Datillo TM, Tuinman MA, Gerhardt CA, Lehmann V. Attitudes and Perceptions of Parenthood Among Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2021; 11:138-145. [PMID: 33999693 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2020.0213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Increasing numbers of childhood cancer survivors enter adulthood and encounter decisions surrounding parenthood. However, limited research has systematically examined how childhood cancer may influence parenthood attitudes among survivors. Methods: Adult survivors of childhood cancer, who had or wanted to have children (N = 77; Mage = 30.2 years, range: 22-43; 91% White), rated their perceived impact of cancer at enrollment and parenthood attitudes using the "Attitudes to Parenthood After Cancer Scale" 2 years later. First, internal consistencies for the parenthood measure were examined, and modified subscales were proposed. Second, hierarchical stepwise regressions analyzed the contribution of background factors and cancer's impact on parenthood attitudes. Results: Reevaluation of parenthood items yielded four subscales with improved internal consistency (α's > .78): improved parenting due to cancer, no children due to cancer, concerns about a (potential) child's health, and parenthood desire irrespective of own health concerns. Already having children (n = 38) was related to more favorable ratings on most subscales. Older age was associated with perceiving improved parenting due to cancer (r = .24) and shorter time since diagnosis was related to considering having no children due to cancer (r = -.23). Hierarchical stepwise regressions reconfirmed parenthood status as related to more favorable parenting attitudes. Cancer preoccupation and perceiving cancer as a most difficult life experience predicted more concerns toward parenthood (R2 = .044-.216). Conclusions: Parenthood attitudes were more favorable among survivors with children, who were older, and/or further into survivorship. Survivors burdened by their cancer experience reported more concerns about parenthood. Childhood cancer may shape parenthood perceptions positively and negatively, warranting further research to inform interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra C Himelhoch
- Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Taylor M Datillo
- Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Marrit A Tuinman
- Health Psychology Research Section, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Cynthia A Gerhardt
- Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Department of Pediatrics and The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Vicky Lehmann
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Benedict C, Dauber-Decker KL, King D, Hahn A, Ford JS, Diefenbach M. A Decision Aid Intervention for Family Building After Cancer: Developmental Study on the Initial Steps to Consider When Designing a Web-Based Prototype. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5:e20841. [PMID: 33480848 PMCID: PMC7864768 DOI: 10.2196/20841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An important aspect of patient-centered care involves ensuring that patient-directed resources are usable, understandable, and responsive to patients' needs. A user-centered design refers to an empathy-based framework and an iterative design approach for developing a product or solution that is based on an in-depth understanding of users' needs, values, abilities, and limitations. OBJECTIVE This study presents the steps taken to develop a prototype for a patient resource for young women who have completed treatment for gonadotoxic cancer to support their decision making about follow-up fertility care and family building. METHODS User-centered design practices were used to develop Roadmap to Parenthood, a decision aid (DA) website for family building after cancer. A multidisciplinary steering group was assembled and input was provided. Guidelines from the International Patient DA Society and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework were used throughout the development process. In addition, guidelines for developing health DAs with respect to patient diversity and health literacy were also followed. RESULTS The Roadmap to Parenthood DA website prototype was systematically and iteratively developed. An extensive process of designing and developing solutions from the perspective of the end user was followed. The steps taken included formative work to identify user needs; determining goals, format, and delivery; design processes (eg, personas, storyboards, information architecture, user journey mapping, and wireframing); and content development. Additional design considerations addressed the unique needs of this patient population, including the emotional experiences related to this topic and decision-making context wherein decisions could be considered iteratively while involving a multistep process. CONCLUSIONS The design strategies presented in this study describe important steps in the early phases of developing a user-centered resource, which will enhance the starting point for usability testing and further design modifications. Future research will pilot test the DA and a planning tool, and evaluate improvement in the decisional conflict regarding family building after cancer. Consistent with a patient-centered approach to health care, the strategies described here may be generalized and applied to the development of other patient resources and clinical contexts to optimize usability, empathy, and user engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Benedict
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | | | - D'Arcy King
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, United States
| | - Alexandria Hahn
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Jennifer S Ford
- Hunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, United States
| | - Michael Diefenbach
