1
|
Chrystyn H, Azouz W, Tarsin W. Dry Powder Inhalers: From Bench to Bedside. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2023; 36:324-335. [PMID: 38016124 DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2023.29103.hc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are now widely prescribed and preferred by the majority of patients. These devices have many advantages over the traditional pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) but they do have disadvantages. The characteristics of the dose emitted from a DPI are affected by the inhalation manoeuvre used by a patient. Each patient is different and the severity of their lung disease varies from mild to very severe. This affects how they use an inhaler and so determines the type of dose they inhale. An understanding of the pharmaceutical science related to DPIs is important to appreciate the relevance of how patients inhale through these devices. Also, each type of DPI has its unique dose preparation routine, and thus it is essential to follow these recommended steps because errors at this stage may result in no dose being inhaled. All issues related to the inhalation manoeuvre and dose preparation are addressed in this chapter. The importance of the inhalation technique is highlighted with a realization of inhale technique training and checking. During routine patient management, devices should not be switched nor doses increased unless the patient has demonstrated that they can and do use their DPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Chrystyn
- Inhalation Consultancy Ltd., Yeadon, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Wahida Azouz
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
| | - Walid Tarsin
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Tripoli, Libya
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dai Y, Duan K, Huang G, Yang X, Jiang X, Chen J, Liu P. Inhalation of electronic cigarettes slightly affects lung function and inflammation in mice. FRONTIERS IN TOXICOLOGY 2023; 5:1232040. [PMID: 37731664 PMCID: PMC10507352 DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1232040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Electronic cigarettes have become increasingly popular, but the results of previous studies on electronic cigarette exposure in animals have been equivocal. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of electronic cigarette smoke (ECS) and cigarette smoke (CS) on lung function and pulmonary inflammation in mice to investigate whether electronic cigarettes are safer when compared to cigarettes. 32 specific pathogen-free BALB/c male mice were randomly grouped and exposed to fresh air (control), mint-flavored ECS (ECS1, 6 mg/kg), cheese-flavored ECS (ECS2, 6 mg/kg), and CS (6 mg/kg). After 3 weeks exposure to ECS or CS, we measured lung function (PIF and Penh) and blood oxygen saturation. The levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and serum were measured using ELISA. HE staining was performed to observe the pathological changes in the lung tissues. The levels of IL-6 in BALF and serum, and TNF-α in BALF, were elevated similarly in the ECS and CS groups compared to the control group. Significant elevation was observed in serum TNF-α levels in the CS group. The total count of cells in BALF were increased after ECS1 exposure and CS exposure. PIF and oxygen saturation decreased, and Penh increased markedly in the CS group but not in the ECS groups. Compared with the ECS groups, mice in the CS group had widened lung tissue septa and increased inflammatory cell infiltration. However, we did not detect significant differences between mint-flavored and cheese-flavored e-cigarettes in our study. Overall, our findings suggested that both ECS and CS impair lung function and histopathology while promoting inflammation. In contrast, ECS has a less negative impact than CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxing Dai
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Kun Duan
- RELX Science Center, Shenzhen RELX Tech Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China
| | - Guangye Huang
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xuemin Yang
- RELX Science Center, Shenzhen RELX Tech Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China
| | - Xingtao Jiang
- RELX Science Center, Shenzhen RELX Tech Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China
| | - Jianwen Chen
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Druggability and New Drugs Evaluation, Guangdong Engineering Laboratory of Druggability and New Drug Evaluation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Peiqing Liu
