1
|
Surr C, Ashley L. End of life care for people with dementia and comorbid cancer: recent studies and research gaps. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2024:00001504-990000000-00128. [PMID: 38841908 DOI: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review examines recent research on end of life (EOL) care for people with dementia and comorbid cancer, highlighting the complexity and challenge of providing effective EOL care for this group and areas of interest for future research. RECENT FINDINGS People with cancer and dementia and their family/supporters have more complex care and support needs at EOL that are less well met than those of older adults with cancer alone, including questionable use of aggressive EOL care interventions, poorer access to specialist palliative care teams and poor pain management. Those diagnosed with dementia at the same time as, or after their cancer diagnosis, are at greater risk of aggressive EOL care and EOL cancer treatment and care plans that are not able to meet their care needs as dementia progresses. SUMMARY There is a lack of research on EOL care for people with cancer and dementia. There is little understanding of what good care for this population looks like and if and how EOL care can best meet the needs of people with cancer and dementia or their carers/supporters. More research is needed to inform improved care for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Surr
- Centre for Dementia Research, School of Health
| | - Laura Ashley
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Plantinga A, Roodbol PF, van Munster BC, Finnema EJ. Nurses' perspectives on shared decision-making in the daily care of hospitalized patients with dementia: An exploratory qualitative study. J Adv Nurs 2024. [PMID: 38590041 DOI: 10.1111/jan.16107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
AIM Gain insight into the process of shared decision-making (SDM) in daily hospital care for patients with dementia from nurses' perspectives. DESIGN Explorative qualitative design. METHODS In-depth digital interviews were conducted with 14 registered nurses between June and November 2022. A phenomenological approach was applied using Colaizzi's seven-step method. RESULTS Five themes were identified in the data: (1) SDM in daily care: How shared decision-making is applied; (2) Nurses' perceptions and competence: How nurses perceive and manage SDM; (3) Nurses' roles and advocacy: The evolving roles of nurses and their advocacy efforts, (4) Recognition of dementia and its impact: How nurses recognize and manage dementia; and (5) Interventions to support SDM: Strategies and interventions to facilitate SDM. CONCLUSION This study highlights the complexity of SDM in patients with dementia. It demonstrates the importance of the involvement of relatives, omission of patient goals in discussions and perceived deficiencies of nurses. The early identification of dementia, evaluation of nuanced capacity and targeted communication are essential. Further research and enhanced training are required to improve care in this context. IMPACT Potential areas for further research on SDM in nurses involving patients with dementia include investigating the effects of integrating goal discussions into SDM training for nurses, overcoming barriers to SDM competence, and challenging the idea that SDM is solely the responsibility of physicians. These findings highlight the need for policies that encourage interdisciplinary collaboration, address misconceptions and recommend training programmes that focus on applying SDM to the daily care of patients with dementia, thereby improving the overall quality of patient care. REPORTING METHOD The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist was used for reporting. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION No patient or public contribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Plantinga
- Health Science-Nursing Research, University of Groningen & University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- NHL Stenden University of Applied Science, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
- University Center of Geriatric Medicine-Alzheimer Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Petrie F Roodbol
- Health Science-Nursing Research, University of Groningen & University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara C van Munster
- Health Science-Nursing Research, University of Groningen & University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- University Center of Geriatric Medicine-Alzheimer Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Evelyn J Finnema
- Health Science-Nursing Research, University of Groningen & University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- NHL Stenden University of Applied Science, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
- Hanze University of Applied Science, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lawson McLean A, Lawson McLean AC. Integrating Shared Decision-Making into Undergraduate Oncology Education: A Pedagogical Framework. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2024:10.1007/s13187-024-02419-8. [PMID: 38448671 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02419-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
The integration of shared decision-making (SDM) into undergraduate oncology education represents a critical evolution in medical pedagogy, reflecting the growing complexity and patient-centric focus of contemporary healthcare. This paper introduces a comprehensive pedagogical framework designed to embed SDM within the undergraduate medical curriculum, particularly in oncology, where the multiplicity of treatment options and their profound impact on patient life underscore the necessity of this approach. Grounded in a systematic literature review and aligned with established educational theories, this framework proposes twelve strategic approaches to cultivate future physicians proficient in both clinical acumen and patient-collaborative decision-making. The framework emphasizes real-world clinical experience, role-playing, case studies, and decision aids to deepen students' understanding of SDM. It advocates for the development of communication skills, ethical deliberation, and cultural competence, recognizing the multifaceted nature of patient care. The inclusion of patient narratives and evidence-based decision-making further enriches the curriculum, offering a holistic view of patient care. Additionally, the integration of digital tools within the SDM process acknowledges the evolving technological landscape in healthcare. The paper also addresses challenges in implementing this framework, such as curricular constraints and the need for educator training. It underscores the importance of continual evaluation and adaptation of these strategies to the dynamic field of medical education and practice. Overall, this comprehensive approach aims not only to enhance the quality of oncological care but also to prepare medical students for the complexities of modern medicine, where patient involvement in decision-making is both a necessity and an expectation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Lawson McLean
