Molecular dynamics simulation of thionated hen egg white lysozyme

Electro-chemo-mechanical model to investigate multi-pulse electric-field-driven integrin clustering

The effect of pulsed electric fields (PEFs) on transmembrane proteins is not fully understood; how do chemo-mechanical cues in the microenvironment mediate the electric field sensing by these proteins? To answer this key gap in knowledge, we have developed a kinetic Monte Carlo statistical model of the integrin proteins that integrates three components of the morphogenetic field (i.e., chemical, mechanical, and electrical cues). Specifically, the model incorporates the mechanical stiffness of the cell membrane, the ligand density of the extracellular environment, the glycocalyx stiffness, thermal Brownian motion, and electric field induced diffusion. The effects of both steady-state electric fields and transient PEF pulse trains on integrin clustering are studied. Our results reveal that electric-field-driven integrin clustering is mediated by membrane stiffness and ligand density. In addition, we explore the effects of PEF pulse-train parameters (amplitude, polarity, and pulse-width) on integrin clustering. In summary, we demonstrate a computational methodology to incorporate experimental data and simulate integrin clustering when exposed to PEFs for time-scales comparable to experiments (seconds-minutes). Thus, we propose a blueprint for understanding PEF/electric field effects on protein induced signaling and highlight key impediments to incorporating experimental values into computational models such as the kinetic Monte Carlo method.

The mechanism by which a propeptide-encoded pH sensor regulates spatiotemporal activation of furin

The proprotein convertase furin requires the pH gradient of the secretory pathway to regulate its multistep, compartment-specific autocatalytic activation. Although His-69 within the furin prodomain serves as the pH sensor that detects transport of the propeptide-enzyme complex to the trans-Golgi network, where it promotes cleavage and release of the inhibitory propeptide, a mechanistic understanding of how His-69 protonation mediates furin activation remains unclear. Here we employ biophysical, biochemical, and computational approaches to elucidate the mechanism underlying the pH-dependent activation of furin. Structural analyses and binding experiments comparing the wild-type furin propeptide with a nonprotonatable His-69 → Leu mutant that blocks furin activation in vivo revealed protonation of His-69 reduces both the thermodynamic stability of the propeptide as well as its affinity for furin at pH 6.0. Structural modeling combined with mathematical modeling and molecular dynamic simulations suggested that His-69 does not directly contribute to the propeptide-enzyme interface but, rather, triggers movement of a loop region in the propeptide that modulates access to the cleavage site and, thus, allows for the tight pH regulation of furin activation. Our work establishes a mechanism by which His-69 functions as a pH sensor that regulates compartment-specific furin activation and provides insights into how other convertases and proteases may regulate their precise spatiotemporal activation.

Propeptides are sufficient to regulate organelle-specific pH-dependent activation of furin and proprotein convertase 1/3

The proprotein convertases (PCs) furin and proprotein convertase 1/3 (PC1) cleave substrates at dibasic residues along the eukaryotic secretory/endocytic pathway. PCs are evolutionarily related to bacterial subtilisin and are synthesized as zymogens. They contain N-terminal propeptides (PRO) that function as dedicated catalysts that facilitate folding and regulate activation of cognate proteases through multiple-ordered cleavages. Previous studies identified a histidine residue (His69) that functions as a pH sensor in the propeptide of furin (PRO(FUR)), which regulates furin activation at pH~6.5 within the trans-Golgi network. Although this residue is conserved in the PC1 propeptide (PRO(PC1)), PC1 nonetheless activates at pH~5.5 within the dense core secretory granules. Here, we analyze the mechanism by which PRO(FUR) regulates furin activation and examine why PRO(FUR) and PRO(PC1) differ in their pH-dependent activation. Sequence analyses establish that while both PRO(FUR) and PRO(PC1) are enriched in histidines when compared with cognate catalytic domains and prokaryotic orthologs, histidine content in PRO(FUR) is ~2-fold greater than that in PRO(PC1), which may augment its pH sensitivity. Spectroscopy and molecular dynamics establish that histidine protonation significantly unfolds PRO(FUR) when compared to PRO(PC1) to enhance autoproteolysis. We further demonstrate that PRO(FUR) and PRO(PC1) are sufficient to confer organelle sensing on folding and activation of their cognate proteases. Swapping propeptides between furin and PC1 transfers pH-dependent protease activation in a propeptide-dictated manner in vitro and in cells. Since prokaryotes lack organelles and eukaryotic PCs evolved from propeptide-dependent, not propeptide-independent prokaryotic subtilases, our results suggest that histidine enrichment may have enabled propeptides to evolve to exploit pH gradients to activate within specific organelles.