Comparison between two newborn screening strategies for cystic fibrosis in Argentina: IRT/IRT versus IRT/PAP

IRT/IRT as a newborn cystic fibrosis screening method: optimal cutoff points for a mixed population

The Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) has incorporated newborn screening for cystic fibrosis since 2001. The protocol involves two samples of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT1/IRT2). This study aims to analyze fixed and floating values at the first and second IRT (IRT1/IRT2) cutoff points and assess the accuracy of the IRT/IRT methodology in a population from Northeastern Brazil. Descriptive, individual-level data from the newborn screening reference service data system (2013-2017) were used in this observational population study. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPV) for the protocol were calculated. The best cutoff point was determined using the Youden's index. The previous year's cut-off values for the IRT1 and IRT2 99.4-, 99.5-, 99.6-, and 99.7-percentiles were utilized for the floating cutoff. During the studied period, 840,832 newborns underwent screening for cystic fibrosis, obtaining 49 cystic fibrosis diagnoses: 39 by newborn screening (79.6%) and 10 (20.4%) by clinical suspicion (false negative). The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of the protocol totaled 79.6%, 99.9%, and 6.1%, respectively. No proposed cutoff for IRT1 performed better than the current one. IRT2 performed similarly to the current protocol at a cutoff point of 90ng/mL, showing the appropriate sensitivity and specificity while reducing the frequency of false positives. The protocol to screen newborns for cystic fibrosis had low sensitivity, a predictive positive value, and a high number of false positives and negatives. A floating cut point for IRT1 or IRT2 seems to constitute no viable option. However, changing the IRT2 cut point from 70ng/mL to 90ng/mL seems to have advantages and should undergo consideration.

Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023)

Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) began in the early 1960s based on the work of Dr. Robert "Bob" Guthrie in Buffalo, NY, USA. His development of a screening test for phenylketonuria on blood absorbed onto a special filter paper and transported to a remote testing laboratory began it all. Expansion of NBS to large numbers of asymptomatic congenital conditions flourishes in many settings while it has not yet been realized in others. The need for NBS as an efficient and effective public health prevention strategy that contributes to lowered morbidity and mortality wherever it is sustained is well known in the medical field but not necessarily by political policy makers. Acknowledging the value of national NBS reports published in 2007, the authors collaborated to create a worldwide NBS update in 2015. In a continuing attempt to review the progress of NBS globally, and to move towards a more harmonized and equitable screening system, we have updated our 2015 report with information available at the beginning of 2024. Reports on sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean, missing in 2015, have been included. Tables popular in the previous report have been updated with an eye towards harmonized comparisons. To emphasize areas needing attention globally, we have used regional tables containing similar listings of conditions screened, numbers of screening laboratories, and time at which specimen collection is recommended. Discussions are limited to bloodspot screening.

Impact of Pancreatitis-Associated Protein on Newborn Screening Outcomes and Detection of CFTR-Related Metabolic Syndrome (CRMS)/Cystic Fibrosis Screen Positive, Inconclusive Diagnosis (CFSPID): A Monocentric Prospective Pilot Experience

Pancreatitis-Associated Protein (PAP)-based Cystic Fibrosis (CF) newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) protocols detect less CFTR-Related Metabolic Syndrome (CRMS)/CF Screen Positive, Inconclusive Diagnosis (CFSPID). We prospectively evaluated the impact of PAP as the second step of the CF NBS protocol, before the CFTR genetic analysis, on NBS outcomes and CRMS/CFSPID detection in the Tuscany region, Italy. In parallel to the usual protocol (IRT/DNA, protocol 1), PAP was analyzed in IRT-positive infants (IRT/PAP/DNA, protocol 2) from 1 June 2020 until 31 May 2022. We defined an infant as NBS positive if PAP was >1.8 μg/L for IRT value 99th percentile-100 μg/L or >0.6 μg/L for IRT value >100 μg/L. To increase the positive predictive value (PPV) of protocol 2, we retrospectively lowered the upper IRT range value from 100 to 90 μg/L (modified protocol 2). We identified 8 CF and 13 CRMS/CFSPID with protocol 1, 5 CF and 5 CRMS/CFSPID with protocol 2 and 8 CF and 5 CRMS/CFSPID with modified protocol 2. With the PAP-based protocols, we observed a reduction of sweat tests, healthy carrier detection and a significant increase in PPV to 15.38%. Further data are needed in order to evaluate the outcomes of CRMS/CFSPID after a long follow-up.