Moreau-Neidhardt M, Leclerc L, Grange J, Périnel S, Pourchez J. Assessing of low-tech solutions for aerosol delivery: Comparative performance study of manufactured versus homemade spacers.
Int J Pharm 2023;
633:122652. [PMID:
36709833 DOI:
10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122652]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
This study aims to evaluate the performance of low-cost homemade spacers compared with manufactured valved holding chambers (VHCs) for fluticasone propionate delivery via a pMDI (pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler).
METHODS
The Total Emitted Dose (TED) and particle size distribution were measured for pMDI alone or connected to the different spacers, according to CAN/CSA-Z264.1-02 standard. Two types of low-cost alternative and manufactured spacers were investigated: 500 mL plastic bottle and 553 mL aluminium can; non-antistatic plastic VHCs and aluminium antistatic VHCs.
RESULTS
The TED of homemade plastic bottle vs plastic VHC were similar in the 20-23% range. In contrast, the TED of homemade aluminium can was higher compared to aluminium VHC (83% vs 68%). The Fine Particle Fraction (FPF) was similar for the two plastic-based spacers (in the 12.68-17.60% range), although it was greater for the aluminium can compared to aluminium VHC (51% vs 42%). However, all spacers have limited large particles fraction, mainly deposited in the oropharyngeal tract, potentially decreasing side effects.
CONCLUSION
We demonstrated that low-tech solutions as homemade spacers have at least similar performances to VHC medical devices composed of same material (aluminium or plastic). Thus, low-cost homemade spacers represent alternatives in case of emergency and without VHCs nearby.
Collapse