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Druggability and New Drugs Evaluation, Guangdong Engineering Laboratory of Druggability and New Drug Evaluation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vartiainen VA, Lavorini F, Murphy AC, Rabe KF. High inhaler resistance does not limit successful inspiratory maneuver among patients with asthma or COPD. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2023; 20:385-393. [PMID: 36820500 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2023.2179984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There has been an active discussion on the sustainability of inhaler therapy in respiratory diseases, and it has cast a shadow on pMDIs which rely on propellant with high global warming potential (GWP). DPIs offer a lower GWP and effective alternative, but there has been concern whether all patients can generate sufficient inspiratory effort to disperse the drug. This review focuses on airflow resistance of DPIs and its clinical relevance. AREAS COVERED For this narrative review, we searched the literature for studies comparing flow patterns with different devices. We also included a section on clinical trials comparing reliever administration with DPI, pMDI with spacer, and nebulizer during exacerbation. EXPERT OPINION The evidence supports the efficacy of DPIs irrespective of respiratory condition or age of the patient even during acute exacerbations. Air flow resistance does not limit the use of DPIs and the patients were able to generate sufficient inspiratory flow rate with almost any device studied. None of 16 identified clinical trials comparing reliever administration via DPIs to other types of devices during exacerbation or bronchial challenge showed statistically significant difference between the device types in FEV1 recovery. DPIs performed as well as other types of inhaler devices even during asthma or COPD exacerbation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ville A Vartiainen
- Individualized Drug Therapy Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Finland, Finland.,Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland
| | - Federico Lavorini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Anna C Murphy
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Klaus F Rabe
- LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Department of Medicine, Christian Albrechts University Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Targeting of Inhaled Therapeutics to the Small Airways: Nanoleucine Carrier Formulations. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:pharmaceutics13111855. [PMID: 34834270 PMCID: PMC8624185 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Current dry powder formulations for inhalation deposit a large fraction of their emitted dose in the upper respiratory tract where they contribute to off-target adverse effects and variability in lung delivery. The purpose of the current study is to design a new formulation concept that more effectively targets inhaled dry powders to the large and small airways. The formulations are based on adhesive mixtures of drug nanoparticles and nanoleucine carrier particles prepared by spray drying of a co-suspension of leucine and drug particles from a nonsolvent. The physicochemical and aerosol properties of the resulting formulations are presented. The formulations achieve 93% lung delivery in the Alberta Idealized Throat model that is independent of inspiratory flow rate and relative humidity. Largely eliminating URT deposition with a particle size larger than solution pMDIs is expected to improve delivery to the large and small airways, while minimizing alveolar deposition and particle exhalation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Silva CPD, Cordeiro JSA, Britto MCAD, Bezerra PGDM, Andrade LBD. Peak inspiratory flow in children and adolescents with asthma using dry powder inhalers: a cross-sectional study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 47:e20200473. [PMID: 34190860 PMCID: PMC8332713 DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To measure peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and assess dynamic lung function in children and adolescents with asthma, as well as to determine the association of PIF with dynamic lung function and clinical variables. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of children and adolescents with asthma using dry powder inhalers (DPIs) regularly. The control group included sex-, age-, weight-, and height-matched individuals without lung disease. Socioeconomic and clinical variables were collected. PIF and dynamic lung function variables were obtained with a specific device. Between-group comparisons were made with the Student’s t-test and ANOVA. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed, and Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to assess associations between PIF and the other variables. Results: A total of 88 individuals (44 asthma patients and 44 controls) participated in the study. PIF and respiratory muscle strength (S-index) values were lower in the asthma patients than in the controls. PIF correlated positively with age, weight, height, and S-index in the asthma group. After controlling for height, we found an increase of 0.05 units in PIF associated with an increase of 1 unit in the S-index in the asthma group. Conclusions: PIF appears to be lower in children and adolescents with asthma than in those without asthma, correlating positively with age, height, weight, and respiratory muscle strength.
