Nocturnal dry cough in the first 7 years of life is associated with asthma at school age

Phenotypic characteristics, healthcare use, and treatment in children with night cough compared with children with wheeze

OBJECTIVES

Population-based studies of children with dry night cough alone compared with those who also wheeze are few and inconclusive. We compared how children with dry night cough differ from those who wheeze.

METHODS

LuftiBus in the school is a population-based study of schoolchildren conducted between 2013 and 2016 in Zurich, Switzerland. We divided children into four mutually exclusive groups based on reported dry night cough (henceforth referred as "cough") and wheeze and compared parent-reported symptoms, comorbidities, exposures, FeNO, spirometry, and healthcare use and treatment.

RESULTS

Among 3457 schoolchildren aged 6-17 years, 294 (9%) reported "cough," 181 (5%) reported "wheeze," 100 (3%) reported "wheeze and cough," and 2882 (83%) were "asymptomatic." Adjusting for confounders in a multinomial regression, children with "cough" reported more frequent colds, rhinitis, and snoring than "asymptomatic" children; children with "wheeze" or "wheeze and cough" more often reported hay fever, eczema, and parental histories of asthma. FeNO and spirometry were similar among "asymptomatic" and children with "cough," while children with "wheeze" or "wheeze and cough" had higher FeNO and evidence of bronchial obstruction. Children with "cough" used healthcare less often than those with "wheeze," and they attended mainly primary care. Twenty-two children (7% of those with "cough") reported a physician diagnosis of asthma and used inhalers. These had similar characteristics as children with wheeze.

CONCLUSION

Our representative population-based study confirms that children with dry night cough without wheeze clearly differed from those with wheeze. This suggests asthma is unlikely, and they should be investigated for alternative aetiologies, particularly upper airway disease.

Prevalence of childhood cough in epidemiological studies depends on the question used: findings from two population-based studies

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies use different questions to assess recurrent cough in children. In two independent population-based studies, we assessed how prevalence estimates of cough vary depending on the questions parents are asked about their child's cough and how answers to the different questions overlap.

METHODS

We analysed cross-sectional data from two population-based studies on respiratory health: LuftiBus in the School (LUIS), conducted in 2013-2016 among 6- to 17-year-school children in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, and the 1998 Leicester Respiratory Cohort (LRC) study, UK where we used data from 6- to 8-year-old children from the 2003 follow-up survey. Both studies used parental questionnaires that included the same three questions on the child's cough, namely cough without a cold, dry cough at night and coughing more than others. We assessed how the prevalence of cough varied depending on the question and how answers to the different questions on cough overlapped. We also assessed how results were influenced by age, sex, presence of wheeze and parental education.

RESULTS

We included 3457 children aged 6-17 years from LUIS and 2100 children aged 6-8 years from LRC. All respiratory outcomes - cough, wheeze and physician-diagnosed asthma - were reported twice as often in the LRC as in LUIS. We found large differences in the prevalence of parent-reported cough between the three cough questions. In LUIS, 880 (25%) parents reported cough without a cold, 394 (11%) dry night cough, and 159 (5%) reported that their child coughed more than other children. In the LRC, these numbers were 1003 (48%), 527 (25%) and 227 (11%). There was only partial overlap of answers, with 89 (3%) answering yes to all questions in LUIS and 168 (8%) in LRC. Prevalence of all types of cough and overlap between the cough questions was higher in children with current wheeze.

CONCLUSION

In both population-based studies prevalence estimates of cough depended strongly on the question used to assess cough with only partial overlap of responses to different questions. Epidemiological studies on cough can only be compared if they used exactly the same questions for cough.

Isolated night cough in children: how does it differ from wheeze?

It has been postulated that some children with recurrent cough but no wheeze have a mild form of asthma (cough variant asthma), with similar risk factors and an increased risk of future wheeze.

This longitudinal study compared risk factors for isolated night cough and for wheeze in the Leicester Respiratory Cohort in children aged 1, 4, 6 and 9 years and compared prognosis of children with isolated night cough, children with wheeze and asymptomatic children.

We included 4101 children aged 1 year, 2854 aged 4 years, 2369 aged 6 years and 1688 aged 9 years. The prevalence of isolated night cough was 10% at age 1 year and 18% in older children. Prevalence of wheeze decreased from 35% at 1 year to 13% at 9 years. Although several risk factors were similar for cough and wheeze, day care, reflux and family history of bronchitis were more strongly associated with cough, and male sex and family history of asthma with wheeze. Over one-third of preschool children with cough continued to cough at school age, but their risk of developing wheeze was similar to that of children who were asymptomatic at earlier surveys. Wheeze tracked more strongly throughout childhood than cough.

In conclusion, our study showed that only some risk factors for cough and wheeze were shared but many were not, and there was little evidence for an increased risk of future wheeze in children with isolated night cough. This provides little support for the hypothesis that recurrent cough without wheeze may indicate a variant form of asthma.

Children with isolated night cough do not have an increased risk of future wheeze, and risk factors for cough and wheeze only partially overlap.https://bit.ly/31IbXSC

Asma infantil

El asma es la enfermedad crónica infantil más frecuente. El diagnóstico es fácil en la mayoría de las ocasiones por la aparición de episodios de disnea espiratoria con sibilancias reversibles espontáneamente o por el efecto de broncodilatadores. En el momento del diagnóstico, se requieren tres pruebas complementarias: las radiografías de tórax, las pruebas funcionales respiratorias y un estudio alergológico. El tratamiento de las exacerbaciones se basa en los beta2-adrenérgicos inhalados y, si es preciso, en la corticoterapia oral. El objetivo del tratamiento de fondo es mantener el control, prevenir las exacerbaciones y restaurar o mantener las funciones pulmonares normales. Se debe adaptar al nivel de control del asma y en él tiene un lugar destacado la corticoterapia inhalada y los broncodilatadores de acción prolongada. En los menores de tres años, el asma se diagnostica a partir de tres episodios de sibilancias. Se debe buscar la presencia de antecedentes particulares, de manifestaciones atípicas o persistentes y de anomalías en la radiografía de tórax para descartar las demás causas de manifestaciones sibilantes recidivantes. Cuando es necesario un tratamiento de fondo, se basa en la corticoterapia inhalada. Las cohortes prospectivas han permitido demostrar que la atopia, la gravedad clínica y la persistencia de una obstrucción clínica son los factores principales tanto de la persistencia como de la gravedad del asma durante la vida.

Pediatric pulmonology year in review 2015: Part 3

Our journal covers a broad range of research and scholarly topics related to children's respiratory disorders. For updated perspectives on the rapidly expanding knowledge in our field, we will summarize the past year's publications in our major topic areas, as well as selected publications in these areas from the core clinical journal literature outside our own pages. The current review (Part 3) covers articles on asthma, diagnostic testing/endoscopy, respiratory complications of neuromuscular disorders, and rare lung diseases. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:747-753. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.