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wayant C, Manquen J, Wendelbo H, Kerr N, Crow M, Goodell J, Tricco AC, Mack JW, Hellman C, Vassar M. Identification of Evidence for Key Positive Psychological Constructs in Pediatric and Adolescent/Young Adult Patients with Cancer: A Scoping Review. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2021; 10:247-259. [PMID: 33464990 PMCID: PMC8220547 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2020.0184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Children and adolescents/young adults (AYAs) with cancer are a vulnerable population susceptible to numerous late effects, such as fatigue and depression, which may diminish their long-term psychological, physical, spiritual, and emotional health. A well-rounded understanding of how positive psychological constructs affect the quality of care and treatment outcomes is therefore warranted. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of 15 positive psychological constructs in children and AYAs with cancer. The primary research questions were (1) what is known about positive psychological constructs in children and AYAs with cancer; (2) what value is ascribed to these constructs by patients? Results: Two hundred seventy-six articles were included after database search and screening. These studies were mostly observational or qualitative and conducted in North America. Constructs were often poorly defined, and measurement tools used to gather data were wide ranging. Numerous factors were correlated with increased or decreased expression of certain constructs, but overall themes were difficult to identify. Similarly, patients often spoke of what increased or decreased expression of a construct, with less emphasis on what they implicitly value. Discussion: This scoping review found ample evidence for what increases or decreases expression of positive psychological constructs, but this evidence was observational and often conflicting. In the future, we recommend the development of a core set of psychological outcomes, with definitions and corresponding measurement tools. We further recommend an emphasis on randomized trials to more rigorously study how expression of constructs can be improved and what effect this has on the quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cole Wayant
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Jack Manquen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Hannah Wendelbo
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Natalie Kerr
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Matt Crow
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Jon Goodell
- Department of Library Services, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Andrea C Tricco
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Epidemiology Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Chan Hellman
- School of Social Work, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Matt Vassar
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fathollah Zadeh E, Parry Y, Eshghi P. Hope in Iranian mothers of children with cancer: a descriptive correlational study. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:3697-3705. [PMID: 33190180 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05881-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to examine the relationship between the level of hope in mothers who have a child with cancer and its related factors in Iran. METHOD A cross-sectional and descriptive correlational design was used in this study. A demographic questionnaire and the Herth Hope Index (HHI) were administered to a sample of 240 mothers who have a child with cancer to assess level of hope. Mothers were also asked to indicate their highest priority hopes such as view of their supportive resources including financial support, psychosocial support, religiosity and spirituality. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics, Spearman's rho, independent sample t test and one-way ANOVA. RESULTS The mean HHI score was 35.44 (n = 237). There was a positive correlation between HHI total score and spirituality (r = 0.267, P < 0.001), and psychosocial support (r = 0.281, P < 0.001). No significant differences were found between HHI total score and respondents who saw themselves as a religious person and the family financial support. There was a significant difference in HHI total scores for a mother who has a disabled child (M = 32.92, SD = 2.75; t (235) = 2.00, P = 0.046) and mothers of a child who do not have any disability besides their cancer (M = 35.59, SD = 4.91). No significant differences were found in the HHI total score and different group of the child's diagnoses and the mother's age or/and child's age. CONCLUSION Mothers who have a child with cancer with better psychosocial and spiritual support showed a higher level of hope. A thorough knowledge of factors associated with hope in mothers caring for children suffering from cancer could provide a means to further advance the support delivered and the available resources given to the parents, especially the mothers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ensieh Fathollah Zadeh
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt North Wing (N306), GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
| | - Yvonne Parry
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt North Wing (N323), GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia
| | - Peyman Eshghi
- Pediatric Congenital Hematologic Disorders Research Centre, Research Institute for Children Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Level 2. Haemophilia Clinic of Mofid Children Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Benedict C, Hahn AL, McCready A, Kelvin JF, Diefenbach M, Ford JS. Toward a theoretical understanding of young female cancer survivors' decision-making about family-building post-treatment. