Completing the Immunological Fingerprint by Refractory Proteins: Autoantibody Screening via an Improved Immunoblotting Technique

Autoantibodies Against Dihydrolipoamide S-Acetyltransferase in Immune-Mediated Neuropathies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify disease-related autoantibodies in the serum of patients with immune-mediated neuropathies including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with these antibodies.

METHODS

Proteins extracted from mouse brain tissue were used to react with sera from patients with CIDP by western blotting (WB) to determine the presence of common bands. Positive bands were then identified by mass spectrometry and confirmed for reactivity with patient sera using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and WB. Reactivity was further confirmed by cell-based and tissue-based indirect immunofluorescence assays. The clinical characteristics of patients with candidate autoantibody-positive CIDP were analyzed, and their association with other neurologic diseases was also investigated.

RESULTS

Screening of 78 CIDP patient sera by WB revealed a positive band around 60-70 kDa identified as dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase (DLAT) by immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry. Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM antibodies' reactivity to recombinant DLAT was confirmed using ELISA and WB. A relatively high reactivity was observed in 29 of 160 (18%) patients with CIDP, followed by patients with sensory neuropathy (6/58, 10%) and patients with MS (2/47, 4%), but not in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (0/27), patients with hereditary neuropathy (0/40), and healthy controls (0/26). Both the cell-based and tissue-based assays confirmed reactivity in 26 of 33 patients with CIDP. Comparing the clinical characteristics of patients with CIDP with anti-DLAT antibodies (n = 29) with those of negative cases (n = 131), a higher percentage of patients had comorbid sensory ataxia (69% vs 37%), cranial nerve disorders (24% vs 9%), and malignancy (20% vs 5%). A high DLAT expression was observed in human autopsy dorsal root ganglia, confirming the reactivity of patient serum with mouse dorsal root ganglion cells.

DISCUSSION

Reactivity to DLAT was confirmed in patient sera, mainly in patients with CIDP. DLAT is highly expressed in the dorsal root ganglion cells, and anti-DLAT antibody may serve as a biomarker for sensory-dominant neuropathies.

Anti-AGO1 Antibodies Identify a Subset of Autoimmune Sensory Neuronopathy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Autoantibodies (Abs) improve diagnosis and treatment decisions of idiopathic neurologic disorders. Recently, we identified Abs against Argonaute (AGO) proteins as potential autoimmunity biomarkers in neurologic disorders. In this study, we aim to reveal (1) the frequency of AGO1 Abs in sensory neuronopathy (SNN), (2) titers and IgG subclasses, and (3) their clinical pattern including response to treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentric case/control study screened 132 patients with SNN, 301 with non-SNN neuropathies, 274 with autoimmune diseases (AIDs), and 116 healthy controls (HCs) for AGO1 Abs through ELISA. Seropositive cases were also tested for IgG subclasses, titers, and conformation specificity.

RESULTS

AGO1 Abs occurred in 44 patients, comprising significantly more of those with SNN (17/132 [12.9%]) than those with non-SNN neuropathies (11/301 [3.7%]; p = 0.001), those with AIDs (16/274 [5.8%]; p = 0.02), or HCs (0/116; p < 0.0001). Ab titers ranged from 1:100 to 1:100,000. IgG subclass was mainly IgG1, and 11/17 AGO1 Ab-positive SNN (65%) had a conformational epitope. AGO1 Ab-positive SNN was more severe than AGO1 Ab-negative SNN (e.g., SNN score: 12.2 vs 11.0, p = 0.004), and they more frequently and more efficiently responded to immunomodulatory treatments than AGO1 Ab-negative SNN (7/13 [54%] vs 6/37 [16%], p = 0.02). Regarding the type of treatments more precisely, this significant difference was confirmed for the use of IV immunoglobulins (IVIg) but not for steroids or second-line treatments. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders showed that AGO1 Ab positivity was the only predictor of response to treatment (OR 4.93, 1.10-22.24 95% CI, p = 0.03).

DISCUSSION

Although AGO Abs are not specific for SNN, based on our retrospective data, they may identify a subset of cases with SNN with more severe features and a possibly better response to IVIg. The significance of AGO1 Abs in clinical practice needs to be explored on a larger series.