Collapse
|
6
|
Azouz W, Chetcuti P, Hosker H, Saralaya D, Chrystyn H. Inhalation characteristics of asthma patients, COPD patients and healthy volunteers with the Spiromax® and Turbuhaler® devices: a randomised, cross-over study. BMC Pulm Med 2015; 15:47. [PMID: 25927483 PMCID: PMC4450517 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-015-0043-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2014] [Accepted: 04/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spiromax® is a novel dry-powder inhaler containing formulations of budesonide plus formoterol (BF). The device is intended to provide dose equivalence with enhanced user-friendliness compared to BF Turbuhaler® in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present study was performed to compare inhalation parameters with empty versions of the two devices, and to investigate the effects of enhanced training designed to encourage faster inhalation. METHODS This randomised, open-label, cross-over study included children with asthma (n = 23), adolescents with asthma (n = 27), adults with asthma (n = 50), adults with COPD (n = 50) and healthy adult volunteers (n = 50). Inhalation manoeuvres were recorded with each device after training with the patient information leaflet (PIL) and after enhanced training using an In-Check Dial device. RESULTS After PIL training, peak inspiratory flow (PIF), maximum change in pressure (∆P) and the inhalation volume (IV) were significantly higher with Spiromax than with the Turbuhaler device (p values were at least <0.05 in all patient groups). After enhanced training, numerically or significantly higher values for PIF, ∆P, IV and acceleration remained with Spiromax versus Turbuhaler, except for ∆P in COPD patients. After PIL training, one adult asthma patient and one COPD patient inhaled <30 L/min through the Spiromax compared to one adult asthma patient and five COPD patients with the Turbuhaler. All patients achieved PIF values of at least 30 L/min after enhanced training. CONCLUSIONS The two inhalers have similar resistance so inhalation flows and pressure changes would be expected to be similar. The higher flow-related values noted for Spiromax versus Turbuhaler after PIL training suggest that Spiromax might have human factor advantages in real-world use. After enhanced training, the flow-related differences between devices persisted; increased flow rates were achieved with both devices, and all patients achieved the minimal flow required for adequate drug delivery. Enhanced training could be useful, especially in COPD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wahida Azouz
- Division of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
| | | | - Harold Hosker
- Department of Respiratory, Airedale General Hospital, Steeton, Bradford, UK.
| | - Dinesh Saralaya
- Department of Respiratory, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
| | - Henry Chrystyn
- Inhalation Consultancy Ltd Tarn House (Formerly Division of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield), 55 High Street, Yeadon, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Performance of dry powder inhalers with single dosed capsules in preschool children and adults using improved upper airway models. Pharmaceutics 2014; 6:36-51. [PMID: 24514766 PMCID: PMC3978524 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics6010036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2013] [Revised: 01/20/2014] [Accepted: 01/23/2014] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The pulmonary administration of pharmaceutical aerosols to patients is affected by age-dependent variations in the anatomy of the upper airways and the inhalation pattern. Considering this aspect, different upper airway models, representing the geometries of adults and preschool children, and a conventional induction port according to the European Pharmacopeia were used for in vitro testing of dry powder inhalers with single dosed capsules (Cyclohaler®, Handihaler® and Spinhaler®). Deposition measurements were performed using steady flow rates of 30 and 60 L/min for the Handihaler®/Spinhaler® and 30, 60 and 75 L/min for the Cyclohaler®. The inhalation volume was set at 1 L. For the Cyclohaler®, the in vitro testing was supplemented by a pediatric inhalation profile. Slight differences of pulmonary deposition between the idealized adult (11%–15%) and pediatric (9%–11%) upper airway model were observed for the Cyclohaler®. The applied pediatric inhalation profile resulted in a reduction of pulmonary deposition by 5% compared to steady conditions and indicated the influence of the inhalation pattern on the amount of pulmonary deposited particles. The comparison of two pediatric upper airway models showed no differences. The performance of the Handihaler® was similar to the Cyclohaler®. The Spinhaler® showed an insufficient performance and limited reproducibility in our investigations.
Collapse
|
8
|
Inhaler competence in asthma: common errors, barriers to use and recommended solutions. Respir Med 2012; 107:37-46. [PMID: 23098685 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 239] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2012] [Revised: 09/20/2012] [Accepted: 09/26/2012] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Whilst the inhaled route is the first line administration method in the management of asthma, it is well documented that patients can have problems adopting the correct inhaler technique and thus receiving adequate medication. This applies equally to metered dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers and leads to poor disease control and increased healthcare costs. Reviews have highlighted these problems and the recent European Consensus Statement developed a call to action to seek solutions. This review takes forward the challenge of inhaler competence by highlighting the issues and suggesting potential solutions to these problems. The opportunity for technological innovation and educational interventions to reduce errors is highlighted, as well as the specific challenges faced by children. This review is intended as a policy document, as most issues faced by patients have not changed for half a century, and this situation should not be allowed to continue any longer. Future direction with respect to research, policy needs and practice, together with education requirements in inhaler technique are described.