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
| | - Anna C Lawson McLean
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ikeda S, Aoyanagi M, Nakaya R, Yoshimura M, Sumi N. Factors Related to Person-Centered Care for Older Patients With Cancer and Dementia in Designated Cancer Hospitals. Cancer Nurs 2024:00002820-990000000-00222. [PMID: 38442015 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Person-centered care (PCC) should be promoted for patients with cancer and dementia who are likely to be hindered from pursuing a meaningful life owing to their will not being reflected in the cancer treatment process. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to clarify the factors related to nurses' practice of PCC for older patients with cancer and dementia in designated cancer hospitals. METHODS An online cross-sectional survey was administered to nurses working at designated cancer hospitals in Japan. The survey items included demographic data and factors assumed to be related to nursing practice and practice of PCC. RESULTS A multiple regression analysis indicated that the factors related to the practice of PCC were attitude toward patients with dementia (β = 0.264, P < .001), holding conferences (β = 0.255, P < .001), knowledge about cancer nursing (β = 0.168, P < .001), knowledge about dementia (β = 0.128, P = .003), and participation in dementia care training (β = 0.088, P = .032). CONCLUSIONS Nurses' practice of PCC may not be sufficient to provide personalized care tailored to patients' cognitive function. The factors related to PCC are attitude toward patients with dementia, holding conferences, knowledge about cancer and dementia, and dementia care training. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE To promote PCC for patients with cancer and dementia, nurses should learn about these conditions with an interest in patients and collaborate with other professionals. Future studies should use cluster sampling and focus on the extent of cancer or dementia symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Setsuka Ikeda
- Author Affiliations: KKR Sapporo Medical Center (Ms Ikeda); School of Health Sciences, Sapporo Medical University (Dr Aoyanagi); Hokkaido University Hospital (Mr Nakaya); Faculty of Health Sciences, Japan Health Care University (Ms Yoshimura); and Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University (Dr Sumi), Japan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bellass S, Scharf T, Errington L, Bowden Davies K, Robinson S, Runacres A, Ventre J, Witham MD, Sayer AA, Cooper R. Experiences of hospital care for people with multiple long-term conditions: a scoping review of qualitative research. BMC Med 2024; 22:25. [PMID: 38229088 PMCID: PMC10792930 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03220-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple long-term conditions-the co-existence of two or more chronic health conditions in an individual-present an increasing challenge to populations and healthcare systems worldwide. This challenge is keenly felt in hospital settings where care is oriented around specialist provision for single conditions. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and summarise published qualitative research on the experiences of hospital care for people living with multiple long-term conditions, their informal caregivers and healthcare professionals. METHODS We undertook a scoping review, following established guidelines, of primary qualitative research on experiences of hospital care for people living with multiple long-term conditions published in peer-reviewed journals between Jan 2010 and June 2022. We conducted systematic electronic searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Proquest Social Science Premium, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase, supplemented by citation tracking. Studies were selected for inclusion by two reviewers using an independent screening process. Data extraction included study populations, study design, findings and author conclusions. We took a narrative approach to reporting the findings. RESULTS Of 8002 titles and abstracts screened, 54 papers reporting findings from 41 studies conducted in 14 countries were identified as eligible for inclusion. The perspectives of people living with multiple long-term conditions (21 studies), informal caregivers (n = 13) and healthcare professionals (n = 27) were represented, with 15 studies reporting experiences of more than one group. Findings included poor service integration and lack of person-centred care, limited confidence of healthcare professionals to treat conditions outside of their specialty, and time pressures leading to hurried care transitions. Few studies explored inequities in experiences of hospital care. CONCLUSIONS Qualitative research evidence on the experiences of hospital care for multiple long-term conditions illuminates a tension between the desire to provide and receive person-centred care and time pressures inherent within a target-driven system focussed on increasing specialisation, reduced inpatient provision and accelerated journeys through the care system. A move towards more integrated models of care may enable the needs of people living with multiple long-term conditions to be better met. Future research should address how social circumstances shape experiences of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Bellass
- Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
| | - Thomas Scharf
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Linda Errington
- School of Biomedical Nutritional and Sport Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kelly Bowden Davies
- Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Sian Robinson
- AGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust and Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Adam Runacres
- Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Jodi Ventre
- NIHR ARC Greater Manchester, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Miles D Witham
- AGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust and Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Avan A Sayer
- AGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust and Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rachel Cooper
- AGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust and Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gans EA, Pieterse AH, Klapwijk MS, van Stiphout F, van Steenbergen IJ, Portielje JEA, de Groot JF, van Munster BC, van den Bos F. Shared decision-making with older adults with cancer: Adaptation of a model through literature review and expert opinion. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6291. [PMID: 38282224 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a literature overview of characteristics of Shared Decision Making (SDM) with specific importance to the older adult population with cancer and to tailor an existing model of SDM in patients with cancer to the needs of older adults. METHODS A systematic search of several databases was conducted. Eligible studies described factors influencing SDM concerning cancer treatment with adults aged 65 years or above, with any type of cancer. We included qualitative or mixed-methods studies. Themes were identified and discussed in an expert panel, including a patient-representative, until consensus was reached on an adjusted model. RESULTS Overall 29 studies were included and nine themes were identified from the literature. The themes related to the importance of goal setting, need for tailored information provision, the role of significant others, uncertainty of evidence, the importance of time during and outside of consultations, the possible ill-informed preconceptions that health care professionals (HCPs) might have about older adults and the specific competencies they need to engage in the SDM process with older adults. No new themes emerged from discussion with expert panel. This study presents a visual model of SDM with older patients with cancer based on the identified themes. CONCLUSIONS Our model shows key elements that are specific to SDM with older adults. Further research needs to focus on how to educate HCPs on the competencies needed to engage in SDM with older patients, and how to implement the model into everyday practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma A Gans
- University Center of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arwen H Pieterse
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje S Klapwijk
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Feikje van Stiphout
- Department of Geriatric Internal Medicine, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Irma J van Steenbergen
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Janke F de Groot
- Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara C van Munster
- University Center of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Castelo-Loureiro A, Perez-de-Acha A, Torres-Perez AC, Cunha V, García-Valdés P, Cárdenas-Reyes P, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E. Delivering Palliative and Supportive Care for Older Adults with Cancer: Interactions between Palliative Medicine and Geriatrics. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3858. [PMID: 37568674 PMCID: PMC10417379 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The world's population is aging rapidly, with projections indicating that by 2050 one in six people will be aged ≥65 years. As a result, the number of cancer cases in older people is expected to increase significantly. Palliative care is an essential component of cancer care with a direct impact on quality of life. However, older adults with cancer often suffer from multiple comorbidities, cognitive impairment, and frailty, posing unique challenges in the delivery of palliative care. The complex healthcare needs of older patients with cancer therefore require a comprehensive assessment, including a geriatric evaluation. Collaboration between geriatrics and palliative care can offer a solution to the challenges faced by older people with cancer, since this is a population with overlapping concerns for both disciplines. This review highlights the importance of palliative care for older adults with cancer and the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach. It also addresses the coordination of palliative care and geriatrics for specific symptom management and decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Perez-de-Acha
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
| | - Ana Cristina Torres-Perez
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
| | - Vanessa Cunha
- School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G5, Canada
| | - Paola García-Valdés
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
- Department of Palliative Care, Hospital Gea González, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
| | - Paula Cárdenas-Reyes
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
| | - Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jones D, Ali OM, Honey S, Surr C, Scott S, De Wit N, Neal RD. Patients' views on the decision to investigate cancer symptoms in older adults: a qualitative interview study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2023:BJGP.2022.0622. [PMID: 37365009 PMCID: PMC10327112 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is predominantly a disease of older adults. To date there has been little research on the experiences of older adults or their views on the diagnostic pathway. AIM To gain an improved understanding of the views and experiences of older adults on all aspects of cancer investigation. DESIGN AND SETTING This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with patients aged ≥70 years. Patients were recruited from primary care in West Yorkshire, UK. METHOD Data were analysed using a thematic framework analysis. RESULTS The themes identified in participants' accounts included the patients' process of decision making, the value of having a diagnosis, the patients' experience of cancer investigations, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnostic pathway. Older adults in this study indicated a clear preference for having clarity on the cause of symptoms and the diagnosis, even in the face of unpleasant investigations. Patients suggested they wanted to be involved in the decision process. CONCLUSION Older adults who present to primary care with symptoms suggestive of cancer may accept diagnostic testing solely for the benefit of knowing the diagnosis. There was a clear patient preference that referrals and investigations for cancer symptoms should not be deferred or delayed based on age or subjective assessments of frailty. Shared decision making and being involved in the decision-making process are important to patients, regardless of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Jones
