1
|
Rake EA, Meinders MJ, Brand G, Dreesens D, Kremer JAM, Elwyn G, Aarts JWM. Explorative observational study of Dutch patient-clinician interactions: operationalisation of personal perspective elicitation as part of shared decision-making in real-life audio-recorded consultations. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079540. [PMID: 38760032 PMCID: PMC11103202 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients' preferences, values and contexts are important elements of the shared decision-making (SDM) process. We captured those elements into the concept of 'personal perspective elicitation' (PPE), which reflects the need to elicit patients' preferences, values and contexts in patient-clinician conversations. We defined PPE as: 'the disclosure (either elicited by the clinician or spontaneously expressed by the patient) of information related to the patient's personal preferences, values and/or contexts potentially relevant to decision-making'. Our goal was to operationalise the concept of PPE through the evaluation of preferences, values and contexts and explore how PPE occurs in clinical encounters. DESIGN Cross-sectional study: observational coding based on a novel coding scheme of audio-recorded outpatient clinical encounters where encounter patient decision aids were applied. SETTING We audio-recorded patient-clinician interactions at three Dutch outpatient clinics. PPE was analysed using a novel observational coding scheme, distinguishing preferences, contexts and four Armstrong taxonomy value types (global, decisional, external and situational). We measured SDM using the Observer OPTION5. PARTICIPANTS Twenty patients who suffered from psoriasis or ovarian cysts; four clinicians. RESULTS We included 20 audio-recordings. The mean Observer OPTION5 score was 57.5 (SD:10.1). The audio-recordings gave a rich illustration of preferences, values and contexts that were discussed in the patient-clinician interactions. Examples of identified global values: appearance, beliefs, personality traits. Decisional values were related to the process of decision-making. External values related to asking advice from for example, the clinician or significant others. An identified situational value: a new job ahead. Contexts related to how the illness impacted the life (eg, sexuality, family, sports, work life) of patients. CONCLUSIONS The operationalisation of PPE, an important aspect of SDM, explores which preferences, values and contexts were discussed during patient-clinician interactions where an ePDA was used. The coding scheme appeared feasible to apply but needs further refinement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester A Rake
- IQ Health, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Guus Brand
- Radboudumc IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dunja Dreesens
- Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Glyn Elwyn
- Radboudumc IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Johanna W M Aarts
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Amsterdam UMC University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Katalan A, Drach-Zahavy A, Dagan E. Medical encounters with patients diagnosed with cancer: The association between physicians' behavior and perceived patient centered care and anxiety. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2024; 68:102484. [PMID: 38064803 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the association between physicians' behavior and cancer patients' perceived patient-centered care (PCC) and anxiety following medical encounters. METHODS A prospective study design with 100 encounters, including 100 cancer patients and 22 oncology/surgery physicians, was performed between November 2019 and July 2021. Before the medical encounters, patients were asked to complete the validated State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and physicians and patients completed sociodemographic and clinical data. During the medical encounters, structured 'real-time' observations of the physicians' behaviors were performed using the Four Habits Coding Scheme (4HCS). Following the medical encounters, patients were asked to re-complete the STAI and to fill the validated Perceived PCC questionnaire. RESULTS Mean 4HCS was positively associated with perceived PCC (β = 0.351, p < 0.001) and contributed 10.5% to the total 25.3% explained variance beyond the sociodemographic and clinical variables. Of the 4HCS sub scales, 'Demonstrate Empathy' displayed the lowest correlation with perceived PCC as compared to informational behaviors. In contrast, mean 4HCS was not associated with post-meeting anxiety (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Our 'in-vivo' observations of medical encounters expands on previous studies in educational settings in showing how physicians' behaviors impact real patients' experience. The findings may provide a more accurate picture of physicians' supportive and unsupportive behaviors that impact on perceived PCC and anxiety. Patients may prefer their physicians to focus on the informational content related to their disease trajectory rather than focusing on empathy with their emotions. Physicians should be trained in ways to support patients on how to regain emotional control in stressful medical situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat Katalan
- Cancer Center, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel; The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
| | - Anat Drach-Zahavy
- The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Efrat Dagan
- The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chan RJ, Milch VE, Crawford-Williams F, Agbejule OA, Joseph R, Johal J, Dick N, Wallen MP, Ratcliffe J, Agarwal A, Nekhlyudov L, Tieu M, Al-Momani M, Turnbull S, Sathiaraj R, Keefe D, Hart NH. Patient navigation across the cancer care continuum: An overview of systematic reviews and emerging literature. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73:565-589. [PMID: 37358040 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient navigation is a strategy for overcoming barriers to reduce disparities and to improve access and outcomes. The aim of this umbrella review was to identify, critically appraise, synthesize, and present the best available evidence to inform policy and planning regarding patient navigation across the cancer continuum. Systematic reviews examining navigation in cancer care were identified in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Epistemonikos, and Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) databases and in the gray literature from January 1, 2012, to April 19, 2022. Data were screened, extracted, and appraised independently by two authors. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Review and Research Syntheses was used for quality appraisal. Emerging literature up to May 25, 2022, was also explored to capture primary research published beyond the coverage of included systematic reviews. Of the 2062 unique records identified, 61 systematic reviews were included. Fifty-four reviews were quantitative or mixed-methods reviews, reporting on the effectiveness of cancer patient navigation, including 12 reviews reporting costs or cost-effectiveness outcomes. Seven qualitative reviews explored navigation needs, barriers, and experiences. In addition, 53 primary studies published since 2021 were included. Patient navigation is effective in improving participation in cancer screening and reducing the time from screening to diagnosis and from diagnosis to treatment initiation. Emerging evidence suggests that patient navigation improves quality of life and patient satisfaction with care in the survivorship phase and reduces hospital readmission in the active treatment and survivorship care phases. Palliative care data were extremely limited. Economic evaluations from the United States suggest the potential cost-effectiveness of navigation in screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond J Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Vivienne E Milch
