Variation in cystic fibrosis newborn screening algorithms in the United States

Cystic fibrosis year in review 2023

This past year, there were many important advances for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Of the many publications related to CF in 2023, there was further evaluation of highly effective modulator therapy, new assessments and guidelines for clinical manifestations and therapies for CF, advances in newborn screening and diagnosis, and evaluation of outcomes for people with CF transmembrane conductance regulator-related metabolic syndrome/CF screen positive, inconclusive diagnosis. The aim of this review article is not to provide a full assessment of the wide range of articles published in 2023, but to provide a brief review of publication that may lead to changes in clinical care.

Update on advances in cystic fibrosis towards a cure and implications for primary care clinicians

During the past quarter century, the diagnosis and treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) have been transformed by molecular sciences that initiated a new era with discovery of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. The knowledge gained from that breakthrough has had dramatic clinical impact. Although once a diagnostic dilemma with long delays, preventable deaths, and irreversible pathology, CF can now be routinely diagnosed shortly after birth through newborn screening programs. This strategy of pre-symptomatic identification has eliminated the common diagnostic "odyssey" that was a failure of the healthcare delivery system causing psychologically traumatic experiences for parents. Therapeutic advances of many kinds have culminated in CFTR modulator treatment that can reduce the effects of or even correct the molecular defect in the chloride channel -the basic cause of CF. This astonishing advance has transformed CF care as described fully herein. Despite this impressive progress, there are challenges and controversies in the delivery of care. Issues include how best to achieve high sensitivity newborn screening with acceptable specificity; what course of action is appropriate for children who are identified through the unavoidable incidental findings of screening tests (CFSPID/CRMS cases and heterozygote carriers); how best to ensure genetic counseling; when to initiate the very expensive but life-saving CFTR modulator drugs; how to identify new CFTR modulator drugs for patients with non-responsive CFTR variants; how to adjust other therapeutic modalities; and how to best partner with primary care clinicians. Progress always brings new challenges, and this has been evident worldwide for CF. Consequently, this article summarizes the major advances of recent years along with controversies and describes their implications with an international perspective.

Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023)

Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) began in the early 1960s based on the work of Dr. Robert "Bob" Guthrie in Buffalo, NY, USA. His development of a screening test for phenylketonuria on blood absorbed onto a special filter paper and transported to a remote testing laboratory began it all. Expansion of NBS to large numbers of asymptomatic congenital conditions flourishes in many settings while it has not yet been realized in others. The need for NBS as an efficient and effective public health prevention strategy that contributes to lowered morbidity and mortality wherever it is sustained is well known in the medical field but not necessarily by political policy makers. Acknowledging the value of national NBS reports published in 2007, the authors collaborated to create a worldwide NBS update in 2015. In a continuing attempt to review the progress of NBS globally, and to move towards a more harmonized and equitable screening system, we have updated our 2015 report with information available at the beginning of 2024. Reports on sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean, missing in 2015, have been included. Tables popular in the previous report have been updated with an eye towards harmonized comparisons. To emphasize areas needing attention globally, we have used regional tables containing similar listings of conditions screened, numbers of screening laboratories, and time at which specimen collection is recommended. Discussions are limited to bloodspot screening.

Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management of CRMS/CFSPID

A multidisciplinary committee developed evidence-based guidelines for the management of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-related metabolic syndrome/cystic fibrosis screen-positive, inconclusive diagnosis (CRMS/CFSPID). A total of 24 patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome questions were generated based on surveys sent to people with CRMS/CFSPID and clinicians caring for these individuals, previous recommendations, and expert committee input. Four a priori working groups (genetic testing, monitoring, treatment, and psychosocial/communication issues) were used to provide structure to the committee. A systematic review of the evidence was conducted, and found numerous case series and cohort studies, but no randomized clinical trials. A total of 30 recommendations were graded using the US Preventive Services Task Force methodology. Recommendations that received ≥80% consensus among the entire committee were approved. The resulting recommendations were of moderate to low certainty for the majority of the statements because of the low quality of the evidence. Highlights of the recommendations include thorough evaluation with genetic sequencing, deletion/duplication analysis if <2 disease-causing variants were noted in newborn screening; repeat sweat testing until at least age 8 but limiting further laboratory testing, including microbiology, radiology, and pulmonary function testing; minimal use of medications, which when suggested, should lead to shared decision-making with families; and providing communication with emphasis on social determinants of health and shared decision-making to minimize barriers which may affect processing and understanding of this complex designation. Future research will be needed regarding medication use, antibiotic therapy, and the use of chest imaging for monitoring the development of lung disease.