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Omer M Ali
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Stephanie Honey
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Suzanne Scott
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Niek De Wit
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, and professor of general practice, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard D Neal
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
The Role of Nurse on the Treatment Decision Support for Older People with Cancer: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11040546. [PMID: 36833079 PMCID: PMC9956907 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11040546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The number of older adults with cancer is increasing worldwide. The role of nurses in supporting patients' decision-making is expanding, as this process is fraught with complexity and uncertainty due to comorbidities, frailty, cognitive decline, etc., in older adults with cancer. The aim of this review was to examine the contemporary roles of oncology nurses in the treatment decision-making process in older adults with cancer. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Results: Of the 3029 articles screened, 56 full texts were assessed for eligibility, and 13 were included in the review. We identified three themes regarding nurses' roles in the decision-making process for older adults with cancer: accurate geriatric assessments, provision of available information, and advocacy. Nurses conduct geriatric assessments to identify geriatric syndromes, provide appropriate information, elicit patient preferences, and communicate efficiently with patients and caregivers, promoting physicians. Time constraints were cited as a barrier to fulfilling nurses' roles. Conclusions: The role of nurses is to elicit patients' broader health and social care needs to facilitate patient-centered decision-making, respecting their preferences and values. Further research focusing on the role of nurses that considers diverse cancer types and healthcare systems is needed.
Collapse
|
10
|
Price ML, Surr CA, Gough B, Ashley L. Understanding the experiences and psychosocial support needs of caregivers of people with comorbid dementia and cancer. Psychol Health 2022:1-23. [PMID: 36536600 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2157030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family carers of people living with comorbid dementia and cancer (CDC) play a vital supportive role, but this may be particularly burdensome and adversely impact their own health and wellbeing. OBJECTIVE To examine the experiences and psychosocial support needs of caregivers of people with CDC. METHODS A flyer advertising the study was distributed to relevant UK voluntary sector organisations and shared across social media. 13 carers of people with CDC were recruited. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted and transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, underpinned by an inductive phenomenological approach. RESULTS Complex interactions of dementia and cancer resulted in heightened responsibility for carers, who played a crucial role in recognition/management of symptoms, performing difficult cancer-related care, and treatment decision-making that posed difficult ethical challenges. Care-recipients had reduced insight into their cancer diagnosis and prognosis, so carers often carried the emotional burden alone. Responsibilities faced by carers were compounded by a lack of targeted, accessible information/support for CDC. Carers expressed a desire to talk to and learn from others who understand the unique challenges of navigating cancer-related decision-making, treatment and care for people who are also living with dementia. CONCLUSIONS Cancer alongside dementia presents complex challenges for carers, who desire more cancer-related information and support which is tailored to people living with dementia and their family caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mollie L Price
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire A Surr
- School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Brendan Gough
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Laura Ashley
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ashley L, Surr C, Kelley R, Price M, Griffiths AW, Fowler NR, Giza DE, Neal RD, Martin C, Hopkinson JB, O'Donovan A, Dale W, Koczwara B, Spencer K, Wyld L. Cancer care for people with dementia: Literature overview and recommendations for practice and research. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 73:320-338. [PMID: 36512303 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
As many countries experience population aging, patients with cancer are becoming older and have more preexisting comorbidities, which include prevalent, age-related, chronic conditions such as dementia. People living with dementia (PLWD) are vulnerable to health disparities, and dementia has high potential to complicate and adversely affect care and outcomes across the cancer trajectory. This report offers an overview of dementia and its prevalence among patients with cancer and a summary of the research literature examining cancer care for PLWD. The reviewed research indicates that PLWD are more likely to have cancer diagnosed at an advanced stage, receive no or less extensive cancer treatment, and have poorer survival after a cancer diagnosis. These cancer disparities do not necessarily signify inappropriately later diagnosis or lower treatment of people with dementia as a group, and they are arguably less feasible and appropriate targets for care optimization. The reviewed research indicates that PLWD also have an increased risk of cancer-related emergency presentations, lower quality processes of cancer-related decision making, accessibility-related barriers to cancer investigations and treatment, higher experienced treatment burden and higher caregiver burden for families, and undertreated cancer-related pain. The authors propose that optimal cancer care for PLWD should focus on proactively minimizing these risk areas and thus must be highly person-centered, with holistic decision making, individualized reasonable adjustments to practice, and strong inclusion and support of family carers. Comprehensive recommendations are made for clinical practice and future research to help clinicians and providers deliver best and equitable cancer care for PLWD and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Ashley