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Fiona Crawford-Williams
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Oluwaseyifunmi Andi Agbejule
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ria Joseph
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jolyn Johal
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Narayanee Dick
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matthew P Wallen
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Anupriya Agarwal
- Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Larissa Nekhlyudov
- Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew Tieu
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Dorothy Keefe
- Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Nicolas H Hart
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Institute for Health Research, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Human Performance Research Centre, Innovative Solutions for Well-being and Health (INSIGHT) Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adler Jaffe S, Kano M, Rieder S, Gundelach AC, Boyce T, Rutledge T, Dayao Z, Sussman AL. "Care needs to be integrated" Patient and provider perspectives on a cancer shared-care model. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01486-y. [PMID: 37889397 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01486-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current early-stage breast and gynecological cancer care models often begin with a referral from a primary care provider (PCP) or gynecologist (OB/Gyn) and end with a patient being transitioned back to the referring provider at the completion of treatment. There is frequently little communication between oncologists and the referring provider during treatment, and this pattern continues after the patient completes their treatment. METHODS We convened a diverse Patient Advisory Board (PAB) to identify areas where breast or gynecological cancer patients felt they could benefit from additional support during and after their cancer care. PAB members attended five Zoom meetings and completed four online surveys. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with primary care or OB/Gyn physicians to collect information on current practices. RESULTS Patients identified multiple areas in which they needed additional support from their PCP. Providers also identified topics on which they could use additional training. However, there was little overlap between patient and provider priority topics. Both patients and providers agreed that there was inadequate communication between the cancer center and PCPs before, during, and after cancer treatment. CONCLUSIONS A shared-care model that emphasizes communication between primary care providers, the oncology care team, and patients is urgently needed. Patients indicated the need for additional support from their PCP on specific topics, and PCPs were interested in continuing their education to better serve their patients with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The importance of consistent communication among all parties during the entire cancer journey was emphasized as a key area for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miria Kano
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Stephanie Rieder
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Amy C Gundelach
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Tawny Boyce
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Teresa Rutledge
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Zoneddy Dayao
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Andrew L Sussman
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hempel S, Ganz D, Saluja S, Bolshakova M, Kim T, Turvey C, Cordasco K, Basu A, Page T, Mahmood R, Motala A, Barnard J, Wong M, Fu N, Miake-Lye IM. Care coordination across healthcare systems: development of a research agenda, implications for practice, and recommendations for policy based on a modified Delphi panel. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e060232. [PMID: 37197809 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE For large, integrated healthcare delivery systems, coordinating patient care across delivery systems with providers external to the system presents challenges. We explored the domains and requirements for care coordination by professionals across healthcare systems and developed an agenda for research, practice and policy. DESIGN The modified Delphi approach convened a 2-day stakeholder panel with moderated virtual discussions, preceded and followed by online surveys. SETTING The work addresses care coordination across healthcare systems. We introduced common care scenarios and differentiated recommendations for a large (main) healthcare organisation and external healthcare professionals that contribute additional care. PARTICIPANTS The panel composition included health service providers, decision makers, patients and care community, and researchers. Discussions were informed by a rapid review of tested approaches to fostering collaboration, facilitating care coordination and improving communication across healthcare systems. OUTCOME MEASURES The study planned to formulate a research agenda, implications for practice and recommendations for policy. RESULTS For research recommendations, we found consensus for developing measures of shared care, exploring healthcare professionals' needs in different care scenarios and evaluating patient experiences. Agreed practice recommendations included educating external professionals about issues specific to the patients in the main healthcare system, educating professionals within the main healthcare system about the roles and responsibilities of all involved parties, and helping patients better understand the pros and cons of within-system and out-of-system care. Policy recommendations included supporting time for professionals with high overlap in patients to engage regularly and sustaining support for care coordination for high-need patients. CONCLUSIONS Recommendations from the stakeholder panel created an agenda to foster further research, practice and policy innovations in cross-system care coordination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Hempel
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - David Ganz
- Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sonali Saluja
- Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science and Innovation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Maria Bolshakova
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Timothy Kim
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Carolyn Turvey
- Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Rural Health Resource Center, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Kristina Cordasco
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Aashna Basu
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Care in the Community Service, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tonya Page
- Office of Community, Clinical Integration & Field Support, Veteran Affairs Central Office, Kentucky City, Kentucky, USA
| | - Reshma Mahmood
- Santa Maria and San Luis Obispo Community Outpatient Clinics, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Aneesa Motala
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jenny Barnard
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michelle Wong