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:4857-4867. [PMID: 31993754 PMCID: PMC7384920 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05307-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Family-building after gonadotoxic treatment often requires in vitro fertilization, surrogacy, or adoption, with associated challenges such as uncertain likelihood of success, high costs, and complicated laws regulating surrogacy and adoption. This study examined adolescent and young adult female (AYA-F) survivors' experiences and decision-making related to family-building after cancer. METHODS Semi-structured interviews explored fertility and family-building themes (N = 25). Based on an a priori conceptual model, hypothesis coding and grounded theory coding methods guided qualitative analysis. RESULTS Participants averaged 29 years old (SD = 6.2) were mostly White and educated. Four major themes were identified: sources of uncertainty, cognitive and emotional reactions, coping behaviors, and decision-making. Uncertainty stemmed from medical, personal, social, and financial factors, which led to cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reactions to reduce distress, renegotiate identity, adjust expectations, and consider "next steps" toward family-building goals. Most AYA-Fs were unaware of their fertility status, felt uninformed about family-building options, and worried about expected challenges. Despite feeling that "action" was needed, many were stalled in decision-making to evaluate fertility or address information needs; postponement and avoidance were common. Younger AYA-Fs tended to be less concerned. CONCLUSION AYA-Fs reported considerable uncertainty, distress, and unmet needs surrounding family-building decisions post-treatment. Support services are needed to better educate patients and provide opportunity for referral and early preparation for potential challenges. Reproductive counseling should occur throughout survivorship care to address medical, psychosocial, and financial difficulties, allow time for informed decision-making, and the opportunity to prepare for barriers such as high costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Benedict
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Rd, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| | | | - Alyssa McCready
- Center for Health Innovation and Outcomes Research, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | | | - Michael Diefenbach
- Center for Health Innovation and Outcomes Research, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer S Ford
- Hunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
"Looking at future cancer survivors, give them a roadmap": addressing fertility and family-building topics in post-treatment cancer survivorship care. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:2203-2213. [PMID: 32889581 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05731-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fertility is an important issue among adolescent and young adult female (AYA-F) cancer survivors. This study examined AYA-F survivors' unmet needs and recommendations for care to address fertility/family-building in post-treatment survivorship. METHODS Semi-structured interviews (45-60 min) explored themes related to fertility and family-building after cancer. Coding categories were derived based on grounded theory methods. Themes were identified through an iterative process of coding and review. RESULTS Participants (N = 25) averaged 29 years old (SD = 6.2; range, 15-39) were primarily White and well educated, and averaged 5.81 years post-treatment (SD = 5.43); 32% had undergone fertility preservation (pre- or post-cancer). Six recommendations for improving care were identified: addressing patient-provider communication, need to provide informational, emotional, and peer support, financial information, and decision-making support. AYA-Fs believed the best way to learn about resources was through online platforms or doctor-initiated discussions. Telehealth options and digital resources were generally considered acceptable. Face-to-face interactions were preferred for in-depth information, when AYA-Fs anticipated having immediate questions or distressing emotions, and with concerns about Internet security. Thus, a combined approach was preferred such that information (via web-based communication) should be provided first, with follow-up in-person visits and referrals when needed. CONCLUSION Informational and support services are needed to better educate patients about gonadotoxic effects and options to have children after cancer treatment is completed. Future work should evaluate how to best support oncology providers in meeting the needs of survivors concerned about fertility and family-building including referral to clinical specialties and supportive resources.
Collapse
|
17
|
Morgan TL, Young BP, Lipak KG, Lehmann V, Klosky J, Quinn GP, Gerhardt CA, Nahata L. "We Can Always Adopt": Perspectives of Adolescent and Young Adult Males with Cancer and Their Family on Alternatives to Biological Parenthood. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020; 9:572-578. [PMID: 32320315 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2020.0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Approximately half of male childhood cancer survivors experience impaired fertility, which is known to cause psychological distress. Yet, less than 50% of at-risk adolescent and young adult (AYA) males pursue fertility preservation (FP) at diagnosis. Alternatives to biological parenthood (e.g., adoption/sperm donation) may be considered, but little is known about perspectives regarding these alternatives among AYA males and their families. Methods: Families of AYAs were recruited for a mixed-method study examining FP decisions at cancer diagnosis. One month later, 48 participants from 20 families (18 male AYAs, 12-22 years of age, 19 mothers, 11 fathers) completed semistructured interviews, including two questions about: (a) alternative routes to biological parenthood, and (b) their knowledge about the processes involved and/or challenges associated with such alternatives. Verbatim transcripts were coded for thematic content using the constant comparison method. Results: Three main themes were identified, of which two represent both ends of considering alternative parenthood: (a) Willingness to consider alternatives to biological parenthood, primarily adoption; (b) No consideration/discussion of alternative family building options; and (c) Variable knowledge of alternatives and/or associated challenges. Notably, more AYAs than parents mentioned a specific preference for biological children. Conclusions: One-month postcancer diagnosis, most parents reported willingness to consider alternatives to biological parenthood for their sons, while AYA males were less knowledgeable or open to these options. Future research should prospectively examine how these attitudes affect FP decisions before treatment. Medical and psychosocial providers should counsel patients and survivors accordingly to optimize reproductive outcomes and prevent psychosocial distress if parenthood goals are unfulfilled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor L Morgan