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire Surr
- Centre for Dementia Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Rachael Kelley
- Centre for Dementia Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Mollie Price
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Nicole R Fowler
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research at Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Dana E Giza
- Joan and Stanford Alexander Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard D Neal
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Charlene Martin
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Anita O'Donovan
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity (ARTT), Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - William Dale
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Bogda Koczwara
- Department of Medical Oncology, Flinders Medical Centre & Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Lynda Wyld
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Neal D, Morgan JL, Kenny R, Ormerod T, Reed MW. Is there evidence of age bias in breast cancer health care professionals' treatment of older patients? EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:2401-2407. [PMID: 35871030 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite NICE (2009; 2018) guidelines to treat breast cancer patients 'irrespective of age', older women experience differential treatment and worse outcomes beyond that which can be explained by patient health or patient choice. Research has evidenced the prevalence of ageism and identified the role of implicit bias in reflecting and perhaps perpetuating disparities across society, including in healthcare. Yet age bias has rarely been considered as an explanatory factor in poorer outcomes for older breast cancer patients. METHODS This mixed methods study explored age bias amongst breast cancer HCPs through four components: 1) An implicit associations test (31 HCPs) 2) A treatment recommendations questionnaire (46 HCPs). 3) An attitudes about older patients questionnaire (31 HCPs). 4) A treatment recommendations interview (20 HCPs). RESULTS This study showed that breast cancer HCPs held negative implicit associations towards older women; HCPs were less likely to recommend surgery for older patients; some HCPs held assumptions that older patients are more afraid, less willing and able to be involved in decision-making, and are less willing and able to cope with being informed of a poor treatment prognosis; and conditions which disproportionately affect older patients, such as dementia, are not always well understood by breast cancer HCPs. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that there are elements of age bias present amongst breast cancer HCPs. The study's findings of age-based assumptions and a poorer understanding of conditions which disproportionately affect older patients align with patterns of differential treatment towards older breast cancer patients suggesting that age bias may be, at least in part, driving differential treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisy Neal
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School. Brighton, UK.
| | | | - Ross Kenny
- Department of Breast Surgery, Surrey and Sussex NHS Trust, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shapkin K, MacKinnon K, Sangster-Gormley E, Newton L, Holroyd-Leduc J. Experiences and perceptions of health care professionals making treatment decisions for older adults with memory loss: a qualitative systematic review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2022; 20:2799-2805. [PMID: 36081371 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-21-00356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to critically analyze and synthesize the experiences and perceptions of health care professionals making decisions that result in treatment recommendations for older adults living with memory loss who are experiencing health problems. INTRODUCTION Health care professionals provide care to older adults living with memory loss and other coexisting health conditions across all clinical settings. Older adults living with memory loss most commonly experience impaired independent decision-making, which can challenge health care professionals when decisions about treatment need to be made. These challenges contribute to older adults with memory loss receiving inappropriate treatment and experiencing higher morbidity than those without memory loss. To date, existing reviews have not focused on the experiences and perceptions of health care professionals who are making treatment decisions when older adults living with memory loss experience health problems. A deeper exploration of this evidence is needed to understand health care professionals' experiences and perceptions of treatment decision-making to support the goal of improving care for older adults. INCLUSION CRITERIA This systematic review will consider studies across all clinical settings focused on the experiences and perceptions of health care professionals making treatment decisions for older adults with memory loss who are experiencing health problems. METHODS We will conduct a comprehensive systematic search using CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Two reviewers will independently appraise the selected studies and extract qualitative data using the recommended JBI method for study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis. The ConQual approach will be applied to provide a level of confidence for the review findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42021271485.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Shapkin