Collapse
|
9
|
Melani AS, Bracci LS, Rossi M. Reduced Peak Inspiratory Effort through the Diskus((R)) and the Turbuhaler((R)) due to Mishandling is Common in Clinical Practice. Clin Drug Investig 2012; 25:543-9. [PMID: 17532698 DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200525080-00007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A minimum peak inspiratory flow (PIF) through dry powder inhalers (DPIs) is required for effective drug delivery to the lungs. Some patients are unable to generate the minimally effective PIF through the DPI. However, little information is available about the 'real life' prevalence of reduced peak inspiratory effort through the Diskus((R)) and the Turbuhaler((R)) as a result of mishandling METHODS We investigated peak inhalation effort through the Diskus((R)) and the Turbuhaler((R)) by both direct observation and the In-Check Dial((R)), a portable PIF meter, in a large sample of patients consecutively referred to our laboratory who were familiar with these devices. Patients with reduced peak inspiratory effort repeated the PIF measurement after a session of instruction on the need for more forceful effort through the device. RESULTS We studied 644 patients (mean age 62 years, 42% female). Of these, 62% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 35% had asthma. The mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 53% of predicted. 502 patients were using the Diskus((R)) and 185 the Turbuhaler((R)). Overall, 106 patients (16.5%) showed weak inhalation by direct observation at baseline. Of 44 subjects with weak inhalation through the Turbuhaler((R)), 34 (77%) demonstrated a PIF <30 L/min. Post-counselling, only four patients did not achieve a PIF of at least 30 L/min (p < 0.01). Of 62 subjects with weak inhalation through the Diskus((R)), 37 (60%) had a PIF <30 L/min. Post-counselling, all these subjects achieved a PIF of at least 30 L/min (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION A significant number of patients show a reduced peak inspiratory effort through the Diskus((R)) and the Turbuhaler((R)) in real life. Our results indicate that the cause of this deficiency is often mishandling of the device because, after a brief session of instruction on the need for more forceful inhalation, most patients obtained an acceptable PIF rate. A PIF meter may identify patients with inadequately weak inhalation and offer useful feedback for obtaining the best inspiratory effort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea S Melani
- Fisiopatologia e Riabilitazione Respiratoria, Dipartimento Cardio-Toracico, Policlinico Le Scotte, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Cowie RL, Giembycz MA, Leigh R. Mometasone furoate: an inhaled glucocorticoid for the management of asthma in adults and children. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2009; 10:2009-14. [PMID: 19618993 DOI: 10.1517/14656560903078428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Mometasone furoate has been available for clinical use, starting with a dermatologic preparation, for nearly 20 years. An inhaled format of the drug for management of asthma had been in development during the last decade and has been available for clinical use for 6 years as a dry powder inhaler delivering either 100 mcg or 200 mcg per dose. It has a long half-life and is suitable for daily dosing. The drug is approved for use in the USA for the treatment of asthma in patients aged 4 years or over. Mometasone furoate is a topically potent glucocorticoid with a favorable risk-benefit profile. A wide variety of randomized clinical trials have shown the drug to have a clinically beneficial effect on asthma comparable to fluticasone propionate, and to permit the reduction or withdrawal of oral glucocorticoid therapy in patients with asthma. Mometasone furoate has approximately 1% oral bioavailability but does produce systemic glucocorticoid effects from the drug released from the lung and its metabolites. These effects are minimal when mometasone is used appropriately at low or moderate doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Cowie