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ning Fu
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- School of Public Administration and Emergency Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Isomi M Miake-Lye
- VA West Los Angeles Evidence-based Synthesis Program, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vrinzen CEJ, Bloemendal HJ, Stuart E, Makady A, van Agthoven M, Koster M, Merkx MAW, Hermens RPMG, Jeurissen PPT. Cancer treatments touch a wide range of values that count for patients and other stakeholders: What are the implications for decision-making? Cancer Med 2023; 12:6105-6116. [PMID: 36373590 PMCID: PMC10028089 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer rates and expenditures are increasing, resulting in debates on the exact value of this care. Perspectives on what exactly constitutes worthwhile values differ. This study aims to explore all values-elements regarding new oncological treatments for patients with cancer and all stakeholders involved and to assess their implications in different decision-making procedures. METHOD Thirty-one individual in-depth interviews were conducted with different stakeholders to identify values within oncology. A focus group with seven experts was performed to explore its possible implications in decision-making procedures. RESULTS The overarching themes of values identified were impact on daily life and future, costs for patients and loved ones, quality of life, impact on loved ones, societal impact and quality of treatments. The expert panel revealed that the extended exploration of values that matter to patients is deemed useful in patient-level decision-making, information provision, patient empowerment and support during and after treatment. For national reimbursement decisions, implications for the broad range of values seems less clear. CONCLUSION Clinical values are not the only ones that matter to oncological patients and the stakeholders in the field. We found a much broader range of values. Proper recognition of values that count might add to patient-level decision-making, but implications for reimbursement decisions are less clear. The results could be useful to guide clinicians and policymakers when it comes to decision-making in oncology. Making more explicit which values counts for whom guarantees a more systematic approach to decision-making on all levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cilla E J Vrinzen
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Center (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Haiko J Bloemendal
- Department of Oncology, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Esra Stuart
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Amr Makady
- Janssen-Cilag B.V., Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Michel van Agthoven
- Janssen-Cilag B.V., Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Mariska Koster
- Janssen-Cilag B.V., Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias A W Merkx
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Center (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick P T Jeurissen
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hutchens J, Frawley J, Sullivan EA. The healthcare experiences of women with cardiac disease in pregnancy and postpartum: A qualitative study. Health Expect 2022; 25:1872-1881. [PMID: 35616361 PMCID: PMC9327873 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cardiac disease affects an estimated 1%-4% of all pregnancies and is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. There is a lack of data on the healthcare experiences of affected women to inform health service delivery and person-centred care. This study sought to explore and understand the healthcare experiences of women with cardiac disease in pregnancy and postpartum. METHODS This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with women who had cardiac disease in pregnancy or the first 12 months postpartum. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants were 25 women with pre-existing or newly diagnosed acquired, genetic and congenital cardiac disease. Analysis of the interviews highlighted the discrepancy between care aspirations and experiences. The participants had a wide range of cardiac diseases and timing of diagnoses, but had similar healthcare experiences of being dismissed, not receiving the information they required, lack of continuity of care and clinical guidelines and of feeling out of place within a healthcare system that did not accommodate their combined needs as a mother and a cardiac patient. CONCLUSION This study identified a lack of person-centred care and responsiveness of the healthcare system in providing fit-for-purpose healthcare for women with complex disease who are pregnant or new mothers. In particular, cardiac and maternity care providers have an opportunity to listen to women who are the experts on their emergent healthcare needs, contributing to development of the knowledge base on the healthcare experiences of having cardiac disease in pregnancy and postpartum. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Public and patient input into the value and design of the study was gained through NSW Heart Foundation forums, including the Heart Foundation's women's patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Hutchens
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jane Frawley
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth A Sullivan
- College of Health, Mediicne and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Newcastle, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Williams A, Cunningham A, Hutchings H, Harris DA, Evans MD, Harji D. Quality of internet information to aid patient decision making in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. Surgeon 2022; 20:e382-e391. [PMID: 35033455 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To review whether online decision aids are available for patients contemplating pelvic exenteration (PE) for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer (LARC and LRRC). METHODS A grey literature review was carried out using the Google Search™ engine undertaken using a predefined search strategy (PROSPERO database CRD42019122933). Written health information was assessed using the DISCERN criteria and International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) with readability content assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid reading ease test and Flesch-Kincaid grade level score. RESULTS Google search yielded 27, 782, 200 results for the predefined search criteria. 131 sources were screened resulting in the analysis of 6 sources. No sources were identified as a decision aid according to the IPDAS criteria. All sources provided an acceptable quality of written health information, scoring a global score of 3 for the DISCERN written assessment. The median Flesch-Kincaid reading ease was 50.85 (32.5-80.8) equating to a reading age of 15-18 years and the median Flesch-Kincaid grade level score was 7.65 (range 3-9.7), which equates to a reading age of 13-14. CONCLUSIONS This study has found that there is a paucity of online information for patients contemplating PE. Sources that are available are aimed at a high health literate patient. Given the considerable morbidity associated with PE surgery there is a need for high quality relevant information in this area. A PDA should be developed to improve decision making and ultimately improve patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Williams
- Department of Surgery, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK; Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Science 2, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK.