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria (UVic), Victoria, BC, Canada.,The University of Victoria (UVic) Centre for Evidence-Informed Nursing and Healthcare (CEiNHC): A JBI Affiliated Group, The University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.,Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Karen MacKinnon
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria (UVic), Victoria, BC, Canada.,The University of Victoria (UVic) Centre for Evidence-Informed Nursing and Healthcare (CEiNHC): A JBI Affiliated Group, The University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | | | - Lorelei Newton
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria (UVic), Victoria, BC, Canada.,The University of Victoria (UVic) Centre for Evidence-Informed Nursing and Healthcare (CEiNHC): A JBI Affiliated Group, The University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Jayna Holroyd-Leduc
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
A comparison of end-of-life care patterns between older patients with both cancer and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias versus those with only cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:1111-1121. [PMID: 36041992 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Aggressive end-of-life (EOL) care that is not aligned with the preferences of persons with cancer has negative impacts on their quality of life. Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) could potentially complicate EOL care planning among persons with cancer. Little is known about the aggressive EOL care patterns among Medicare beneficiaries with both cancer and ADRD. MATERIALS AND METHODS A matched retrospective cohort was created using the 2004 to 2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results-Medicare (SEER-Medicare) data differentiated by beneficiaries' ADRD status. Beneficiaries with breast, lung, colorectal, or prostate cancer who died between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2016, were included. Six existing domains of aggressive EOL care and one overall indicator were derived. The major predictor was having ADRD comorbidity; other covariates included sex, marital status, census tract poverty indicator, race/ethnicity, metro status, geographic location, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), survival time, cancer site, and histology stage. Multivariable logistic regression models were deployed to estimate the odds of receiving aggressive EOL care. RESULTS The study sample was 135,380 people after the one-to-one propensity score matching. The prevalence of aggressive EOL care utilization was slightly lower in beneficiaries with both cancer and ADRD when compared to beneficiaries with cancer only (54% vs. 58%, p < 0.0001). Beneficiaries with both cancer and ADRD were less likely to receive aggressive EOL care (AOR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.90) versus beneficiaries with cancer only. From the multivariable logistic regression model, certain beneficiaries' characteristics were associated with higher odds of receiving aggressive EOL care, such as: beneficiaries belonging to a racial/ethnic minority, a shorter survival time, and a higher CCI score. DISCUSSION The combined presence of ADRD and cancer was associated with lower odds of receiving aggressive EOL care compared to the presence of only cancer; however, the prevalence difference between the cohorts was not huge. Future studies could conduct in-depth evaluations of the ADRD's influence on the EOL care utilization.
Collapse
|
15
|
Aldridge MD, Hunt L, Husain M, Li L, Kelley A. Impact of Comorbid Dementia on Patterns of Hospice Use. J Palliat Med 2022; 25:396-404. [PMID: 34665050 PMCID: PMC8968839 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The evidence base for understanding hospice use among persons with dementia is almost exclusively based on individuals with a primary terminal diagnosis of dementia. Little is known about whether comorbid dementia influences hospice use patterns. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of comorbid dementia among hospice enrollees and its association with hospice use patterns. Design: Pooled cross-sectional analysis of the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study (HRS) linked to Medicare claims. Subjects: Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in the United States who enrolled with hospice and died between 2004 and 2016. Measurements: Dementia was assessed using a validated survey-based algorithm. Hospice use patterns were enrollment less than or equal to three days, enrollment greater than six months, hospice disenrollment, and hospice disenrollment after six months. Results: Of 3123 decedents, 465 (14.9%) had a primary hospice diagnosis of dementia and 943 (30.2%) had comorbid dementia and died of another illness. In fully adjusted models, comorbid dementia was associated with increased odds of hospice enrollment greater than six months (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-2.09) and hospice disenrollment following six months of hospice (AOR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.43-4.553). Having a primary diagnosis of dementia was associated with increased odds of hospice enrollment greater than six months (AOR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.86-3.68), hospice disenrollment (AOR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.32-2.51), and hospice disenrollment following six months of hospice (AOR = 4.31, 95% CI: 2.37-7.82). Conclusion: Approximately 45% of the hospice population has primary or comorbid dementia and are at increased risk for long hospice enrollment periods and hospice disenrollment. Consideration of the high prevalence of comorbid dementia should be inherent in hospice staff training, quality metrics, and Medicare Hospice Benefit policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa D. Aldridge
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.,Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, James J. Peters Bronx VA Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.,Address correspondence to: Melissa D. Aldridge, PhD, Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1070, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Lauren Hunt
- Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mohammed Husain
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lihua Li
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amy Kelley