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Department of Medicine, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Al-Showair RAM, Tarsin WY, Assi KH, Pearson SB, Chrystyn H. Can all patients with COPD use the correct inhalation flow with all inhalers and does training help? Respir Med 2007; 101:2395-401. [PMID: 17629471 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2007] [Revised: 05/24/2007] [Accepted: 06/09/2007] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The inhalation rate is important when patients use an inhaler. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) require an inhalation rate >30 L min(-1) whereas metered dose inhalers (MDIs) should be used at <90 L min(-1). Within the setting of a routine clinic, we have measured peak inhalation flows (PIF) of COPD patients when they used a Diskus (SDSK), Turbuhaler (STBH), Handihaler (SHAND) and MDI. Subjects were then randomised into trained (VT) and non-trained (NT) groups. One hundred and sixty-three patients with a mean (S.D.) age and % predicted FEV(1) of 72.5 (9.9) years and 47.8 (22.2)% completed the study. Of the patients, 4.9%, 14.2% and 57.0% inhaled <30 L min(-1) through SDSK, STHB and SHAND, respectively and 59.5% inhaled >90 L min(-1) with the MDI. Generally, the more severe the COPD, the slower was their PIF with all inhalers. The MDI PIF values in the VT group (n=84) post-training were significantly (p<0.001) slower but there was no change for the DPIs. Of the 55 VT patients inhaling >90 L min(-1) through the MDI only 7 (p<0.001) inhaled too fast post-training. Pre-training 3, 15 and 46 VT subjects inhaled <30 L min(-1) through the SDSK, STBH and SHAND and after training none, 5 and 26 did not inhale faster than this minimum required rate. Some COPD patients have problems achieving required PIFs through DPIs but training is useful to help some exceed the minimum required rate despite only small improvements. The patients found it easier to slow their PIF through the MDI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raid A M Al-Showair
- School of Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Innovation, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
von Berg A, Kremer HJ, Ellers-Lenz B, Conrad F, Erb K, Maus J, Hermann R. Peak inspiratory flow rates generated through the Novolizer and the Turbuhaler dry powder inhaler devices by children with stable asthma. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 20:50-8. [PMID: 17388753 DOI: 10.1089/jam.2006.0558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
We compared the peak inspiratory flows (PIF) generated through a novel dry powder inhaler device, the Novolizer (PIF-N), and the Turbuhaler (PIF-T). Forty-six pediatric patients with stable bronchial asthma were randomized in an open-label, multicenter, crossover trial. No drug was administered during the inhalation maneuvers that were spaced by 10 min. There was neither a carryover nor a sequence effect. The patients were characterized by mean age of 8.5 years, mean FEV(1) of 1.79 L, and mean PIF without any device (baseline, PIF-B) of 185 L/min. Through the devices mean PIF-N of 94 L/min and mean PIF-T of 69 L/min were achieved, calculated from the maxima of three inhalations. This resulted in p < 0.0001 for the difference. The median PIFN/PIF-T ratio was estimated as 1.39. Each child achieved a higher PIF-N than PIF-T and was able to release the feedback mechanisms of the Novolizer indicating sufficient inhalation performance. We conclude that the PIF through the Novolizer is higher than the PIF through the Turbuhaler in stable asthmatic children. The flow rates achieved through the Novolizer allow for sufficient lung deposition even in children as young as 6 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea von Berg
- Research Institute for Prevention of Childrens' Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, Marien-Hospital, Wesel, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Inhalational drug delivery is the primary mode of asthma therapy in children and is the main focus of this article. Pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) are now the method of choice in infants and children under 5 years old, when used in combination with an appropriate valved holding chamber or spacer. Spacers are particularly important for steroid inhalation to maximize lung deposition and minimize unwanted oropharyngeal deposition. Optimal inhalation technique with a pMDI-spacer in infants is to inhale the drug by breathing tidally through the spacer. Drug delivery to the lungs using pMDIs can vary greatly, depending on the formulation used and the age of the child. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are driven by the peak inspiratory flow of the patient and are usually not appropriate for children under 5 or 6 years of age. Nebulizers continue to play a role in the treatment of acute asthma where high doses of bronchodilator are required, though multiple doses via pMDI spacer may suffice. Important drug delivery issues specific to children include compliance, use of mask versus mouthpiece, lower tidal volumes and inspiratory flows, determination of appropriate dosages, and minimization of adverse local and systemic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunalene G Devadason
- School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|