Diagnostic challenges in CFTR-related metabolic syndrome: Where the guidelines fall short

Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) has enabled earlier diagnosis and has improved nutritional and growth-related outcomes in children with CF. For those with a positive NBS for CF that do not meet the diagnostic criteria for CF, the clinical entity called CFTR-Related Metabolic Syndrome (CRMS) or CF Screen- Positive, Inconclusive Diagnosis (CFSPID) is used. Although most children with CRMS remain relatively asymptomatic, studies have shown that between 11% and 48% of these patients may eventually progress to a diagnosis of CF over time. Although the CF Foundation guidelines for CRMS management and European CF Society guidelines for CFSPID have some similarities, there are also some differences. Here, we review challenging case scenarios that highlight remaining gaps in CRMS guidelines, thus supporting the need to update and unify existing guidelines.

Biochemical and genetic tools to predict the progression to Cystic Fibrosis in CRMS/CFSPID subjects: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Aim of this study was to identify risk factors for a progression to cystic fibrosis (CF) in individuals detected as CF Screening Positive, Inconclusive Diagnosis (CFSPID).

METHODS

This is a systematic review through literature databases (2015-2023). Blood immunoreactive trypsinogen (b-IRT) values, CFTR genotype, sweat chloride (SC) values, isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) from respiratory samples, Lung Clearance Index (LCI) values in CFSPIDs who converted to CF (CFSPID > CF) and age at CF transition were assessed.

RESULTS

Percentage of CFSPID > CF varies from 5.3 % to 44 %. Presence of one CF-causing CFTR variant in trans with a variant with variable clinical consequences (VVCC), an initial SC ≥ 40 mmol/L, an increase of SC > 2.5 mmol/L/year and recurrent isolation of pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) from airway samples could allow identification of subjects at risk of progression to CF.

CONCLUSIONS

CFSPIDs with CF causing variant/VVCC genotype and first SC in the higher borderline range may require more frequent and prolonged clinical follow-up.

Severe lung disease in children with cystic fibrosis missed in newborn screening

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is now routinely diagnosed through newborn screening (NBS), but the tests employed in the USA have been evolving for two decades as missed cases become recognized and lab methods improve in association with more knowledge about CF genetics. New Jersey was among the first states to implement CF NBS in 2001 when it introduced the original two-tiered method that combined measurements of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) with detection of the principal pathogenic variant (F508del) in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene.

OBJECTIVE

With continuation of the IRT/DNA (F508del) algorithm for two decades and identification of screening false negative children, we decided to examine the condition of some missed cases with special attention to their respiratory status.

METHODS

To strengthen the arguments for quality improvement in New Jersey's CF NBS program, we reviewed and evaluated false negative cases to determine the potential extent of preventable patient suffering as a consequence of delayed diagnoses.

RESULTS

Five children with CF who had false negative screening results were studied in detail. In each case there was a different cause of the negative screening results. They all had clinically significant/severe lung disease, ranging from chronic cough with CF pathogens on respiratory culture at a young age to respiratory failure.

CONCLUSION

This case series highlights the consequences of false negative screening results, which served as the impetus to upgrade New Jersey's CF NBS algorithm. Implemented changes include lowering the IRT cutoff to 70 ng/mL and expanding to a 139 variant CFTR panel. In 2023, a floating IRT cutoff is anticipated to be implemented.