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.,Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, James J. Peters Bronx VA Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hodges V, Hynes C, Lassa S, Mitchell C. Support needs of carers making proxy healthcare decisions for people with dementia: a systematic review based on the Noblit and Hare meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e052608. [PMID: 34930737 PMCID: PMC8689175 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are 50 million dementia sufferers worldwide. Decisions about healthcare often need to be made when the person with dementia lacks capacity to do so.Understanding the support needs of carers acting as proxy healthcare decision-makers will be vital in improving the decision-making process for people with dementia and addressing the holistic needs of carers. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to review the existing literature on the support needs of carers acting as proxy healthcare decision-makers for people with dementia. DESIGN A qualitative systematic review protocol was published on PROSPERO. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used to appraise study quality. A meta-ethnographic synthesis was performed to develop third-order constructs. DATA SOURCES A search was conducted using three online databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria: primary qualitative research involving carers of people with dementia who had been involved in making proxy healthcare decisions. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent researchers conducted validity assessments for each paper selected for inclusion, and discrepancies were resolved by discussions with a third reviewer. Nvivo software was used and conceptual findings from study papers lead to interpretations of findings by the team. RESULTS From the 15 papers included in the study, three main domains arose from the meta-ethnography; informational, practical and emotional. Informational support needs included information about dementia itself and the anticipated disease trajectory. Practical needs included continuity of care, person-centred care and the use of legal frameworks.Emotional support included recognising the guilt that healthcare decisions can provoke and the importance of providing guidance in an empathic manner. CONCLUSIONS This meta-ethnography highlights opportunities for healthcare professionals and policymakers to improve experiences of carers making proxy healthcare decisions for people with dementia. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020124485.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Hodges
- Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, Sheffield, UK
| | - Catherine Hynes
- Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, Sheffield, UK
| | - Samuel Lassa
- Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, Sheffield, UK
| | - Caroline Mitchell
- Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fujii T, Wada M, Hasebe S, Takeuchi K, Yorozuya T, Yakushijin Y. Treatment and prognosis of patients with both cancer and impaired decision-patient with both cancer and dementia making as a symptom of dementia. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21:1105-1110. [PMID: 34652052 DOI: 10.1111/ggi.14292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM In our aging society, the number of patients with both cancer and dementia has recently been increasing. One of the major clinical questions is whether patients with dementia could receive appropriate cancer treatment. The purpose of this study is to know the prognosis of patients with both cancer and impaired decision-making as a symptom of dementia, and to discuss the proper cancer treatment of the patients with dementia. METHODS Patients newly diagnosed with both cancer and impaired decision-making as a symptom of dementia at Ehime University Hospital between January 2010 and December 2016 were reviewed. The data of patients with cancer were retrospectively analyzed using an electronic medical record system. RESULTS In total, 9354 cases were diagnosed with cancer in the Ehime University Hospital over 7 years, and only 105 (1.1%) cases with impaired decision-making as a symptom of dementia were recorded by medical professionals, probably due to poor attention to the cognitive functions of patients with cancer. Analysis of the cancer prognosis of these patients showed that a better prognosis was seen in patients with any therapeutic interventions than in those with no treatment for the cancer itself. However, the prognosis of patients was not significantly different between standard and non-standard treatments. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that the poor interest of medical professionals in the cognitive function of patients with cancer at the time of diagnosis of cancer and the lack of any guidelines for patients with both cancer and dementia are major problems in our aging society. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 1105-1110.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomomi Fujii
- Palliative Care Center, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Japan.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan
| | - Michiko Wada
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan
| | - Shinji Hasebe
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.,Cancer Center, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Japan
| | - Kazuto Takeuchi
- Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ehime Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Tobe-cho, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Yorozuya