Conformation-stabilizing ELISA and cell-based assays reveal patient subgroups targeting three different epitopes of AGO1 antibodies

Autoantibodies (Abs) are biomarkers for many disease conditions and are increasingly used to facilitate diagnosis and treatment decisions. To guarantee high sensitivity and specificity, the choice of their detection method is crucial. Via cell-based assays, we recently found 21 patients with neurological diseases positive for antibodies against argonaute (AGO), 10 of which having a neuropathy (NP). Here, we established a simple and conformation-sensitive ELISA with the aim to distinguish between AGO1 Abs against conformational epitopes and non-conformational epitopes and to reveal further characteristics of AGO1 antibodies in NP and autoimmune disease (AID). In a retrospective multicenter case/control and observational study, we tested 434 patients with NP, 274 disease controls with AID, and 116 healthy controls (HC) for AGO1 Abs via conformation-stabilizing ELISA. Seropositive patients were also tested for conformation-specificity via comparative denaturing/stabilizing ELISA (CODES-ELISA), CBA positivity, AGO1 titers and IgG subclasses, and AGO2 reactivity. These parameters were statistically compared among different epitope-specific patient groups. We found Abs in 44 patients, including 28/434 (6.5%) NP, 16/274 (5.8%) AID, and 0/116 (0%) HC. Serum reactivity was consistently higher for AGO1 than AGO2. Globally among the 44 AGO1 Abs-positive patients, 42 were also tested in CBA for AGO1 Abs positivity and 15 (35.7%) were positive. Furthermore, 43 were tested for conformation-specificity and 32 (74.4%) bound a conformational epitope. Among the subgroups of highly positive patients (ELISA z-score &gt;14) with sera binding conformational epitopes (n=23), 14 patient sera were also CBA positive and 9 bound a second conformational but CBA-inaccessible epitope. A third, non-conformational epitope was bound by 11/43 (15.6%). Among the epitope-specific patient subgroups, we found significant differences regarding the Abs titers, IgG subclass, and AGO2 reactivity. When comparing AGO1 Abs-positive NP versus AID patients, we found the conformation-specific and CBA inaccessible epitope significantly more frequently in AID patients. We conclude that 1) conformational ELISA was more sensitive than CBA in detecting AGO1 Abs, 2) serum reactivity is higher for AGO1 than for AGO2 at least for NP patients, 3) AGO1 Abs might be a marker-of-interest in 6.5% of NP patients, 4) distinguishing epitopes might help finding different patient subgroups.

Anti-FGFR3 antibody epitopes are functional sites and correlate with the neuropathy pattern

Antibodies against FGFR3 define a subgroup of sensory neuropathy (SN). The aim of this study was to identify the epitope(s) of anti-FGFR3 autoantibodies and potential epitope-dependent clinical subtypes. Using SPOT methodology, five specific candidate epitopes, three in the juxtamembrane domain (JMD) and two in the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD), were screened with 68 anti-FGFR3-positive patients and 35 healthy controls. The identified epitopes cover 6/15 functionally relevant sites of the protein. Four patients reacted with the JMD and 11 with the TKD, partly even in a phosphorylation-state dependent manner. The epitope could not be identified in the others. Patients with antibodies recognizing TKD exhibited a more severe clinical and electrophysiological impairment than others.

CIDP Antibodies Target Junction Proteins and Identify Patient Subgroups: An Autoantigenomic Approach

OBJECTIVE

To discover systemic characteristics in the repertoires of targeted autoantigens in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), we detected the entire autoantigen repertoire of patients and controls and analyzed them systematically.

METHODS

We screened 43 human serum samples, of which 22 were from patients with CIDP, 12 from patients with other neuropathies, and 9 from healthy controls via HuProt Human Proteome microarrays testing about 16,000 distinct human bait proteins. Autoantigen repertoires were analyzed via bioinformatical autoantigenomic approaches: principal component analysis, analysis of the repertoire sizes in disease groups and clinical subgroups, and overrepresentation analyses using Gene Ontology and PantherDB.

RESULTS

The autoantigen repertoires enabled the identification of a subgroup of 10/22 patients with CIDP with a younger age at onset and a higher frequency of mixed motor and sensory CIDP. IV immunoglobulin therapy responders targeted 3 times more autoantigens than nonresponders. No CIDP-specific autoantibody is present in all patients; however, anchoring junction components were significantly targeted by 86.4% of patients with CIDP. There are potential novel CIDP-specific autoantigens such as the myelination- or axo-glial structure-related proteins actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 1B, band 4.1-like protein 2, cadherin-15, cytohesin-1, epidermal growth factor receptor, ezrin, and radixin.

CONCLUSIONS

The repertoire of targeted autoantigens of patients with CIDP differs in a systematic degree from those of controls. Systematic autoantigenomic approaches can help to understand the disease and to discover novel bioinformatical tools and novel autoantigen panels to improve diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, or patient stratification.