Experiences of cystic fibrosis newborn screening and genetic counseling

The South Carolina cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening (NBS) program changed in 2019 to include CFTR genotyping for babies with top 4% immunoreactive trypsinogen, which improves sensitivity and timeliness but increases carrier detection. Carrier identification has genetic implications for the family and parents of NBS+ babies have increased emotional distress. Genetic counseling (GC) may increase parent understanding and reduce anxiety yet is not uniformly offered at CF centers. We report our early results after implementing GC for NBS+ families at the time of sweat chloride testing based on GC availability, which resulted in an unselected GC- control arm. Sixteen mothers (GC+ = 9, GC- = 7) participated in an online survey about their experience. Responses were analyzed in aggregate and for differences between GC+ and GC- groups. All-respondent sadness and anxiety increased with notification of the NBS+ result and decreased after sweat test results. Anxiety and sadness were greater in GC- compared to GC+ until after the diagnosis was resolved, though emotional differences between the groups were not statistically significant. On a scale of 0 = not at all to 10 = extremely, GC was rated very helpful (mean 9.0, range 5-10), informative (mean 8.9, range 4-10), comforting (mean 9.1, range 6-10), and minimally distracting (mean 1.8, range 0-9). All participants correctly identified that a risk for a child to have CF exists when both parents are (at least) carriers. Delivery of NBS results to respondents varied by timing, informant, and information given. The child's pediatrician notified 10 (62.5%) of the NBS+ result. Parents felt they were notified in a timely manner (68.8%), by someone knowledgeable about NBS (62.5%), the sweat test (62.5%), CF (43.8%), and genetics (43.8%) and who cared about them (81.3%). Parents felt worried (81.3%), confused (81.3%), empowered (25%), and other (sad, shocked, scared, overwhelmed, devastated, defeated). Data from this single-center study suggest benefit of GC, that families would value earlier contact with an expert, and that prompt diagnostic resolution may reduce duration of parental distress.

Late Diagnosis in the Era of Universal Newborn Screening Negatively Affects Short- and Long-Term Growth and Health Outcomes in Infants with Cystic Fibrosis

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis was fully implemented in the US by 2010, but delays in timeliness of evaluation for infants with positive newborn screening tests persist. Through evaluation of national patient registry data, we determined that late initiation of cystic fibrosis care is associated with poorer long-term nutritional outcomes.

Why cystic fibrosis newborn screening programs have failed to meet original expectations… thus far

This Commentary summarizes what the author has learned in 46 years of research on newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) combined with healthcare and public health practice. The original expectation was that screening for this relatively common, life-threatening genetic disorder would lead to consistently timely diagnoses in the neonatal period and be equitable. Unfortunately, this ambitious goal has not been achieved in the USA despite the availability of an excellent, although imperfect, 2-tiered screening test employing immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) and DNA analysis for pathogenic variants in the gene that encodes the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). In fact, variations in the quality of NBS programs, inconsistencies in their operations, and disparities in outcomes have been prominent features. The causes include leadership challenges and deficiencies among both CF centers and NBS labs; failures to form effective partnerships among CF centers and with NBS programs; relatively rapid implementation after 2005 with variable quality planning; misunderstandings and erroneous dogma about CF; data limitations regarding IRT, especially cutoff values, and CFTR genetics; tolerance of suboptimal protocols and false negative results; problems in dried blood spot collections plus a lack of transparency and national oversight; partial lack of readiness, qualifications, funding and/or willingness to innovate with floating IRT cutoffs and DNA/CFTR analyses; follow up challenges/deficiencies impairing timeliness, including sweat testing limitations; and published guidelines that are more descriptive than sufficiently critical and directive. But the lessons learned through uniquely intensive CF NBS research have been enlightening and guided the U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation to nationwide quality improvement initiatives.

Neonatal Screening for Cystic Fibrosis in Hungary-First-Year Experiences

The aim of this study is to evaluate the strategy of the cystic fibrosis newborn screening (CFNBS) programme in Hungary based on the results of the first year of screening. A combined immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) and pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) CFNBS protocol (IRT/IRT×PAP/IRT) was applied with an IRT-dependent safety net (SN). Out of 88,400 newborns, 256 were tested screen-positive. Fourteen cystic fibrosis (CF) and two cystic fibrosis-positive inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPID) cases were confirmed from the screen-positive cases, and two false-negative cases were diagnosed later. Based on the obtained results, a sensitivity of 88% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 5.9% were calculated. Following the recognition of false-negative cases, the calculation method of the age-dependent cut-off was changed. In purely biochemical CFNBS protocols, a small protocol change, even after a short period, can have a significant positive impact on the performance. CFNBS should be monitored continuously in order to fine-tune the screening strategy and define the best local practices.