- Departments of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Yakushijin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.,Cancer Center, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Griffiths AW, Ashley L, Kelley R, Cowdell F, Collinson M, Mason E, Inman H, Henry A, Farrin A, Surr C. Balancing the needs of individuals and services in cancer treatment for people with dementia: A focused ethnographic study. Int J Nurs Stud 2021; 121:104006. [PMID: 34271462 PMCID: PMC8404043 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Managing multiple conditions is difficult for patients and their families, increasing complexity in care. Two of the most common long-term conditions, cancer and dementia, both disproportionately affect older adults. However, little is known about the needs and experiences of those living with both conditions, which could inform practice in the area. OBJECTIVES This focused ethnographic study sought to understand how oncology services balance the unique and complex needs of these patients with those of the service more widely. DESIGN Focused ethnography. SETTING Two National Health Service hospital trusts. PARTICIPANTS Seventeen people with dementia and cancer, 22 relatives and 19 staff members participated. METHODS Participant observation, informal conversations, semi-structured interviews, and medical notes review. RESULTS Improved satisfaction and outcomes of care were reported when staff were delivering person-centred care. Staff tried to balance the need for personalised and flexible support for individuals with dementia with managing targets and processes of cancer care and treatment. The importance of continuity of people, places, and processes was consistently highlighted. CONCLUSION Navigating and managing the delicate balance between the needs of the individual and the needs of services more widely was difficult for both staff and patients. Improved awareness, identification and documentation of dementia would help to ensure that staff are aware of any specific patient needs. Consistency in staffing and appointment locations should develop familiarity and routine for people with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Fiona Cowdell
- Birmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle Collinson
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ellen Mason
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Hayley Inman
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Amanda Farrin
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Surr
- Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Berben L, Floris G, Wildiers H, Hatse S. Cancer and Aging: Two Tightly Interconnected Biological Processes. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1400. [PMID: 33808654 PMCID: PMC8003441 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Age is one of the main risk factors of cancer; several biological changes linked with the aging process can explain this. As our population is progressively aging, the proportion of older patients with cancer is increasing significantly. Due to the heterogeneity of general health and functional status amongst older persons, treatment of cancer is a major challenge in this vulnerable population. Older patients often experience more side effects of anticancer treatments. Over-treatment should be avoided to ensure an optimal quality of life. On the other hand, under-treatment due to fear of toxicity is a frequent problem and can lead to an increased risk of relapse and worse survival. There is a delicate balance between benefits of therapy and risk of toxicity. Robust biomarkers that reflect the body's biological age may aid in outlining optimal individual treatment regimens for older patients with cancer. In particular, the impact of age on systemic immunity and the tumor immune infiltrate should be considered, given the expanding role of immunotherapy in cancer treatment. In this review, we summarize current knowledge concerning the mechanistic connections between aging and cancer, as well as aging biomarkers that could be helpful in the field of geriatric oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieze Berben
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
- Laboratory of Translational Cell and Tissue Research, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sigrid Hatse
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ashley L, Kelley R, Griffiths A, Cowdell F, Henry A, Inman H, Hennell J, Ogden M, Walsh M, Jones L, Mason E, Collinson M, Farrin A, Surr C. Understanding and identifying ways to improve hospital-based cancer care and treatment for people with dementia: an ethnographic study. Age Ageing 2021; 50:233-241. [PMID: 33156901 PMCID: PMC7793597 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afaa210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Providing cancer care and treatment for ageing populations with complicating comorbidities like dementia is a growing global challenge. This study aimed to examine the hospital-based cancer care and treatment challenges and support needs of people with dementia, and identify potential ways to address these. Methods A two-site ethnographic study in England involving semi-structured interviews, observations and accompanying conversations, and medical record review. Participants (N = 58) were people with dementia and comorbid cancer (n = 17), informal caregivers (n = 22) and hospital staff (n = 19). Ethnographically informed thematic analysis was conducted. Results There was an accumulated complexity of living with both illnesses simultaneously. People with dementia and families could feel confused and uninformed due to difficulties understanding, retaining and using cancer information, which impacted their informed treatment decision-making. Dementia increased the complexity and burden of travelling to and navigating unfamiliar hospital environments, frequent lengthy periods of waiting in hospital, and self-managing symptoms and side-effects at home. Oncology staff were often working without the full picture, due to variable documenting of dementia in medical records, dementia training was limited, and time and resource pressures impeded the highly individualised, flexible cancer care required by people with dementia. Supportive family carers were crucial in enabling people with dementia to access, navigate and undergo cancer treatment and care. Conclusions Dementia complicates cancer care in a range of ways accumulating across the cancer pathway. Our findings suggest there are several strategies and interventions, which we list here, with potential to improve cancer care and treatment for people with dementia and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Ashley
- Leeds School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Rachael Kelley
- Centre for Dementia Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Alys Griffiths
- Centre for Dementia Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Fiona Cowdell
- Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ann Henry
- Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hayley Inman
- Oncology Services, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Ellen Mason
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Michelle Collinson
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Amanda Farrin
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire Surr
- Centre for Dementia Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|