Can bronchodilator response predict bronchial response to methacholine in preschool coughers?

Assessment of bronchodilator response in preschoolers: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several techniques can be used to assess bronchodilator response (BDR) in preschool-aged children, including spirometry, respiratory oscillometry, the interrupter technique, and specific airway resistance. However, there has not been a systematic comparison of BDR thresholds across studies yet.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on all studies up to May 2023 measuring a bronchodilator effect in children 2-6 years old using one of these techniques (PROSPERO CRD42021264659). Studies were identified using MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, CINAHL via EBSCO, Web of Science databases, and reference lists of relevant manuscripts.

RESULTS

Of 1224 screened studies, 43 were included. Over 85% were from predominantly European ancestry populations, and only 22 studies (51.2%) calculated a BDR cutoff based on a healthy control group. Five studies included triplicate testing with a placebo to account for the within-subject intrasession repeatability. A relative BDR was most consistently reported by the included studies (95%) but varied widely across all techniques. Various statistical methods were used to define a BDR, with six studies using receiver operating characteristic analyses to measure the discriminative power to distinguish healthy from wheezy and asthmatic children.

CONCLUSION

A BDR in 2- to 6-year-olds cannot be universally defined based on the reviewed literature due to inconsistent methodology and cutoff calculations. Further studies incorporating robust methods using either distribution-based or clinical anchor-based approaches to define BDR are required.

Bronchodilator response by interrupter technique to guide management of preschool wheeze

OBJECTIVE

We examined relationships between clinical features and pulmonary function before and after inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment in wheezy preschool children, and specifically, whether measuring bronchodilator response (BDR) could predict benefit from ICS.

DESIGN

Clinical non-randomised intervention study SETTING: Secondary care.

PATIENTS

Preschool children (2 years to <6 years) with recurrent wheeze.

INTERVENTIONS

Inhaled beta-agonist, ICS.

OUTCOME MEASURES

We measured prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator interrupter resistance (Rint) and symptom scores at 0 (V1), 4 (V2) and 12 (V3) weeks. At V2, those with a predetermined symptom level commenced ICS. Modified Asthma Predictive Index (mAPI) and parental perception of response to bronchodilator were recorded. Response to ICS was defined as a reduction in daily symptom score of >0.26. Positive BDR was defined as fall in Rint of ≥0.26 kPa.s/L, ≥35% predicted or ≥1.25 Z Scores.

RESULTS

Out of 138 recruited children, 67 completed the full study. Mean (SD) prebronchodilator Rint at V2 was 1.22 (0.35) kPa.s/L, and fell after starting ICS (V3) to 1.09 (0.33) kPa.s/L (p<0.001), while mean (SD) daily symptom score fell from 0.56 (0.36) to 0.28 (0.36) after ICS (p<0.001). Positive Rint BDR before ICS (at V1 and/or V2), using all three threshold criteria, was significantly associated with response to ICS on symptom scores at V3 (p<0.05). mAPI was not significantly associated with response to ICS, and parents' perception of response to bronchodilator was not related to measured Rint BDR .

CONCLUSIONS

Rint BDR may be helpful in selecting which wheezy preschool children are likely to benefit from ICS.

Assessment of Airway Bronchodilation by Spirometry Compared to Airway Obstruction in Young Children with Asthma

A reversibility test by an increase of greater than 12% in FEV1 can support a diagnosis of asthma and alter a patient's treatment plan but may not be applicable to the young ages. We retrospectively gathered spirometric data from 85/271 asthmatic children having mild obstruction (FEV1 > 80% predicted), age 2.6-6.9 years. Spirometry was performed before and 20 min after inhalation of 200 mcg Albuterol. We defined a deviation below -1.64 z scores from control as obstruction and an increased above 1.64 scores from control as a positive response to bronchodilators. Sensitivity of the index was considered significant if it captured >68% of the participants. The sensitivity of detecting airway obstruction in these children by FEV1 was 15.3% and 62.4% by FEF25-75. A positive response to Albuterol was an increase of 9.2% for FEV1 (12% for adults) and 18.5% for FEF25-75. The sensitivity for detecting a response to Albuterol in mild asthma was 64.7% by FEV1 and 91.8% by FEF25-75. Young children having normal spirometry can demonstrate airway reversibility. The response of spirometry parameters to bronchodilators may be more sensitive than obstruction detection and may help to support the diagnosis of asthma and adjust treatment plan.

How to avoid misinterpreting lung function tests in children: a few practical tips

Assessments of pulmonary function play an integral part in the clinical management of school age children as well as providing objective outcome measures in clinical and epidemiological research studies. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) can also be undertaken in sleeping infants and in awake young children from 3 years of age. However, the clinical utility of such assessments, which are generally confined to specialist centres, has yet to be established. Whether requesting or undertaking paediatric PFTs, or simply reading about how these tests have been applied in research studies, it is essential to question whether results have been interpreted in a meaningful way. This review summarises some of the issues that need to be considered, including: why the tests are being performed; which tests are most likely to detect the suspected pathophysiology; how often such tests should be repeated; whether results are likely to be reliable (in terms of data quality, repeatability and the availability of suitable reference equations with which to distinguish the effects of disease from those of growth and development), and whether the selected tests are likely to be feasible in the individual child or study group under investigation.