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Braedon P Young
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Keagan G Lipak
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Vicky Lehmann
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - James Klosky
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Cynthia A Gerhardt
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Leena Nahata
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article reviews the current literature on psychosocial care of children with cancer with particular focus on evidence-based standards of care, including developments in systematic distress screening, utilization of patient-reported outcomes, evidence-based interventions, survivorship, palliative care and bereavement. RECENT FINDINGS Although attention to the psychosocial needs of the child and family is increasingly recognized as an essential element of care for children with cancer, implementing evidence-based care remains suboptimal. Recent efforts have focused on utilizing technology to improve the reach of these interventions and to enhance engagement with special populations, such as adolescents and young adults. Increasing data elucidate the long-term psychological and physical late effects of childhood cancer survivorship and the impact of cancer on siblings and the family. Gaps in clinical care and important directions for future research include the needs of infants and toddlers, overlooked minorities, and patients with hereditary tumor predisposition syndromes, and attention to the psychosocial impact of exciting new treatments, such as autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. SUMMARY The evidence base for the psychosocial standards of care for children with cancer and their families continues to grow, but more work is needed to successfully implement these standards across pediatric cancer centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori Wiener
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Room 1C247B-4, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Katie A Devine
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Amanda L Thompson
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children’s National Health System, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Benedict C, Ford JS, Schapira L, Simon P, Spiegel D, Diefenbach M. Family-building decision aid and planning tool for young adult women after cancer treatment: protocol for preliminary testing of a web-based decision support intervention in a single-arm pilot study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e033630. [PMID: 31888941 PMCID: PMC6937115 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many young adult female (YA-F) cancer survivors who received gonadotoxic therapy will experience fertility problems. After cancer, having a child will often require assisted reproductive technology (ART), surrogacy or adoption. However, there are significant informational, psychosocial, financial and logistical barriers to pursuing these options. Survivors report high rates of decision uncertainty and distress related to family-building decisions. The aim of this study is to pilot test a web-based decision aid and planning tool for family-building after cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The pilot study will use a single-arm trial design to test the feasibility and acceptability (aim 1) and obtain effect size estimates of the decision support intervention (aim 2). The target sample size is 100. Participants will include YA-F survivors (aged 18-45 years) who are post-treatment and have not completed desired family-building. A longitudinal prepost design will be conducted. Participants will complete three psychosocial assessment surveys over a 3-month time period to track decisional conflict (primary outcome) and cognitive, emotional, and behavioural functioning (secondary outcomes). After completing the baseline survey (T1; pre-intervention), participants will have access to the decision aid website. Postintervention surveys will be administered at 1-month (T2) and 3-month (T3) follow-up time points. Feasibility and acceptability metrics will be analysed. Pairwise t-tests will test mean scores of outcome variables from T1 to T2. Effect size estimates (Cohen's d) will be calculated. Google analytics will evaluate user engagement with the website over the study period. Baseline and follow-up data will examine measures of feasibility, acceptability and intervention effect size. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This will be the first test of a supportive intervention to guide YA-F cancer survivors in family-building decisions and early planning. Study findings will inform intervention development. Future directions will include a randomised controlled trial to test intervention efficacy over a longer time period. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04059237; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Benedict
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jennifer S Ford
- Hunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), New York City, New York, USA
| | - Lidia Schapira
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Pamela Simon
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - David Spiegel
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Michael Diefenbach
