Surfactant delivery via thin catheters: Methods, limitations, and outcomes

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Compared to Intubation, Surfactant, Rapid Extubation Method in Preterm Neonates: An Umbrella Review

INTRODUCTION

In spontaneously breathing neonates, surfactant can be administered via thin catheter while enabling the own breathing (less invasive surfactant administration [LISA]). Alternatively, the neonate is intubated for surfactant delivery (intubation, surfactant, rapid extubation [INSURE]). Thus, the aim was to provide an overview of the efficacy of the LISA compared to INSURE.

METHODS

We performed an umbrella review of previous meta-analyses including randomized controlled trials. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in July 2023. Two authors screened the search results, and systematic reviews with meta-analyses that focused on LISA versus INSURE were included. One author extracted, and another author validated the extracted data. AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS evaluations were performed by two authors independently.

RESULTS

A total of 9 systematic reviews with meta-analyses were included. The quality according to AMSTAR-2 was high in one, moderate in one, low in three, and critically low in four. According to ROBIS, the risk of bias was low in three and high in six of the reviews. LISA was more effective than INSURE in preventing mechanical ventilation (8/8 reviews), death or BPD (4/4 reviews), death (3/9 reviews), and BPD (3/9 reviews).

CONCLUSIONS

All the included systematic reviews and meta-analyses reported LISA to be more effective than INSURE in terms of need for mechanical ventilation and death or BPD. However, the quality of the published systematic reviews has been mostly deficient. Future systematic reviews should focus on reporting quality.

Rigid versus soft catheter for less invasive surfactant administration: A crossover randomized controlled manikin trial

BACKGROUND

We compared surfactant administration with a rigid versus soft catheter in a manikin simulating an extremely preterm infant.

METHODS

Randomized controlled crossover (AB/BA) trial. Fifty tertiary hospital consultants and pediatric residents. The primary outcome was the time of device positioning. The secondary outcomes were the success of the first attempt, the number of attempts, and the participant's opinion.

RESULTS

Median time of device positioning was 19 s (interquartile range [IQR]: 15-25) with rigid catheter and 40 s (IQR: 28-66) with soft catheter (p < 0.0001). Success at first attempt was 92% with rigid catheter and 74% with soft catheter (p = 0.01). Median number of attempts was 1 (IQR: 1-1) with rigid catheter and 1 (IQR: 1-2) with soft catheter (p = 0.009). Participants found the rigid catheter easier to use (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a preterm manikin model, using a rigid catheter for less invasive surfactant administration was quicker and easier to use than a soft catheter.

Effects of less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation-surfactant-extubation on bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a single-center, retrospective study from China

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the effects of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and intubation-surfactant-extubation (InSurE) on bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

METHODS

Neonates with respiratory distress syndrome requiring surfactant, with gestational age < 32 weeks and birth weight < 1500 g admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit from January 2018 to December 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. LISA and InSurE were used independently. The incidence of BPD at 36 weeks postmenstrual age, pre-discharge mortality, and need for mechanical ventilation (MV) within 72 h of birth were compared between LISA and InSurE group. Secondary outcomes including necrotizing enterocolitis requiring surgery, retinopathy of prematurity ≥ stage 3, patent ductus arteriosus requiring medical therapy or surgery, and length of hospitalization were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 148 included neonates, there were 46 and 102 infants in LISA group and InSurE group, respectively. There were no significant differences in BPD incidence, the severity of BPD at 36 weeks postmenstrual age, and the rate of MV within the first 72 h after birth between the two groups (P > 0.05, respectively). The incidences of necrotizing enterocolitis requiring surgery, retinopathy of prematurity ≥ stage 3, patent ductus arteriosus requiring medical therapy or surgery, and length of hospitalization did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

For surfactant administration among preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome, LISA did not decrease bronchopulmonary dysplasia and severity of BPD at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. The benefits of LISA would require further evaluations.

Safety and efficacy of a novel double-lumen tracheal tube in neonates with RDS: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a new double-lumen tracheal tube for neonates, with a conventional tracheal tube as a control.

METHOD

Newborns with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) requiring endotracheal intubation admitted to the tertiary neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Qujing Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital in Yunnan Province between March 2021 and May 2022 were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Outcome indicators related to effectiveness included mainly the number of intubations, duration of ventilation, duration of oxygenation, and length of stay; safety indicators included any clinical adverse effects during and after intubation. Appropriate stratified and subgroup analyses were performed according to the purpose of intubation, gestational age, and whether the drug was administered via endotracheal tube.

RESULT

A total of 101 neonates were included and divided into two groups based on the choice of tracheal tube: the conventional (n = 50) and new (n = 51) tracheal tube groups. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of adverse effects during and after intubation (p > 0.05). In neonates who were mechanically ventilated without endotracheal surfactant therapy or newborns receiving InSurE technique followed by non-invasive ventilation, no significant differences were found between the two groups regarding any of the efficacy indicators (p > 0.05). However, for neonates on invasive mechanical ventilation, the new tracheal tube allowed for a significant reduction in the duration of mechanical ventilation (96.50[74.00, 144.00] vs. 121.00[96.00, 196.50] hours, p = 0.037) and total ventilation (205.71 ± 80.24 vs. 277.56 ± 117.84 h, p = 0.027), when used as a route for endotracheal drug delivery. Further analysis was performed according to gestational age for newborns requiring intratracheal surfactant administration during mechanical ventilation, and the data showed that for preterm infants, the new tracheal tube not only shortened the duration of mechanical ventilation (101.75 ± 39.72 vs. 155.50 ± 51.49 h, p = 0.026) and total ventilation (216.00 ± 81.60 vs. 351.50 ± 113.79 h, p = 0.010), but also demonstrated significant advantages in reducing the duration of oxygen therapy (9.75 ± 6.02 vs. 17.33 ± 8.43 days, p = 0.042); however, there was no statistical difference in efficacy outcomes between the two groups in full-term infants (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of this new tracheal tube are promising in neonates with RDS, especially those requiring surfactant administration via a tracheal tube during mechanical ventilation. Given the limitations of this study, however, the clinical feasibility of this catheter needs to be further confirmed in prospective randomized trials with larger sample sizes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=122073.

A systematic review of surfactant delivery via laryngeal mask airway, pharyngeal instillation, and aerosolization: Methods, limitations, and outcomes

Less invasive surfactant administration methods without laryngoscopy and endotracheal catheterization include delivery via laryngeal mask airway, pharyngeal instillation, and aerosolization. These less invasive techniques are promising and have several advantages over INSURE (Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation) and thin catheter techniques. The objective of this review is to discuss the requisites, techniques, short-term outcomes, and adverse events associated with these methods.