| | - A Cunningham
- Department of Surgery, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK; Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Science 2, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK.
| | - H Hutchings
- Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Science 2, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK.
| | - D A Harris
- Department of Surgery, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK.
| | - M D Evans
- Department of Surgery, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK.
| | - D Harji
- Population Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Austin JD, Allicock M, Fernandez ME, Balasubramanian BA, Lee SC. Understanding the Delivery of Patient-Centered Survivorship Care Planning: An Exploratory Interview Study With Complex Cancer Survivors. Cancer Control 2021; 28:10732748211011957. [PMID: 34689577 PMCID: PMC8718161 DOI: 10.1177/10732748211011957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding key elements of the survivorship care planning process, such as patient-centered communication (PCC) and health self-efficacy, are critical for delivering patient-centered survivorship care to cancer survivors with multiple chronic conditions (“complex cancer survivors”). Building upon our team’s recent research efforts to examine the survivorship care planning process from a patient-centered lens, this exploratory study leveraged an ongoing quasi-experimental trial to elucidate the experience of complex cancer survivors with survivorship care planning and post-treatment management. Methods: We conducted a hypothesis-generating thematic content analysis on 8 interview transcripts. Results: Survivors reported positive experiences communicating with their oncology care team but the presence of multiple chronic conditions in addition to cancer creates additional barriers to patient-centered survivorship care. Conclusion: These findings support the need for further in-depth research aimed at improving PCC across all care teams and enabling self-management by delivering more personalized survivorship care planning that aligns with survivor’s needs, values, and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica D Austin
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marlyn Allicock
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health, Dallas, TX, USA.,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,UTHealth School of Public Health, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria E Fernandez
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health, Dallas, TX, USA.,UTHealth School of Public Health, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bijal A Balasubramanian
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,UTHealth School of Public Health, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Simon Craddock Lee
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health, Dallas, TX, USA.,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Serafimovska A, Liu J, Beith J, Butow P. Patients' and oncologists' perspectives on a novel Clinician-led Fear of Cancer Recurrence (CIFeR) Intervention. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:7637-7646. [PMID: 34132882 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06336-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite strong demand from breast cancer survivors, there is a dearth of flexibly delivered, accessible psychological interventions addressing fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). This study aimed to explore patients' and clinicians' perspectives concerning the experience, utility and barriers to a novel clinician-led FCR intervention (CIFeR). METHODS Twenty female participants (mean age, 59.8, SD = 11.43), diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer (mean years since diagnosis = 2.8, SD = 1.37 years) participated in telephone interviews, and their five oncologists completed a semi-structured electronic survey. Thematic qualitative analyses were performed on interview transcripts and survey responses. RESULTS Findings indicated both patients and clinicians were positive about CIFeR with perceived cognitive, behavioural and emotional benefits of CIFeR most pronounced for patients with clinically significant FCR. All patients, however, found that receiving CIFeR (especially the tailored prognostic information) from their oncologists with whom they had a long-standing relationship added a much-needed human element to addressing FCR. Similarly, clinicians valued CIFeR as a clear and consistent way to address unmet needs around FCR, with some barriers around time, language and cultural issues noted. CONCLUSION Overall, all participants perceived CIFeR as strongly beneficial in reducing FCR and related worries, thus warranting further evaluation of its utility in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Serafimovska
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jia Liu
- ProCan, The Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.
| | - Jane Beith
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|