- Center for Health Innovation and Outcomes Research, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ernst M, Brähler E, Wild PS, Faber J, Merzenich H, Beutel ME. The desire for children among adult survivors of childhood cancer: Psychometric evaluation of a cancer-specific questionnaire and relations with sociodemographic and psychological characteristics. Psychooncology 2019; 29:485-492. [PMID: 31713915 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Long-term childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are less likely to become parents than their peers of the same age. Previous research has suggested that besides fertility, this outcome is shaped by psychosocial factors such as emotional motives toward having a child. Drawing from a sample of CCS with survival times >25 years, we present the validation of a questionnaire assessing cancer-specific reproductive motives and concerns. METHODS We evaluated the cancer-specific version of the Leipzig Questionnaire of Motives to have a Child (LKM-C) in a register-based sample of adult CCS (N = 632, 31% had children, 44.5% women). We conducted a confirmatory factor analysis and tested associations with sociodemographic characteristics and psychological symptoms (PHQ-9, GAD-2). RESULTS The questionnaire showed good item discrimination parameters and reliability (α = 0.86). The two-factorial structure was confirmed with the independent scales "return to normalcy" and "illness-related worries (child's/own health)." On average, CCS reported more motives in favor of a child than worries (P < .001; d = 1.12). Favorable attitudes were associated with the presence of a partnership and children, stronger current desire for a child, and fewer depressive symptoms. Worries were associated with an unfulfilled desire to have a child and elevated levels of depression and anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSIONS The LKM-C offers a brief measure of parenthood motivations in long-term CCS. Having a child signifies return to normalcy, health, fulfillment of life perspectives, and enrichment of the partnership. Less intense worries included illnesses of the child and concerns regarding one's own health. The questionnaire could inform follow-up care, psychotherapy, and fertility treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mareike Ernst
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Philipp S Wild
- Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine-Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jörg Faber
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Hemostaseology, Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Hiltrud Merzenich
- Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manfred E Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Semler R, Thom B. Fertility Preservation: Improving Access Through Nurse-Advocated Financial Assistance. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2019; 23:27-30. [PMID: 31538989 DOI: 10.1188/19.cjon.s2.27-30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young adult patients and survivors may face impaired fertility or infertility as a result of their cancer treatment, and many will need costly assisted reproductive technology to build their families. Fertility nurse specialists (FNSs) can play a role in alleviating the distress associated with the co-occurrence of financial toxicity and impaired fertility/infertility. OBJECTIVES This article describes a nurse-led oncofertility program that offers counseling to patients of any age, with any diagnosis, and at any stage of treatment. METHODS An overview of the literature and a description of a clinical practice, including relevant case studies, are presented. FINDINGS FNSs can seek to lessen the financial burden associated with family building before and after cancer treatment by developing a network of reproductive specialists who will provide discounted services and by sharing information on available resources that might reduce the costs.
Collapse
|
22
|
Hauken MA, Grue M, Dyregrov A. “It's been a life‐changing experience!” A qualitative study of young adult cancer survivors’ experiences of the coexistence of negative and positive outcomes after cancer treatment. Scand J Psychol 2019; 60:577-584. [DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- May A. Hauken
- Center for Crisis Psychology Faculty of Psychology University of Bergen Norway
| | - Marthe Grue
- Center for Crisis Psychology Faculty of Psychology University of Bergen Norway
| | - Atle Dyregrov
- Center for Crisis Psychology Faculty of Psychology University of Bergen Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gorman JR, Drizin JH, Mersereau JE, Su HI. Applying behavioral theory to understand fertility consultation uptake after cancer. Psychooncology 2019; 28:822-829. [PMID: 30761655 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine the association between theoretical constructs from the Health Belief Model and fertility consultation status after cancer. METHODS Reproductive-aged female cancer survivors self-reported their use of fertility consultation, perceived severity of and susceptibility to infertility, perceived barriers to and effectiveness of fertility consultation, and cues to action from family/peers and doctors, as well as demographics and cancer characteristics. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association between theoretical constructs and fertility consultation status. RESULTS Fertility consultation uptake was more prevalent among survivors with higher incomes, those without children, those who wanted a (another) child, and those who were diagnosed more recently. In the final multivariate model, higher perceived severity of infertility, fewer perceived barriers to fertility consultation, and more cues to action from family/peers and doctors were significantly associated with fertility consultation uptake, controlling for income. Exploratory bivariate analyses of barriers to fertility consultation revealed that cost and trouble accessing services were significantly associated with not having a fertility consultation. CONCLUSIONS The Health Belief Model is useful for understanding factors associated with fertility consultation uptake. Efforts should be made to reduce financial barriers and improve patient-centered assessment of family-building goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica R Gorman
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Julia H Drizin
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Jennifer E Mersereau
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - H Irene Su
- UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|